BioWare Backtracks: 4 things changed in the new Mass Effect 3 endings

BioWare promised it would only "expand and clarify" the new Mass Effect 3 endings. Then it changed things anyway...

Read Full Story >>
The story is too old to be commented.
Chuk51994d ago

The no ending was actually a good ending.

crxss1994d ago

i admit bioware did a better job on the endings (but they're still not that great), but the part leading up to the endings is still crap. i don't care for the slow motion walk to the beam all the way up to the catalyst child.

InTheLab1994d ago

The no ending was actually the ONLY good ending. They should have had the reset button as an option from the start.

tigertron1994d ago

I preferred the destroy ending. Shepard still lives, you see a happy ending, the Reapers are defeated, the crew and the Normandy aren't stranded any more and they rebuild the Citadel etc.

Seems like the best one to me.

FAGOL1994d ago

I don't understand why the Catalyst gave him a option to destroy all synthetics though.

In the no ending option you can hear the catalyst say "so be it", which sounds very much like Harbinger. That itself pretty much proves the indoctrination theory.

MacDonagh1994d ago

The synthesis ending was the best. You didn't kill/destroy all synthetic life. Every civilization could rebuild and the knowledge gathered from previous cycles would be added to the current one.

@FAGOL What's this? The thing that controlled all the reapers sounds like a reaper? Also, your character and every civilization that you were supposed to be fighting for has died. The indoctrination theory has been disproved. It's over.

Eyesoftheraven1994d ago

In destroy, not only does the chest armor breathe still, but Garrus doesn't place the Commander's plaque on the wall, either.. hmm, what the hell is it Bioware has planned for the future???

Also: how the hell did they manage to magically evac right in front of Harbinger where a ton of other land and air vehicles just got obliterated!? Fix one plot hole with another..

In the radio chatter they still say reports are saying someone has made it into the crucible, but Anderson claims he followed Shepard in as well, PLUS TIM is in there as well! That's three people, not someone.

Something just still isn't right here.

Eyesoftheraven1994d ago

@MacDOnagh... the Star Child doesn't sound like Harbinger throughout the conversation.. just at that one moment where very evil says SO BE IT! That's quite a powerful and obviously diliberate suggestion.

tigertron1994d ago

I don't believe synthesis is the best ending at all. Shepard doesn't have the right to interfere with evolution. I'd hate it if some guy made me half robot just to save some.

Control is what the Illusive man wanted so thats the most renegade. Destroy is paragon.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1994d ago
MacDonagh1993d ago

@Parallax_Films The Catalyst gave Shepard a choice of three possible routes to break the cycle. By choosing not to make a choice, Starchild is angered by the egotistical rant about dying for the freedom of all species and ending it YOUR way. As for it sounding like Harbinger; it's clearly not. It sounds far more like Mac Walters and Casey Hudson shouting "SO BE IT" together as a response to the IT fanfiction that gained far more credence than it really should've mustered. As the great Geddy Lee from Rush sang in his song Freewill; "You can choose a ready guide in some celestial voice. If you choose not to decide; you still have made a choice!"

@Tigertron I respectfully disagree with you on that. While I am incredibly wary of the transhumanist idea that was behind synthesis; I'd rather not destroy all synthetics who have gained sentience and freewill just because I wanted to see Shepard puff his little chest. If the destroy option was the "right" option; it'd have meant that you destroyed the Geth if you hadn't already. I hold the belief that it'd be utterly unfair to commit genocide against any group just because they could be considered "expendable".

Blacktric1992d ago (Edited 1992d ago )

What in the holy mother of f*ck are you talking about? Reset button? There is no such thing as reset button. You either choose from the previous three or shoot the Catalyst/tell him to f*ck off instead of forcing Shepard to choose from the options he gave, which triggers a horrible ending in which everyone gets harvested by the reapers and you see the recording Liara made play plus a little different version of the Stargazer after credits scene at the end. THERE IS NO RESET BUTTON. STOP MISINFORMING PEOPLE.

InTheLab1992d ago (Edited 1992d ago )


Holy mother of fuck? Are you serious??? The refusal ending is the reset button. You start the cycle again...aka reset.

No wonder you're short a bubble...

Blacktric1991d ago

"The refusal ending is the reset button. You start the cycle again...aka reset."

Way to warp the meaning of the word reset... Reset means starting from the beginning as in resetting the cycle. Which would mean sending Reapers to wait for another 50.000 years to harvest again without completing their current one. And since no such thing happened in that ending and cycle actually continued without anything happening to stop it, it is just called the refusal ending. And FYI, I started with 5 bubbles more than 3 and a half years ago and gained and lost bubbles over the time I was here. Some of them were deserves losses some were not. And I said holy mother of f*ck because your comment actually gave me hope that the "reset" ending you said may be real so that no one would die, including Shepard, EDI and the Geth and they would have another 50.000 years to be prepared for Reapers. But it turned out to be a horrible one...

agingerbreadbum1994d ago

it took them many months too make this dlc? they literally changed four things. I expect a new post-game dlc release soon. and you can bet they'll charge for this one.

Lord_Sloth1994d ago

If they do than I'll youtube it. Beating this game to see the new endings is proving to be a chore anyway.

Eyesoftheraven1994d ago

Something just still isn't right with any of the endings.. the only one that makes perfect sense is the new Refusal Ending. Bioware has huge well hidden plans for the future, I just know it. Things got too strange, too quick.

googergieger1994d ago

If you mean they are in fact coming out with "true ending" dlc. Holy crap is that going to piss people off. Even more so. I mean I know a good portion of the small portions of fans happy with the ending are in the IT camp. However they are basically saying, "Thank you Bioware for an incomplete game. I can't wait to pay more money for the real ending!". So if they do indeed come out with DLC that supports the IT or anything that says, their game was incomplete. Well, final nail in the coffin? Probably not. Close to it though.

Eyesoftheraven1994d ago

It's not incomplete if they have huge plans for awesome DLC with a true ending because that would mean we paid to get indoctrinated, to truly become a part of the fictional universe!

Commander-Koslun1994d ago

I played it, I liked it, it fixed some plot-holes, provided more closure, and gave us a new choice, which personally I find very interesting because it reflects the whole series' theme, freedom of choice. Still, Bioware is up to something... something....

Eyesoftheraven1994d ago (Edited 1994d ago )

RIGHT!? I sure hope they're up to something, anyways. This could really innovate how DLC works and how much more immersive games can be. The entire story and lore is just too fleshed out and well done to end like this, it's just too damn strange.

Otherwise, THIS truly is the sad reality:

Commander-Koslun1993d ago

Yeah man, have you heard of the Leviathan DLC?

Show all comments (28)
The story is too old to be commented.