Let me start off by saying that I'm one of the rare breed who prefers their first-person shooters on console -- I'm allergic to PC gaming -- and was quite looking forward to having a go at Resistance on the show floor. Since it's one of the games that Sony deems worthy to keep hidden from public view -- to see anything you needed to queue before entering a closed-off play area made to look like one of the bombed-out bunkers in the game -- I did the 20-30 minute wait to get some hands-on action.
Plenty of unforgettable games have completely messed up their players throughout the years, all the way back from the PS1 days to the dark recesses of the modern internet.
Gary Green said: Namco Bandai heard the call of many fans asking for the PlayStation release of Tales of Graces which was originally released seemingly exclusively for the Wii back in 2009. If you’re acquainted with the Tales series then Graces f won’t be something entirely new to you, yet if you’re a newcomer then you’ll find a plethora of gameplay mechanics and nuances that distinguish this series from other JRPGs. While the game finds itself following the traditional archetype of JRPGs, such as a somewhat clichéd story, Graces has something to offer to both veterans and newcomers alike.
Huzaifah from eXputer: "Sleeping Dogs from the early 2010s is one of the best open-world games out there but in dire need of a resurgence."
You say "yet" as if it's even possible anymore. United Front Games is gone, along with anyone that made this game what it is
That’s what happens when games sell poorly. And I’ve seen people wonder why people cry when a game sells badly… this is your answer.
Majority of the time it's true but if a company/publisher is big (in terms of money), they can take a hit or 2. e.g. I am not worried about Rebirth sales as Square will make Remake 3 anyway but if FF 17 doesn't sell then Square might need to look for alternative. <-- my humble opinion
Oh okay, Activision owned True Crime, but when that didn’t sell as intended it was canceled. Six months later Square Enix bought the rights and changed the title to Sleeping Dogs.*
*As per Wikipedia
Sleeping Dogs was a sleeper hit back then. It was fantastic. It actually still is. Would love a sequel to this, or at least a revive of True Crime series.
Although this is an opinion article, he brings up a few points others have overlooked. Mainly being the fact that the PS controller sucks with FPS's. Im not the one that has played it, but the new controller may improve that. MS is the clear victor in a good quality controller for FPS's. Right now. We shall see in the future. Depends how good the triggers are on the PS controller.
hmm... everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but it seems like the article author is alone on that one. 1up, IGN, and the rest stated that it was a great game. i will wait for a full review. until then, this game is still not on my "must buy list".
That alone says a lot. Most of the PS3 downgrade rumors originated with this site, and they constantly hate on Sony. No one really knows why.
You can't just go and ignore every negative article about ps3 and such. All the positive things can be seen as if they were written by ps3 fanboys who were soo excited that they finally got to play their ps3 and they ignored all the flaws. Y'know?
I’m sure resistance is great and all, but he could be right about the controls.
for the fps fans this game should sell well but i dont think i would like it much. if it has a good online system i would like it a lot more. i hope the ps platform network is better than what ps2 had.