1170°
Submitted by Rick_Addition 863d ago | image

Graphical comparison of Batman Arkham City: Wii U vs PS3 (Large image)

As one of the best superhero games, Batman: Arkham City which now goes to the Wii U can give us an idea of ​​how much more powerful than the PS3 and Xbox 360 consoles, the Nintendo's new console. With a new control system, Wii U is possible to get the same feeling of being Batman. And we all want to be Batman, right? (Batman: Arkham City, Batman: Arkham City - Armored Edition, E3, PS3, Wii U)

« 1 2 3 »
moegooner88  +   863d ago
Is it just me, or does the suit look different.

@ Y_5150, thanks for the clarification, i feel like a noob now lol
#1 (Edited 863d ago ) | Agree(33) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
Y_5150  +   863d ago
That's one of the first things I notice when I first saw this version of the game. His suit is a new armored suit. That's why the WiiU version is called "Armored edition" :)
DarkBlood  +   863d ago
your right plus the joker seems more clearer ? not sure what to say of it but cool none the less
slayorofgods  +   863d ago
Should have seen these comparisons coming.

What I noticed is two things.

1. The Wii U version looks more 3D and has better spacial recognition, or doesn't look as flat.

2. The PS3 version has better overall detail.

I guess we can say the Wii U holds it's own but doesn't overtake the PS3. I'm sure these screens will have enough for both side to start blasting each other.

Of course the Wii U should have the better graphics due to it's release date which I believe is 6-7 years after the PS3 launch. What's alarming is the PS4 is only about 1 year away and should include updated graphics over it's predecessor.
Hisiru  +   863d ago
@slayorofgods
I think you should read the last part of this article:
http://www.eurogamer.net/ar...
slayorofgods  +   863d ago
@ Hisiru

I'm not sure why all the disagreements that is an interesting article. Maybe some horsepower is left on tap due to budgetary concerns but no doubt the Wii U has to prove it somehow.

Here is the most interesting part I found in the article in reference to this game and it supports what I said.

"There are so many changes in this particular engine-driven cut-scene that we do wonder quite why the developers had to make them. There are both improvements and cutbacks compared to the existing versions."
#1.1.4 (Edited 863d ago ) | Agree(10) | Disagree(7) | Report
Boody-Bandit  +   863d ago
IMO the PS3 version looks better without question. More detail, sharper, better textures. I really hope this is just a very early alpha version of the WiiU. If not, why is Nintendo even bothering?
Spydiggity  +   863d ago
anyone who thinks they can form a conclusion based on this one image is an idiot.

P.S. i'm playing this game right now on 360. sure is a nice looking game. though the camera is a little off when in combat. sometimes it doesn't seem to know where to go exactly.
#1.1.6 (Edited 863d ago ) | Agree(14) | Disagree(8) | Report
Kran  +   863d ago
Its so shiny :P
Gamer1982  +   863d ago
Wii-U lacks draw distance you can clearly see it on second image that's why they tilted picture up to try hide it. This could be down to lack of memory on the console. We won't know until released.
pixelsword  +   862d ago
Well, it's like this:

It doesn't matter if the Wii games look as good or almost as good as this gen; the specs themselves, if true, suggest that the WiiU is underpowered compared to this gen's consoles.
Reibooi  +   862d ago
Looking at the comparison the PS3 version does indeed look better. It looks a bit sharper then the Wii U version and the overall detail is a bit higher. It also looks like there is a bit of aliasing on the Wii U version(particularly around the ears or pointy whatever you call of on Batman himself)

The thing with the Wii U for me is that more powerful or not Nintendo NEEDED to prove that not only was it gonna be worth buying but that it could compete with the next gen consoles and from what we have seen it will probably only be able to compete with current gen consoles and maybe Nintendo missed the boat but those consoles are gonna start winding down soon to prepare for their successors.

Another big issue is the games. Batman Arkham City was in my opinion a masterpiece and any gamer worth their salt has already played it and with so little added to the experience on the Wii U why would anyone buy it? The same can probably be said for most of the 3rd party games they showed off at E3.
MaxXAttaxX  +   862d ago
There's no improvement
Just new armor.
SilentNegotiator  +   863d ago | Well said
*Yawn!*

I called it when all that was available was highly-compressed Youtube videos. In fact, the Wii U loses out with the fact that the shiny suit makes the aliasing dance in the moonlight.

Welcome to the 7th generation, Nintendo. 720p first party games, basically identical third party games, and a controller with a screen. Whoopee.
#1.2 (Edited 863d ago ) | Agree(55) | Disagree(18) | Report | Reply
zodiac9   863d ago | Spam
SilentNegotiator  +   863d ago
It is not "most", who are you kidding?

And I never said that the ps3/360 didn't have some sub-720p games. NEVER. Don't put words in my mouth.

Besides....we're talking about a supposed generational leap here. Do you really think I care if....what, COD? releases on the Wii U at 720p? No, I wanted to see "8th generation" consoles do 1080p. But not even first party games are doing a "horrible" 980p or whatever on the Wii U.

Don't try to distract from my point; the Wii U is not much more powerful than current generation consoles. This matter has been busted wide open; Nintendo dodged the "native 1080p?" question for a reason...I knew it. The rumors of it being twice as powerful or even 1.5x as powerful are out the window.
#1.2.2 (Edited 863d ago ) | Agree(24) | Disagree(11) | Report
ozstar  +   863d ago
Welcome to bankruptcy MS and Sony!

There we go, I just proved how blindly making assumptions can demonstrate both ignorance and lack of fore sight.

Wait and see please, wait and see.
live2play  +   863d ago
LAUNCH wiiu games look ''basically identicall'' as ps3 xbox games that DEVELOPERS HAD 6-7 YEARS to learn from the console

compare ps360 LAUNCH GAMES to wiiu LAUNCH GAMES
Aloren  +   863d ago
@CaCl Well, compare SNES launch games and NES games, PS1 launch games and SNES games, Dreamcast launch games and N64 games, 360 launch games and Gamecube games... there's always an obvious gap.

The only exception until now was the wii which was barely better than the Xbox or GC. Well, it looks like the Wii U is now going to be the second exception...
kikizoo  +   863d ago
"compare ps360 LAUNCH GAMES to wiiu LAUNCH GAMES"

hmm lol ? and don't forget to compare wiiu launch games with ps4 games...it's more important ! (because ps3 is 6 years old hardware = way more than wiiu launch and ps4 launch)

it's funny to see dated nintendo hardware, always compared to older system (ps1, ps2, now ps3), and it's even more funny when delusional fans consider it could be "superior" with 2,3 and now 6 years, delays.

by the way, if you want really to compare ps3 and wiiu, use superior exclusives, for both, multis are never as good as best ps3 exclusives (and stop talking about ps360 games denial xboyz, only multiplatforms games are on par) ;)
#1.2.6 (Edited 863d ago ) | Agree(11) | Disagree(5) | Report
neogeo  +   862d ago
Why don't you relax into the final port is released! IBM power7 says hi! Tons od Edram says hi. directx11 says hello. so STFU into you see more.
Ju  +   862d ago
I can understand why Nintendo tries to show titles ported from other platforms and don't push those. It's a learning curve and sure the goal is to show those can run on the WiiU.

What I don't understand is, why Nintendo didn't show any first party title which pushes the envelope. At least one game which looks like PS3/360 but runs 60fps @ 1080 would have sufficed; even Picmin would be fine for that.

I have no doubt the machine will show more over time, but the presentation from Nintendo did not convince me to switch just yet. Especially if it takes another year to surpass PS3/360 when in that year we will learn more about new consoles from the competition.

Price will also play a role, and at the same time, I think from a pure financial standpoint, building a top spec console with a secondary screen will not be competitive. They had to cut specs to devote resources into the controller. That's obvious; but it doesn't push neither one (console nor controller) to the limits.
yabhero  +   862d ago
My question is why are people so biased. Compare this with launch titles of PS3 and 360. Didnt PS3 launch titles like Resistance 1 look like a PS2 game. Yes they did. So if a Pre-Alpha demo version of Batman looks exactly like the PS3 version port from the end of the PS3's life is that bad?
Were there any PS3 launch games that looked like the Last of Us? NO. Sheesh. I wonder if in 06' people were saying PS3 must be underpowered because launch titles looked like 6th gen?
Also please stop the PS4 NextBox crap. We don't know the WiiUs power besides theses launch titles, which as I said don't show power and we dont know The other next gens power . I would expect ps4 and 720 to be stronger but the gap is not going to be like that of ps3 to wii but mor won Xbox to ps2.
#1.2.9 (Edited 862d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(1) | Report
Nimblest-Assassin  +   863d ago
He's wearing armor... which is why its called the armored edition... hes more shinier
C0MPUT3R  +   863d ago
The suit is the only difference I see. Fidelity wise they look the same. Maybe PS3 barely edging it out.
#1.4 (Edited 863d ago ) | Agree(10) | Disagree(7) | Report | Reply
Prophet112  +   863d ago
Do you not see all the aliasing in the Wii U pics?
BlmThug  +   863d ago
Hmmm I remember the times when the launch titles on both the 360 and PS3 overtook the last gen consoles in terms of graphics with ease, this isnt the case for the Wii U as its barely 'on-par' with the current gen
browngamer41  +   862d ago
You remember 360 launch games looking better than the previous gen huh? well here is a taste of 360 launch games-doesn't seem to be overtaking shite at all.. http://www.escapistmagazine...
Make sure to click on the spoiler banner in the first half of the page to see them..
STONEY4  +   862d ago
360 launch games looked like HD PS2 games. Some of them actually looked worse, like that "Gun" game in that link. Amped 3 looks worse than SSX 3, apart from the resolution.

I do remember being impressed though every time I walked into a Best Buy and saw the King Kong 360 demo. That was probably the best looking early 360 game.
avengers1978  +   862d ago
it does not bother anyone else that the Wii U is capable of what the 360 and PS3 already do, but it's supposed to be "Next Gen" Batman Arkham City is a fantastic game, that most people will have already played more than a year ago(when the wii U comes out)
falconm80  +   862d ago
That's not cool at all. Wii U being a next gen console getting compared to a current gen console and the difference is hardly noticed is not impressive at all.
Ju  +   862d ago
Which makes me wonder who is Nintendo selling the new console too. Current Wii users? PS3/360 users? What's the incentive to yet buy another console - which probably will cost more than what you can get now. The new controller? Nice feature; but I don't even know how to play those games now. Tablet controller? WiiMote? Pro controller? Well, Nintendo didn't have much of choice. Wii sales dropped rapidly...time will tell. If I have the money and they'll have some must have games I might as well give it a shot. Currently doesn't look too good on my budget, though.
xxLuckyStrike  +   862d ago
This is where PS3 fanboys use one small shred of evidence to convince themselves that the ps3 is just as powerful or superior to WiiU.. lol at the blind logic round here
#1.8 (Edited 862d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(4) | Report | Reply
pixelsword  +   862d ago
Correct evidence has a nasty habit of accumulating.
moparful99  +   862d ago
Why don't you compare uncharted 3 to a wii u title? Thats the true lithmus test for graphical prowess not multi plats....
mike1up  +   863d ago
Pictures of the same image would've been more helpful.
ChickeyCantor  +   863d ago
I dont see why, I'm not expecting it to look any different anyways.
Gamer1982  +   863d ago
I agree the wii u images lack draw distance thats why the images are differnt. But the fact is nobodys surprised wiiU is matching current gen consoles as the wii did the same its no more powerful than the original xbox and ps2. That wasnt its selling point and cannot believe they trying to sell wiiU on this right now. Then again thats down to Sony and MS trying to squeeze as much out of PS3 and 360.
LOL_WUT  +   863d ago
The Jokers picture from both the PS3 and the Wii U version look the same so i don't know what DarkBlood is talking about. Now the one with Batman clearly the PS3 version looks better.
Nugan  +   863d ago
This is what I thought.

But the batman images are different, so I don't know what conclusions can be drawn.
LocutusEstBorg  +   863d ago
You can compare rendering quality even with different screenshots. The Wii U is inferior, but probably because it's the first port of the engine to the platform.
live2play  +   863d ago
wiius LAUNCH GAMES look about the same as ps360 games that developers had 6-7 YEARS TO LEARN from the console

to be fair compare wii u LAUNCH GAMES to ps360 LAUNCH GAMES
Hanuman  +   862d ago
Finally! If you hadn't posted this remark, I would have. Comparing Wii U to PS3 or 360 at this point is just stupid. I think Wii U will need at least two years to catch up to 360 or PS3's current graphics.
moparful99  +   862d ago
In two to three years the new playstation and xbox will be out and then wii u will be irrelevant graphic wise.. If the wii u cant even beat the ps3/360 it wont hold a candle to the next gen consoles... Nice try
pixelsword  +   862d ago
The PS3/360/WiiU Joker's from animated portions, if I'm not mistaken; so I don't expect to find any graphical differences.
esemce  +   863d ago
It's sad but I think the WiiU looks worse, there is a lack of shadow detail and the backdrop is all blurred.
jeseth  +   863d ago
Agreed. The pictures of Batman show the most difference.

Sad really. . . . .for WiiU
ChickeyCantor  +   863d ago
Depth of field is bad?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...

Also the armor implies there is a light source infront of him.

These two basically are identical. Not sure why people are so inclined to make stuff up.
#4.2 (Edited 863d ago ) | Agree(15) | Disagree(22) | Report | Reply
tarbis  +   863d ago
Joker looks the same, but the shininess of batman is a little bit overdone on Wii U.
Skateboard  +   863d ago
How can you disagree with this post. That Batman screenshot looks ridiculous. PS3 version looks superior from those screen shots now click whatever you want on the bottom since I didn't support your agenda.
live2play  +   863d ago
yes the ps3 version looks super
the ps3 game that the developers had 6-7 YEARS TO LEARN THE CONSOLE.

compare wiiu LAUNCH GAMES to ps360 LAUNCH GAMES

c'mon man you know that as the devs have more time with the system the games look better
moparful99  +   862d ago
@cacl but it shouldn't matter if the wii u is supposedly 2x as powerful as the ps3/360.. Face it the wiiu is only comprable to the ps3/360 and once their respective new consoles come out the wii you will look last gen... Nintendo is dropping the ball yet again..
zodiac9   863d ago | Spam
xCaptainAmazing  +   863d ago
You must wait for direct feed footage to compare when it's released. Besides, I'd use something a little more solid than a year old port to gauge graphical fidelity.

AC3 will be a really good game to test this when it's released. It's being developed in conjunction with the other versions, done by the exact same studio.

For a first generation game for the system, we will see how it does. I'm pretty much ignoring anything that's being ported directly, especially if it's being handled by a different internal studio.

I've never trusted a game ported by anyone other than those directly working on the game. Mostly nobody else does either. Nor should you.
#7 (Edited 863d ago ) | Agree(9) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
stuna1  +   863d ago
For those saying the WII U one looks better, you need your eyes checked! Just look at batmans face to see the difference, the WII U version looks pixelated.

The only thing that helps the WII U version is that it's a first generation game on the console! Even I expect games to start looking better as time progresses, but no the graphics are not leaps and bounds better than the other systems of which many have grown accustomed too.

People need to also realize that by the time the developers get a handle on what the WII U can actually do, the other two players will have already arrived on the field!!!
Which goes to say, it was nintendos responsibility to showcase the WII U potential, for which I must say they sadly failed at.
live2play  +   863d ago
those are wiius LAUNCH GAMES

look way better than ps360s LAUNCH GAMES

compare launch games to launch games not launch games to games that developers had 6-7 years to learn the console
DaPrintz  +   862d ago
Why would anyone be happy about WiiU launch games being compared to Xbox/PS3 launch games? You're already admitting WiiU isn't next gen. You should be saying let's wait to see PS4 launch games. By the way, this game released Oct last year on PS3 lol.
BubloZX  +   862d ago
This port isn't just a port. It was also built to make use of wii u features. And look at the Batman models. The face on the wii u version looks very kiddy while the ps3 version looks more realistic. Now either the wii u can't handle the ps3 textures and needs to be dumbed down or they just wanted to go in a different direction. But a port should look very identical, not completely different.
konnerbllb  +   863d ago
It looks the same. Not a bad thing at all. I knew the WiiU wasn't going for next gen graphics but a different way to play instead.

Bring on ZombiU
live2play  +   863d ago
a wiiu LAUNCH GAME looks just as good as a game that developers had 6-7 years to learn from the system

compare wiiu LAUNCH GAMES to ps360 LAUNCH GAMES
GoldenGamer  +   863d ago
I love how CaCI wasted 5 bubbles copy and pasting the same thing in some blind fanboy attempt. Yes the PS3 is 6-7 years older, but I doubt people compared first wave PS2 titles to the PS3 when it came out, I would much rather see end of generation titles compared to "next gen" hardware. Who wants to wait 7 years for a console that's supposedly next generation to catch up with a current-gen console?
WagFanger  +   862d ago
This is all you say, not even just on this article.

The PS3 and Xbox 360 launch games were a huge step up from PS2 and Xbox ('which the developers had 6-7 years to learn from the system'), but yet somehow the Wii U is unable to make any progress on current gen, apart from adding a retarded amount of shine.

You don't deserve all those bubbles to keep spamming your fanboy drivel.
m2stech  +   863d ago
If you look closely and zoom in the PS3 version has better textures and no antialiasing in WiiU version...Nintendo why u so cheap ?
#10 (Edited 863d ago ) | Agree(25) | Disagree(4) | Report | Reply
xCaptainAmazing  +   863d ago
according to digital foundry, the wii u is the only one that has anti aliasing. the other two do not. I will agree that arkham city is looking a bit lackluster thus far though. a lot of the character models are pretty good, but some of the textures look incredibly flat.

again, it's being ported by a different studio. writing it off as a bad indication as Ubisoft as a whole seems to have a much better grip on the system. Pitchford has been saying Aliens is easily best looking on Wii U as well. As of right now, I'll just have to take the man's word for it.

The only way to chalk these up as early efforts is by knowing the system specs in detail. Unfortunately, we know this will probably never happen. Like I said, comparisons will be useless until the games are released. As of right now, it seems like a mixed bag. Some look equal to better, and others not so much. Hardly proof of anything, especially when you consider some of the early PS3 games, which were undeniably horrendous compared to the wizardry we see now.

Edit: if you'd like to see an unbiased take, look here:

http://www.eurogamer.net/ar...
#10.1 (Edited 863d ago ) | Agree(7) | Disagree(5) | Report | Reply
maddfoxx  +   863d ago
Thats funny because I can see all sorts of artifacts in the WiiU screenshot of batman. Just look at the ears of batman in the WiiU compared to the PS3 screenshot. That doesn't look like anti aliasing to me. The Joker screenshots look identical tho.
natchez2  +   863d ago
sorry looks the same 4 next gen vs current sorry Nintendo you fell short i.m.o
SpinalRemains138  +   863d ago
Yeah I dunno. Im an avid SONY supporter, but I do not see this being a contest. The WiiU shots looks silly to me. Way too shiny and not as sharp. Just me
theWB27  +   863d ago
Comparing a game on a system that's been out for 6 years to a port of a brand new system. Strangely I look for Zelda and it's style to see how powerful Nintendos systems are. Unless this gen changes and a developer goes all out exclusive and pushes for graphics for the WiiU then it'll be nice to judge then.
Shok  +   863d ago
Comparing multiplats have never made sense to me.
Outside_ofthe_Box  +   863d ago
So we should compare exclusives instead?

Obviously comparing a port of a nearly 1 year old game isn't really fair especially one that is early in the Wii U's life cycle, but the Wii U should have at least looked slightly better.

Both versions look about the same to me, but I do expect Wii U games to look better graphically over the course of the console's life.
#14.1 (Edited 863d ago ) | Agree(6) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
VverdugovV  +   863d ago
Why not? Show me a Nintendo exclusive that looks better than Halo4 or The Last of Us.
Knushwood Butt  +   863d ago
This.

Plus, I think some people are missing the bigger point here:

Why on earth would anyone spend top dollar on a game that came out last year and can already be picked up cheaply today?
Lucretia  +   863d ago
sweet, you guys waited stubbornly and refused to buy a 360 or a ps3, so now you get to play all the games we have BEEN played.

Enjoy it because it still doesn't even look as good as the ps3 version. its almost the same buuut yeah.

I will give the benifit of the doubt that its because its a port.

but not a nice way for nintendo to show of its console. launching with games everyone has already and no new exclusives. sounds like a bad first half year at the least
glopez  +   863d ago
I seem to remember everyone on here laughing at the ps3 for not having any games at launch. Ps3 fanboys kept saying "just wait we'll get more than ports" Its funny that now ps3 fanboys laugh cause the wiiu is getting ports at launch. Hypocritical much?
Lucretia  +   863d ago
oh no, your right. ps3 had like.....lol ima say 2-3 good exclusives in the first year.

and obviously wii-u games are going to look alot better 2 years down the line.

it still doesn't mean wii-u is worth a purchase in year one does it?

just like im sure the ps4 and 720 wont have any games. Heck they will have even less games because if they are that much stronger than the wii-u then they need games only they can handle.

and wii-u will be in the middle land between this gen and next gen preformance wise....unless those tech demo's square showed is able to run on ps4 and 720.....then i feel bad for wii-u because thats just not happening on that lol.
DaPrintz  +   862d ago
PS3 had ports of 360 games not ports of Gamecube games.
mike1up  +   863d ago
You said it yourself, "it's a port". A port that is early in the WiiU's life cycle, and late on the PS3's.

To be frank, it's not even the same image, the PS3 version of the WiiU screenshot could look identical... or worse.
#15.2 (Edited 863d ago ) | Agree(7) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
esemce  +   863d ago
So the WiiU can only run Rayman,ZombieU,Pikmin3 at 30fps, looks like it will be very underpowered.

With all the money they made selling the DS and Wii you would think Nintendo could have spent a little more in future proofing the WiiU.

I will probably get a used WiiU later just for 1st party and exclusives.
#16 (Edited 863d ago ) | Agree(10) | Disagree(4) | Report | Reply
konnerbllb  +   863d ago
I haven't read that, can anyone link me?

Everything that I have read has said games run at 60fps unless there are two gamepads/screens used.
torchic  +   863d ago
it runs Rayman at 30fps? that would be disappointing, 2 screen streaming or not. Origins ran at 60fps on 360/PS3. I think it was also a 1080p.

or is Rayman Legends a completely different style to Origins (i.e. is it 3D and now 25
Rageanitus  +   863d ago
I am more interested in how it compares to th PC version! since the wii U should be newer (up to date technology).
acemonkey  +   863d ago
it kinda looks brighter and shiny...ps3 looks better tho
#18 (Edited 863d ago ) | Agree(10) | Disagree(6) | Report | Reply
additup28  +   863d ago
thats disappointing, at least nintendo first party games will look good on the system. the new mario, metroid, zelda, etc title will definitely benefit from a hd presentation. first impressions, don't bother with third party multiplatform titles.
Ethereal  +   863d ago
The fact remains that while this looks somewhat decent today what happens a year from now when Sony and MS release there next gen consoles. Nintendo will be behind the curve, graphically speaking. Yes, I know graphics don't make the game. I am just staying on topic.
#20 (Edited 863d ago ) | Agree(8) | Disagree(5) | Report | Reply
eagle21  +   863d ago
Laughing at anyone who thinks a port can show graphical power versus if WiiU was lead development. How about load times, controls, frame rate? Oh, i forgot it's pictures of two totally different viewpoints you are making scientific conclusions about.
jonli76  +   863d ago
who can really tell the differences they look the freaking same the only difference is just the Batman suit
josephayal  +   863d ago
PS3 Poweful than NEXT GEN CONSOLES?
konnerbllb  +   863d ago
Go back to school and learn how to create sentences.
Sikct9a  +   863d ago
Not much improvements I must say. I'll wait for more games to be announced.
DigitalAnalog  +   863d ago
For now, it's way to early to judge the capabilities of the Wii-U considering we have the lack of solid information. Besides, trying to get code to run optimized from day-1 is just silly. That would be like saying "why doesn't Uncharted 1 look as good as 3".

Again, we have 6 more months before it's release and gamescom to look for more info. By then we should have a more accurate view of what the Wii-U is capable of.
Silly gameAr  +   863d ago
This is ridiculous. Can't believe how many people fail for this bait.
corrus  +   863d ago
Are you blind PS3 looks better than WII U version i had try to tell you few times of course Nintendo fanboys will defending Nintendo and will saying that WII U version is better
#27 (Edited 863d ago ) | Agree(6) | Disagree(6) | Report | Reply
jonli76  +   862d ago
THEY BOTH LOOK THE SAME TO ME THE ONLY DIFFERENCES IS THE BATSUIT OTHER THAN THAT IS SAME FREAKING GAME
Darukain  +   863d ago
Don't make conclusions on two screenshots play the GAME.
DaPrintz  +   862d ago
We played it last year.
mightylucky  +   863d ago
The website the article is on is so horrible...
mcstorm  +   863d ago
All every one seems to talk about on here is power. If gaming is all about power why did the psx out sell the n64 or the ps2 out sell the xbox and gamecube or why has the wii out sold the 360 and ps3? Its all about the games and rather than talki g down the wiiu lets wait and try it for our selfs before we all slag it off. People these days are took quick to judge something.
PirateThom  +   863d ago
If it was all about games, the Wii should have died a death.
neogeo  +   862d ago
What do you know about games? For every good ps3 or 360 game I can name a better Wii game. Up for the challenge?
PirateThom  +   862d ago
No, because that would makes it look like you have a legitimate argument, when you don't.

I'm not saying the Wii doesn't have good games, that would be ridiculous, I'm saying there's a severe lack of good games compared to the other consoles and "good for a Wii game" doesn't cut it, I'm afraid. The console never sold on "good games".
#30.1.2 (Edited 862d ago ) | Agree(9) | Disagree(6) | Report
« 1 2 3 »

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
10°

Samurai Warriors 4 Interview: Porting The Game To PS4 'Was Not As Difficult As First Anticipated'

7m ago - Omega Force's Akihiro Suzuki talks about the recently release hack and slash adventure. | PS3
10°

The Oddities of Super Smash Bros. for 3DS’ Menu System

8m ago - GameKoop contributor Mike McMahon writes, "After months of eager anticipation, the newest entry i... | 3DS
10°

Lauren 'Pansy' Scott's Rumble in the West predictions

8m ago - The caster tips SchoolBus to triumph at the big World of Tanks tournament in Poland this weekend. | PC
10°

Hands On With The Pokémon Omega Ruby And Alpha Sapphire Demo - Siliconera

9m ago - "The Pokémon Omega Ruby & Alpha Sapphire demo opens with Steven and you (preset to the male prota... | 3DS
Ad

iCreditCardNow.com

Now - Quickly locate just the right card for you. | Promoted post
10°

Theatrhythm Final Fantasy Curtain Call: Limited Edition Discounted On Best Buy

10m ago - The limited edition of Theatrhythm Final Fantasy Curtain Call, the new rhythm game based on the F... | 3DS