Top
90°
5.0

Medal of Honor: Warfighter Review (Console HQ)

"Like the seasonal flu, every fall blatant copies of popular titles are shoved down the consumer’s throats right in time for the hopeful holiday rush. What’s popular enough now to be the topic of conversation between the kiddies at the playground? Military first-person shooters have been this go-to cash grab for years now and usually titles lacking Call of Duty in the title fall on a suicidal land mine. This year we have Medal of Honor: Warfighter, a first-person shooter touting “realism” (remember, THIS IS INSPIRED BY ACTUAL EVENTS) set in a modern military world. 2010′s Medal of Honor was terrible in its own right and Warfighter does little to better the name. It’s about as forgettable and poorly constructed as most of its competitors."

Read Full Story >>
consolehq.com
The story is too old to be commented.
Cam9771436d ago

Well, I won't be buying this due to low reviews and it is your average FPS...

Bumpmapping1436d ago (Edited 1436d ago )

LOL I hope Dangerclose <aka COD perk doesn't attempt to make another FPS,they failed twice in a row,the second being the final nail in the coffin.

shadowwizard1436d ago

Lulz, what's up with all these 5/10? I mean, not even 6s or 7s :-D

Soldierone1436d ago

If Single Player was longer it could have saved the game and made it an easy 7 or better. However for some odd reason people are content throughing out 4-5 hour campaigns....and it wasn't even hard.

dontbhatin1436d ago

It seems like since EA held off with the review copies everyone is just punishing them with horrible reviews. If you really think this game deserves such bad reviews, there is something wrong with people these days. Me and my friends are having great fun with this game. I loved the campaign and the multiplayer has a different feel than any other shooter i have played. Ill admit it has some pretty bad bugs, but they will obviously get fixed. Seriously if Kinect Star Wars ends up having a better critic score than this game, i will lose all hope in mankind and never believe any review that comes out ever again.

FragMnTagM1436d ago

I think people should just stop putting numbers up and instead, Crappy, Mediocre, Good, and Awesome.

Something along those lines.

People concentrate too much on the numerical scores, while not even reading the review. Then we get an average of these scores and it could still be a good game, yet have terrible sales because of it.

Sometimes the words in the review do not match scores at all (actually a lot of the time.)

Basically we have lazy people that don't like to read reviews and would rather judge a game by a number.

Personally, I would give it a mediocre, or maybe even good if they fix the bugs for MOH:W

Show all comments (13)