Top
20°

DICE: Does Consolidation Kill Innovation?

Kris Graft of Next-Gen writes: Vivendi Games/Blizzard. Harmonix. BioWare Pandemic. Big Huge Games. All of these companies have recently merged with or been bought up by their respective suitors. It would seem that the flag-wavers of independence are disappearing.

Why is independence held in such high regard? Independence allows studios to create what they want, when they want, and even to kill off a project when they want if they're fed up with it. Independence is often equated with unbridled creativity and innovation.

Industry vet Mitch Lasky refused to let consolidation take the heat for killing innovation in games, directing it instead towards other alleged innovation-killers.

"Don't blame consolidation. Blame Sony and Microsoft for jumping the budgets up to $30 million for a console game. That's not consolidation's fault," Lasky said. It's that high price of entry that will cause many of the industry's real innovators to completely avoid working on the major consoles in the packaged goods business. "At this point, the console game business and PC boxed game business is closed unless you want to dance with the devil," Lasky added.

Read Full Story >>
next-gen.biz
The story is too old to be commented.
Genki3516d ago

This is essentially asking "Do mergers reduce competition?"

Of course they do, and it's happening way too much now. That's the nature of a billion dollar industry, I suppose...

ravinash3516d ago (Edited 3516d ago )

Independencies are important to the industry because it brings in new meat.
It mixes up new talent by giving new opportunities to people who might otherwise couldn't get in.
It also gives the freedom to do new thing and try new ideas with out another companies over looking everything and watching the budget rather than what your creating.