60°
Submitted by Ben_Giff 962d ago | opinion piece

You can't teach an old game new tricks

Can reviews of old games become inaccurate or ‘wrong’ as the medium evolves?

The PC version of this game has a very positive 89/100 on Metacritic (based on 32 reviews). Fans like it even more, with some 249 ratings bestowing an average score of 9.1/10, yet this is one of the worst games I’ve played recently. The level design is bland, the AI is unfair, the difficulty is too high and the story arc is unbalanced. While there are glimpses of good writing and a few innovative ideas, it still pales in comparison to nearly every other video game today. (Max Payne, Metacritic, PC, PS2, Retro)

wallis  +   962d ago
Okay - proof read your god damn articles if you're going to even pretend to be a "writer" of any kind. You forget to mention the game (max Payne) in the first sentence rendering this entire article a terrible exercise in confusion - how hard is it to read the fucking article you just wrote? Or better yet! Give it to a friend!

Movies get magazines and red carpets and video games get journalists who don't even proof read their work.
#1 (Edited 962d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(4) | Report | Reply
Ben_Giff  +   962d ago
Typos generally don't invalidate articles, and everyone makes them. I intentionally left the game's title out of the paragraph because I wanted to describe it for readers without bringing in their biases.

Edit: I'm not really sure what you're talking about. I went back to proofread (a second time), and added a comma and changed two words.
#2 (Edited 962d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
jeeves86  +   962d ago
You can't really review a game by today's standards. You always have to take into consideration the fact that it's an old game, that the technology that powers our games has changed dramatically. So to put it bluntly, you could have said that Max Payne has not stood the test of time.

Incidentally, if you wanted to be descriptive, describe the title and its characteristics in the first two paragraphs. If people have to read halfway through the review just to get the title of the game you're reviewing, it becomes a chore rather than a pleasure to read. And then people get mad. Just look at our friend wallis up there.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
30°

CGM Reviews: Dragon Ball: Xenoverse

35m ago - Not since George Carlin gave a time travelling phone-booth to Bill S. Preston, Esq. and Ted “Theo... | Xbox 360
20°

Can a Bad Sequel Hurt the Original Work?

37m ago - Some of the best loved videogames—ones like Silent Hill 2, Assassin’s Creed II, and Mass Effect 2... | Industry
Ad

Study Game Design at DeVry

Now - DeVry University, is an accredited* university offering you the flexibility of over 90 locations, online courses and a wide variety of bachelor's a... | Promoted post
30°

Zoot Plays Slender: The Arrival Review

47m ago - Developed by Blue Isles Studios, Slender: The Arrival is a first-person fetch-quest and run-like-... | PS4
20°

Pillars of Eternity – Crafting Guide

47m ago - GamingSoFar: An important part of the game, which sooner or later everyone comes into contact, is... | PC
20°

World Of Warships Beta Gameplay Video

47m ago - Skewed and Reviewed have posted some gameplay video of World of Warships. The game is the latest... | PC