Top
100°
6.2

Gametrailers: Medal Of Honor Warfighter Review

If you want to fight a virtual war and you purchase Medal of Honor: Warfighter, you won’t exactly be in a position to claim false advertising. However, in spite of some strong individual elements, it ends up feeling like a sloppy and ultimately pointless conflict. Focusing on superficial distinctions that add nothing to the game, Warfighter lacks a convincing reason to fight, and there’s no reason anyone should pick up the banner apart from brand loyalty or sheer boredom.

Read Full Story >>
gametrailers.com
The story is too old to be commented.
Bumpmapping1370d ago (Edited 1370d ago )

Gametrailers gave it a 6.2 I personally would of gave it 4.2

SOD_Delta1370d ago

This game truly is a hot boring mess. One of this years worst games.

AAACE51370d ago

Starting to think the only way medal of honor will be any good is if they give it to respawn to make it.

slaton241370d ago

oh wow people of course will say bad things about it just because its not another cod game...in my own opinion i liked it ok....ready for nov 13 to play blops2 but still moh warfighter is still a fun game to play

jimbobwahey1370d ago

I'm surprised that they rated the presentation so highly since the game has some of the worst graphics I've ever seen in a FPS. The abysmal framerate and constant screentearing don't help either, visually it's a complete mess.

When your game looks and runs worse than COD, maybe it's time to get a new engine.

ritsuka6661370d ago (Edited 1370d ago )

Just beat the SP campaign and I actually liked it. It started off pretty boring but got much better as the game went on. The story wasnt that bad and it was def better than BF3.

Evolve1370d ago

I didn't played it yet. But, sounds like this is the most disappointing game of 2012.

Snappy1370d ago

Completed Single player in 5 hours honest option 5/10.
Multiplayer played 3 hours straight, very enjoyable 8/10.
Overall 7/10

Maxie19921370d ago

I bought the game the day before yesterday and have to admit that the flaws are not really evident in the PC version of the game.

Just like Battlefield 3, the Frostbite 2 engine is not really optimized for consoles. I mean, the framerate and screen tearing in Battlefield 3 on the Xbox 360 is the same as in MOH:Warfighter(my brother bought it for his Xbox 360).

But as far as the story goes, it is not as engaging as the SP from MOH out of 2010. I can't explain it, maybe EA was pushing the game so badly that everything took a hit. I still have goosebumps(in a bad way)from those CG cutscenes , it is so dull. Everything ingame is good.

I think EA should have given Danger Close more time and wait till December, because you are able to feel in certain sections that the pacing is of.

The multiplayer is fun, but nothing out of the ordinary.

If I would have to rate it, overall: 7

Ju1369d ago

I have no screen tearing in the PS3 version. No idea where that comes from.

Maxie19921368d ago (Edited 1368d ago )

I was talking about the 360 version. The PS3 does not have that issue.

Show all comments (14)