Approvals 10/10 ▼
RugbyGod (1) - 4323d ago Cancel
Hellsvacancy (2) - 4324d ago Cancel
NightMystic (1) - 4323d ago Cancel
isntchrisl (1) - 4324d ago Cancel
Emilio_Estevez (3) - 4324d ago Cancel
digitaleraser (2) - 4324d ago Cancel
250°

Just Add Water: "Blame Microsoft for not letting us publish on Xbox 360.”

TheGamingLiberty.com:

"When asked over on the official Oddworld blog just what the status of Stranger’s Wrath HD for XBLA was, a JAW representative going by the name of ALF responded with the following:

“The boat has really passed on that one. We’re winding up development on Stranger’s Wrath HD and Munch’s Oddysee HD. Blame Microsoft for not letting us publish on Xbox 360.”

Read Full Story >>
thegamingliberty.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

Add/remove tag
add game tag
Emilio_Estevez4324d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community4323d ago
aviator1894324d ago

That's too bad, I would have bought it.
But seriously, MS needs to loosen up on policies like size. The devs even worked to tone the size down from their original intent, and were still turned down. :(

NukaCola4323d ago

I grew up on Oddworld. It's by far my favorite franchise and the original games on PS1 are still to this day my all time favorite titles. I am so happy the originals are getting a reboot and the Quintology will continue.

That being said, these titles moved to Xbox and I have some of the biggest disgust for MS because of it. They pulled a scam saying Oddworld would be the face of Xbox but when their marketing demons told them Halo is the game they need to focus on ( even added thee gay Combat Evolved remark for marketing) they completely ruined and destroyed the franchise. JAW and Sony have come together to breathe new life in it and I am glad it's getting the attention it needs on PlayStation. It's where it started and where it should end up. I hate it when these companies milk and run on the same titles over and over again and refuse to innovated.

Raoh4323d ago

Is this due to their policy of, if a game is published on PS3 first microsoft will not publish it and if its published on xbox 360 it must be released as an exclusive or on the same day and date of release?

I might be off on the actual policy but it really screws the gamer. There are 360 gamers thinking a game is ps3 exclusive but its actually 360 banned.

DarkBlood4323d ago

that policy is probably because they dont want to shit out exclusives so they do it like this to secure it in the hopes we'll flock to thier console and buy it there instead

thats just how i see it

though they are really trying to push it to the living room

rdgneoz34323d ago

Their policy doesn't say that it needs to be as an exclusive, just that it has to release at the same time as other platforms or before them, as well as having the same content. And yah, there are some devs that have wanted to bring their games over but have been unable to as a result of the policy.

Though if Aviator189 is correct, its due to size constraints that MS didn't let them.

As for the update, glade they're putting out some nice improvements to an already great game.

JellyJelly4323d ago

Then how do you explain Joe Danger that released later on XBLA?

I don't think there exists a policy like the one you are speaking about.

Jdoki4323d ago (Edited 4323d ago )

I believe the policy MS has, is that a game can come later to XBLA, but it has to have addition features / content..

So...

1. Exclusive to XBLA
or
2. Same time as PSN but with the same or more content on XBLA
or
3. Later on XBLA but with exclusive / more content

StayStatic4323d ago

@Raoh
"There are 360 gamers thinking a game is ps3 exclusive but its actually 360 banned."

Its not an PS3 exclusive as it's on PC too , however it's currently free on PSN+ :D loving this revamp.

Skate-AK4323d ago

Halo, Alan Wake, and Metro 2033 are all on 360 and PC and they are still 360 exclusives.

IHateYouFanboys4323d ago (Edited 4323d ago )

if developers want their game on XBLA then they need to follow the XBLA rules, its pretty simple.

simply dont make it a timed PSN exclusive and there are no problems. doesnt get much simpler. blame the developer for taking the quick sony-fed buck instead of going for more sales across multiple consoles.

PirateThom4323d ago

Nothing to do with that, it only released on PSN because Microsoft wouldn't allow the higher file size for the game.

They wanted day and date on the two platforms and couldn't reduce the file size any more.

It's Microsoft's fault, not the developers. If Microsoft are happy to allow Games on Demand why not arcade games with higher limits?

AusRogo4323d ago

What makes you think they took the quick 'sony fed buck'? Its on pc too so Sony didnt pay for exclusivity since its not. It is Microsofts fault, simple.

KwietStorm_BLM4323d ago

Educate yourself before commenting. Its really that simple.

nukeitall4323d ago

Why is the size an issue in the first place? From what I remember, XBL gives you 2GB. That's a lot!

Also, it doesn't seem like the public cares about this game. If they did, they would have forced MS hand by lots of negative publicity.

lodossrage4323d ago

For someone with a name like "IHateYouFanboys", you sure come off awfully hard like an xbox fanboy with the comments you dole out on here day in and day out.

And you're comments lack any common sense 90% of the time to boot.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4323d ago
lashes2ashes4323d ago

This is really old news. I be leave its not on Xbox live because of the file size limit at the time the game was finished.

Show all comments (21)
80°

El Shaddai: Ascension of the Metatron - Coming Back for a New Generation

Originally launched in 2011, El Shaddai: Ascension of the Metatron is coming to Nintendo Switch, so It's time to look back at the original.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community4h ago
jznrpg3h ago

Still have my ps3 copies. Bought it at launch and another one when I found it cheap and in perfect condition about 10 years ago. I wouldn’t buy it on Switch but if they made a PS5 version I would. I still have one of my PS3 Fats hooked up so good to go either way.

darthv723h ago

Id play it again on the switch. I wished my 360 version was bc but this is still a good way to play.

130°

Fallout 3's Reveal Led To Death Threats And Bethesda's First Security Guard

The artist behind Fallout 4’s Deathclaw reveals just how bad things got back when Bethesda took over the series

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community7h ago
anast5h ago

People are stupid I get it. No one should feel unsafe,

But I think they need to talk about why they cut so many corners during the development process and why none of their games ever look current. And why they think all of this is okay while they charge full price.

LucasRuinedChildhood4h ago

As much as Bethesda deserve criticism, that's not really relevant to the reveal of Fallout 3 in 2007.

VenomUK1h ago

The default angle Kotaku always go for is to highlight the worst in gaming.

I would’ve focused on the creative.

gold_drake26m ago

there is no "but". the hell lol
you dont send death threats, period.

60°

Chatting Shadows of the Damned: Hella Remastered with Suda51

CGM Writes: While we were over at PAX East, we were able to sit down with Goichi Suda (Suda51) and talk about the upcoming remaster of Shadows of the Damned

Read Full Story >>
cgmagonline.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community1d 5h ago
Changed: content
bfrye261d 18h ago