Eurogamer: "Hearthfire, the next slice of Elder Scrolls 5: Skyrim DLC, will arrive for Xbox 360 on 4th September, Bethesda has announced."
While this all looks quite fun, what I'd really like from Skyrim DLC is a separate adventure with self-contained map/landscape to explore, along the lines of Point Lookout in Fallout 3.
I just hope you can build your house everywhere and not just in some certain places.
I doubt it. From the way the video makes it sound, is that there are predetermined "free lots" available.
I get the feeling you'll be disappointed. They'll give you a choice of land to buy, but that's about as much choice as you'll have. Still, for 400 points, I don't suppose there's much to complain about.
Does this mean I have to start over because my "wife" died. Or can you just adopt any kid.
i can do this in pc about 8 months ago.
I have both the 360 and steam version, so I wont be buying this since I can already do this using the creation kit on steam.
I doubt it, that would mean a little effort from bethesdas part. "Download Hearthfire on Xbox live" Or alternatively, download the mod from skyrim nexus that does the exact same thing.
I'm sure they're working on something along Dawnguard or that as well. This comes across as more of a side-project as I see it. I would not mind pre-determined lots. It would be very difficult to program the ability to create homes anywhere and if there are enough lots it won't be at all bad. Though I expect someone to try modding a build-anywhere feature in.
wtf is this,fable?
I'm loving the sound of this but it's not really up to Shivering Isles expectations is it... I wouldn't complain really if these smaller DLCs were out quicker but to wait nearly a full year so you can adopt a child and build a house...well I don't know but it sounds kind of lame. With Shivering Isles we waited a year to explore a brand new region full with a massive plotline and tons of side quests...plus they added the houses DLC and the Orrey/Spell tombs in the massive gap.
S.I. was the only reason I played Oblivion longer than 20 hours. Such a repetitive game. S.I. made things unique and funny and neatly straight-forward.
I can't believe 360 owners are getting another DLC pack before PS3 owners even receive the first one. Doesn't anyone else(360 or PS3 owner)find this type of practice disgusting and utterly disrespectful? Bethesda has lost all respect from me. I will continue to buy their games used.
I love Xbox.
its coming soon, i dont see why not, just play something else until it does ;)
PS3 owners NEED to be smart and not support Bethesda in this. Bethesda is making too much of a profit in their dealings with Microsoft while screwing over PS3 owners. If PS3 owners jump on this DLC whenever it comes, like flies on crap, then Bethesda will keep doing this. 12
Hasn't this already been explained why for years now. Is it really necessary for you to stir the fanboy war over something that everyone on here knows about? 360 has done this for a reason, to give the 360 owners first dibs on timed DLC. It's called BUSINESS, I'm sure if PS3 did this (which they do) you would not be complaining.
I rented Skyrim for my ps3 and played it for 80 hours, that was more than enough to confirm for me that once again Bethesda was fucking over PS3 gamers. I brought Skyrim for my 360, if I had a better PC I would have got it for that. Bethesda has a long history of fucking over PS3 customers, they did it with Oblivion, both Fallouts, and now Skyrim. I feel bad for anyone that only has a ps3, but if you want a quality Bethesda game get it for PC or settle for 360.
That's funny, I played Oblivion on both consoles and I know for a fact that it ran better on the ps3. The 360 problems with loading times, as to where the ps3 version didn't nearly have as much. Go to any major gaming sites review on the game, it's one of the major differences between either version. Good one though troll. Oh, and if I was gonna settle for anything, it would be a machine that did more than play third party titles. In the meantime while you guys argue more about this, I'll just be waiting for the goty version when it sells for 15 bucks.
its coz ps3 sucks. no studio cares about it. its all xbox exclusivity.
actually i find this brillant. Xbox had a two dlc contract that allowed them to have them at least a month early than the ps3 (or two months for us PS3 guys) now they have ended that agreement with a small sh**ty dlc so when the third DLC comes out(hopfully it is bigger than Dawnguard) us ps3 guys wont have to wait as long(yes i know that bethesada will f**k it up but you get where i am coming from) it's a win, win.
"Microsoft desperately spends money on exclusive DLC because they dont pump out exclusive after exclusive game like PS3." Actually the 360 has more exclusives, more retail, indie, arcade, and lol DLC. As for the DLC, Sony does the same thing so stop pretending like it's only MS. In fact Sony has been spending money on timed exclusives before there was even an Xbox. all facts
I own both consoles. I'm loving Dawnguard on 360, feel bad for my friends who only own PS3 and have to wait, and am a bit jealous of my friends with Monster PC's who have access to all sorts of mods and extra content. You just have to make the most of what you have. Plenty of other games for PS3 owners to play until Bethesda gets it right. *shrug*
Microsoft must be making monthly payments to keep delaying the PS3 DLC. There's no good excuse for this crap. I don't believe their excuse that it doesn't run well enough on the PS3. They've had plenty of time to figure out the PS3.
JESUS CHRIST you ps3 guys really are wound up about this aren't you? chill out and go play god of war or something.
PS3 Skyrim is a failure and rotting.
like your comment ;)
how does a game rot? lmfao
They should have added Hardcore mode and get rid of the exploits in the game then this house would be usefull to use for cooking and other stuff...
I want it, but that adopt a child seems like a strange addition.
The adopt children thing was part of their GameJam feature, which was stuff they wanted to add to the game. This isn't surprising is my point. It's a way to make homes more interesting, I guess. I'm not going to complain about new features, especially if optional.
Wouldn't it be better to just let you screw your wife...unless a real dragonborn child would screw up the plot in future ES games.
That's what I was thinking. Time might be an issue there though, it would forever be a baby (after the long wait of pregnancy) or it would be like a time warping kid. I think this was their solution to that problem. That aside, couldn't the dragonborn child also help future plots?
I think they like to leave things from past characters alone while they move onto a new "special" character in the next game. I mean it probably wouldn't be as fun to be another dragonborn in the next game. Look at the champion of cyrodil in Oblivion we've hardly heard anything about him despite him saving the world 200 years ago. Still with time being quicker in this game...an hour being a minute or so in real life, the child would grow up pretty quickly then once it reaches a fully developed child they would just stop the aging process so it dosen't become as old as you. It would of been nice to teach your child all the shouts you've learnt.