The Strategy Gamer goes to town on how strategy games portray narrative through gameplay, a detail a lot of popular games haven't considered.
"Games like Uncharted 3 try to cover up weak core gameplay with highly polished non-interactive elements. While Naughty Dog did a fantastic job with those cutscenes, with beautiful graphics, excellent and top notch voice acting, they served as misdirection, as the actual gameplay consisted of weak shooting and poorly designed levels. It is a monstrous error when the greatest feature of a game is a portion where the player does not even get to participate."
I believe that's what called for Carl's 'nitpick' comment.
Edit: For the record, I didn't actually read your article. If you think Uncharted 3 features "weak shooting and poorly-designed levels," then it's probably not worth my time to read the rest of what you had to say. No hit for you.
I'm not saying you are wrong for liking it, I am pro-"everyone has an opinion, mine is mine", but the shooting was pretty terrible in UC3.
Story was more personal and added much-needed depth to Nathan Drake.
Core elements such as shooting and platforming were refined and more puzzles that required you to think were added.
Online was also leagues above Uncharted 2.
But Uncharted 3 does have horribly done stealth sections.
But I guess I'm only calling them horrible because you need insane timing and positioning to really get through the optional stealth sections, and if you failed, Uncharted 3 made you pay, hard.
But at the end of the day, Uncharted 3 was spectacular.
Nunca!
its not U3's weak point.
look harder.
Despite this it still is a good game to me, and is second best in the series.
Different strokes for different folks.
In regards to Uncharted 3's narrative, I think it falters quite a bit. It seems written around the level design and so we go off for levels that look cool but have no actual narrative point, like the middle portion of the UC3.
If all these haters made a game better than Uncharted, it would get acknowledged... but they can't/don't
Haters gonna hate!
Most people acknowledge UC2 as being better than UC3, including the majority of those here defending UC3. For my part, I enjoyed the hell outta UC3, but not as much as UC2; even so, neither is my favorite game this gen, let alone EVER.
The problem we have is with the undue scrutiny the game is receiving, perhaps especially in light of other titles in other franchises NOT receiving the same treatment.
Edit: The ONLY way it does not refute your statement is if you're not referring to what's happening right here and now. And if that is the case, your statement is irrelevant.
UC3 has been praised many, many times. Sure there have been some reviews which knocked the multiplayer but this has been even stated by fans that played it. And it is no known secret that a lot of people prefer part 2 or 3. How is this game getting unfair treatment?
If the shooting and the level design was so poor how did I finish the game? If a game has problems that are so bad as people try to make UC2 and UC3 seem then how did I finish the game? I should have been stuck in certain levels without knowing where I am going and constantly killed because I can't aim right. But it wasn't. People attack Uncharted because it was given so many accolades and therefore constantly try to bring it down anyway they can.
No one mentions lame AI, bad design, boring level design, bad story etc in games that have it in spades but when UC3 came along suddenly it's like everyone woke up and suddenly can find fault in everything in it.UC3 is not perfect, what game is, but can we stop the constant nitpicking.Try telling the other offenders about the crap they do with their games that passes under your nose for a change. Start with Bethesda, Nintendo and EA.
"No one mentions lame AI, bad design, boring level design, bad story etc in games that have it in spades "
Have you not read bad reviews before, I mean seriously throw a rock at any bad review and you can see this.
"Start with Bethesda, Nintendo and EA"
I am very curious as to what Nintendo game has lame AI, bad design, boring level design, bad story etc.
I would really like to know.
And Bethesda gets away with glitches and errors all the time, Gears gets away with lame story and dialogue, Pokemon gets away with repetitiveness,all new Mario games get away with weak challenge, New Mario Karts get away with rubber band AI. I would go on but I really don't feel like it.
Get over it people. Just because the narrative doesn't work for you doesn't mean it doesn't work.
Does this guy realize that the narrative was the most interactive in UC3 than any of the other UCs?!? Hello? Chapter 18!!!!