60°
Submitted by Ben_Giff 991d ago | opinion piece

You can't teach an old game new tricks

Can reviews of old games become inaccurate or ‘wrong’ as the medium evolves?

The PC version of this game has a very positive 89/100 on Metacritic (based on 32 reviews). Fans like it even more, with some 249 ratings bestowing an average score of 9.1/10, yet this is one of the worst games I’ve played recently. The level design is bland, the AI is unfair, the difficulty is too high and the story arc is unbalanced. While there are glimpses of good writing and a few innovative ideas, it still pales in comparison to nearly every other video game today. (Max Payne, Metacritic, PC, PS2, Retro)

wallis  +   991d ago
Okay - proof read your god damn articles if you're going to even pretend to be a "writer" of any kind. You forget to mention the game (max Payne) in the first sentence rendering this entire article a terrible exercise in confusion - how hard is it to read the fucking article you just wrote? Or better yet! Give it to a friend!

Movies get magazines and red carpets and video games get journalists who don't even proof read their work.
#1 (Edited 991d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(4) | Report | Reply
Ben_Giff  +   991d ago
Typos generally don't invalidate articles, and everyone makes them. I intentionally left the game's title out of the paragraph because I wanted to describe it for readers without bringing in their biases.

Edit: I'm not really sure what you're talking about. I went back to proofread (a second time), and added a comma and changed two words.
#2 (Edited 991d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
jeeves86  +   990d ago
You can't really review a game by today's standards. You always have to take into consideration the fact that it's an old game, that the technology that powers our games has changed dramatically. So to put it bluntly, you could have said that Max Payne has not stood the test of time.

Incidentally, if you wanted to be descriptive, describe the title and its characteristics in the first two paragraphs. If people have to read halfway through the review just to get the title of the game you're reviewing, it becomes a chore rather than a pleasure to read. And then people get mad. Just look at our friend wallis up there.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
10°

eSports: An open letter to ESPN's Colin Cowherd

7m ago - A veteran gamer takes a direct shot back at ESPN's Colin Cowherd following the anchors disrespect... | Culture
20°

Mortal Kombat X Review | Fortress of Solitude

23m ago - The controversial poster child for ultra-violent fighting games, Netherrealm’s Mortal Kombat, is... | PC
Ad

Xenoblade Chronicles 3D (3DS) Review

Now - Justin takes the latest 3DS remaster for a spin. | Promoted post
20°

A Few Second Thoughts on Mortal Kombat X: Easy Fatalities, Tough QTEs

23m ago - KDH News: "Sometimes having a word limit can really stunt my opinion of a game. I like to hit eve... | PC
10°

Mortal Kombat X Review | 3KB | Gamester 81

23m ago - Jay is back and on this episode of 3KB, he squares off against Mortal Kombat X in another compre... | PC
20°

10 3DS eShop Games You Really Should Play

23m ago - The 3DS eShop wasn't even available when Nintendo's portable launched, but now it's home to some... | 3DS