GR - "These games range from the unnecessarily gory, to those which offend for the sake of being offensive. It’s bad enough that they manage to stir up the press into covering games as if every game were like this—they’re also not very fun to play."
(Culture, Ethnic Cleansing, manhunt, PC, PS2, PS3, Simcopter, Xbox 360)
Muslim Massacre was pretty boring but at least it was better than Postal 3. Postal 4 should include a third world country setting, Da Silva's with flip flops, and lots of weapons (machetes included).
Bought Postal 3 day one (had to get it from some weird site since the Steam download was broken without a code haha) and payed 60 bucks for it. lmao.
I regret nothing because it was Postal and im a huge fan of the series, but, my god, was it ever bad. I eventually beat it but still. Not touching that again.
its a pathetic and pointless game. i am not sure what looked fun to you. played it out of curiosity, wasn't impressed. infact most of the games listed are really bad people just make them to offend others.
Meh. Too many flash/Game Maker sort of games, made by one person.
My skin is too thick to care about ONE troll, redneck, psycho, extremist, etc sharing something on the internet. And I say you can't censor the bad and expect good not to be affected, so take the bad of the internet with the good.
Almost none of these examples are even remotely "impressive". Excluding the Rockstar games, DNF is the closest thing to professionally made...and that piece of crap was over a decade in the making.
Anyone can make a game these days. It only takes one hateful person.
Just don't let the typical hipster BS belief that the modern age is more "f***ed up" than the past simply because we live in such a connected, digital age, is all I'm saying.
i remember the JFK game, i think it was a competition who ever could assassinate JFK in the closest way he was shot in real life received like a £1000 but it costed like £10 to play
I'm a "weak gamer" because a flash torture game allows a person to use a variety of weapons on a ragdoll? the fact that it was so abysmal looking yet offended me is quite a feat. It's not so much what the game says or does that offends me, it's the notion that there are people who picked up and played that aforementioned flash game and LOVED it. That creeps me out.
Ah yes, a few individual speak for all society. If we look back into the past every person was well inline with each other. Civil wars, world wars? What are those right?!
I regret nothing because it was Postal and im a huge fan of the series, but, my god, was it ever bad. I eventually beat it but still.
Not touching that again.
My skin is too thick to care about ONE troll, redneck, psycho, extremist, etc sharing something on the internet. And I say you can't censor the bad and expect good not to be affected, so take the bad of the internet with the good.
Almost none of these examples are even remotely "impressive". Excluding the Rockstar games, DNF is the closest thing to professionally made...and that piece of crap was over a decade in the making.
Just don't let the typical hipster BS belief that the modern age is more "f***ed up" than the past simply because we live in such a connected, digital age, is all I'm saying.
By the way, those girls tits offend me.
It's not so much what the game says or does that offends me, it's the notion that there are people who picked up and played that aforementioned flash game and LOVED it. That creeps me out.