GameTrailers let the dinos out on HDMI.
PS3: Full RGB
Xbox 360: Expanded Blacks
Your comparing Mutliplat Games. Thats the stupidest thing i've ever heard of. All the darn assets are IDENTICAL. i mean get real. The only Hangups at the beginning was because the PS3 hardware was brand spankin new. Now they will always be the same.
I love my PS3 and my 360 collects dust. But in this video the 360 version does look better, in terms of colors. The PS3 is miles better than the 360 IMO, but these comparisons just show the one thing the 360 does right, and thats rich colors. Sure your hardware might fail, and games will be on multiple discs, and you wont be able to hear anything over the loud vacuum sound, but it does seem that the PS3, when put side to side with the 360 has deeper colors. Now...if you didn't see it side to side, the PS3 version still looks beautiful.
especially at first the PS3 version looks really white and faded.
So what? I'm still a PS3 fan and Turok still sucks.
I would sell my PS3 today if ANY game played like that. I have the turok demo, it looks NOTHING like that. Its like damn near a white screen. Why do the guys on Neogaf post colorful pictures that arent' touched up YET gametrailers can constantly post whitescreen PS3 "captures" that they claimed they couldn't do 3 weeks ago.
no need for ARGUEMENT there since the DEVS said that too
The DEVS ran into some problems with PS3 version's development
A SECRET ;- TUROK was also planned to be canned by the DEVS at some stage since they were having problems coding for the PS3 version. The DEVS didnt do it since a lot of money was invested in porting it from X360 and so they rather decided to release the game in the inferior state
GAMETRAILERS ps3 comparisons are always GIMPED.
However TUROK is better on x360 just like Burnout being better on ps3 with faster FR(60 vs 40). no need for flamebait
it's just 360 fanboys always trying to bank off any lazy developers who make bad PS3 ports.
The best PS3 so far in my opinion is Uncharted and that game looks amazing.
In this comparison the differences were minor, with the 360 version having slightly (and I mean slightly) less visible jaggies on screen. But then again this game sucks so who cares? The fact the game sucks is not going to change because of what platform you buy it on.
I have a hd tv hdmi and all that and the demo looks nothing like that washed out... I always use the full rbg and extra white thing too and even on my cutom display settings (brightness is pretty high)_ it looks a lot darker than that... kinda like wtf that just aint right... anyone with a ps3 and a decent capture card put up a real sample so these fools can see I speak the truth. Unfortunetly our 360 doesnt have hdmi out or Id check out that version for myself just to make sure they didnt mix them...
Why is the PS3 still washed out? I might get this game when it is cheaper, I still think the dinosaur concept is sweet. You wanted the PS3 on "juice" comparisons well there it go..
From what I noticed, the PS3 didn't have the best cut-scene (the contrast/ brightness was messed up on it.) but the main part of the game was darker or the colours where richer. It was really noticeable in the characters faces. There's a distinction there. P.S. I've typically scene these comparisons on a calibrated CRT monitor for graphics design / screen to print. I probably have an advantage over the typical computer user.
The video are gimped, I can say just looking at it that this isn't full RGB, or they just turned up the bright and down the contrast, cause you see as the same textures are just colored different (do you expect they to do twice the same texture for a multiplat game? kidding me, right?) and as the shrubs almost disappear on the dark hill, blurring everything (no contrast).
But I agree with Zambrota, this is the game that is worse on PS3 too... Nothing to really care about, the game isn't anywhere near a tech top (COD4 is, and PS3 version is better) and is just plain bad random FPS crap.
What I would like to see is a comparison from Assassin's Creed in 360 full-specs and PS3 full-specs. That is a open well-lightened game, there the difference shall be huge. And don't come to me with that "standard is what comes in the box, it's fair" cause if so, PS3 would be in 480i (fair?) and we would have to down the 360 version to it just to realize that is the same game (fair?)... The fair is to fallow how the devs produced the game. If they colored it with the HDMI in mind, this is the way the game is meant to be played, so this "standard" BS means nothing.
i think that the games are just the same
wow.....the ps3 version looks really washed out, especailly with full rgb.
i hope thats not how it really looks
i will agree with GT here
READ my comments above
The devs confirmed that since they ran into problems coding for the PS3.
With proper coding any game can be made to run better on the MORE POWERFUL PS3. no denying that
eg Burnout looking much better on PS3 and running at 60 fps rather than 40 fps on x360
DMC4 looking much cleaner on PS3,having no Screen tearing and also having MORE SATURATED COLOURS on PS3 in comparison to the x360 version
A) The two machines are roughtly equal in horsepower. Any other view is wishfull thinking.
B) It costs more money and more work to get a simple title like this to perform on the PS3 equal to the
Evidence? THIS VIDEO.
Even in the "gamerzone",
I'm sick and tired of this site and its cry baby Sony apologists trying to deny WHAT IS CLEAR AS DAY AND HAS BEEN REPEATED OVER AND OVER AGAIN.
We've heard developers tell us this.
We've seen the games over and over prove it.
But, on N4G, I keep hearing "oh, the devs are lazy!" and "Oh, the PS3 is soooo powerful" and "oh, who cares, the game isnt good anyway" when it is clearly NOT THE CASE.
Is there NO limit to the amount of bullshait this site can spew?
N4G needs to get some serious moderation help.
x360 is 2 years on the market.
ps3 is only one year on the market.
best graphics in action third person shooter.
best graphics in 3D platform game.
best graphics in racing game.
soon it will be:
best graphics in JRPG game.
best graphics in FPS game.
best graphics in Anime game.
and many other genres.
even lair had amazing graphics, but that game was RUSHED, that`s why it ended bad.
http://img218.imageshack.us... http://finalfantasyversusxi... Does x360 has something better after 2 years?
I do not have an XB360 so I can compare, but blacks really do not look like white-grey on my Sony Bravia 40X3500. Either these videos are bullshit, or they are grabbing the video wrongly.
Colours are vibrant and rich, and blacks are pretty darn black on my PS3.
The Turok demo never looked so washed out on my HDTV.
you will never know what your TV really looks like with both systems.
after UDF, RCF:ToD, COD4, & Burnout:P and even PSN games. They keep releasing crap games, I mean this is stupid devs need to hire people that arn't stuck in the stone-age with out-dated technology. They need to start learning how the current gen of games should look. Porting from crap gives you watered down crap.
No matter what GT does, their reputation will never be forgotten, and that goes to most gaming websites othet than IGN,
ALL games made on 360 and ported to PS3 looks worse on PS3 thats a no brainer, but GT adding a washed out version of that PS3 port is just ridiculous, ive tried my turok game on both SD HD PLASMA LCD and still havent had that white washed out look GT is getting.
we all know they are 360 supporters, and trying to win back Sony fans is just patheticly embarrasing, even that is more proof of them being 360 supporters.
every comparison video is fake, none of the games look like that on both SD and HD tv's. clearly something smell fishy.
they can put the same video out there and say its, 1080p, 20 000 contrast, OLED screen, super white, Full RGB, and it would still mean zero to me, after all their washed out comparison vids, i never take them seriously anymore, the only website i haven't had any issues with is IGN, end of story
but in case of TUROK ps3 version is indeed slightly inferior
But why care when you hav emulti games which look better and run much faster on PS3-- eg BURNOUT PARADISE/DMC4
Poo Vs. Poo = Poo Wins
Wow that PS3 video is crap. I tried the demo on my XBR4 and it doesnt even look anything close to that.
Again xbois hyping crappy games that look better on their crappy console lmao self-ownage xbois. And when all the AAAs multi-pats like cod4,Oblivion,dmc4 and Burnout look and play better on the superior console PS3. xbois keep you crappy games lolzzzz.
They both suck.. turok is weak multiplat trash
Down to Compare exclusives anyone? ...........
didnt think so
you can't compare exclusives because there's nothing on the other system to compare them to. DUH!
wow, the ps3 version looks nothing like that in HD! what is going on here?
turok looks better on the 360, but it will probably be one of the last games to do so
They're pretty much the same. At certain points the 360 version is darker, but more often the PS3 has more contrast and colour. Honestly, I would stick with the PS3 version.
These 2 would be identical. Still, small difference, very small.
if that video is correct then the 360 version does look better, but not nearly as much as the previous article suggested
VERY WRONG with the beginning on the PS3 side... Nice washout GT, looks fantastic! yeah... No.
Regarless, i'm sure the Turok for 360 looks better (because thats where the game started) even if i can't really tell.
But seriously, who cares. Its TUROK, its never (for me at least) got my attention. But people say its fun, so i might rent it, just to say that i tried it.
no difference to see here (graphically).
Turok looks like crap on the PS3 in the first place. It's just lazy developers, and I played the demo and it was mediocre at best. It seems most reviews feel the same way.
Why don't they do a DMC4 comparison? Or just stop with the FiretrUCKING comparisons period?
By 'lazy developers', do you mean the team responsible for Turok or the team responsible for the PS3? j/k
because it gives their site hits.. that's why
Expanded black on the 360 isn't a feature that helps HD gaming. Its for the washed out/faded blacks in the 480p format creating deeper blacks due to the lack of deep Blacks on Standard-def.
Enhanced-Definition 480p isn't Standard-Definition
Exactly. When will people understand that there are no adjustments for the 360's HD output? When will people understand that those adjustable levels are for EDTV 480p only?
Looking at your posts POG and PS3-1701D I suddenly realize what the problem is with this site (and others) is - people type stupid sh*t that is not even remotely true and then other people read it , believe it and then adopt it as a fact. This is copied and pasted from the XBOX support page:
Reference Level or Black Level: If you're using the Xbox 360 Component HD AV Cable, the Xbox 360 VGA HD AV Cable, or the Xbox 360 HDMI Cable, then screen format options include Reference Level. The default setting, Standard, delivers the normal range of white and black levels that your TV or monitor supports. Select Intermediate to increase the level of white and black in the video output. Select Expanded to maximize black level. Reference level is sometimes used to make a picture sharper, and you can experiment with what format suits your viewing pleasure.
Now back your statements with facts or STFU.
Whoa, calm down there buddy. Reported as offensive. You can correct people without claiming they are the reason for the ruining of a site. You are correct however. I based my statement upon a memory. I had never taken notice that if you were using HD and not SD / EDTV output, you had the option for "reference levels"
I noticed framerate drops in the PS3 version, it's especially visible when performing close-up kills(look at when he kills the dinosaur). Also, the textures were better on the 360 version. It also displayed more foliage and had less jaggies. I hope third party devs get better at handling the PS3. It would be a shame if this kind of thing happened to better titles. Orange Box was idiotic. Outsource it to EA...
Agreed. I own a PS3, and I did notice some glaring frame-rate drops. The more I play these stupid low-quality multi-plats, the more I appreciate the people who CAN program for the PS3.
they both looked the same to me... but i'm not getting this game anyway
I tought it was "impossable"
I have to ask; is RGB on Full?
Funny how they choose games that use 360 as lead platform. GT is dangerously playing with their reputation. If they want to became new 1UP or gamespot a.k.a xbots than fine, but if they continue with this i will lose respect for them
ass. But there's three problems here: I don't care about this game, no other game looks as washed out as this that I own on the PS3, and I don't trust GT after they've already been dishonest.
I can't truss it --
on the PS3 in the beginning of video. In the middle and further into the comparison the game looks identical except some framrate issues but this isn't surprising as the Xbox was the lead platform and the Turok devs have been stating they hd been having problems with the unreal engine on th PS3.
I have the turok demo and the game doesnt even look that washed out on a 780p Vizio 26" HDTV!!!! I'm still using HDMI and RGB Full.... what the hell? My game is nowhere near that white, and looks a helluva lot better.... Somethings up here.
ps3 version looks much worse than I expected, why doesnt turok use the CELL and BLU RAY
If they did, this would've been like Haze...."Exclusive for the PS3". Please "Vanquish" to the open zone.
a crappy game looks better on the 360, does anyone care?
End of Story. I mean I know how it looks on my 32in samsung tv which runs in both 720 and 1080i and it looks nothing like in the right with the faded greyness. Idk wat else to say all fanboism aside this is total bull. Also I using components too...
you will always think what you see on your TV is good.
This is about as interesting as watching the Beowulf comparisons.
What surprises me, is during the t-rex part, the ps3 has better textures, probably because of shaders as well.
But i'm sorry gt that is not hdmi full rgb, and you know it.
But as everyone is saying doesn't seem like anyone is going to buy it, and if not, thats the end of turok.
so now the probability of me getting this game went from 0.000000003% to 0.0000000015...oh well, maybe next time. Question, is there anyone actually getting this game for either console?
The only diff I see is in the biginning the ps3 version is way too white but later on in the outdoors it seems darker
some moments maybe are better on x360, some moments really are better on ps3.
some moments look just same.
and still, somehow ps3 version in the begining looked very white, and at the end looked fine. Strange.
If i adjust my tv for the 360, PS3 games look to bright... If i adjust my TV for the PS3, 360 games look to dark.....do you get the picture?
Beginning looks better on the 360, the rest looks almost exactly the same or at least not enough that someone should care while playing.
Chalk up a win for 360 fanboys for having the best looking worst game in town.
who continuouly make up sh1t just to justify the inherent weakness of the ps3.
I was really hoping this game would be good. One of my friends who also owns both ps3 & 360 told me he might get and i suggested he should pick up the 360 version.
it's close though, no need to lose sleep over it.
I am so sick of every PS3 fanboy having to explain why there version looks like shmit. The typical comment is "The developers are lazy". OK, let's look at it from a business perspective since that is what it is anyway. If I can take x amount of hours and resources and develope for one console and have it look better and that console has a larger install base which one do I develope for? Or do I take more hours and more resources so I can develope for the PS3 which has a smaller install base. Which gives me a better return on investment? In the end folks it's all about the dollars and if I can make a killer game on the 360 and sell 5 million units vs. the same game requiring more hours of developed and more resources and sell < 1 million what would you do. I swear we got a bunch of retards out there who wouldn't make it one day in the corporate world even the small business world. Shuck it Trebek!!!
what kills me is the guys that say IT DONT LOOK LIKE THIS ON MY TV, thats because your not COMPARING it to anything!! I thought the same thing until I compared the jericho demos, there was a big difference in color with those 2 versions, there were a few other games also. if theres nothing to judge by then you really CANT TELL if something is brighter or darker because theres nothing to compare it to!!
i cant trust this comparison. first half the ps3 version is washed. second half its actually darker than the 360. wtf. but the 360 is the better version. it has slightly less jaggies which can be seen on the zoomed in bits. i also see tearin on the ps3 version. we kno what to expect of ports. until ports are done from ps3 to the 360 this aint set to change.