Submitted by ShadyDevil 707d ago | news

Dead Or Alive 5 Requires Online Pass

TGH Writes: "Dead Or Alive 5 is set to release and fans all around the globe are eager to get their hands on it. Now comes word that it will follow in recent footsteps of Tekken Tag Tournament 2 and require an online pass. " (Dead or Alive 5, PS3, Xbox 360)

Tastynoodle  +   707d ago
When PC gamers complain about DRM we usually manage a good response from the publishers. Meanwhile, you're all getting hit by these passes of the same vein while they ignore your hate.

I feel bad for you guys. I really do :(
rainslacker  +   707d ago
The PC market though isn't really subject to second hand game sales though. There are some of course, but nothing compared to consoles.

Online passes are a direct response to that, whereas DRM is a response to piracy. For piracy DRM doesn't stop it at all, and in some cases are reason used for piracy. This is why publishers have cut back on their DRM practices, because it just became wasteful spending with no results.

However, yeah it does kind of suck. I buy games used sometimes, but I'm not a huge fan of online play. Usually if I see an online pass though I'll ignore the used game, which means I won't play it at all, which means I may miss out on a game which I might enjoy a sequel to or the developers next game.

That being said this news doesn't come as any surprise. Can't really think of any game in recent history with an online component that didn't have one.
#1.1 (Edited 707d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
DivineAssault  +   707d ago
Im buying the game new so i dont pay jack for the pass
Darrius Cole  +   707d ago
I was going to buy it new, now I may wait and buy it used.
Hicken  +   707d ago
Damn. DOA is the franchise that made me decide to give the whole genre a chance(prior to that, I really only played Rival Schools). I was really looking forward to playing this game, but I'm not a fan of online passes, even if it's a game I, personally, was planning on buying new.

Edit: Lots of things don't affect me personally; that doesn't mean I should ignore them. I could, at any time, fall on harder times and only be able to buy this game used somewhere down the line. At that point, the online pass would affect me. Besides, regardless of whether I'm buying new or used, I believe developers and publishers have no right to profits from secondhand sales, as they no longer own the product in question. They own the IP the way Ford owns the design patent of a car, but their right to compensation is ended once the original sale is made.
#3 (Edited 707d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
ShadyDevil  +   707d ago
If your planning to buy it new...it shouldnt affect you..
Servbot41  +   707d ago
Even if you buy it new it affects you. There will be less players online to play against and it's worth less if you sell it, which could affect how much money you have to put towards another new game.
ShadyDevil  +   707d ago
but if you enjoy it..you wont sell it.
DFresh  +   707d ago
I don't play fighting games online.
Only play story and 2 player fighter mode with another friend in the same room/screen.
Rai  +   707d ago
This shouldn't effect anyone that buys it new..I don't see whats the big deal with online passes. its doing its job, its to make sure the developers make some money off their products.
hazelamy  +   707d ago
i just love when people trot out this tired old excuse.

the fact is, and it is a fact, that they made their money on every copy, all the money they're entitled to.

for each copy sold there's only one presence online, which i remind you they got paid for, one person stops playing, another person takes their place.

they might even get a second chance to sell some dlc that they wouldn't have otherwise.

this just shows they would rather the game sat on somebody's shelf gathering dust than it being given to another player to play.

this is the only industry where the creators think they own what we buy.

this is not a service industry where we need the services they provide, this is a luxury item where they should be grateful for our custom.
they need us a whole hell of a lot more than we need them.
hazelamy  +   707d ago
that's a shame, but i don't support this kind of thing.
i guess i'll be denied the online modes then.

but then the online modes on the last one turned into a frakking slideshow most of the time.

they can absolutely consider this preowned sale a lost sale, but they should also remember it's only a preowned sale because of their anti preowned bullshit.
#6 (Edited 707d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
New stories

AR-K Episode Two Improves On The First | Siliconera Review

13m ago - Siliconera: "I’m a big fan of episodic games. I like the way that the wait between episodes allo... | PC

Diablo III: Reaper Of Souls - Ultimate Evil Edition Review | Codec Moments

13m ago - Cev writes "Developed and published by Blizzard Entertainment, Diablo III is a hack and slash loo... | PC

Rockstar Hot-fixes Invincibility Glitch - New Trend?

27m ago - Rockstar seems to have hot-fixed an invincibility/god mode glitch for GTA Online for the first ti... | Xbox 360

Activision CEO on open-world 'Call of Duty': 'Never say never'

37m ago - Activision CEO Eric Hirshberg discussed the possibilities of an open-world 'Call of Duty' game du... | Industry

Looking for a great Pokemon Community?

Now - Look no further. Join us at the BulbaGarden Forums, the best community for everything Pokemon | Promoted post

Dragon Age: Inquisition's co-op multiplayer revealed - expect microtransactions but "no paywall"

40m ago - Dragon Age: Inquisition will, indeed, have a multiplayer mode, created over two years by "a speci... | PC
Related content from friends