Though Devil May Cry 4 was initially scheduled for Playstation 3 only, CAPCOM shows their mastered skills with Microsoft's Hardware in this port. This comparison shows head to head captures from both Demos released today.
360 ver looks better, oh well another ps3 game i wont be buying, good job capcom.
davez82, I'm willing to guess that you were born in 1982 (maybe) and that you are 29 years old. You are way too old to behaving like a child, no matter how sad the PS3 fans are on this site, you shouldn't be just like them just because they get to you.. act your age man. Be the better person and act dignified. 1.3 - @TheSadTruth I don't disagree with the comment about childishness, just the comment about being able to be born in 1982 and 29 in 2008 at the same time. *Typo my bad, but you get my point. 26 is basically the same as 29 in terms of maturity and if you are over 12 you shouldn't be behaving like that.
It is from AQUANOX in the psu forum AQUANOX is banned from posting in the ps3 section in PSU.He only posts in the x360 section He posted the pictures of x360 versions in VGA/COMPONENT and claimed them to be ps3s. OTHERS check here :- http://www.ps3forums.com/sh... look at aquanox sig on the left ALSO aquanox doesnt have a ps3 Please be advised that FULL RANGE RGB/SUPER WHITE on PS3 could be turned on ONLY with HDMI 1.3 However you cannot record HDMI 1.3 streams if you dont have PS3 SDK a normal user like AQUANOX wont have the PS3 SDK (costs 25000$) to record HDMI streams @jenzo the Gamersyde video wasnt done by the people at that site. It was sent to them by DOT50CAL --a random user PROOF :- "Dot50cal sent us this nice comparison video of both demos of Devil May Cry 4 on PS3 and 360. " so it wasnt done by people at Gamersyde . they actually posted the video sent to them . Ofcourse the ps3 version had RGB PARTIAL/SUPERWHITE turned off since a random user cannot record streams on HDMI 1.3 and SUPER WHITE/RGB FULL are turned on ONLY WHEN YOU USE HDMI :) so the video comparison/screenshots are FAKE
I don't disagree with the comment about childishness, just the comment about being able to be born in 1982 and 29 in 2008 at the same time.
Now if you want to make your own judgement about which looks better http://img156.imageshack.us... The right side is the 360, the left is the ps3. I honestly thought they both looked the same until I resized both. One obviously looks better but I won't point it out, you can judge for yourself since I'd prefer to keep my 2nd bubble for a few more weeks. I don't enjoy this kind of game anyways personally and don't even own a HDTV. ' And for those that are delusional out there.. look at the bottom of the sword.. they are both resized to the same proportions also (you can do it yourself if you want) edit: @Zambrota Like I said I'm not one to make biased judgments and I'm not saying the PS3 version sucks or anything nor do I know anything about the pics I'm just posting about what is in front of me If you are right then obviously it's a poor comparison to make
the pics were posted by AQUANOX an XBOT in the PSU forum He is banned from posting in the ps3 section Others see the GAMERTAG of AQUANOX here http://www.ps3forums.com/me... http://www.ps3forums.com/sh... check AQUANOX gamer tag too He doesnt own a ps3. He posted the pictures of x360 versions in VGA/COMPONENT and clailed them to be ps3s
"davez82, I'm willing to guess that you were born in 1982 (maybe) and that you are 29 years old. You are way too old to behaving like a child, no matter how sad the PS3 fans are on this site, you shouldn't be just like them just because they get to you.. act your age man. Be the better person and act dignified." oh please, get off your pedestal, I'm a consumer and I decide how I spend my money, it has nothing to do with maturity. If i see im getting the bad end of the stick then im not forking over my money. And a lot of ps3 owners feel the same, look at games like rainbow six, it woulda sold way more if it had been at least an equal port, capcom will lose big on the ps3 side, word gets around fast.
Born on 1982 = 29 years old??? Think you needed to emphasize a little bit more on math... too late I guess
Once again we sit here and look at picture from an unknown source. And once again people eat it up like it's fact. Let's see a comparison by a site that can be trusted. This is what loot-ninja.com said: "The controls felt a little tighter on the PS3 version simply because that is what the game was designed to be on and that’s what we used to from previous DMC games. The Xbox 360 is virtually identical to its PS3 counterpart, but it does have rumble. You can’t go wrong with either version." PS3 owners say: "It doenst look like this on my screen. It sadly looks like a person trying to manipulate the results to fit his own twisted needs."
xbox 360 = 512 mb video card ram ps3 = 256 mb video card ram all because cliffy b. go cliffy b.
Dont you think he got banned from ps3forums.com because he was showing pics that show the xbox 360 as being better?? yeaa that wouldnt happen on a xbox fanboy site if the situation was reversed right...anyways...these are some terrible pics too have comparisons with...the only pic i think was different was the dragon ones and they were not that different.
@1.9 The Xbox has more ram but the ps3 has faster clock speeds. plus it can access the xdr any time.
N4G = Fony PofS3 fan site! either that or lot of people need to get there eyes checked.
Doesn't he link it to Gamersyde?
Try blaming gamersyde instead, that's where he got the pics from. http://www.gamersyde.com/ne...
Thats it, I quit the comments section on n4g. I cant handle these immature little b!tchboys arguing over which version looks better, just for the sake of being right and somehow feeling superior. The comments get worse as I read them, and its finally made me realize that there are some things you need to ignore, and that logic and reasoning is pointless to try and use on them. There is no longer any room for discussion about games anymore, it's all just a great big f*cking contest on who has the best game console. Grow the hell up, seriously, talk about the actual game, and compare it if you must, but be civilized about it and stop throwing around these stupid "hahaha, just shows that X is always better than Y, and Y is not as good as X, and your stupid for thinking that you fanboi drone" comments. Not like any of you will listen, as a comment that tries to balance everything out is always seen as "fanboyism". Correct me if I am wrong, but I thought games were created to be fun, not to be argued and bicker over. Guess I thought wrong... /rant
You're posting your own fanthread in a forum for PS3 users with screenshots from the biggest Xbox fanboy site, that were taken by a NOBODY random guy as a submission to N4G news? Anyone who does that is TRYING to prove something desperately. This is complete propaganda at its fullest effect. I can't believe people are saying "thats it, i'm buying the 360 version for sure now" based on this comparison, its ludecrous! if you say that, you never intended to buy the PS3 version, and most likely don't own a PS3. Even if they WERE true, its not that much different. I know for sure there fake because looking at my own TV with my own eyes, the PS3 version doesn't look like that. Its like all the credible sites are saying, there is no difference graphically, it all comes down to controller choice, and for me its DualShock 3 all the way.
I don't see how anyone can say the 360 version looks better. First, the screen shots are mostly horrible choices to show anything. Most of the PS3 shots are nothing but dark areas so you can't compare them. But just look at the last shot. The sword is a lot smoother on the PS3 side. The 360 side seems to have a lot of jaggedness to the sword.
"360 has 512 video ram" its a fact the the 360 has 512mb of total memory, so if all of it is for video, where is its system ram? if you had more than $hit for brains youd know that the 360 has 512mb of shared GDDR3 for the video AND system. The ps3 has 256 dedicated GDDR3 for video and 256 dedicated XDR ram @ 3.2 ghz. and as someone has pointed out, its possible to access all of the ram from anywhere on the system. You = fail.
I'm still surprised MS managed to get bad boy away from Sony, but I would naturally assume it would look better on the PS3 ----> Here comes the...outright denial
These are Japanese programmers were talking about. Not EA/Ubisoft.
It looks almost identical. The only difference is when it shows the swords in the middle. The 360 has more jaggies. that is the only diff i see.
Played the demo... It was, as I suspected, just like the others. The graphics on the ps3 version didn't interest me in the least. I didn't say WOW, one time. I didn't enjoy the demo at all. It was like I stepped back to 2001 again. I cannot comment on the xbox 360 version, but ... Ps3 fans, wait for this one to drop in price. It's not even worth a download.
I have to say that I don't agree one bit. The demo is well worth the download, and the graphics/environments are great in this game. Floor textures etc look amazing, and I would recommend this demo to everyone, just for the imagery. Got it for the PS3, haven't downloaded it on the Xbox 360 yet, since I prefer the PS3 controller for these kinds of games.
Damn, I thought the Ps3 one would look better!
It does. I dont know what versiuon you guys are looking at.
DMC4 PS3 component vs x360 component: http://www.xboxperu.com/for... NGS4 PS3 hdmi vs PS3 component: http://super.gameshot.net/p... http://super.gameshot.net/p...
yup.. 360 screenshots are better.. looks like a lot of jaggies on the ps3 side, and the ground looks better on 360. It just looks kinda blurry.. then again.. always wonder what is doing the screen capture.. just play the demo see for yourself. I wonder how the controls are on the 360 though.. ive heard some things.
what jaggies, my you please point them out to me?
Look on the edge of sword and hair - better AA on 360 (thanks to free AA developers get form the built in function on 360).
I have to say that you guys are wrong. I see jaggies on the 360 side. The sword has a lot more on the bottom pic. Other than that I see 0 difference.
Ok, now I'm hearing that both versions have jaggies. I'm also hearing a lot of confusion about where the photos originated from. Therefore, I'm going to download the PS3 version first. If I see any problems with it I will check out the 360 version. If there are no problems with the PS3 version I will likely buy that version for the simple fact that DMC was born on the Playstation. I can wait for the dual shock 3 to come out for the rumble, which is possibly the only real reason to buy the 360 version. Make sense?
the 360 version looks a lot better. Poor PS3. No matter how people want to look at it, they just got it handed to them this gen. They overlooked the gaming aspect of the console. It's not just Devil May Cry 4, it's every multi platform game. The results don't lie, the 360 can deliver the better result. It's XBOX 360 the one that should cost more. That's just the way it is.
omg, you should be in comedy. sorry turdbreath, I can actually afford both consoles and the PS3 version on HDMI with the proper settings takes a HUGEEE dump on the flat dull and sluggish gameplay of the 360 version. it is absolutely amazing the lengths MS has gone to this generation to try to increase their market share. When are they gonna realize the world hates microsoft and their crap products.
rofl 360 am win flame on bu teh cell? lazy dev
u illiterate bag of she3t go die
360 looks better does not mean it plays better
Even though lots of peeps will be in denial the 360 has better textures again (hint unified memory vs split). Now WATCH 'EM SQUIRM and say they don't care about the game .. :)
dude, they're the same. lmao
Thanks Martini, always great to get the input from the short bus crowd.
what they should have done was have 2 of each shot, one with 360 on the right, and one with it on the left, and vice versa with ps3. though it does seem that the ps3 version has more jaggies.
That is because 360 AA is done without any hit on the graphics which is the reason why some multiplat games have better AA on the 360. Other than the few more jaggies, everything looks the same. The textures, the gameplay, the same crappy VA.
no worries, i know how the "Free" aa works on 360. but its only effective at 720p though. anything higher and it doesn't make a difference.
That's just stupid. Compare the retail version, idiots.
The game's out in a few weeks, it will not change when it shipps. I have to say i downloaded both demos and u can hardly tell any differences between the two. And on top of that i have my 360 running via component and my ps3 via hdmi. And no this game will not be running at a native resolution of 1080p
LOL! Xbots falling all over themselves to post their sad little "teh 360 looks better" comments. So utterly pathetic. 60 bucks for the second worst DMC game with last gen graphics? LOL!
Last gen? Did you say last gen? Man you just set a new benchmark for stupidity
I hope someone lets them hear about this. What more excuses are they gonna make? I'm sure it will be the same for Grand Theft Auto 4 also. The PS3 version is just an afterthought port. I'm one less person who's buying a PS3.
uve been added to weak ass nerd list, ur head will fall soon. i would smash ur face into the floor and then relinquish bodily fluids onto ur unconcious corpse.
@ psycho San Son you need counseling. These are just games no need to go all rambo over it. Now go and get rid of your shotgun and go to school.
PS3 has the CELL - 360 shouldn't be able to keep up, I dont understand
That's because you fell into the hype trap - it's happen before (PS2) they claimed it's more poverfull then computers back then... lol.. Live and learn
LOL! This thread is absolute GOLD! 'Keep up'!!! Capcom had to gimp this game to fit in the smaller than last gen 7 gig 360 DVD discs and wimpy graphics hardware. So yes, the PS3 is gimped down to 360 level graphics too.
Microsoft paid off those jaggies
The Cell has nothing to do with it. This is a Multiplatform game so you have to develop it to the lowest denominator
is starting to wear off, don't worry this is normal after the first year of promises and under deliverence.
the 360 can NEVER keep up with the cell, proof?? Resistance 2 and Uncharted wave hi to the xbots on the short bus.
Lol. The news about plain previews about DMC4 don't get a lot of hits, but the comparison image posts do. Shows you that a lot of 360 and PS3 fans aren't interested in the game at all, just interested in which version looks better. Looks like Capcom won't be making a lot of money with this game...
..The 360 version doesn't even feel like 60 fps. Major frame rate drops. Instead of making a game that runs as smooth as the PS3 version, they chose to focus on graphics more, ruining the DMC experience. Meh. We should compare the retail versions IN ACTION.
yea it felt wierd playing a action adventure game on 360 and not a fps, but still i love my 360 and the demo is good but i must say do not campare fucn demos.. compare shots of real game not a file on the hardrive its stupid and not fair and has nothin to do which system is more powerful
The PS3 ??
oh wat a joy it will be killing u silly american nerd. smash smash smash right in the skull. thats it u will moan. please daddy noo0oo?!?!?! GROUND N POUND MOFO
Wait kinda like how the PS2 was the lowest of the last gen systems? Maybe hating on the internet wasnt as big back then, but I seemed to remember people enjoying games because they were fun to play, not arguing over whose console is gimping everyone.
didnt burnout 3 look way better on xbox than it did on ps2? hell yes. did tony hawk 2 look the same on dreamcast as it did on ps1? I dont think so. If the Ps3 was more powerfull they could easily make the game look better than the 360 version.
The last 4 multiplats have shown the edge in graphics to the PS3, yet the PS3 haters out there have to make up information and blatantly lie through your teeth so you feel better for staying with the 360? Your as bad as POG saying the PS3 is still selling less than the 360 when world wide sales show the opposite...since the end of last year. I played the PS3 version this morning and found it quite enjoyable even though I have never played any of the original 3. I am downloading the 360 version while I am here at work and will look how it plays tonight. As for the game itself, I probably will not be a first purchase for me, but if there is a coupon for a reduced price or something, I can see picking it up for the PS3.
This isn't a big shock, people. 3rd party games prove nothing on cell architettura. We all know this. Did anyone expect A ) Ps3's version to look vastly superior? It's Capcom, people. B ) Ps'3s version to even be on par? IT's Capcom, people. or C ) Either version to be a huge step forward? It's capcom, people. You all are acting like this is news or a huge life altering event. It's not. It's Ps3 proving once again you need to code for it and it alone to yield strong results. Way it goes.
CELL is far more advanced than 360, I dont understand why PS3 looks worse