Look, first things first: I’m not a gigantic Devil May Cry fan. I missed out on the first three games (for the most part) while they were hot, but did play (most of) 4 and picked up the HD Collection. I liked what I saw. That doesn’t mean I don’t think you’re a crazy person if you’re not excited for DmC. Hype, guys! I has it! -Twinfinite's Tyler Humphrey
He already showed what side he is on by saying he isn't a fan of Devil May Cry.
See, when a game indicates change, to serve the purpose of the developer, I have no issue. Especially if the change is cosmetic.
Splinter cell has become a bastardized franchise, warming up to the wrong crowd. I have my reasons for disliking "Conviction", and "Blacklist" doesn't instill hope as well. My main gripe for disliking the direction of the franchise is that the very fundamental design of the game has changed. It leap frogged entire genres until it sat in an area that is incredibly oversaturated (action heavy third person shooter).
I ask why you dislike this game when it still has the player fighting demons, it still has a guy who thinks he's badass, and the same stylish gun and swordplay have remained.
The main gripe? his character redesign. Jesus. Put down the torch and pitchforks, and realize the game, on a multitude of levels, is very much the same.
And I don't "hate" the game. I'm largely indifferent to it, mainly because of NT and Campom's reaction to fan reactions they somehow were clueless about.
DMC4 was flawed, but it also looked to be introducing a continuing story as well as new characters. Ones that could have been playable in DMC5 and on. Now that idea is likely gone.
And I don't "hate" the game. I'm largely indifferent to it, mainly because of NT and Campom's reaction to fan reactions they somehow were clueless about.
Capcom and NT never said they don't see the fan complaints as a matter of fact they acknowledge it on more than one occasion
And you know what they do they say "we've studied game design, software engineering, etc also we have several critically acclaimed games under our belt" Now how many games do you or the rest of the vocal minority have?
I'm gonna guess none.
SOOOOO
shuddup and let these people do their jobs if you dont like it dont buy it
I for one on the other hand see that this game is going to be awesome and on a level only comparable to the 3rd devil may cry if not better.
So be in denial as long as you guys want keep finding reasons to say this game sucks.
LIke c'mon seriously
"What's going on with DMC is a sudden and near total rewrite. A wholly different yet similar universe and not just Dante."
This my friend is exactly what dmc needed a re-write Because the story itself while good in some areas has become a mess
and I myself as a true dmc fan have accepted this along time ago and am now excited to get the best of both worlds amazing gameplay and amazing story
Not just about those who disagree with the reboot, but the series itself.
Go back and play something worth wile if it bothers you so much. Or go play the originals.
Think of it as the modern Prince of Persia game that everyone hated. Think of this DmC as an experiment or something if it makes you feel better.
No, we won't be playing this, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't voice our opinions on it.
New Prince was different. They didn't say, "This is the old Prince, but we're changing everything about him. From the start, they said it was different in every way. (And, by the way, not everybody hated it, not by a long shot.)
The developers of this game gave a big middle finger to the fanbase. This article is defending that and, honestly, so are you, if you think we shouldn't have anything to say about it.
Your saying that those who hate the way NT have made the game should automatically win and not those who actually like the changes (I am not one of those people BTW)
It looks decent. Doesn't have the feel of a DMC, in the slightest. Dante doesn't look, sound, or act like Dante, and the gameplay is similarly changed. I'm not a MASSIVE fan of the series, though I do enjoy it, but Ninja Theory has taken away everything that made the franchise iconic.
And all because they wanted to. They even went as far as to diss the original games.
In the past, they've blamed their own lack of success on others, and they continue to make excuses. To top it all off, they have no respect for the fans.
YOU and ME. They don't care about us.
Why the hell should anybody support that?
But I wouldn't exactly say that they don't care about the consumer. But their problem is they try so hard to act like they don't. It really rubs a lot of you the wrong way. I get that.
Then at that point, your opinion is invalid.
Same goes with ANY remake.
Take the Star Trek movie for instance. Millions thought it was brilliant. Thousands hadn't seen the original series'. Does that make their point invalid too?
I understand some of the things this guy says can be silly... but your point is less valid than his.
Call of Duty is horrible, Peter Molyneux is an ambitious but utterly deplorable game designer, and character redesigns are the equivalent of premeditated murder.
"It's" DMC. Deal with it.
I think pretending is just fine lol.
So based on your logic then in the ultimate marvel universe of Spiderman.....it's not really Spiderman because a different person wrote it, changed some things and origins of the characters (like carnage).
That's sound reasoning.
why would anyone approve this shity articles
Also, you can't just shake off 2 years of a Dev telling us how we, as the fans, don't matter. It's a shame that politics will hurt the game but NT is the only one to blame for that...