Try our new beta!Click here
Submitted by Gekko 1261d ago | news

Spec Ops: The Line's "bullsh*t" multiplayer "literally a check box"

The online component for Spec Ops: The Line seriously irks lead designer Cory Davis from developer Yager because it's something the team didn't want, and was in fact handled by another studio.

2K Games "was relentless" in securing multiplayer made it in despite being "literally a check box" feature. Online was "never a focus" and game mechanics "were raped" to fit in multiplayer.

Cory Davis is one unimpressed lead designer. The online side barely represented what Spec Ops was, he added, pointing out that no one plays it because it stinks. (PC, PS3, Spec Ops: The Line, Xbox 360)

Alternative Sources
kma2k  +   1261d ago
The SP of the game is definatly the sleeper pick for GOTY IMO. One of the best stories in a TPS game ive ever experinced!
iamnsuperman  +   1261d ago
I agree I loved the single player. The multiplayer wasn't bad just, I felt, it didn't really fit with the tone of the game, didn't really add anything and because of this not many play it.

I hope more people pick up this game because the single player story is great
#1.1 (Edited 1261d ago ) | Agree(7) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
-Alpha  +   1261d ago
Yup, publishers do this, and then developers eat the crap from fans
#2 (Edited 1261d ago ) | Agree(16) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
Bathyj  +   1261d ago
Just goes to show that not all games, (even shooters) need, or should have Multiplayer.

Even the devs are saying it now.
Freakazoid2012  +   1261d ago
If someone designed a car to be a single passenger car from the beginning and suddenly added in another 3 seats last minute would that also prove to you that having a car with more than one seat doesnt work?

IMO they made a poor design choice. Most games now come with online(even shooters,especially shooters actually) so for them to try to skip it was a bad decision. Not the publisher or shareholders fault for wanting the game to be able to compete with other shooters that will be right beside it on the shelf for the same price but have higher replay value because they have online.
jb1276  +   1261d ago
lulz to the headline
vitorizzo  +   1261d ago
who actually bought this game for its multiplayer anyway
dazzrazz  +   1261d ago
If it was only checkbox what was the point of all those beta test and almost year delay hmm...
Moby-Royale  +   1261d ago
Damn you're smart.

taquito   1261d ago | Trolling | show | Replies(2)

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
New stories

Earth Defense Force 4.1: The Shadow of New Despair Review – GameSpew

8m ago - Those invaders from outer space never learn do they? Save planet Earth once again by shooting bug... | PS4

Fortified Review I The Video Games

8m ago - Fortified is an explosive strategy shooter where players will defend the Earth against a menacing... | Xbox One

Gran Turismo SPORT Beta Testing Begins early 2016

Now - Start tracking GTS with's release date alert service and be notified when the GTS beta launches. | Promoted post

Life is Strange Episode One Review I The Video Games

9m ago - Life is Strange is a five part episodic game that sets out to revolutionise story based choice an... | Xbox One

MOP: Operation Cleanup Review (PS4) - Punk and Lizard

2h ago - SJ Hollis writes for P&L:"Oh good, a game about housework. I vacuum bi-monthly and I’ve not picke... | PS4

Review: XCOM 2 - Time to save Earth - Gaming Boulevard

2h ago - The guys of Gaming Boulevard uploaded their review of XCOM 2 and decided: XCOM 2 is a wonderfu... | PC