70°

Sleeping Dogs: Nightmare at North Point brings zombies in time for Halloween

PCGiA - It's October, so you know what that means: zombie DLC announcements. Zombies tend to show up in pop culture much like how poison ivy might show up after time spent rolling naked through a forest; unwanted, but inevitable. Don't get me wrong, zombies clearly have a place in games, but that's usually only when the work is centered around zombies from the start with a few notable exceptions.

CockSplash4208d ago ShowReplies(1)
konnerbllb4208d ago

I would have preferred a real dlc release, not something fake like zombies. It doesn't fit in this game.

I'm looking forward to the next "real" dlc. Great game :)

krisq4208d ago (Edited 4208d ago )

I'm with you. I also would prefer 'real' DLC than zombies. I'll still get it though because as you said, it's a great game.

isarai4208d ago

Have you actually seen it in action, it's a lot more than "just zombies" in fact they aren't really even zombies, they're mythical zombie like creatures based off of ancient Chinese lore, and they can do a lot more than just stumble towards you and bite you. This DLC also comes with a lot more moves to master and abilities to try out, and my guess is it comes with a campaign.

And it fits the game perfectly IMO. the whole premise behind this game was Hong Kong Cinema, well horror is just as big as action when it comes to Hong Kong style cinema, and while the game was very serious, it had it's humor, and this fits it well IMO.

I honestly can't wait for this DLC, it's like Ong Bak meets Big Trouble in Little China.

konnerbllb4207d ago

Yes I watched the preview. I'm happy for you, enjoy it man. It's just not for me, I'll wait for the next one.

60°

I’m Glad Atlus & SE Changed Dates To Avoid Competing With Shadow Of The Erdtree

Saad from eXputer: "I'm glad I don't have to choose between Square Enix, Atlus, and FromSoftware due to bad release windows and Shadow of the Erdtree."

H917h ago

More intelligent than guerilla games

120°

It's A Crime That There's No Sleeping Dogs 2 Yet

Huzaifah from eXputer: "Sleeping Dogs from the early 2010s is one of the best open-world games out there but in dire need of a resurgence."

LG_Fox_Brazil9d ago

I agree, I consider the first one a cult classic already

isarai9d ago

You say "yet" as if it's even possible anymore. United Front Games is gone, along with anyone that made this game what it is

CrimsonWing698d ago

That’s what happens when games sell poorly. And I’ve seen people wonder why people cry when a game sells badly… this is your answer.

solideagle8d ago

Majority of the time it's true but if a company/publisher is big (in terms of money), they can take a hit or 2. e.g. I am not worried about Rebirth sales as Square will make Remake 3 anyway but if FF 17 doesn't sell then Square might need to look for alternative. <-- my humble opinion

Abnor_Mal8d ago

Doesn’t Microsoft own the IP now since they acquired Activision?

DaReapa8d ago

No. Square Enix owns the IP.

Abnor_Mal8d ago

Oh okay, Activision owned True Crime, but when that didn’t sell as intended it was canceled. Six months later Square Enix bought the rights and changed the title to Sleeping Dogs.*

*As per Wikipedia

boing18d ago (Edited 8d ago )

Sleeping Dogs was a sleeper hit back then. It was fantastic. It actually still is. Would love a sequel to this, or at least a revive of True Crime series.

Show all comments (10)
130°

Yuji Naka guilty of insider trading breaks silence to accuse Square Enix producer of lies

Yuji Naka was fined $1.2 million and given a suspended jail sentence for the crime.

Profchaos14d ago (Edited 14d ago )

I find his comments around how Balan turned out to be very insightful as to why the game is trash. He basically apologises for its existence

solideagle13d ago

can you please give some of us who don't know anything about this, a summary of what happened?

Chocoburger13d ago

Balan was knowingly rushed out by S-E, it had an extremely short dev cycle and was fairly low budget.
Naka was the game's director until near the end when he was fired or perhaps he quit, I forgot.

carrotcakeag13d ago

@Chocoburger Yeah they did fire and replace him which caused him to unload a bunch of rants about the company. The project only existed because of Naka in the first place, he convinced Square to give him one shot at making a platformer. They gave him an opportunity but pulled the rug out before he was done for reasons not explained.