Official Battlefield 3: Armored Kill DLC Features Revealed
Over on the official site for Battlefield 3, it seems DICE stealthy revealed some new details about the DLC coming later this year. Check out the major key features of the content.
(Battlefield 3, PC, PS3, Xbox 360)
Actually, CQC is really good in BF3. I enjoy it very much.
The large map sounds good but it's too bad that we can't have more than 24 people on a map at once. People will get lost on that big map. Will feel empty.
I dont like CQC on BF3 but alot of people do. I dont care what Dice do as long as they cater for everyone. Someone like myself who loves Rush and Conquest Assault might not have found the last DLC that fun. However Armoured Kill just seems fantastic.
One thing, anyone who plays Battlefield 1943 would know of Air Superiority mode, I hope something similar will be on BF3.
I'm not that into CQC either (it lack the good objective based modes), but I dig the smaller or not so open maps (as Metro, Seine Crossing and Bazaar, as well as CQC maps).
The thing is it feels pretty empty on those huge maps and you have to deal with people destroying vehicle at spawn all the time, it annoyed me so much I started to skip matches at Firestorm and Caspian Border.
If CQC was geared more towards, let's say Rush, with slightly bigger/longer maps, the closed environments make up for some well heated battles, specially with the destruction changing the geometry all the time. But what I would really love to see is something like Socom's Demolition or some Capture the Flag stuff.
At least for me, it's not so much about vehicles or map size... The thing is BF3 needs more diverse objectives. Conquest (all CQ modes, DOM, CQA, etc) and TDM doesn't feel like you are achieving anything, just mindlessly killing stuff 'till the timer countdown expires, so I'm kinda stuck with Rush so far.
Big map and vehicle emphasis....this is one of the packs I'll be passing up. Calm down its personal opinion, and I play on console so the maps are big enough since our player count is so low.
Well think about it, 24 players on foot on a huge map is pretty ridiculous.
24 players in vehicles on a huge map... well that's completely different. Although I'm sure we'd all prefer more players per game, 32+ or so, I think this will work fine with 24 players considering for example, in Tank superiority mode everyone having a tank. That's 24 tanks in one map, to me that isn't too bad.
This mode is something I've been very excited about, hopefully Dice wont disappoint.
DICE said the PS3 and 360 could have 64 player servers. It's just that consoles have a bandwith cap on them so they can't handle more players. The frostbite 2 destruction takes up most of the bandwith so if we wanted 64 man servers Sony and Microsoft would have to remove the bandwith cap.
Mag has 256 players...I remember them saying that the quality of the game on consoles would drop due to higher player counts, but nothing about bandwith.
pretty sure the maps wont be bigger than Caspian Border, Operation Firestorm on the consoles.... NOTHING TO WORRY ABOUT... when the say beggest map, they're talking about on the PC
Meh...bring free for all mode and fix TDM please....never seen soo many campers in any game. I dont play objective and territory based games, i hate them so better start releasing descent TDM type maps and Gun game type modes and i will continue To play ur game.
U sir are one retarted idiot If you want TDM superiority go play COD because battlefield is all about objective and working as a team That's what makes bf3 so great
if its empty or full if it can have battles on it its a map. deal with the fact and move on swiftly. dont bother replying cos n4g posters are too tight to give me extra bubbles. 1 bubble since i joined up. at least a year ago. pathetic website with pathetic wingey people.
How did an observation that DICE claim "massive scale maps" but with nothing on them result in having these types of responses?
And its true, size means nothing if there is nothing to do in those big empty spaces, fair enough have a desert map, but dont claim somehting is so massive when all it is, is one big massive empty space.
And to boot literally insulting mental disability?
Think il stop posting on this site as the community is just the worst I have seen.
Not sold on it yet. But I'm wondering how the 5 vehicle unlocks will work in the base game, can you just spawn it out of your ass or something? Confusing.
80°
70°
60°
70°
Ad 
80°
10°
20°
20°
20°
40°
This is what BF is all about.. not that CQC garbage
The large map sounds good but it's too bad that we can't have more than 24 people on a map at once. People will get lost on that big map. Will feel empty.
I don't like CoD. I love Battlefield. Played every BF game ever since BF1942.
Also, it's not yours. You didn't make the game.
Rent-a-Server... now that's something to compain about! ^^
Someone like myself who loves Rush and Conquest Assault might not have found the last DLC that fun. However Armoured Kill just seems fantastic.
One thing, anyone who plays Battlefield 1943 would know of Air Superiority mode, I hope something similar will be on BF3.
The thing is it feels pretty empty on those huge maps and you have to deal with people destroying vehicle at spawn all the time, it annoyed me so much I started to skip matches at Firestorm and Caspian Border.
If CQC was geared more towards, let's say Rush, with slightly bigger/longer maps, the closed environments make up for some well heated battles, specially with the destruction changing the geometry all the time. But what I would really love to see is something like Socom's Demolition or some Capture the Flag stuff.
At least for me, it's not so much about vehicles or map size... The thing is BF3 needs more diverse objectives. Conquest (all CQ modes, DOM, CQA, etc) and TDM doesn't feel like you are achieving anything, just mindlessly killing stuff 'till the timer countdown expires, so I'm kinda stuck with Rush so far.
Damn. Clan battle tankers galore!
24 players in vehicles on a huge map... well that's completely different. Although I'm sure we'd all prefer more players per game, 32+ or so, I think this will work fine with 24 players considering for example, in Tank superiority mode everyone having a tank.
That's 24 tanks in one map, to me that isn't too bad.
This mode is something I've been very excited about, hopefully Dice wont disappoint.
Caspian border is the same. Sometimes its fun as hell, other times you wonder why you even have a gun in your hand.....
DICE give me some more Conquest Domination levels!!!
and more Close Quarters in general
i will give you my $
TAKE MEH MONEH
TDM a priority dont deserve to be the best.
If you want TDM superiority go play COD because battlefield is all about objective and working as a team
That's what makes bf3 so great
My ass...Just like how Firestorm was the biggest EMPTY SPACE in history?
Wide open empty spaces dont make a map big DICE, why cant we have some big city maps set in the main city we often see set in the distance.
here is a good site for you
http://aacap.org/page.ww?na...
And its true, size means nothing if there is nothing to do in those big empty spaces, fair enough have a desert map, but dont claim somehting is so massive when all it is, is one big massive empty space.
And to boot literally insulting mental disability?
Think il stop posting on this site as the community is just the worst I have seen.