Top
130°

Nintendo says no, then yes, now no AGAIN on LEGO City: Undercover's multiplayer feature.

"Does LEGO City: Undercover have a multiplayer option?

About 2 weeks ago now, I posted how Nintendo representatives had been back and forth on LEGO City: Undercover having some form of multiplayer, because the fact sheet for the game showed, "Players: 1-2", while the official page for the game showed, "No. of Players: 1". I waited patiently on responses from Nintendo representatives, and Jeremy, from NintendoFuse.com, even offered to send an email asking for clarification.

We both received two different responses though. The response Jeremy received basically said that LEGO City: Undercover does not have a multiplayer feature. The response I received, a few days after his, told me to refer to the fact sheet for the game which said, "Players: 1-2".

After receiving the two responses, I posted up the "Grounds for Celebration! Award - LEGO City: Undercover" and "LEGO City: Undercover to feature multiplayer? Nintendo says no, then yes?" posts that covered the issue and responses...

Read Full Story >>
coffeewithgames.com
-Mika-1299d ago

Typical nintendo. This is why im not buying a WiiU. They just don't know how to do anything modern. It like their always years behind the competition.

jjdoyle1299d ago

I dont even have ones reserveds and they cant provide straight answers on stuff no helping any

ChickeyCantor1299d ago (Edited 1299d ago )

How did you go from "Nintendo says no, then yes, now no AGAIN " to " They just don't know how to do anything modern"?

Nintendo isn't developing this game. They are only publishing it. Perhaps it's time for you to get "Modern" and educate yourself.

Moncole1299d ago

Trolls cant get educated.

-Mika-1299d ago

And as a publisher. They have a say in what features the game should have since they're investing money into it.

There have been many developers this gen that was forced to add multiplayer into their game because of the publishers.

Now nintendo was most likely being cheap because they didn't want to pay for the servers or they're trying to rush the game.

ChickeyCantor1299d ago (Edited 1299d ago )

We don't know what features are in there. So on what crack are you running?

You keep assuming stuff to fill the hate for Nintendo.

Why not stay away and focus on your Sony brand?

wampdog291299d ago

@-Mika-

Actually, you may want to go and read up on what the Trine 2 Developer is saying about Nintendo. They seem to not really boss devs around much. They aren't EA or Activision....

Baka-akaB1298d ago (Edited 1298d ago )

"Now nintendo was most likely being cheap because they didn't want to pay for the servers or they're trying to rush the game. "

or the dev just realized they didnt want mp or couldnt do it right for this particular game .

I have to wonder , did you say the same thing for the likes of Vanquish , or you are just foaming as usual at the sight of the name Nintendo ?

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1298d ago
mike1up1299d ago (Edited 1299d ago )

Typical -Mika-, foaming at the mouth and looking for easy prey.

"They just don't know how to do anything modern. It like their always years behind the competition."

Are ALL single-player games considered ancient by your standards, or just Nintendo's? I only ask because Sony, and Microsoft, have single-player games too. So, what the hell are you talking about?

metroid321299d ago

Are u about 10 years old if not how embarrassing m8 Nintendo have a 3ds selling close to 20 million all ready and have wiiu a proper HD console with Nextgen graphics out at christmas with Nintendo TVii and a ton of services and MiiVerse with video chat ect and that's what you call behind well you Sony fanboys are very immature.

corrus1299d ago

Nintendo are crazy first no then yes and now no again they are crazy

CaptainN1299d ago

Nintendo didn't even make the game, yet your already coming out with your torch to start a little flame war against Nintendo. If it doesnt have multiplayer, thats due to the developer who made the game, not Nintendo who is only publishing the game exclusively on Nintendo platforms. How can Nintendo be behind the times because they dont have 100% confirmation from the games developer ??? It's responses like this, that make us all a little dumber on N4G !!!

dark-hollow1299d ago (Edited 1299d ago )

I will buy two Wii u's.

GraveLord1298d ago

The fact that they're avoiding the question is grounds for suspicion. What are they hiding?

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 1298d ago
mike1up1299d ago

They should just say Yo, or, why not Nes?

omarzy1299d ago

I don't want multiplayer in this game. I don't think it would be that amazing, and it just end up like other games that had the single player suffer due to too much time being put into a multiplayer mode that nobody played. The single player looks fun. Focus everything on that.

Gamer-Z1299d ago

why hasn't Nintendo shown any footage of the Wii U's online features?

Gohadouken1298d ago

That's one of the first things they've shown on wii u so far , so i dont get your meaning there .

From day one they showed and hyped , badly or really well , features like integrated social medias and chatting . And outside of games , Tv features .

GhostHero3331298d ago

miiverse is not the online features everybody wants to know about. Most people who are getting the wii plan to play online with others so yeah social medias is for my phone and computer.

GreenRanger1299d ago

Didn't you know?
Daniel Bryan is the new CEO of Nintendo.

Show all comments...