Lens of Truth writes "Welcome back for another exciting Head2Head! This week we take a look at Bethesda’s Dishonored for the PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360. Jump inside to see if you can spot any differences."
Close but the PS3 looks slightly better to me.
In those pics they put yes the ps3 version looked superior.
But, everything to you the PlayStation looks superior? Why is that?
They look EXACTLY THE SAME
ill tell you what,the difference is very small here even between cons/pc so it shouldnt really matter to you. but what really should make you giggle is the way the movement in this game works. maybe im the only one but while playing this ive notice that theyve SOLVED EVERY PROBLEM ive ever had with movement in games. say theres a canister tucked underneath a walkway if you were to try to get on this canister in other games you may as well have given up yet in this game you just simply go up to the canister and jump it brings you up and crouches you at the same time squeezing you underneath the walkway so you are now prone. or when you jump off chains, most every other game ive played you had to manuver your body around so your back faces the way you want to jump off and you had to look back at it and jump sometimes at the expense of extreme frustration. in this game you just climb the chain and jump it gives you plenty of momentum and it ALL just feels right. to the way the character doesnt die when you jump off of things it feels like he shouldnt. and the shock absorber like animation when landing. or the fact that when you carry bodies you can actually throw them over railing or far enough to feel like you accomplished something, unlike batman ak aslyum where there was an invisible barrier keeping you from bataranging thugs off roofs. this game is SO smooth. i think it revolutionizes the movement in modern gameplay. it all just works and works brilliantly. GO play the Fkn Game it might not seem like it at first but it just sucks you in with how well it offers you the freedom to do what you want and not get frustrated in the process.
@Autodidactdystopia I haven't got a fluffin clue what it is you're trying to say.
"...the difference is very small here even between cons/pc..." Stopped reading after that part.
In tests the PS3 version looked slightly better than 360, the 360 version performed slightly better than PS3, and the PC version looked and performed better then both console versions. http://www.youtube.com/watc...
as i am playing on PC i can tell you that the assets are the same. meaning that any difference is mereley resolution and draw distance. what i was trying to say is that navigation is tits, all the little quirks ive had in the past with games like deus ex etc is that they kept me in a box and i couldnt get to the most obviously accessible places, this game makes it easy to get anywhere. the mechanics in place for ledge grabbing and jumping are the best ive ever played with. so hard to understand?
Can I point out that you guys are basically bickering over which version of game looks better graphically when really its nothing spectacular in that department.... I am more interested in which version runs better.
Very competent releases on all 3 platforms. However it's not the raw graphical grunt that makes Dishonored stand shine, rather it is it's amazing art design aided by some great lighting effects. Regardless of your platform of choice; you are depriving yourself of one of this gen's best gaming experience by not buying this game.
In general, not that impressive of a game as far as graphics. Even on the PC I'm underwhelmed by how it looks with everything maxed out. Even the textures are still low-res with many of the writings you find on paper/posters throughout the game too blurry to read. Not all, but many of them.
I dont care which looks better as long as the ps3 version doesnt suffer from bethesda and its memory issues. Sinve its a game that doesnt allow u to pick up 200 million worthless objects, it should be fine. I cant wait to finish borderlands and play it. It was my most anticipated game this year now that bioshock is pushed back.
Thankfully Bethesda is only the publisher of this game, not the developer so their curse on the PS3 shouldn't be a problem!
Yeah, what sazzrah said. Dishonored was made by Arkane Studios. They also worked on Bioshock 2, which was also almost identical between the PS3 and XBOX visually. With the Dishonored head to head, they are very close IMO, shouldn't be any noticeable difference. In some of the screens, the PS3 version has slightly better resolution. It may be the case throughout the game, or it may be the screen captures were taken at a more precise point in action. Either way, they are very similar. I don't think wither console owner will be upset with this game... keep hearing great things... can't wait to play it.
No offense but who cares.Just play the dam game its absolutley sick.This game should be praised for how good it is not its stupid screen shot comparisons.Get it together guys GOTY right here.
Check out Gamespot's graphics comparison video: http://www.gamespot.com/dis...
I have to say, my PC version looks absolutely spectacular. From what i've seen from Xbox 360 Let's plays, it must suck to be a console owner.
PC blows them both away so who cares? Consoles have been lacking for years now. I turned my ps3 on the other day to play tekken tag 2 and thought wow these graphics are horrible. PC in 1080p is the way to go and you can do it for the same price as a console.
Sorry man but they are both exactly the same. The difference between the two is dark and light. You either like the 360 version better because its darker or you like the ps3 version because its lighter. But as far as what matters they both look exactly the same
This whole website is a funny joke, comparing compressed jpeg files in youtube size windows
link isn't working for me :/
http://www.lensoftruth.com/... And here is Digital Foundry comparison (much better than just a bunch of screens) http://www.eurogamer.net/ar...
Digital Foundry are the only one worth reading. Not only they don't care about "who wins" or "who loses", they are perfectly objective, but they also compare games and platforms based on RAW datas and provide a real technical analysis. I really enjoy reading their articles, even for games I don't care.
Should be fixed now. I think LOT was having some site issues.
From the pics it looks like the Xbox looks better. Which is to be expected because Bethesda published this and make all there games on Xbox and ported to the PS3. And even in a few screenshots the PS3 shines a bit. Resident Evil and Borderlands look visual better on PS3. People need to take off there fanboy goggles and look with there eyes and quit the denial its not healthy for you.
360 version looks better to me. But what are you smoking? Have you played Borderlands 2 and Resident Evil 6 on both platforms? Have you seen comparisons? PS3 looks miles better on Resident evil 6 and a tad bit better on Borderlands.
Bethesda PUBLISHED, they didn't make it. It's runs on UE3, not Bethesda's engines. Mostly typical results for UE3, PS3 looks a little brighter with the 360 being darker, but I think the PS3 managed to look ever so slightly better in this one somehow, real close.
Idk why you got disagrees. It's common knowledge.
They look the same. Both are about equivalent to medium setting on pc, running only at 720p of course.
ps3 version is btr but nice on 360 too...
One thing the SS won't show is all of the PS3 version screen tearing
Or the 360s 20fps