130°
Submitted by Gekko 701d ago | news

Spec Ops: The Line's "bullsh*t" multiplayer "literally a check box"

The online component for Spec Ops: The Line seriously irks lead designer Cory Davis from developer Yager because it's something the team didn't want, and was in fact handled by another studio.

2K Games "was relentless" in securing multiplayer made it in despite being "literally a check box" feature. Online was "never a focus" and game mechanics "were raped" to fit in multiplayer.

Cory Davis is one unimpressed lead designer. The online side barely represented what Spec Ops was, he added, pointing out that no one plays it because it stinks. (PC, PS3, Spec Ops: The Line, Xbox 360)

Alternative Sources
kma2k  +   701d ago
The SP of the game is definatly the sleeper pick for GOTY IMO. One of the best stories in a TPS game ive ever experinced!
iamnsuperman  +   701d ago
I agree I loved the single player. The multiplayer wasn't bad just, I felt, it didn't really fit with the tone of the game, didn't really add anything and because of this not many play it.

I hope more people pick up this game because the single player story is great
#1.1 (Edited 701d ago ) | Agree(7) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
-Alpha  +   701d ago
Yup, publishers do this, and then developers eat the crap from fans
#2 (Edited 701d ago ) | Agree(16) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
Bathyj  +   701d ago
Just goes to show that not all games, (even shooters) need, or should have Multiplayer.

Even the devs are saying it now.
Freakazoid2012  +   701d ago
If someone designed a car to be a single passenger car from the beginning and suddenly added in another 3 seats last minute would that also prove to you that having a car with more than one seat doesnt work?

IMO they made a poor design choice. Most games now come with online(even shooters,especially shooters actually) so for them to try to skip it was a bad decision. Not the publisher or shareholders fault for wanting the game to be able to compete with other shooters that will be right beside it on the shelf for the same price but have higher replay value because they have online.
jb1276  +   701d ago
lulz to the headline
vitorizzo  +   701d ago
who actually bought this game for its multiplayer anyway
dazzrazz  +   701d ago
If it was only checkbox what was the point of all those beta test and almost year delay hmm...
Moby-Royale  +   701d ago
Damn you're smart.

/s
taquito   701d ago | Trolling | show | Replies(2)

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
40°

There Be Zombies Rumored To Be Coming To GTA V

24m ago - Rumors indicate that GTA V will be getting a dose of new DLC in the form of zombies. | PC
20°

Why Square Enix Chose ryo To Be Bravely Second’s Composer

25m ago - “We decided that we wanted someone who can make music with melodies that stand out,” says Bravely... | 3DS
30°

These Beautiful GTA V Lightning Strike Photos Will Make You Want The Remake Now

32m ago - An Imgur user has created a gallery showing the wrath of mother nature in GTA V. Using precision... | Culture
30°

Not Every Indie Game Is A Godsend

49m ago - The indie games market like any market is hitting its awkward phase, or some would say a phase wh... | Industry
Ad

Sniper Elite III (PS4) Review

Now - Ken holds his breath and takes the shot with the latest Sniper Elite title. | Promoted post
40°

Sacred 3 Review – The lonely co-op game - TXH

49m ago - James writes - "The thought of an action/hack’n’slash role-playing game which puts a hefty focus... | PC
Related content from friends