OXM - Medal of Honor: Warfighter hands-on - starting a fight it can't finish?
OXM - Medal of Honor: Warfighter might be the most depressing game I've played since the expectation-defying Amy for Xbox Live Arcade, and that's saying something given that it's not half bad.
(Medal of Honor: Warfighter, PC, PS3, Xbox 360)
same here. i bought the reboot and it was the first game ive sold in years ( i collect games so i keep everything i buy 99% of the time, admittedly though id have prob kept it if my dog didnt chew the case. i like every game in mint condition so aside form being a shit game it was damaged. gone ).
anyway, still i gave the beta a shot. it was also shit, time to let MOH die and just stick to battlefield.
plus lets be honest, its not different enough from call of duty to even be on the market esp when cod does everything 10x better. at least BF and COD are different enough to be on the market simultaneously
I think they should stick to BF games and rather than giving us a new FPS every 12 months make a new game every 2 to 3 years and give us that many years of new map packs and addons. I think this will be the best way for EA to take on COD games and gives us more life in our games.
Yeah it's horrible tbh. The whole buddy system is a decent idea but being able to see whoever killed ur buddy is just a stupid idea. If you want a modern fps game, get GRFS (Ghost Recon Future Solider) instead, it's much better than the beta at least.
It's almost like EA are trying to pull a call of duty by releasing a moh one year then bf the next.. with moh being like an updated version of the latest battlefield made poorly by call of duty fanboys.
It's like the store generic brand of BF3. Not as good, can't compare to the real thing and just isn't going to ever satisfy what it set out to do originally. And as far as destruction goes, I'm not seeing much there.
To each is own though...
This game is also coming out around the bigger titles this year, which means that some people who buy this will most likely be trading this in towards something else in a matter of weeks.
ANOTHER PATHETIC CoD FANBOY that can't judge the game on its own without mention that P.O.S CoD franchise.. people need to make their own decisions through their own experience and dont be influenced by fanboys of the competing franchise..
Now - Join us on Filmwatch as we celebrate the release of Star Trek Into Darkness this month with a must-have collectible for Star Trek fans! | Promoted post
anyway, still i gave the beta a shot. it was also shit, time to let MOH die and just stick to battlefield.
plus lets be honest, its not different enough from call of duty to even be on the market esp when cod does everything 10x better. at least BF and COD are different enough to be on the market simultaneously
I think this will be the best way for EA to take on COD games and gives us more life in our games.
I'm glad I read this article. To think I nearly wasted £37 on this game.
It's a shame they decided to copy the above instead of refining the 2010 original.
It's almost like EA are trying to pull a call of duty by releasing a moh one year then bf the next.. with moh being like an updated version of the latest battlefield made poorly by call of duty fanboys.
To each is own though...
This game is also coming out around the bigger titles this year, which means that some people who buy this will most likely be trading this in towards something else in a matter of weeks.
well you have one big mountain of cow P.O.S.
when it's trying to so hard to copy something else how much of it's own merits can you judge it by.