330°

Insomniac's Ted Price: "Interest certainly hasn't waned in Ratchet"

Ratchet & Clank and Resistance developer Insomniac Games is in something of a transitional phase. It's done making Resistance games, it's got a new IP on the way with the just barely announced Fuse - formerly called Overstrike - and it just recently released its first Facebook game Outernauts.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
Relientk774241d ago

Why would it? Ratchet & Clank is amazing franchise. Fantastic platforming and story, creative and destructive weapons and gadgets, and the games are just a blast to play, really fun.

Hatsune-Miku4241d ago

I will say that the ratchet games are so underrated. Amazing series I think with innovative ideas and platforming

Relientk774241d ago

Ratchet & Clank and the Spyro the Dragon series are my favorite franchises by Insomniac. I wish they still had the rights to Spyro. :-/

Abash4241d ago

Ratchet retail releases need a competitive multiplayer mode, that would definitely make sales even bigger

linkratos4240d ago

I love how the sheep just instantly disagree with Abash. Anyone who has played multiplayer Ratchet knows how awesome it can be.

JKelloggs4241d ago

Also with Jak and Daxter, it needs a sequel. I agree with Spyro too, and with Crash, wish Activision didn't own the rights to them, the last games that they made with them in, were just horrific. Bring back the oldies!

black9114241d ago

Jak and daxter PS4. Sony is saving alot for PS4.

fredrikpedersen4241d ago

How did Activision end up with the rights for Crash anyway?

Teflon024240d ago

@Fred
Hmm...
Easy way to say it is, Naughty Dogg was owned by Universal games while Crash 1- CTR was developed. After that I believe something happened where Sony had the chance to aquire them and they did, Insomniac didn't want to be aquired i believe. But when this happened Sony as a company new to the games industry made a big mistake. They mistake of not getting the IP rights before getting Naughty Dogg so Universal owned it by default. So I think they murged with vivendi and then something happened and activision was under vivendi so they game them the rights tk the game. This is after radical games and so on trying to make hits. But I believe crash has no new games because they realized Naughty Dogg onky knows the key to good crash lol. And if sony was smart they'd buy out crash now since vivendi is trying to sell activision which means crash would be fairly cheap right now and naughty dogg said theyd love to do a new crash game

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4240d ago
ado9084241d ago

@Abash

I don't see why you got disagrees. That would be a great idea. Kinda have that Deadlocked vibe into the game's multiplayer

TheLyonKing4241d ago

I just disagreed cause I don't see why every game has to have some multi-player aspect.

ado9084241d ago

@TheLyonKing

Putting in multiplayer in this game is totally different then multiplayer say in COD. You play Ratchet and clank up your arsenal? You ever play the game modes with your friend or sibling splitscreen and try to mess around and capture and destroy bases? It's amazingly fun. Late ps3 releases of R&C has never had multiplayer so it'll be cool to have it because it will give more replayability. Besides you have the option to play multiplayer it's not like you're forced to. I'm a true R&C fan and I know many other's who are too and they would love to try out multiplayer together

Freak of Nature4241d ago (Edited 4241d ago )

@ ADO908...

I quess because "Abash" he did not totally praise the game bowing down to it on his knees...? if it's not all candycanes and rainbows here about a PS3 game you get bashed, there is no realistic middle ground, no option to even give something PS3/2 related the most minute crit.It's OMGZzzzz, the best ever or else!

Now watch my disagrees? And I own all the systems with PS3 being my favorite, and PS4 will be bought on DAY 1!...But no matter, no room for anything but the sweetest of words, the grandest of compliments, if you do or say what I just have it's the plank for ye...Just watch me in a second LOL....

Anyways. Ratchet and Clank is one of my favorite series, I do wish they would evolve some, add some depth,bring in a new hook, instead of what seems to be going the old cash cow route (right I dare say that here on N4G's..... A new open World, more depth in COOP, add MP in a bigger way, sure you don't care for MP, then don't play it, but it's a nice option for many...remote play treatment for Vita would be great...

Overstrike (FUSE) looks very promising, one high up on my radar list...

CYA...

-Gespenst-4241d ago (Edited 4241d ago )

I just wish Insomniac would make a proper outing. All these new spin-off games feel like they should be modes in or gameplay features of a larger, proper R&C game.

Also, Insomniac getting the rights to Spyro again would be a dream come true. If they could get Stewart Copeland on board too... agh, incredible. Sad that it probably won't happen.

indubitably4241d ago

Ratchet & Clank is literally the only reason I want a PS3. I beat the first 4 games 100% on the PS2 but I can't quite do that by just borrowing my friend's PS3

Canary4240d ago

I wouldn't go that far. The gameplay -is- perfectly executed, but story has -never- been R&C's strong point.

And as for the interest not waning... well, yes, part of that can be attributed to the fact that it's a great franchise... but I think the greater part is because, well, Insomniac's really the ONLY developer left making that kind of PS2-era platformer. The only other games that come close are either Nintendo's 3D mario platformers (to a degree) or HD ports of PS2 games.

If there were still games like Jak and Daxter, Sly Cooper, Maximo, Beyond Good & Evil, etc., etc. coming out, Ratchet and Clank wouldn't be nearly so popular today.

Which is a shame. As much as I love Ratchet and Clank, I'd love some competition in the market a good bit more.

HellzAssassin4240d ago

Honestly, I agree with Abash and linkratos. The competitive multiplayer in Deadlocked was a hell of alot of fun back in the days. Granted, I'm not absolutely crazy about most MP options in games that don't need it, but Ratchet would definitely benefit from an incredible online competitive MP experience with the tons of different skins, weapons, customization options and so forth, as long as they keep the single player top notch. Similar to what Naughty Dog has done with the Uncharted franchise.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4240d ago
dorron4241d ago (Edited 4241d ago )

Ratchet franchise is amazing, but I feel lately they're heading a wrong direction. I don't feel All for One was a Ratchet game at all. Didn't catch my interest. And the forcoming Qforce...I tried the demo and I'm not convinced (still buying it since it was damn cheap and had crossbuy, but ...tower defense???? come on!!!).

They should go back to A crack in time style gameplay...

OhMyGandhi4241d ago

Interest in Ratchet couldn't be higher.
My own love for the franchise begins with the characters, the hysterical writing, the beautiful and extremely well realized worlds, and ends with the rock solid game mechanics.
No other game I've played in recent times makes you feel so good collecting things. It's the explosion of bolts that gravitate towards you as you run by them, the "ting" sound as you collect them, it's like the best kind of drug.
More than a single coin from Mario, I could compare the feeling of collecting bolts to Sonic running through a solid, uninterrupted line of rings in a loop.

A fine example of quality writing and design, and (obviously) some of the best weapons in gaming.

Captain Qwark 94241d ago (Edited 4241d ago )

all 4 one.....full frontal assault.....

Captain Qwark 94241d ago

its going to start if they dont give us a real ratchet soon. all 4 one was a joke and full frontal assault looks like another mediocre game to tarnish the franchise. a crack in time was amazing and the best since going commando and those game are how you follow it up! thats a freaking joke.

Capt-FuzzyPants4241d ago

Full Frontal Assault looks like it could be pretty fun for what it is. I want a real Ratchet game too like A Crack in Time too. But Full Frontal Assault looks like a MOBAish game and i hope they add in 5v5 eventually because a 3rd person MOBA game on consoles would be pretty fun.

MidnytRain4241d ago (Edited 4241d ago )

Couldn't have said it better myself! While I didn't play the games, the betas for A4O and FFA were terrible. Not technically so, but as a concepts they blew chunks. A Crack in Time needs a proper successor.

Show all comments (45)
120°

Report: Marvel's Spider-Man 2 Villain DLC Spotted in Debug Menu

Marvel's Spider-Man villain DLC potentially spotted via the debug menu that surfaced from the New Game+ title update released recently.

60°

Video Game Leaks Suck For Everyone, Gamers Included

Ahmed from eXputer writes "Video game leaks have become a major cause of concern for Triple-A studios, as they're becoming increasingly malicious and dangerous."

240°

Adding First-Party Games to PS Plus Negatively Impacts Sales, Sony Data Confirms

In a leaked Sony Interactive Entertainment presentation, the company declares that including first-party games on PS Plus has had a “big” effect on “traditional sales.” As an example, the company mentioned that Horizon Forbidden West‘s sales “flat-lined” immediately after being added to PS Plus.

Read Full Story >>
playstationlifestyle.net
XiNatsuDragnel117d ago

That's smart Sony knows what's up with that.

Reaper22_115d ago

They are just stating the obvious. Of course a game is not gonna sell as much when gamers can get it for a fraction of the cost because of subscription service. On the other hand, a subscription service can extend the life of a game by making it available to gamers who want to play it but not necessarily willing to pay full price.

What works for Microsoft doesn't necessarily have to work for Sony and vice-versa. I'm glad we have some variety. Personally, I don't want 2 consoles who are doing the exact same thing.

Crows90115d ago

Price cuts do the same thing your describing. Subscriptions aren't bringing anything new to the table.

Crows90115d ago

It's not that smart. In fact...it's not smart at all. A dumbass could figure that out. If you give a game for free or for peanuts...why would anyone pay a lot for it instead?

It's like if you had the whopper menu at 7.99 and then the whopper menu at 1.99
Same damn whopper! What item you think most will choose?

The only ones that will choose 7.99 option are those oblivious to the 1.99 option.

Hedstrom115d ago (Edited 115d ago )

Yea! And to make more money if you are selling the 1.99 whooper you will have to lower the quality and make the ingredients as cheap as possible and take away the sallad and cheese. But you could pay extra to get that.

proudly_X116d ago

Clank was profitable after all

DarkZane116d ago

Would have been a lot worst if it was on PS Plus day one.

FIELDMARSHALL_P115d ago

How much does Sony or Xbox pay the devolpers to put the games on the services? Do they take that into account for profit, I don't know just asking. If we pay for online giving out some games is cool either platform. The companies must think it helps in some sort of capacity for accepting the deal I would think.

purple101116d ago

Oh dam
I even commented on someone who said it wasn’t.

Load of hallabaloo on the site indeed

REDGUM116d ago

To add to you're point, this is what I don't understand about the MS subscription service. If you're getting all the day one released games for next to nothing by using thier service how on earth are the developers supposed to make enough money back to create their next game/s?
Myself, and I might be of the few, but I prefer to purchase a game from a store or digital store at the recommended price, or wait for a discount if not completely sold on what I've seen of a game so far and get what I paid for than pay monthly, yearly etc subscription & get everything while the games themselves become less in all aspects due to less funds/resources. (Not sure if I've explained that properly or not)
If every company goes down the subscription based path in the future I see gaming overall dying to some degree for the non diehards I mean. Putting up older games etc that are inc in the service fees I agree with but not day one releases. Again, just an opinion.

Hedstrom115d ago

@REDGUM
You lower the quality of the games to make the process of making them as cheap as possible. You make them like f2p games with season passes and microtransactions. And over time you will make subscription more and more expensive.

BlackCountryBob116d ago

Also really interesting to see through to one of the sites they link to (Resetera) that the 2 cross gen titles in Miles Morales and Ghosts of Tsushima sold over 40% each of their first year in year 2, almost double what even the best performing games like GOW 2018 and Spider-Man did. Kinda seeing the cold hard numbers makes it really clear why they did cross gen games and remastered some of the later PS4 games to PS5 Directors Cuts.

Glemt116d ago

"“In year 1, Horizon Zero Dawn and Horizon Forbidden West were very comparable,” the presentation reads. “HFW was included into PS Plus at the start of Year 2. HFW saw an enormous influx of PS Plus players, but at the cost of flat-lining the game activations from retail sales.”"

So, the data shows there were fewer traditional sales, but it doesn't show us anything about how many people joined PS+? It does say there was an influx of HFW players, but it doesn't state how many of these players owned PS+ to begin with.

To conclude that it negatively sales is correct, but it doesn't mean less money is made. We cannot draw that conclusion until we know how many more people joined PS+ because of HFW.

mkis007116d ago

Well each ps plus account is only good for what? $15 per month max if they go monthly? There are a lot of reasons why even if a million new signups happened loosing out on the $60 gamesales is a worse.

Glemt116d ago

I think that's a good assumption, but that's what I was referring to. It's an assumption. If someone comes with hard data, we need the complete picture. The way it sits now we might draw the right conclusions, but we've proven nothing.

Crows90115d ago

If sales flat lines and subscriptions don't equal the same as said purchasable game then no matter how you spin it...less money is made on that game per player

TheCaptainKuchiki116d ago

MS's bet is that although it lowers traditional sales, it makes the services more appealing and millions of new people will subscribe if they see that good games are added to the service. And in the end, the subscription profit (not revenue) will outpace that of the traditional sales.

However even after 6 years they still haven't reached that point lmao

Shane Kim116d ago

Sadly it's just Netflix of gaming. They saturate the service with garbage just to keep releases on a regular basis and to keep players hooked to the service. It won't be sustainable in the long run.

Reaper22_115d ago

There are some really good games on gamepass. That's the problem with you guys who only think one way. I'm playing Remnant 2, Dead space remake, Tomb Raider, Forza, Far cry 5, Gears Judgement, Mass Effect 3 and MLB The Show. Now please tell me which one of those are garbage?
You sound like a hater or is it you are jealous at the success of Mictosoft with gamepass.

Crows90115d ago

@reaper

Far cry 5 and mass effect 3...also gears judgment was horrible

DEEHULK88112d ago

Netflix is the ONLY streaming service that is making a profit right now. In fact others are back to licensing their content to Netflix because that's a great revenue stream for them.

Crows90115d ago

Except that works for MS because most of their games barely break 1 million in sales ... They know this and try to throw shade and brag about how great subscriptions are because they were already not making much money at all.

Reaper22_115d ago

Nah, that's not true. Their games do sell. Games are getting more expensive to make and sometimes selling millions still don't make up for losses. Services like gamepass can be good for developers and the publishers. Games do sell on gamepass.

Crows90115d ago (Edited 115d ago )

@reaper

Nope. It is true. Just look at estimated sales for lots of their games across the board. Except for major titles like GTA most games barely sell on Xbox. At least back when physical was the majority...now with mostly digital maybe it has changed but their audience hasn't gotten bigger.

A few outliers but the majority barely sold.

DEEHULK88112d ago

If they didn't put their games on PC and Gamepass day 1 their games would be on the charts like the 360 days, but they don't want to do that and that's okay.

Show all comments (44)