Quantcast
260°
Submitted by bunt-custardly 321d ago | opinion piece

Today I reached 200,000 gamerscore on Xbox 360

Reaching a milestone figure has possible wider implications than a simple proverbial self congratulating pat on the back. (Xbox 360)

« 1 2 »
user4500854   321d ago | Spam
Hellsvacancy  +   321d ago
200.000? so what would that be in trophies, give or take?

I guess its a slow news day, i got my 20 the platinum the other week, im gonna go write an article

Edit: I got the Dark Souls platinum 2 days ago so its 21 Ps, how could i forget, no point writing an article now, who cares about odd numbers?
#2 (Edited 321d ago ) | Agree(15) | Disagree(9) | Report | Reply
jetlian  +   321d ago
like fully beating 200 ps3 games! but he works for a site where they are given games for free. Also he played well over 200 games im sure
kreate  +   321d ago
and there's multiple ppl playing on the same account :)
claud3  +   321d ago
sad, really sad
ChunkyLover53  +   321d ago
Sweet! I got Gamefly recently and I'm hoping that can give me a boost in the Gamerscore department. One thing I love about the Xbox 360 and their Achievements is that every single game supports them, dating back to its launch in 2005, so there are a lot of games that throw it at ya.
stage88  +   321d ago
Try harder.
Nelson M  +   321d ago
And ?
alessandro10  +   321d ago
yeah and... are there stupid people approving this s***t
mxkite  +   321d ago
i feel bad for you :(
MacDonagh  +   321d ago
I guess that's an achievement? O_o'

I honestly don't know what to say, but perhaps achievements shouldn't be measured by score?
Hicken  +   321d ago
That's the thing about achievements: it essentially means you've played a lot of games. For all we know, it could be Sesame Street and Dora filling up his list.
ChunkyLover53  +   321d ago
Does it matter what game or games people are playing? Gaming isn't dictated by the types of games people play, but rather by the fun they are having with those games.

No two people are exactly alike in what game types they enjoy. Some people play a bit of everything, so who really cares what it is, as long as they are a gamer and having a good time.
Hicken  +   321d ago
No, it doesn't "matter," except for when people start bragging about their score. As best I can tell, a gamerscore is supposed to be some indication of your gamer-ness. Having a high score is supposed to be really important.

People who brag about what their score is would say it matters, I'm certain. Otherwise, there'd be no need for the bragging in the first place.
ChunkyLover53  +   321d ago
Gamerscore isn't an indication of someones gamer-ness, lots of gamer's play the Wii and that has no Achivements, a ton of PS3 games lack Trophies. I'd say Achievements are a way of tracking what you've done, I often go and look back on the many accomplishments I've attained throughout the years.

At the same time I've never really bragged about it to anyone, its more for my own use. Sometimes people will say to me "Wow, you got 50k Gamerscore, that's beast". I don't really care either way, I just like to have something (for the most part) to show for beating games.

I don't think very many people go into the idea of Achievements with the intention to one up people.
BrutallyBlunt  +   321d ago
@ChunkyLover53

Don't worry about the guy above you, he's obviously upset about Microsoft being involved in videogames in the first place. So he will do whatever it takes to discredit their input because they are in direct competition with his favorite company.

The truth of the matter is people shouldn't care what other people play because you're right, it's all about entertainment. If someone wants to get a perfect score for Dark Souls by grinding for hundreds of hours all the more power to them. If they want to master the moves in Dance Central why should that bother anyone? The real issue is some people have created this box and can't really see outside of that box. Call it narrow-minded or ignorance but that attitude is quite rampant in forums. I think one of the issues of this so called harcore group is they feel like they aren't being represented well, so they talk a lot thinking nobody is listening. Chances are outside of game forums like this they're right. People tend to tune them out because instead of coming here to discuss things maturely often times they go on the attack.

I still don't think they should be offering certain rewards for online multiplayer. Not if gamers choose to focus on them rather than the game at hand.

Oh and by the way, people who use XBOX Live do know how they attained their Achievements and with which games they played. It's all right there for others to see. I guess those who only use the Playstation Network don't know all the finer details XBOX Live has and just how informative it is for each account.
#7.2 (Edited 321d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(13) | Report | Reply
madjedi  +   320d ago
@Chunky "a ton of PS3 games lack Trophies" Right only games before 2009 lack trophies, so i wouldn't call it a ton. And unless your a trophy whore bid deal.

"Sometimes people will say to me "Wow, you got 50k Gamerscore, that's beast". I don't really care either way"

"Sweet! I got Gamefly recently and I'm hoping that can give me a boost in the Gamerscore department. One thing I love about the Xbox 360 and their Achievements is that every single game supports them, dating back to its launch in 2005, so there are a lot of games that throw it at ya."

Dude make up your damn mind already, which is it because your saying contradictory things.
#7.3 (Edited 320d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
Elvis  +   321d ago
Okay.
Upbeat  +   321d ago
200,000 thats about the same amount of times my xbox has broken lol
iNFAMOUZ1  +   321d ago
fuc* achievements or trophies i play for fun and when i need to be good i try, but the fun is in not having to strain your every move for a damn fictional cyber reward of a mere number!
Alos88  +   321d ago
I can sympathise with being proud of your achievements/trophies.
But writing a whole article just to boast about it is pretty lame.
the worst   321d ago | Immature | show
wenaldy  +   321d ago
None a single damn was given in that glorious day.
Sarobi  +   321d ago
I'm all for trophies and achievements.. but I wouldn't make an entire article about it
NoobJobz  +   321d ago
This is what I was thinking. I mean congrats but hardly news worthy.
NoobJobz  +   321d ago
Ah, yes. I remember when I passed 200k. The only difference is I didn't write an entire article about it and act like it was a huge deal.
numonex360  +   321d ago
congratulations on getting 200k. However cheats, glitches, hacks and game saved files can get boost your score without earning all of the achievements.

game saved files can be found online and downloaded to your xbo 360 and unlock all of the achievements without even playing the game.
multiple versions of the same game: insert disc and the achievements magically unlock.
#17 (Edited 321d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
DFresh  +   321d ago
Meh.
I prefer real life achievements over digital ones.
This applies to trophies/achievements as a whole.
DwightOwen  +   321d ago
Platinum trophies are all anyone cares about on PS3.

Gamerscore? Couldn't care less really.

Neither are a measure of true skill anyway. Then again, why anyone would care how "skilled" they are in comparison to other gamers is beyond me.
bahabeast  +   321d ago
i never liked the gamer scores, seems like its just a bunch of number piling up. trophies feel more accomplished i smile whenever i see a gold or silver trophy honestly i have not 1 platinum yet but the trophies just feel better.
pixelsword  +   321d ago
You'll get there if you keep the game and try long enough. I got like seven or so plats but they are on all games I like to play; if you keep that in mind, the plats will start to pile up.
GamingFeud  +   320d ago
If this was about him getting 50 platniums you'd all be like "that's awesome" typical N4G ps3 fanboys.
madjedi  +   320d ago
Actually the questions would be what games did he platinum and what are the time stamps for the trophies like(ie real or hacked). Yeah if he had 200 platinums, the ps3 owners would be very skeptical.

And 50 platinums, that wouldn't be anything unheard of legitimately, not very common though maybe 35-40 would be more reasonable. Of course, you would have to talk to a actual ps3 owner, not just whine typical sony fanboy.
#21.1 (Edited 320d ago ) | Agree(5) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
GamingFeud  +   316d ago
LMFAO, typical N4G PS3 fanboys.
SITH  +   320d ago
It is the small insignificant victories in life that provide no profit, no legacy, no progress to society that people with no life cherish.
dragonyght  +   320d ago
Yet you are here...funny huh!?
Psychotica  +   320d ago
Well if he spent hundreds of hours to write that comment then it would be funny, other than that your point isn't valid..
DeadlyFire  +   320d ago
No interest. I complete every game I play. I don't search for achievements. If I do something awesome I know it and will be cursed out by the dead player on the other team. Then I can smile. If not then owell.
Frodosmugins  +   320d ago
Love achivments! Why!?

It gives me targets in the game to go for and once I have completed a game and there are still achivmetns to get it gives me replay value..

BUT! I dont go and rent games to get a few extra points thats just sad!!
chela  +   320d ago
guy spent more time enjoying games than ppl here on hate xbox so he get hated xD
cstyle  +   320d ago
200,000 is a pretty awesome score. I'm not even close to that yet. My goal is to have 50,000 by the time the next xbox launches.lol at the sony fans here hating on a person's gamer score. Change that title to trophies and they would be all for it.
Azazel  +   320d ago
Xbox gamerscore of 200,000.... how many trophies does that equal?
NoobJobz  +   320d ago
If I had to guess I would say its about 8,000 achievements, so 8,000 trophies.
DigitalRaptor  +   320d ago
Both Achievements and Trophies are a great extension to replay value, but c'mon give Sony credit where it's due for their Trophy system that build upon Achievements, which are simply a number that increases.

The Trophy system is tiered and is a measurable indicator of skill.. or lack of, if you only have a bunch of bronze trophies that you get for completing a level or something. That is where the difference lies, and the system is a step ahead of Achievements for that reason. The more gold and platinum trophies you have, the higher your level is likely to be. It would be great if Microsoft implemented that for the next Xbox, otherwise it's just a score that keeps on increasing.

@ cstyle (above)

If they changed the title to trophies, it wouldn't even be an appropriate title, since that would suggest they have bronze, silver, gold and platinums. A Platinum Trophy is the best indicator of skill and dedication for a game by far in any system. Gamerscore can't touch it. A person who has 20,000 GS is most likely someone who just plays a lot of games, and there's nothing wrong with that - it shows they enjoy games. A person who has 20 Platinums though, is someone who is dedicated and skilful and that is the real point of a measurable achievement system.

You can see just straight up on someone's profile how good they are by how many Bronze, Silver, Gold and Plats they have and that's brilliant!
#28 (Edited 320d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
cstyle  +   320d ago
You got it all wrong dude... A high gamer score does mean something. Not only can you see how much they play but you can look at each individual achievement and see how skillful they are too just like trophies. Their is no difference only that ms gives you points which you can use towards other things which is way cooler than trophies.Plus, all games on the 360 have achievements and sony has a lot of them that don't have trophies..Achievements are way cooler IMO.
DigitalRaptor  +   320d ago
All wrong? As far as I know, there is no clear cut way to visualise skill from someone's XBL profile. Like I said you can go on any PSN profile and instantly see how many bronze, silver, gold and platinums that player has... immediately. It's great. There's just no alternative for that with Achievements. A Platinum on Xbox 360? There's no comparison. Then there's the RPG-like user levelling trophy function.

It's not surprising that you think achievements are way cooler since MS implemented them on consoles first and that will always be the lasting impression for you. All I'm asking is to judge things comparatively. I outlined the difference clearly. The fact that you say there's no difference other than MS giving you points, is a complete lie and supreme ignorance.

"way cooler"? Microsoft gives you reward points. That's cool. Well guess what? Sony started their reward program in 2010 and it's still being explored, so I'd say that's just as cool especially since they're gonna be doing something with it in the future.
http://blog.us.playstation....

And I know this is getting slightly off topic, but you only get those Xbox rewards as a Gold member. So... breaking it down, you can get a year's PS+ subscription and get a ton of content during the year for the same cost as being a Gold member. Just sayin.

Sure, there's a whole bunch of PS3 games that don't have trophies, but going into the future, all PS3, Vita and PS4 games will. It doesn't really negate the system itself.
#28.1.1 (Edited 320d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report
NoobJobz  +   320d ago
@ digital.
1000 points on a game is a platinum. So you can determine skill if you would look through someone's profile. But is it easier to tell on PS3? Yes.
numonex360  +   320d ago
Avatar: The Last Air Bender, king kong, terminator: salvation, fight night round 3 and other easy games that require little time to unlock 1000 points.
Steer clear of online games that require you being the best ranked player and spending lots of hours to get 20 or 50 points.

200k can be obtained by playing through the easy shovel ware games.

High rated games that require lots of time to obtain the achievements online and in offline mode should be avoided if you want a big score in a very quick time.
#29 (Edited 320d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
user4500854   320d ago | Spam
« 1 2 »

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
10°

New Rugby Challenge 2 Video Released

11m ago - Tru Blu Games has released a new video looking at the many new gameplay features that have been a... | Xbox 360
20°

Cognition Episode 3: The Oracle Review

27m ago - Author Joshua Moris of Capsule Computers writes: "Pumping out the adrenaline in climatic cliff... | PC
20°

Tetris Blitz Review by Gaming on Batteries

50m ago - Triverse writes, "Anyone that was a gamer from the early 80′s onward probably remembers when Tetr... | iPhone
30°

Call of Juarez: Gunslinger review: Back in the saddle | Joystiq

50m ago - Joystiq: "Call of Juarez has had its ups and downs, and Gunslinger isn't without its flaws, but i... | PC
Ad

Take the N4G Video Game Quiz and Win a PS4

Now - Download our new trivia game for iPhone and iPad and take our official N4G gamer quiz to win a PS4! | Promoted post
20°

StarDrive Review | Destructoid

50m ago - Destructoid: "For a one-man effort, StarDrive is impressive. It's huge, looks great, and it has a... | PC