Try our new beta!Click here
60°
Submitted by Ben_Giff 1277d ago | opinion piece

You can't teach an old game new tricks

Can reviews of old games become inaccurate or ‘wrong’ as the medium evolves?

The PC version of this game has a very positive 89/100 on Metacritic (based on 32 reviews). Fans like it even more, with some 249 ratings bestowing an average score of 9.1/10, yet this is one of the worst games I’ve played recently. The level design is bland, the AI is unfair, the difficulty is too high and the story arc is unbalanced. While there are glimpses of good writing and a few innovative ideas, it still pales in comparison to nearly every other video game today. (Max Payne, Metacritic, PC, PS2, Retro)

wallis  +   1277d ago
Okay - proof read your god damn articles if you're going to even pretend to be a "writer" of any kind. You forget to mention the game (max Payne) in the first sentence rendering this entire article a terrible exercise in confusion - how hard is it to read the fucking article you just wrote? Or better yet! Give it to a friend!

Movies get magazines and red carpets and video games get journalists who don't even proof read their work.
#1 (Edited 1277d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(4) | Report | Reply
Ben_Giff  +   1277d ago
Typos generally don't invalidate articles, and everyone makes them. I intentionally left the game's title out of the paragraph because I wanted to describe it for readers without bringing in their biases.

Edit: I'm not really sure what you're talking about. I went back to proofread (a second time), and added a comma and changed two words.
#2 (Edited 1277d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
jeeves86  +   1276d ago
You can't really review a game by today's standards. You always have to take into consideration the fact that it's an old game, that the technology that powers our games has changed dramatically. So to put it bluntly, you could have said that Max Payne has not stood the test of time.

Incidentally, if you wanted to be descriptive, describe the title and its characteristics in the first two paragraphs. If people have to read halfway through the review just to get the title of the game you're reviewing, it becomes a chore rather than a pleasure to read. And then people get mad. Just look at our friend wallis up there.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
20°

Is it time E3 opened its doors to gamers?

9m ago - MCV: E3 must find a way to incorporate more consumers into the show, say leading games industry... | Culture
20°

Patches and the dreaded “Day One” – Reasons to Be Cheerful

15m ago - Lee Garbutt: "It’s Monday, so you probably need cheering up – So here I am with another Reason to... | PC
Ad

Track the Release Date for PlayStation VR

Now - Sony is yet to reveal the exact release date for PlayStation VR. Start tracking it now using Releases.com | Promoted post
30°

What's so great about Undertale and The Witness?

15m ago - DTOID: It's a secret!, Spoilers. In the last few months, two games were released that I feel mig... | The Witness
30°

PS4/PS3/PS Vita Exclusive Attack on Titan Gets New Video, Hilarious Count-Down Art

15m ago - Just ten days to go until the release in Japan of Attack on Titan for PS4, PS3 and PS Vita, and K... | PS3
30°

Is it about time to revive the WW2 shooter?

15m ago - Apparently so, Battalion 1944. Years ago, World War II shooters were everywhere. Then the bubble... | Call of Duty