60°
Submitted by Ben_Giff 1116d ago | opinion piece

You can't teach an old game new tricks

Can reviews of old games become inaccurate or ‘wrong’ as the medium evolves?

The PC version of this game has a very positive 89/100 on Metacritic (based on 32 reviews). Fans like it even more, with some 249 ratings bestowing an average score of 9.1/10, yet this is one of the worst games I’ve played recently. The level design is bland, the AI is unfair, the difficulty is too high and the story arc is unbalanced. While there are glimpses of good writing and a few innovative ideas, it still pales in comparison to nearly every other video game today. (Max Payne, Metacritic, PC, PS2, Retro)

wallis  +   1116d ago
Okay - proof read your god damn articles if you're going to even pretend to be a "writer" of any kind. You forget to mention the game (max Payne) in the first sentence rendering this entire article a terrible exercise in confusion - how hard is it to read the fucking article you just wrote? Or better yet! Give it to a friend!

Movies get magazines and red carpets and video games get journalists who don't even proof read their work.
#1 (Edited 1116d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(4) | Report | Reply
Ben_Giff  +   1116d ago
Typos generally don't invalidate articles, and everyone makes them. I intentionally left the game's title out of the paragraph because I wanted to describe it for readers without bringing in their biases.

Edit: I'm not really sure what you're talking about. I went back to proofread (a second time), and added a comma and changed two words.
#2 (Edited 1116d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
jeeves86  +   1115d ago
You can't really review a game by today's standards. You always have to take into consideration the fact that it's an old game, that the technology that powers our games has changed dramatically. So to put it bluntly, you could have said that Max Payne has not stood the test of time.

Incidentally, if you wanted to be descriptive, describe the title and its characteristics in the first two paragraphs. If people have to read halfway through the review just to get the title of the game you're reviewing, it becomes a chore rather than a pleasure to read. And then people get mad. Just look at our friend wallis up there.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
20°

The Swindle Review - The Gamers Lounge

11m ago - The Swindle offers a unique gameplay experience, one that has equal chances of catching you with... | PS4
40°

Mad Max Review: Brutal, Brash, Bone-Breaking Fun - The Games Cabin

11m ago - Mad Max isn’t the best game you’ll play this year but if you’re a fan of the movies and you’re st... | PC
Ad

Check What PC Games are Coming Out in August

Now - At Releases.com you can check release dates for PC games. Visit now and start tracking the games you plan to buy. | Promoted post
30°

PCEWorks: The Gems Bundle Review I Hey Poor Player

29m ago - PCEWorks has released their latest love letter to NEC’s PC Engine with The Gems Bundle. This coll... | Retro
30°

Podcast 49 - Sports, Sports...and Sports

35m ago - Retro Game Fix writes "What better week to talk about sports than Madden week? We talk about our... | Retro
40°

TechRaptor: Senran Kagura 2: Deep Crimson Review - Jiggle Jiggle Jiggle

40m ago - TechRaptor: Senran Kagura 2: Deep Crimson is the sequel of Senran Kagura Full Burst, also known a... | 3DS