Lens of Truth Writes "Welcome back for another exciting Head2Head! This week we take a closer look at Resident Evil 6 Demo the PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360. Come join us as we compare another of the most anticipate game release this year."
The odd texture and light source seems to be slightly weaker in some of the PS3 shots but other than that they look the same.
The coloring and sharpness of the PS3 version makes me want to get it on PS3, textures look the same to me though
The ps3 version looks fuzzy on its Resident Evil-ness, and the 360 version looks like it has a lot of aliasing on its classic gameplay.
But truth be told, I'm more interested in game performance. Consistant frame rate to No/ or very minimal screen tearing would be great.
How can everyone be so stupid? It's simple - the aliasing is identical. Shadows are more pronounced on PS3, and textures are more pronounced, just look down the stairs, and if you have a brain it will be obvious. I've seen the 360 version and there's a ton of screen tearing it's horrible. The PS3 is v-locked, no screen tearing that you will ever notice. Make your own conclusions if you have both consoles and both demos (if you don't have both consoles then stop griping, as these comparisons will mean nothing to you).
Both look horrible and looks nothing like the earlier footage they released after game's announcement. Classic Crapcom.
First Borderlands 2 Now RE6. It must be 2012 if the PS3 Version is superior. (Like IT Should Be)
LOL PC is the way to go.. Lets stop comparing consoles already. If you really care about graphics get a PC or shut up already. I been playing all the latest games at full 1080p for years now. I missed a few exclusives but have both consoles for those. PC and STEAM are my favourite option though out of my PS3, 360 and PC.
"LOL PC is the way to go.. Lets stop comparing consoles already. If you really care about graphics get a PC or shut up already. I been playing all the latest games at full 1080p for years now. I missed a few exclusives but have both consoles for those. PC and STEAM are my favourite option though out of my PS3, 360 and PC." How do you know there's a PC gamer in the crowd? Talk about graphics and they'll make themselves known!
I was contemplating a 360 purchase on this for the early DLC, but judging by this source, the PS3 contrast is better, textures look sharper and more detailed, and the colours are more vibtant too. Looking at other comparisons the difference seems to be universal and not "swapped 360 for PS3" screens that fanboys are barking about for some reason =S Even at that, at the end of the day, i'm just plain ol' excited for this to come out now, negligible differences once you're actually sitting playing it and DLC being slightly earlier on one platform is hardly a huge deal. Loved Resi 5 despite the hate, and i'm sure i'm gonna have a blast with this too playing coop with my buddy like we did in 2008 with Resi 5 =)
Did anyone thought that the demo has low quality texture because of the dimension of the file? There's a lot of stuff and it's only around 850 MB
If you look you can see the WiiU verison has better shadows and lighting. Also better color and less jaggies. I say WiiU wins this round:) hehe we will be soon seeing a lot of these. I'm excited to have new system in the graphics whore game.
pretty close but ps3 version looks better.
The demo made me want to barf with all the wild camera movement but I thought it looked pretty good on 360.
PS3 looks sharper
PS3 has been winning the H2Hs lately. Do devs finally get it.
You need to go back and check again
Right back at you.
Truer words have never been spoken.
i have never trusted lens of turth, sure i am a ps3 fan and i should be happy about the ps3 version being the "best" version. but lot are way too shady and lie too much on there comparisons. does anyone remember the mass effect 2 debate? it was obvious the ps3 version was the best...BIOWARE SAID IT! . so someones lying, and when i put in some of my game that they supposedly told me was the inferior version, it turned out to the the exact same thing.
http://www.eurogamer.net/ar... http://www.eurogamer.net/ar... Does Euogamer lie too? Most times now both versions are very similar. It's nothing to really worry about and developers are much more used to the PS3. In this comparison it looks as though the PS3 version is sharper. The XBOX360 seems to look granier and the bloom lighting appears better on the PS3. How the game runs is more interesting to me so we'll see.
eurogamer does not use advanced adaptive luma set to full on the ps3 games (its set to limited) hence the washed out look, and before you start going off about them confirming they do use full rgb they dont. i have seen it with my own eyes and INFACT have proof why most ps3 versions looked washed out, its a lie. http://www.youtube.com/watc... http://www.youtube.com/watc...
@ tentonsoftube Because what's on Youtube is truth right? Now prove what is being shown on those youtube links is factual. All I see is still pics with either 360 or PS3 up in the corner. Prove to me that they are properly labeled. Prove to me that FULL RBG was used. You can't. Yet you are so eager to disbelieve what LoT say and would rather believe what some random youtube poster puts as truth without them showing you the set up. In the 2nd video where is the proof that the screen on the left is ME2 on RGB and NOT a 360 clip. You are just choosing to believe what you want to believe rather than thinking logically about it.
Way to neglect the most important aspect, the performance. Which Eurogamer does a complete analysis of. But then again you're the one who tells people Sony never has timed exclusives, just Microsoft. So obviously you have an agenda in the first place. I guess when you only see what you want to see things appear different.
Full RGB shouldn't even be used unless you're using a monitor. That's what that setting is meant for, since monitors use colors differently. On TV's, it ends up crushing the blacks. You can see what I mean if you have a picture that has dark shadows, but still should have visible details. On a TV with Full RGB, it will turn pure black. On a monitor, the details stay. The "washed out look" is much less apparent on an actual TV then it is in screenshots. The 360 has it's Full RGB equivalent forced into the hardware, so it's always going to give the impression the PS3 is washed out in comparison. I feel like facepalming whenever people bring the "washed out" thing up in an argument, at both sides. It doesn't matter at all.
Reply to Stoney4 I get the impression that you don't recalibrate your display after you enable full range colour. My samsung hdtv looks so much better with full range on. I highly recommend proper display calibration.
ME2 came out on PS3 much later than the PC/360 versions on the updated ME3 engine LOL
Xbox version looks a little washed out
Making the last two comparisons seem a bit fishy. Reminds me when LOT swapped ps3 and 360 pics with certain games in the past like Crysis 2. Eurogamer will be needed to know for sure.
its seems the 360 framerate runs better under stress!even so they still cant make a game running at 30fps stable after all this years. LOWS of 22fps on the ps3 and 25fps on the 360,its just a shit work by CAPCOM! http://ps360.ldblog.jp/arch...
I have yet to see a gamer playing a game and being annoyed about the fps until they find out its under 30fps.
You're insane. Go play the later levels of Enslaved or Crysis 1 (or 2) on consoles, then come back to me. Low FPS is VERY noticeable in action scenes and WILL affect your aim and reflexes 100% of the time - every single person in the world plays worse the lower the FPS is. It's scientific fact. Play a 60fps action game like DMC or Bayonetta on the XBox 360 then right away play a 30fps action game. Play a racer like Forza 2-4 then play a 30fps one like NFS Shift. You can see stuff coming and act earlier and more effectively in the 60fps games. It's night and day. Same for shooters - your accuracy on headshots and overall reflexes are just better.
It looks awful on both system, Capcom should be ashamed.
looks awful compared to...? Honestly, this game looks pretty f'ing good compared to games like Spec Ops or Final Fantasy 13-2 (2 games I think looked good, btw, but not like phenomenal). What are you so fixated on that is bad? I can see some lo-res textures, but with the amount of geometry and expansive environments, that's actually something normal. You do realize textures take up a certain amount of memory right? And you do realize that the more memory you take up has an affect on the game performance, right? Some of these games you think are so amazing are passing off an illusion through smaller environments which allow for more detail because of less geometry. Y'know, they have the open memory space. Plus take this into consideration, all of this is jam packed onto a single disc...so doing so much with so little space could be a testament to the skill of the developers to take full use of every resource and space they have allocated on disc memory.
I'm an XBOX 360 fan, but there's no denying it, the PS3 version looks richer and sharper. The 360 has a very washed out look and maybe even slightly lower texture resolution (i mean super slight), but without having a juxtaposed comparison, I would never be able to tell this sort of difference playing it on my TV. I've been playing the 360 demo and it doesn't looked "washed" out like it does in these pictures and since I prefer the 360, it won't dissuade my purchase. Oh and p.s. yeah, i own a ps3.
who cares i just want a decent Resident Evil game........
It took em around 6 years to finally start getting things right with PS3.. Some games like FF13 & Castlevania were much better on it but alot of western developed games came out best on 360.. Oh well, i guess all the compression they have to do to 360 to make games fit on those dvds are starting to hurt it.. Doesnt matter, i buy few games on 360 regardless if its a bit better.. I dont support companies that dont give anything back
It seems these comparisons are increasingly less and less different. Personally, I am happy to see more and more equality of the different platform versions of games. With Next gen coming up quickly I hope we see something similar for the PS4 & Xbox 720 so no owner of either platform feels they got the raw end of a stick because they have one platform or the other.
Let's face it, we're looking at screen shots. When the game is in motion you or I wont be able to tell the bloody difference. That's why we should focus on the performance aspect.
I am first and foremost a 360 fan. That being said I am also not blind and I can clearly see the 360 version looks washed out. If I did own both systems then I would most likely buy the PS3 version.
I look at this and clearly see the same thing but just to say that the PS3 version looks that all tiny little bit better is a huge insult it seems to some people who just click the disagree button just because they have a 360
Downloaded both demos. First things first. The game does look a little shitty in the graphics department. Second, I did find that the Xbox looks a little washed out next to the PS3. However the PS3 strangely almost seems to come really close to losing detail due to its darkness. Not black crush just dark. Lastly I did notice that some textures etc seemed sharper on the Xbox (the BSAA patch on Chris's arm for example). If you own both consoles like I do it'll come down to which controller you prefer. Also, to ease some fears of Xbox fans there was absolutely no screen tear.
Looks a bit better on the PS3 but if you care that much about graphics then you should get it for PC. Im buying it for PS3.
LOL @ playing this type of game on PC. Talk about ruining the experience
pc fanboys say its the same thing but its not. i know it looks better but you dont have to fiddle with graphics settings, download the latest drivers or any of that mumbo jumbo on consoles. only games you should play on pc are mmo's.
The game looks dark, muddy on both. Just not a great looking game to do any sort of comparisons with.
The game is ugly either way, and the gameplay is worse. This game has the worst camera positioning in the history of games.
The game is garbage
Funny when ps3 version is superior, the xbox fans says that the game is garbage... Ps3 does look sharper this time. It's not much but a bit better detail overall.
On the grand scale of things they look the same but if we are going to be this anal about the PS3 does look a little sharper for me. but either way the best is Resident Evil 2 and that now looks alot worse then RE6
Who cares? Resident Evil 6 visuals not 2012 quality. -I play ps3 demo- -This game graphics medicore-
Xbox fans: The 360 version looks better. PS3 fans: The PS3 version looks better. It will always be like this no matter how good or bad a game looks on either console.
In some shots,the PS3 looks sharper and the texture looks spot-on while the Xbox360 ones look washed out,on other shots the Xbox360 looks sharper and the texture are spot-on while the PS3 ones look washed out..! So whatever,get whichever you want for your favorite system of choice :D !
Who cares about this piece of crap !
Based on the demo, I actually think RE5 looked better then 6, then again, It's on a demo. Could be an early build.
Xbox 360 has better lighting and detail but overall they're the same.
Two wins in a row for PS3. Borderlands 2 (sharper) Res evil 6. (better lighting, sharper textures)
3.. Tekken Tag 2 & soon 4 with DOA 5
As long as the ps3 version look the same and perform the same. Who cares!!!
Both pretty much look like ass. But PS3 does look better.
the ps3 looks a lil darker and a lil bit of xtra detail?
After seeing this, As much as I love my 360 and PS3. I'll be getting it for 360 for sure. I don't know but playing the demos on both systems, I find it much more clearer on 360 than PS3.
"The PS3 is the best gimped version!" "No, the 360 is!" Half you people couldn't tell them apart if they weren't presented side-by-side. That's how little difference there is. Get a job and buy a PC if you want great graphics.
Both systems have decent graphics. Just be glad rescuing Ashley isn't the main objective.
It used to be that every 360 version was better, now it's the other way around. I guess developers are finally catching on that the 360 doesn't matter outside of the US, where it barely has a lead anyway.
At this point in the console race either developers are actually pushing both consoles to the point of parity or the developers aren't pushing the advanced console over the other and are looking for the all mighty dollar instead. What brings more money in, a game that looks roughly the same on both consoles or the game that actually has an advantage on one console over the other? The gamers are being played in this scenario plain and simple.
the hypocrisy of some gamers never ceases to amaze me. A lot of console-only gamers unite from both ps3 and xbox 360 camps to scream at pc-only gamers that graphics dont matter and gameplay is the only thing people should care about. Then they proceed to tear at each others throats for graphical quality of multiplat games that basically looks identical on both consoles. Looks "Sharper" on one version than another? yeah ok. The truth is that if these games ran side by side none of you would be able to tell which version is running on which machine. This kind of behavior is embarrassing to say the least. You have an amazing piece of technology (be it ps3, 360, or PC) to play video games on. Whatever you have is your platform of choice and you are happy with it. Why do some of you feel the need to try to say your system is "better" than another system. If you are happy with what you have that is all that matters. A lot of people arent fortunate enough to have any video games. You are lucky and you should recognize that fact...just sayin.