IGN reviews Turok - If you don't move, this game can't see you

Closing comments from the review by IGN's Greg Miller:

"There's no doubt that Turok can be fun, but ultimately, the feeling of satisfaction that comes with slitting a raptor's throat or pulling off a headshot with your bow is lost in the shuffle of swarming enemies, less than stellar visuals and a story that disappears. Do I recommend Turok for folks just looking for a game to run through with two shotguns in hand? Yes, but I wouldn't expect to walk away from playing with your mind blown."


The X360 version got 7.3/10 overall score.

X360 version got 7/10 while PS3 got 6/10 to graphics. IGN's comments on the latter version:

"The Xbox problems complaints (jaggy corners and shiny guys) are here, and they're added to PS3-specific problems such as framerate issues, screen-tearing and worse textures."

The story is too old to be commented.
TheExecutive3736d ago

this score doesnt surprise me. The demo was lackluster. Nothing to see here.

antoinetm3736d ago

yup, they can give the ps3 version 2/10 and the 360 version 7/10 but for all i care, that game turned out to be a major disappointment, turok 1 was awsome tho.

Enough with the marines on steroids, its getting old, we need more ninjas, samurai and pirates!

imageicb3736d ago (Edited 3736d ago )

pretty much what I figured it would get after playing the demo.


the crave in the caves suck but once out in the forest it looks a lot better (demo)

Rice3736d ago

I played this game both on xbox 360 and ps3, and i agree, they both look like crap, and play like crap.

INehalemEXI3736d ago

yup, crap is what this is a 7 might mislead someone to think its good.

Rice3736d ago

i think ive misinterpreted what u said, are u trying to ridicule me.

mintaro3736d ago

i agree, this game was completely lackluster, nothing liked i hoped it would be

Show all comments (38)
The story is too old to be commented.