In a recent Tokyo Game Show interview with Sony worldwide studios head Phil Harrison, he denied that the PS3's Blu-ray movie capabilities are handicapping the console's cost effectiveness
Ive said it before and ill say it again this guys talks the biggest load of rubbish,barbie kens got his hand up his a@@ pulling his strings.IGNORE this nub....
there is no way a blue ray player costs 350$ for sony, this redicolous. many ppl argue, that sony sell blue ray for movies, to sell more movies, but i think this is bs, because with what make they more money with ps + games or with movies ??? i bet with ps+games, so i am sure they will care about games more than about movies.
Blu-Ray players retail for $1000!
A $350 cost for Sony sounds right on.
Yeah yeah whatever,wtf you on of course blue rays for movies are you stupit or just blinded by your utter fanboy mentality,why the hell do you think sony are incorperating the blue ray into ps3,TO TRY and gett blue ray in to as many homes as it can,its a TROGEN HORSE now you can beleive any old [email protected]
Richie, Richie, Richie. If you're so against "Trojan Horses" then I guess you're against Sony-built DVD players that are common throughout the states. In fact, you shouldn't even be playing DVDs because they were injected into the market via the PS2.
For what you say, your bubble should be rubbed off.
Standalone Blu-ray players cost $1000, compared to $40 progressive scan DVD players at Walmart, so I believe the $350 cost estimate.
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.