"While it’s true that Zynga definitely doesn’t come up with original games, I would like to provide a counterpoint to all of the negativity surrounding the company: it’s doing nothing new, it’s doing nothing illegal, and it won’t be found guilty in EA’s claims because of this." | Explosion.com
http://www.wired.com/gameli...
~EA
"Supernatural" expansion pack is doing VERY well, and players are having a ball with it. I don't anticipate a lack of interest in the franchise to happen any time too soon. As a Simmer, myself, and one who has been playing the game and collecting all of the Expansions and Stuff Packs, along with nearly every item that EA has made available for the game in their on line store, since February of 2000, I can tell you that I'm having as much fun with the game as I ever had. I still see players designing the fantastic homes, the luxurious fashions, and hairstyles, and creating Mods to correct problems with the game, and giving us a lot of great new options and possibilities. No, The Sims game Franchise is going to be around for a very long time.
EA should respect their IP's
Look at this site I'm linking. This site shows every game Zynga ripped off. Page 2 shows The Social Sims in comparison to The Ville. If that's not blatant ripoff, then I don't know what is.
http://www.forbes.com/sites...
Copyright infringement requires showing that (1) movant owns copyrights and (2) respondent has created an authorized copy. Data East USA, Inc. v. Epyx, Inc., 862 F.2d 204, 206 (9th Cir.1988). Proof of copying requires showing (1) access to the protected work before creating the accused work and (2) that a substantial similarity of expression exists between the protected and accused works. Narell v. Freeman, 872 F.2d 907, 910 (9th Cir.1989). The Ninth Circuit applies a two-part test to assess similarity, an “extrinsic” inquiry to determine whether the similar elements between the works are protectable, and an “intrinsic” inquiry to determine whether an ordinary reasonable observer would consider the copyrighted and challenged works substantially similar. Mattel, Inc. v. MGA Entm't, Inc., 616 F.3d 904, 913–14 (9th Cir.2010).
If EA can convince the court of those factors, then yeah, they have a case. Seems to me that the sticking point will be "access to the protected work before creating the accused work." If EA bases their case on SimCity, then it seems like they have a good chance. Given the Mattel v. MGA case was the whole Barbies vs. Bratz issue and Barbie won, I can see EA winning over Zynga.