Top
220°

15 games that aged horribly

MyGaming's Tarryn van der Byl writes: "Remember when Unreal was just, like, totally the most unreal thing you’d ever seen, ever? That was almost fifteen years ago, and graphics technology has improved somewhat since then."

Read Full Story >>
mygaming.co.za
The story is too old to be commented.
PhantomTommy1395d ago

And yet I'd still choose System Shock 2, Half-Life and Deus Ex over most current gen games.

Gaming1011395d ago

lol I know right, this dumb author actually wrote "I don't know what this is, but it isn't high resolution textures and anti-aliasing" on a game released in 1993! This was when 16 bit Nintendo and Sega Genesis games were just getting around to doing good sprites, what else would the expectation be?

Plus, you can mod those PC games to make them look phenomenal by comparison, there's a System Shock 2 mod that makes it look fantastic I just saw on youtube.

BlmThug1394d ago

What a horrible horrible article. This article is the equivalent to a article being written criticizing a 1950's Ferrari because it isn't as fast as a modern day Ferrari

Septic1394d ago

In all fairness, I think this article is just being tongue-in-cheek.

The 'Next Generation' magazine and caption did actually make me laugh out loud. At the time, I'm sure they looked mind-blowing. I remember being blown away by Unreal Tournament, Goldeneye and Half Life (amongst others on that list).

You never know, we might even mock the visuals of the current gen games in the future.

I don't think the article was meant to be taken seriously.

darthdusty1395d ago

So graphics are the only thing you should measure when it comes to determining if a game has "aged terribly?" I don't know about you, but System Shock 2, Half-Life, Deus Ex, and a handful of those games still play phenomenally. If you can't look past the graphics to see how amazing a lot of the games are your list actually are, then you need to take a step back and rethink what truly makes a game great.

versusALL1395d ago

Uh Final Fantasy VII anyone?

LAWSON721395d ago

no i just played that game a year ago and it was fantastic. everything makes up for the poor character models. graphics do not ruin a game, not once have i heard anybody say that games sucks because of the graphics being terrible. I have just started playing mgs1 for the first time and as bad as it looks i am having more fun than i have with many games with pretty graphics.

Sketchy_Galore1395d ago

Just about every one of those games looks great to me when considering the time it was made. 'Dated' would be something you look back on and think, 'wow, how did we ever think there was anything good about this?' whereas most of those screenshots made me think, 'wow, it's quite impressive what they could do with such primitive hardware'.

amaguli1395d ago

The graphics may be a little hard on the eyes at first, but the gameplay is still great. I don't think these have 'aged horribly'. Graphically, sure, but gameplay wise? Nope, and in the end that is what truly matters.

It's just proof that graphics don't make the game.

Reverent1395d ago (Edited 1395d ago )

A great example of that is "Shadowman". The game was made back in the 1999, the graphics are a bit painful to look at, and I had never played it before in my life until just a week ago... But damn it has to be one of the most fun games I have ever played, even by todays standards.

Show all comments...
The story is too old to be commented.