Battlefield 4: why it's time to go back to the future

OXM - EA's Frank Gibeau would like to remind you that Medal of Honor: Warfighter is not a Battlefield clone, should you have any doubts as to the clear and unambiguous gulf between one's brand of gritty death and the other's brand of deathly grit. "We are very careful that Battlefield and Medal of Honor stay differentiated," he told Game Informer this week (via AOTF). "There is an inefficiency to having two different brands coming out alternating like that, [but] there is some upside. You don't have the annualized sequel fatigue. With Medal of Honor we tried to embrace that the game is real. The multiplayer is different than Battlefield. We're trying to use a sequencing strategy to keep it as fresh and different as possible."

The story is too old to be commented.
-Mezzo-2279d ago

Great find, i totally missed that.

Somebody2279d ago

I guess there's your valid reason for the Skyrim fans calling for fixing the 2GB RAM limit when it first came out. 64 bit is inevitable.

I've seen a lot of flight sim players use Win 7 64 bit long before BF3 made it cool. And Arma 3 demands that you have 64bit for it.

Fishy Fingers2279d ago

I still think there's plenty of scope for BF3 to improve and grow, no real need for a direct sequel in just 24 months. Me, I'd prefer a sequel to 2142.

gazgriff2k122279d ago

i think they saw black ops 2 and thought i want a piece of that im guessing battlefield 4 will be set in 2024 not 2124 or 2012

h311rais3r2278d ago

Uh bf did future long before CoD did. It's called 2142.............

gazgriff2k122278d ago (Edited 2278d ago )

BIG difference between 2024 & 2124 and still want dino's.

ps stfu&tmm primal carage looks crap

KontryBoy7062278d ago

I want bad company 3. Bring back REAL destruction