70°
Submitted by gulevski 802d ago | opinion piece

Mobile Games Lack Depth?

"It is no secret that tower defense games dominate both the Android and Apple app stores. A whole lot of these games are also free which automatically gives them a head start. The problem with this genre is that it is prone to lacking depth. " (Android, Angry Birds 2, Casual games, Choice of Zombies, Draw Something, Godville, iPad, iPhone, Mobile, Star Traders RPG, Townsmen 6)

Amazingmrbrock  +   802d ago
They'll come along eventually. Square has been putting out various rpg's onto phones for a while now. They don't end up on the top sellers list but thats probably because they cost around thirty times more than most things on the app store. As they should since their thirty or more times the game.

At some point somebody will manage to hit something more in the middle. Bite sized phone appropriate game experiences that still manage to have depth and complexity and story. They just aren't there yet. Regular platforming games are too cumbersome to play on phones, rpg's are in a similar way. Regardless something will work out. Some dev will figure out what will work best on those systems and then everything will just click.
360ICE  +   802d ago
Squarenix are struggling with depth on consoles these days, so if they're going to be the frontier for mobile game depth, then good going.

The best RPG I've played on a phone was an emulated version of Pokémon Silver. And due to control issues it was inferior to the original Gameboy version.

But, yeah, no. Bring on Elder Scrolls VI: iOS....
NastyLeftHook0  +   802d ago
there are some fun mobile games, it depends on the person.
zebramocha  +   802d ago
They don't lack depth,the controls are what's hurting them.
darkride66  +   802d ago
Are they really that limited though? Touch the screen and you've indicated a spot on the screen with complete precision. Swipe, pinch, rotate your device for other effects. Throw a thumbstick in a corner or use buttons on the screen for other options. Tap and hold, double tap, triple tap, etc. If anything it offers far more options to gamers and developers than the traditional up/down/left/right and two button combo that the majority of games for the past 30 years have relied on.

Is that such a limited method of interacting with a game? As a mobile developer, I certainly don't see controls as an issue, and clearly others don't either as the game's industry on mobile is worth billions.
#3.1 (Edited 802d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(3) | Report | Reply
live2play  +   802d ago
the touch screen can add 10x more touchscreen buttons and joysticks than dedicated gaming machines

thats not the issue

the issue is the tactile feed back of pressing an actual physical button
of actually moving a joystick
of actually pressing a shoulder trigger button
(some might even say rumble too)

the reason moblie app games are so successful is because they are just there, a tap or swipe away
people like doing something while they are waiting in line, for a bus, for a friend

those are good time wasters

dedicated console games are experiences

you KILL TIME with app store games
you MAKE TIME to play console/dedicated handheld games
#3.1.1 (Edited 802d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(1) | Report
Ben_Grimm  +   801d ago
Here's the thing that people don't understand and why I agree with Darkride.

Developers are designing games with the touchscreen in mind. So when you do play a game that was designed for a touchpad controls are not an issue because it is a smooth experience.

Now there are bastardize ports of old nes games that are crucial with a controller and just does not work with a touchpad only (megaman on the androis *ugh*).

But that is not the touchpad's fault.
KidBroSweets2  +   802d ago
They do lack in depth and the only time I've had problems with controls is on the shooter games. Infinity blade 1 and 2 were great and I've bought two of the square enix produced games and they were also great. But if you want depth in a mobile game, you'll be paying $18 for the game which a lot of people don't bother with because they prefer the $1 games for a quick fix.
live2play  +   802d ago
AND BUTTONS!
Ritsujun  +   801d ago
they're casual games for a reason

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
30°

Halo MCC matchmaking improved but still flawed

24m ago - GGG writes: "Simply put, matchmaking is still not where it needs to be after this update but it i... | Xbox One
30°

Assassin's Creed: Unity Gets Free DLC From Ubisoft Here's Why

28m ago - Ubisoft apologizes for Assassin's Creed issues with free DLC. It's little wonder to me why Ubiso... | Industry
30°

Watch Godzilla Destroy Japan in PS3 Game's TV Commercial

36m ago - Bandai Namco continues the push with a TV commercial. | PS3
30°

5 Games Releasing In 2015 That We Aren’t Quite Sold On…Yet

38m ago - WGTC writes: The honeymoon period is typically defined as a time in the beginning of a longterm r... | Culture
Ad

Start Making Games for the PS4

Now - Want to design the next generation of video games? Start learning game design today. Click for more info on how to get started. | Promoted post
30°

100% Orange Juice Gets Second Character Pack

40m ago - The second Character Pack brings even more characters to the game. | PC