150°
Submitted by QuinnSullivan 621d ago | news

Resident Evil 6 Agent Hunt Mode Revealed

For those who want to experience the action as a zombie, J’avo or other C-virus mutation then the all new online mode Agent Hunt delivers. (PS3, Resident Evil 6, Xbox 360)

Attached Video
Alternative Sources
Irishguy95  +   621d ago
Not Zombie...just saying. These really shouldn't be called Zombies
QuinnSullivan  +   621d ago
Title has been changed. Thank you for the advice. [not being sarcastic].
QuinnSullivan  +   621d ago
Errr, that came off sarcastically.
Mike_Tha_Hero  +   620d ago
Wow can we give the zombie shit a rest already? Accept the game for what it is.
Irishguy95  +   620d ago
What makes you think i'm not accepting it? I'm just saying, the title used to say you could play as zombies(t Virus ones). But you play as C virus guys in this, run around with a machete
helghast102  +   620d ago
I have accepted the game for what it is.
A piece of shit not worthy of bearing the Resident Evil name with the only connection to the series being the names of some characters.

See? Accepted, dealt with.
Mike_Tha_Hero  +   620d ago
Yet you went out of your way to click on the story. Get a life my dude.
user5467007  +   621d ago
Wow an online mode aswell thats like the one in Dead Space 2

This is game is going to suck balls

RIP Resident Evil
LOGICWINS  +   621d ago
Agreed. I hate it when games add extra modes that add more value to the package.
Skate-AK  +   621d ago
Haha I really can't tell if you were being sarcastic or actually agree.
Irishguy95  +   621d ago
Agreed Logic, more content = ****
cgoodno  +   621d ago
Depends on how much it detracts from the quality of the single player game, Logic.
LOGICWINS  +   620d ago
Just because resources were used for other modes doesn't automatically mean that resources were taken away from the main game. For example, just because Dead Space 2 had a multiplayer component doesn't mean that resources were taken away from the single player component.

You don't know how many resources devs intended to allocate for each portion of the game. The single player portion of RE6 was most likely completed WAAAY before this mode was even conceived.

Assuming that RE6 was a single player campaign only game(no multiplayer, no extra modes), can you "prove" that Capcom would have used their extra resources to make the SP game better than the one we are getting now?
#2.1.4 (Edited 620d ago ) | Agree(7) | Disagree(1) | Report
cgoodno  +   620d ago
***Just because resources were used for other modes doesn't automatically mean that resources were taken away from the main ***

I didn't say it did. I said, specifically, that it depends on how much it DOES detract from the quality of the single player game. That could mean it doesn't (Zero Detraction).

***For example, just because Dead Space 2 had a multiplayer component doesn't mean that resources were taken away from the single player component.***

You don't know that it wasn't. But, we do know that many people felt that multiplayer did not add anything worthwhile to the game and felt that some of the 'horror' element was removed from it to make it more of an action game. Does this mean that focusing only on SP could have made a better single player experience? I don't know, but with the lackluster multiplayer, I think many people wouldn't have minded to find out. Or, they wouldn't have minded a much better multiplayer experience for the time and effort that was put into it.

***The single player portion of RE6 was most likely completed WAAAY before this mode was even conceived. ***

You don't know that, which you should know since your preceding statement said just that.

***Assuming that RE6 was a single player campaign only game(no multiplayer, no extra modes), can you "prove" that Capcom would have used their extra resources to make the SP game better than the one we are getting now?***

No, but I can say that if the single player game is lackluster compared to the previous games that they should have invested more money into it. If they couldn't, it could very easily be determined that money that was used to make the multiplayer game could have been used to improve the single player experience.

Would it be 100% accurate? No, but it would still be a fair assessment of the situation. Does that mean the multiplayer sucks because the single player experience doesn't hold up well? No, but that's beside the point, isn't it?

Again, I never claimed they had, but I said that it depends on how much it detracts from the quality of the single player game. I didn't say it did, I said if it does.
#2.1.5 (Edited 620d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report
Sevir  +   620d ago
Considering that There are 4 Capcom branches working on this game
with over 500 bodies coding, animating, processing and developing this game for the last 3 years I doubt this mode was just tacked on 3 months ago!

I hate when gamers who complain about added content and assume its tacked on, You dont know how much resources was dedicated to added content or how much time planning and effort was put into having it up and running. how do you just assume its taking away from the single player experience!

I'm not sure why you haters care soo much about the game anyway when you say you hate this game, and how much its going to suck!. if it sucks to you right now, save yourself the trouble and disappointment and stay the F*** off the threads that pertain to this game!
Blackpool  +   620d ago
Hmm, haven't heard DLC yet lol.
DigitalRaptor  +   620d ago
Normally I think that the old excuse that adding multiplayer detracts from the single player experience is a load of crap, but in this case it definitely hadn't done it any favours. With RE6 it seems that Capcom are trying to build a game that offers a lot of content and value rather than focus on what series fans want to see.

If you don't mind playing an action game and are looking forward to it, then at least respect the ones who are pissed off about the lack of survival horror because they're probably bigger fans of the series than you are. At any rate this "extra option" is not the first sign that RE6 is not the game many of us care about anymore, and is sadly becoming a franchise of similar stature. Unnecessary gratuitous nudity, live (not zombie) enemies that shoot back at you, the lack of the scares that are expected from the franchise.and numerous other things.

The story at least looks interesting, which is why a rental is the best Capcom are gonna get from me.
#3 (Edited 620d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
Sainox16  +   620d ago
Wow not a DLC package thanks capcom

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
30°

4 Hollywood Trends Video Games Need To Steal (And A Couple They Don’t)

5m ago - A video game Avengers and other Hollywood inspired ideas that could take video games to the next... | Industry
20°

The Evil Within: Why the Game Will Be Really Scary

5m ago - Vgamerz writes: "There’s been a lot of talking lately about the upcoming The Evil Within and the... | PC
10°

Goat Simulator – Review | ReviewMango

5m ago - Goat Simulator isn’t a game that will occupy you for more than an hour, two if you’re lucky — but... | PC
20°

Trials Fusion Review | Super Clash Gaming

5m ago - The game offers a rich variety of levels with varying difficulties for the player to experience.... | PC
Ad

Enter to Win a PS4 and More!

Now - We are buying one lucky N4Ger a PS4 just for commenting on any N4G story! | Promoted post
20°

Journey & Flower Dev – Wii U “A Possibility” For Next Project

5m ago - Thatgamecompany, the team behind popular PSN titles Flower and Journey have revealed that their n... | Wii U
Related content from friends