Try our new beta!Click here
Submitted by TnS 2937d ago | rumor

Splinter Cell: Conviction PS3 dated?

The previously 360 and PC-only Splinter Cell Conviction is now also set for a simultaneous release on PS3, according major UK retailer GAME.

The site also pens the game to release on all three formats on April 1, despite previous announcements only stating a vague early 2008 release. (PC, PS3, Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell: Conviction, Xbox 360)

Alternative Sources
Need more votes
Is this rumor true? Rumor votes 0
« 1 2 3 4 »
darx  +   2937d ago
No it's not!
Panthers  +   2937d ago
woah. a little scared are ya?
Anego Montoya FTMFW   2937d ago | Spam
cloud360-7th_account  +   2937d ago
PS3 Era 2008
darx  +   2937d ago
First off, it's a video game system!

Second, I could careless if this game is multi-plat. I will be picking it up for the 360 anyway. So what do I care!

And finally it will not be released on all 3 at the same time!

April Fools!
MJY2K  +   2937d ago
Yes I agree it's not...

well not on that date anyway, games in the UK are released on a Friday, 1st of April isn't a Friday so maybe the 4th? Or some complete different date.
#1.5 (Edited 2937d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
heroman711  +   2937d ago
its funny cause i remember ps3 exclusives going multi platform before in 07 and 360 gamers laughing. well it seems the shoe is on the other foot ( and yes i did say the shoe is on the other foot ). i guess developers are starting to realize multiplatform games is a good thing
pukka_p  +   2937d ago
1.4 - ??Scared??
First off, it's a video game system! Second, I could careless if this game is multi-plat. I will be picking it up for the 360 anyway. So what do I care! And finally it will not be released on all 3 at the same time! April Fools!

LOL. I love it when what people type gives a completely different impression to the intended message. Objectively read, yes, you do sound scared!!
solidt12  +   2937d ago
why not
godofthunder10  +   2937d ago
i have a 360 and i love it and had 1 since launch and i never had 1 problem with it.i hate sony and i never will own a ps3 but it's a good system and just like the 360 it will be around a long time.
the reason i wrote the first paragraph was to show that i'm not bias like %90 of people that own a system and act like kids.
the last time that they said the same thing about mgs4 all the ps3 fans said that it wasn't true and i knew that it wasn't true because sony already admitted that it was a ps3 exclusive.
now they are saying the same thing about a 360 exclusive that was already admitted by microsoft was an exclusive and now ps3 fans are saying that it's true,well they better make up their minds instead of being bias because it's childish.
i don't understand how ps3 and 360 fanboys thinks(maybe it's because they act like kids)because when it's something that good for the ps3 but it's bad for the 360, ps3 fans say it's true but when the same thing is said about the 360 that's good and bad for the ps3,ps3 fans say it's a lie and i think that it's just childish and stupid the way they act and the same thing for the 360 fansboys.
fanboys from both side might not like it but both systems will be around as long as people want to play games but as far as the ps having over %50 of the market is gone because nitendo and microsoft is finaly giving the ps a race and i don't like the wii but they were smart and the only one out of the 3 that really had something new to give game fans and they proved that graphics isn't everything,hell they proved that graphics isn't the first thing that the majority of game fans look far.
microsoft were smart when they didn't put a br or hd drive in the 360 because they had to keep the 360 cheaper then the ps3 because they knew that they had to compete with sony and that was the only way and it also knew that games didn't really need br or hd drives for games for at least another 5 to 6 years when they released the 360 and they were right.i know that ps3 fans will say it's not true and we need br drives for games over 2 years ago but they are bias.just think,the 360 been out going on 3 years now and so far out of all the games that came out %99 of them only needed one disc and about %98 that they mention that's coming out in the next 2 years only need one disc,i know that a few games need more then one but the %2 that will that's out and coming out in the next 2 years isn't worth paying another $200 just to put them on 1 just think in 2 years the 360 would have been out almost 5 years and just like microsoft perdicted the dvd-9 drive was all we needed for games till then and microsoft said that the 360 will last 5 to 6 years(hell about that time the 360 and ps3 will be outdated)and they will release the new xbox and i bet since it look like br won it will have a br drive in it because we will probaly need it for games then.
i think that sony made the biggest mistake that they ever made.if sony would've worried about games instead of trying to use the ps3 to win the format war they probaly would've had the lead when they first came didn't put the br drive in the ps3 for games,sony forced br drives on the gamers because they figured that since ps always sold a lot that they could get br in homes faster then hd if they but a br drive in the ps3 and it worked because it was the main reason that they won the format war but it hurt them on the ps3 sales.
ps3 fans think that sony own all of the rights to the br drive but they have 100s of investers that own rights in br to,hell just like cds when they first came out,it looked like tishiba owned all the right to cds and they even had a war with sony over the format but cds won and it looked like they owned cds just like sony is with br but now you don't even hear tishiba mentioned in the same sentence as cds because they had 100s on investers just like sony with br and the same thing will happen with br,hell i bet that the majority of people can't even rememberd what company pushed dvds the hardest because dvds had 100s on investers to.
skychad1111  +   2937d ago
ParaDise_LosT  +   2937d ago
Will every typo become gaming news now?
Anego Montoya FTMFW  +   2937d ago
you want some cheese?
to go with that WHINE!

did everything bad for the ps3 in 2007 get posted?


yes, they are unconfirmed.

these last few days have made me realize......

The MEDIA has TURNED on 360.

regardless if any of this is true or NOT.

wouldn`t you agree?

Ps. I like you posts aswell.



if you want to blame me, blame me.
but right now, your the one who looks like a b!tch.

now, go TRY to find a negative ps3 story!

good luck!
#2.1 (Edited 2937d ago ) | Agree(17) | Disagree(6) | Report | Reply
IntelligentAj  +   2937d ago
Anego. I normally agree with you cause you make sensible posts but he has a good point. These are all unconfirmed rumors but they are dominating the news lately.

EDIT: Yeah good point. Up until November all I could see was bad news being posted about the PS3. The tides certainly have changed though.
#2.2 (Edited 2937d ago ) | Agree(11) | Disagree(4) | Report | Reply
LeonSKennedy4Life  +   2937d ago
Media turns toward POWER!!!

While Microsoft is a big company, their gaming division is nowhere CLOSE to Sony's. SOE, Team Ico, Santa Monica, and all the other Sony devs still have an arsenal to unleash.

Team Ico, Santa Monica, Naughty Dog, Insomniac, Suckerpunch (Infamous looks awesome), and NCSoft will bring it!!!
Snukadaman  +   2937d ago
How has the media turned on the xbox 360????
Im surprised you sony droids dont think microsoft controls the media seeing that they are all powerful and control this hd-dvd format business...but we have been here the past few days and I havent seen this so called turning on the media...whats even funnier is you post news montoya...stop trying too make the news and just post it copyboy.
Kleptic  +   2937d ago
while overall I don't really care...there definitely is a trend that started somewhere around the release of CoD 4, where negative PS3 news needs to be dug from the depths of hell...rather than being everywhere all the time...

there is no arguing that 2007 had a "its cool to hate the PS3" mentality for the most that would marginally underperform their 360 counterpart were immediately written of with a big stamp of "the ps3 sucks" from almost every gaming website...but recently, different development tactics have resulted in more and more titles being deemed as identical, and in some cases slightly better on the PS3...

it definitely has not resulted in "the 360 sucks", its more of a "well finally the PS3 version looks better, but it still doesn't have this this this and this, so the 360 version is better"...which before, would have immediately turned an article into a shotcomings-of-the-PS3 rant...

and this stuff has increased exponentially in the last month...all of a sudden the PS3 outsells the 360 worldwide for the last month of 2007, and is continuing to do so...all of a sudden the gaming media has realized that the PS3 has a vastly superior lineup for 2008 on every single level...all of a sudden the stuff that was once not important (open/free online service, standard USB profiles, non-proprietary accessory compatibility, etc.) is making more headlines...and these little things are all stuff that MS has absolutely no answer to...they are tight lipped on UGC distribution, with no decent looking outcome in sight...they have been removing XBL features for silver members (wait a week now for demos? is that moving forward?)...

and the now infamous ongoing public hardware beta is finally reaching critical mass...there is no denying that if the PS3 was what had failure rates of even half that of the 360, that it immediately would have been flopped...

MS is in a position they are used to though...they dabble in market after market, holding on until the competition does what they started is the only thing MS has that has not been beaten on every single level over and over...XBL is acceptable, despite all its annoyances and nickel-and-diming shortcomings, until something else comes along...offering more for less...which is exactly what is setting up with the PSN...the PSN needs two features implemented to match xbl on a user basis...which is unified in game messaging/invites/joining and music access...yet already has features that xbl doesn't support...such as tons of games with dedicated servers (some of which are third party, Epic/midway has over 30 dedicated to the PS3 for UT3)...a much easier and better way of distributing UGC...

not only that but the PSN has shown what it is likely to become in 2008...XBL has no answer for the services of Home...XBL has only grown in terms of content...PSN has/is growing in feature plus content...

in the end none of this really is simply humorous to watch fanboys have to put new spins on old sayings just to keep well as see 80% of the gaming media try to get the egg off their face...

2008 will have some great times for both systems...its just nice to see that more and more people are seeing that the PS3 isn't anywhere near as bad as it was originally declared...and, dare I say it, it might be the best console to own starting this year...
pukka_p  +   2937d ago
good post. Not sure everyone will agree, but reasoned and well argued. Bubbles deserved (not that you're short of them)...
Kleptic  +   2937d ago
ha thanks man...

while I agree that not everyone will take a post like as a friendly is worth noting that I am not looking for the tables to be turned on the 360...

nearly every single post I make is pro-Sony, but I only post in response to someone else ranting ignorantly about "sony'droids" and the PS3 in general...the only thing I find funny is towards those who continuously bashed the PS3 all last year, hailing victory in a battle that had never even really begun...that wasn't just fanboys on this stie, but a very large portion of the general media...

I never cared for the conspiracy issues surrounding 1up and other sites...its just very obvious at times where there preferences stand...2008 will be, if nothing else, hilarious in watching sites and editors alike try to apologize for a year of kicking sand in the face of owners of the "other" console...
Dmack79  +   2937d ago
This was predictable
This game has much more of a chance to come over to the PS3, then MGS4 being ported to the 360.
jwatt  +   2937d ago
It's funny though, last year the 360 was taking the ps3 exclusive now this year the ps3 is taking thiers.

Related video
poos3  +   2937d ago
in the same thread ubisoft confirmed it was not coming to the ps3 so what the point of this thread ?
ravinash  +   2937d ago
True poos...
But they said not confirmed, they didn't say no it isn't.
But I guess we'll just have to wait and see.
Jamegohanssj5  +   2937d ago
Who cares? This game blows.
heroman711  +   2937d ago
so true dude. mgs4 will blow this game away
Iron Man 2  +   2937d ago
Yawn,who needs this game when we have MGS4?;)
AngryHippo  +   2937d ago
how about.....
.....the ps3 owners that enjoy the splinter cell series as well. How far up your own arse can you be. Think about it muppet.
calis  +   2937d ago
I wouldn't mind having Splinter Cell - Conviction on PS3. I love the Splinter Cell series.
MikeGdaGod  +   2937d ago
i love Metal Gear..........
and i've never played a Splinter Cell game, but i wouldn't mind it coming to the ps3 so i can try it out.

it won't replace Metal Gear but it doesn't have to. its just another game that can be played on ps3 and one less reason to own a 360 if it turns out to be a good game.
#5.3 (Edited 2937d ago ) | Agree(5) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
Kleptic  +   2937d ago
I enjoyed the first splinter cell...

with that said though it quickly felt like one of those need for speed franchises...where the originals were great, and then you keep getting lame sequel after lame sequel (if you could even call it that, ist more like need for speed '05, '06, '07, etc.)...

I have not played any since the first game that really caught my attention...and as of right now, have absolutely zero interest in conviction...

lastly...weren't these the devs that said "blah blah blah, but teh cell can't do AI"...or something moronic like that...
Statix  +   2937d ago
Splinter Cell is dead
Splinter Cell is a dead franchise. It's been basically steadily going downhill ever since the first game, which was very good. Although Double Agent wasn't bad.

Comparing MGS to Splinter Cell is like comparing a B-movie to a highly anticipated blockbuster with huge production values. Nowadays, there's just no quality comparisons between the two franchises.
Joey Gladstone  +   2937d ago
Splinter Cell
Oh NO, if this is true, will Xbox360 cope with losing another exclusive, they dont have to many as is........
."The JOEY has Spoken"
Shadow Man  +   2937d ago
"The Moron has spoken"
I don't care if is multi, as long is on 360.
KS1985  +   2937d ago
You don't mind games going multiplatform.

If so, what would have happened if HAZE, Assassin's Creed and Unreal Tornament III stayed PS3 Exclusives?
Iamback  +   2937d ago
Same said Surfer Girl few weeks ago
CRIMS0N_W0LF  +   2937d ago
Splinter: Wanna be Metal Gear.
DaCandyman  +   2937d ago
@ Crimson_Wolf
Ubisoft wants Splinter Cell to compete with MGS4. And what better way to compete with it than on its home console. some developers are trying go beyond hardware vs. hardware, and get back to software vs software. Like the old arcade days.
Streetfighter vs. MK
MK vs KI
Fisher vs. Snake
Croft vs. Drake
COD4 vs. GRAW2 vs. R6V1&2
and so on.
KDash  +   2937d ago
I hope...
this part of "snake wanna be" is better than the last one-
Anego Montoya FTMFW  +   2937d ago
me too.
i love the 1st and Chaos Theory.

but the last one was straight sh!t.

Anego Montoya FTMFW  +   2937d ago
looks as if p3opl3 ar3 b3ginning to........

"JUMP OUT" oops....I m3an "JUMP IN"

at l3ast on3 of th3s3 3 ar3 tru3.

- Crysis
- Ninja Gaid3n 2
- Splint3r C3ll





you lik3 that?


every once and a while i bring out the 3`s, mainly when i`m feeling REAL GOOD.
#10 (Edited 2937d ago ) | Agree(5) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
Mario18  +   2937d ago
You 333 33 33 33 33333 33 333333 33333333333 33 333333 33333.
Meus Renaissance  +   2937d ago
It's not true. Ubisoft say it can't be done on the PlayStation 3, such as the sophistication of the game. Obviously it would cause the console to explode or just spit the disc out - consequently hitting you either in the groin or between the eyes. So for the safety of all involved, this game will not be released.

And if it is released, it'll be a clash of the titans. Consumers will see Splinter Cell on one side of the shelf. And Metal Gear on the opposite. Which to choose..which indeed..Hmm..

Am I being sarcastic? An I indeed..Hmm
#11 (Edited 2937d ago ) | Agree(19) | Disagree(6) | Report | Reply
InYourMom  +   2937d ago
Considering you are a PS3 fanboy
of course you are being sarcastic.
ukilnme  +   2937d ago
Exclusive or not, I can buy both.
Vertius  +   2937d ago
Meus is more level-headed than most of us around here, hence the ten bubbles.
games4fun  +   2937d ago
not only that people will in droves claim how innovative and classic splinter cell is above mgs4 and its franchise people will buy millions of copies of splinter cell wich we all know sells better than mgs4 the ammount of people who spent all these years saying how splinter will be multiplatform will finally get their game

thanks mues for the laugh it was actually pretty good writing there
clash of the titans was a great touch it made me laugh imagining them side by side it would a no brainer for millions of people
#11.4 (Edited 2937d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(3) | Report | Reply
Meus Renaissance  +   2937d ago

It's funny how you have something against the concept of fanboys yet you're probably the most obvious one a person can meet. How does that work?

And you consider me a fanboy? And I care what you think of me because?

I was actually making fun of Ubisoft with their nonsense about how certain games are not possible on the platform.
#11.5 (Edited 2937d ago ) | Agree(9) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
IntelligentAj  +   2937d ago
Yeah you can see Meus favors the PS3 over the 360 but everyone on this site has a system that they favor. Anybody who says otherwise isn't realistic. Some people who have a bias of one console make sensible statements about said console, while others simply bash the competing console and deny any good news(First Knight, Genuine, Tanod/Shmee/Mr.PS3, Harriet Tubman, etc.. heres looking at you). It's easy to see who fits on which end of this spectrum by looking at people's comments.
gano  +   2937d ago
April 1
deeznuts  +   2937d ago
I only have a PS3, and I still don't really care too much about this game. Does it have any room behind Vegas 2 and MGS4?

Very Good news, if true, for PS3 only Splinter Cell fans.
games4fun  +   2937d ago
fools day cmon ill take this news with a grain of salt and then i will put it in water and evaporate it to get sodium and that grain of sodium will be taken and cut in half and viewed with a microscope and that molecule ill take as true
#14 (Edited 2937d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
Hugh Hefner  +   2937d ago
This is a typo and it happens all the time (Remember when MGS 4 was listed for the 360 in one of these gamestores as well?)
InYourMom  +   2937d ago
Read the article!

"However, Ubisoft UK has told CVG that neither a PS3 version of Conviction, or any proposed release date, have been confirmed by the publisher."

No PS3 version and this is from Ubi themselves. Another Type-o turned into a news story..

Splinter Cell is much more appealing to me than MGS. Sorry droids, I know you want to spam up this thread with your d!ck grabbing game but not everyone is into that stuff.
The_Engineer  +   2937d ago
what's funny
is that most PS3 fans couldn't care less for Ubiturd's latest MGS wannabe offering. This series had promise up until chaos theory. then it went right down the toilet. 360 can keep this one.
KillaManiac  +   2937d ago
I currently only own a PS3, and if this did come to the PS3 it would be a slap in the face at M$, but I am assumbing they paid out BIG $$$$$ to keep this exclusive (Just as Sony did for MGS!).

MSG > Splinter Cell in EVERY way possible tho...Double Agent = INSANELY terrible...
Jandre02  +   2937d ago
So Ninja Gaiden 2
And Splinter Cell: Conviction both multiplatform now?
Does it feel like Microsoft is giving up to anyone else? Honestly, failure rates, losing the format war, letting big studios leave MGS.

I'm sure they have SOMETHING up their sleeves, but what is left now? Next thing you know the PS3 will be cheaper with all XBL features and Gears will be multiplatform

Something is fishy.
InYourMom  +   2937d ago
The only thing fishy
is the FUD that is reported on this site. You will notice how no-one else but N4G will report this stuff.. Both NG 2 and this game are not going to see the PS3.
Jandre02  +   2937d ago
Im pretty sure you cant report anything on this site
Without someone else reporting it.
(See story source.)

Lol its not like this is a forum. CVG reported this, referenced it.

Before that, eurogamer listed NG2 as multiplatform and no one has denied it.

I think in most cases those rumors are shot down a little faster if its a "typo".

Remember when they said a Xbox360 titles was cancelled? How long did that take? Same for the Frontline PS3 cancelled rumors. Thats all im saying, cry and whine and disagree all you want. But its not n4g posting it, its other sites.
hotshot127  +   2937d ago
okay sorry to squash peoples hope of the next big stealth game but splinter cell conviction looks like crap
its like assasins creed with guns and less exploration.
Anego Montoya FTMFW  +   2937d ago
but most likely LESS REPETITVE.
but most likely LESS REPETITVE.
but most likely LESS REPETITVE.
but most likely LESS REPETITVE.
but most likely LESS REPETITVE.
but most likely LESS REPETITVE.
but most likely LESS REPETITVE.

@who ever disagree`s
I like AC

BUT, please state you name if you think AC is NOT repetitive.

so can ignore you for NOT HAVING A BRAIN.
#18.1 (Edited 2937d ago ) | Agree(5) | Disagree(3) | Report | Reply
DarkSniper  +   2937d ago
Dark Sniper believes Splinter Cell:Conviction will see release on PLAYSTATION® 3 primarily due to superior hardware functionality. PS3's port of Splinter Cell will undeniably be viewed as the de-facto port because of Microsoft's inability to produce a console that engraves the trust of gamers with gimped hardware, price gouging and a garbage lineup of games.

DaCandyman  +   2937d ago
@ DarkSniper
You forgot to mention that UBISOFT is pretty much the only developer that has the best method of porting games from one console to the other. If this report stands XBOX 360 can definitely expect HAZE.
illizit  +   2937d ago
Uhm, Haze is made by free Radical , ubisoft is the publisher
CRIMS0N_W0LF  +   2937d ago
its not worth the money and time to release this on PS3. I doubt it will sell more then 1000 units on PS3 competing with MGS4
SoulReaper  +   2937d ago
not like i care i got mgs4..
Mr_Kuwabara  +   2937d ago
Wow I thought this game was multiplatform to begin with. I mean, all Splinter Cell games have been....
hotshot127  +   2937d ago
i wouldnt be suprised if this is just a TIMED EXCLUSIVE
all splinter cells have been multiplat anyway, all microsoft is interested in is making it a system seller.

but seriously guys, this game looks like garbage. it looks so boring. who really wants to walk around as a refugee and do all that boring crap that they've been showing. but w/e makes people happy i guess
CNIVEK  +   2937d ago
...maybe the millions that enjoyed ASSASSIN'S CREED?? This uses the same engine, and will share many gameplay characteristics with AC, but with a much more advanced physics simulation. Pretty much everything in the environment can be used as a weapon, and/or interacted with.
solidt12  +   2937d ago
All the other ones came to the playstaion 2 & 3 so no surprise to me.
mullet  +   2937d ago
Keep it on 360.
Splinter Cell is the poor man's MGS and I don't want it on my PS3.
dark loard  +   2937d ago
iv got a ps3 and i played all the splinter cell games on the Xbox 1 i found them to be pretty good games hope its true

psn darkloard1981
#25 (Edited 2937d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
smokeymicpot  +   2937d ago
The splinter games are cool. Who honestly doesn't like sam fisher he is the man. If this is true that would be cool.
prowiew  +   2937d ago
Splinter Cell is a game with good gameplay with bad presentation.
MGS is a game with good presentation with bad gameplay.
ThaGeNeCySt  +   2937d ago
so what was all that Peter Moore rubbish about "exclusive to the xbox360 and Games for Windows"
Diugu  +   2937d ago
Hope it wont come to PS3... this series is terrible. At least for me. Anyways... it wouldnt hurt, I would just not get it. So... whatever.
CRIMS0N_W0LF  +   2937d ago
I want to know
Why enemies don't spot you in the dark with 3 huge green lights on your head!
Bender  +   2937d ago
Ha, it should be 3 RED lights.
ThaGeNeCySt  +   2937d ago
The same reason Snake can pull a box out of his back pocket, hide in it, and move to avoid being detected by Genome Solders.

*EXCLAMATION POINT* What's the box.
Mr_Kuwabara  +   2937d ago
Touche; but check out the video, Naked Snake explains why he likes going into the box in the first place, hehe funny stuff.

Like father like son eh? =P

Related video
#30.3 (Edited 2937d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
ThaGeNeCySt  +   2937d ago
LMAO @ video
I didn't mean to seem like a fanboy if i came across that way.. I enjoy the metal gear series far more than I enjoy Splinter Cell... just needed a smart retort
to407  +   2937d ago
i'll tell you why
Maybe you are just taking the mickey out of Sam Fisher's Night vision goggles. But anyway, I will tell you. It is the same technology used by the U.S marine Corps and S.A.S at night. It uses IR illuminators. Night vision devices (NVD) work in the near-infrared band at a wavelength of about 1 micrometer.They also generally come with an infrared light source of their own. Light strikes a metal grid that is charged with high voltage electricity. it causes electrons to fly off and strike a nearby phosphorescent screen, causing a GREEN glow that the wearer can see

Hence, Infrared is used because the wearer of the NVGs will not give himself away to others who are not using night vision technology.
#30.5 (Edited 2937d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
Ignorant Fanboy  +   2937d ago
@ 2047
exactly, but the real reason is to have less clutter on the screen, taking away the meter.

Its like the AC130 mission on COD4, you can see the blinking lights on friendlys, but the enemies cant see them.

Look up any night-time video on youtube, they usually have the lights on, usually, depends on the mission, and chances for friendly fire.
« 1 2 3 4 »

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
New stories

The Everdrive 3.0 for Nintendo 64

20m ago - Krikzz has done great work with making multiple backup flash carts for many platforms. His everdr... | Retro

BattleHand — Heroic cheats, tips and tricks

20m ago - BattleHand is a role-playing game for iOS and Android from Kongregate. In this game you have to d... | iPhone

Top 5 Games To Play - February 2016

Now - It's time to see what this month has to offer... Here's Your Top 5 Games To Play In February 2016... | Promoted post

Top 5 Best Nintendo 3DS Games That Got Cancelled

21m ago - The 3DS is obviously packed full of great games that have flooded the system over several years.... | Nintendo DS

Bandit Six and Bandit Six: Salvo on Sale for Gear VR

21m ago - A flurry of new releases arrived for Samsung’s Gear VR head-mounted display (HMD) this week. They... | Android

February 2, 2016 Game News Update - Bat-Controversy Returns, Molyneux's Mistake

23m ago - BNR: Not too much happened this week in game news- some cool games were released and announced, a... | PC