DSOGaming writes: "Remember back in July 2011, when DICE claimed that Frostbite 2 was too complex and that was the reason why the company did not release mod tools for Battlefield 3? Well, they were lying. We knew back then that there was something fishy but our guess back then was that DICE decided to lock Battlefield 3 because the release of those mod tools would ruin their DLC plans. We were partiartly right, as the company has planned BF3′s DLCs long before the game’s launch. However, it seems that there was and another reason that forced DICE to lie when it came to the game’s modding tools."
It's within their bloody rights not to release said code.
What about COD. They sell packs nobody wants.
A friend of mine just wants the zombie maps, not 1 fking map with aload of mp maps.
At least BF3 is giving the option of different gameplay.
But BF4 coming so soon is a major NO NO.
BF4 should have been on other planets.
pussie stick to the same tried and tested stuff.
They said they weren't comfortable about real easing mod tools and said its a scary business
And I'd rather have a secure game than a bunch of hackers running around shooting walls and getting kills
And the game is great without mod tools
Without modding capability, it's just a goofy twitch shooter with some slapped on vehicles, and half assed customization which is even less in depth than CoD.
I think you need to check that (and I don't even like CoD)
That in itself says "we are not releasing them because we have DLC" but doesn't straight up say it. Its a lot better than lying and saying its because of hacks.....
Not really , BF3 would be flooded with hackers otherwise , not saying they don't exist but come on of course there going to lie because consumers will complain regardless , easier just to come up with a ruse.
I mean come on think about it , if they told us the truth , the end result would still be the same , for example:
DICE says : "We will not be releasing mod tools because we want to protect our code from hackers and not allow mods tools to interfere with our DLC distribution."
What would be the response to that ? , probably similar I imagine along the lines of:
"EA/DICE suck" . but the game sales would probably be hindered.
Diablo 3 went the same route with hiding code and is barley piratable outside of an item emulator iirc , just face it the end user will always suffer as a result of pirates and hackers as well as big publishers pushing to maximise profits.
It really is a sad state of affairs.
That is what worries me the most , you hand over the keys , not sure what kind of havoc can be stirred up , maybe DICE is covering up security holes while EA wants to distribute DLC packs so it makes sense from there perspective of things to be like this.
Now COD on the other hand already had mod tools , dedicated servers with COD 4 and Activsion took those away and treats the PC community like dirt in comparison to EA/DICE who just added in an annoying client and didn't release mod tools.
I don't really have a problem with battlelog because it runs faster and is a lot less clunky than the in-game BF2 browser tbh.
Guess what I am saying is be careful what you wish for , neither company is a saint but one will screw you over a lot more than the other in the long run, depending on your gaming background of course.
(A LOT)
They also gave 360 one of its best games, which is funny because they are a pc dev.If only they had more money so they could bring the 2nd to ps3 as well.
I don't like EA at all. They are even worse than activision. The only thing they EA had over Activision is that they didn't milk games AS MUCH, now they are going the milk route.
In short, I only buy products from 2K, Ubi, THQ Sony and Microsoft. EA and Activision don't care about us gamers, they would throw us under the bus for their non-gaming 50 year old share holders.
As much as I imagine DICE wanted to give us some tools to use, the higher ups at EA probably shut them down pretty quickly because you can't exactly profit off of it.
EA doesn't see money in allowing gamers to create things themselves. It's easier to block it, and release DLC.
I'll be playing Arma 3 and Planetside 2!
Battlefield is DEAD to me
Battlefield Born 1942-Died BF3
http://www.engadget.com/201...
First ever game to do this..
Sad because the vanilla maps were bad and the community would have created way better content than that close quarters rubbish
"Remember back in July 2011.." Yes, I do, back when there were a dozen of these articles and they were still topical.