40°
Submitted by HiddenMission 956d ago | opinion piece

If you think a Review is an Opinion you're an idiot

Hidden Mission writes: Over the past few years it's become very clear to me that many a journalist and gamer alike have zero clue on what the word review actually means. (Culture, Industry)

dedicatedtogamers  +   956d ago
Whenever I hear "oh, a review is just an opinion" as an excuse I cringe. A review is SUPPOSED to inform the reader, but when modern reviews are full of so much misinformation and fanboyism...

Saying "this review is just an opinion" should be seen as an insult. A review should be more than just someone's opinion. It should help guide the reader's purchase.

And of course, I'm setting aside the fact that a lot of reviews these days are just a thinly-veiled advertisement for whichever game dev is paying the bills for the website.
#1 (Edited 956d ago ) | Agree(6) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
NYC_Gamer  +   956d ago
I don't trust reviews from these mainstream sites..High scores are just thrown out to games that suffer from all kind of flaws which the journalist often fail to mention.The major sites will do anything to keep that ad space money.I remember when Jeff got fired from Gamespot over his review for Kane&Lynch.
#1.1 (Edited 956d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
Dlacy13g  +   956d ago
I agree NYC. I think the mainstream sites seem to be unwilling to mark down the bigger titles when they have flaws but will flail lesser titles for the same issues.
J0Scorpionake  +   956d ago
I totally agree, I think reviews should be an imparcial description of the quality of the game.
smashcrashbash  +   956d ago
No one has to listen to what the reviewer says. But to others it is a guideline to the game. A reviewer tells you what he observes and what he does or doesn't like and it is up to the gamer if he or doesn't want to buy it.Like I always say 'tell the truth and let the gamer decide if they want the game' not make excuses for it or say it is good so you won't anger gamers. What is worse is when they have nothing to say about the bad things in mainstream popular games but make sure and pick on the smaller titles for the same thing the big titles do. Bethesda for instance gets away with all the glitches and problems with high scores and praise but just watch any smaller less popular title do that. They get ripped to shreds over it.
TheSuperior  +   954d ago
Reviews are so misleading. I would honestly never rely on someone else to tell me if i should or should not play a game based off of their experience with it. I like to read about what is in a game what the modes are and stuff but not anything that forces the writters opinon on me.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
10°

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Review | TSA

12m ago - TSA: I don’t know where to go next as the land stretches out before Geralt. I could follow the p... | PC
20°

How delays turned ‘The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt’ into a must-own game

20m ago - Newly released “The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt” is a great game released at an even better time. Becaus... | PC
Ad

The Witcher 3

Now - All the lore you need to know. | Promoted post
30°

Pushing the Genre’s In Games

20m ago - What your game Genre means | PS4
10°

Arkham Insider: Episode 3, Get Up Close With Arkham Knight, Scarecrow, And Batman

21m ago - Arkham Insider Episode 3: This time, it's personal. Rocksteady unveils a brand new mini-trailer f... | PC
20°

Durante's Witcher 3 analysis: the alchemy of smoothness

21m ago - Peter "Durante" Thoman is the creator of PC downsampling tool GeDoSaTo and the modder behind Dark... | PC