OXCGN:
"Today, Ubisoft announced the next iteration in the franchise entitled Blacklist, and many warning signs blared in my head: little to no stealth was present, Sam looks young, the connection to Conviction was never explained (as it is obviously a sequel since Third Echelon is shut down)…
And one of the most appalling: Michael Ironside will not be returning as the voice of Sam."
I wonder if he was asking for too much?
Lastly, did you even notice that most the take downs are now all lethal, i didn't see a knock out or kill option when the input button appeared.
The voice will take awhile to get used to, but the new one is fairly close. At least it isn't as bad as having an American accent for an arabic assassin (as in the first Assassin's Creed).
Splinter Cell looks like a mix between Assassin's Creed and Ghost Recon.
What's the diference here? No silver lining at all.
as per usual looks shiny and has nice scripted smooth animations but how much of the game are you in control?
walk around, press for one button takedown, mark all the enemies, press fire and win.
so immersive, so engaging.
Ubi just needs to drop the tom clancy stuff and move on.
Okay, Splinter Cell is officially dead now.
A:Retired the character, story wise. Maybe have a "Create a Cell" so you can make your own rookie (male or female).
B:Made this a prequel thus making Sam younger in appearance, actions and voice.
At least then the loss of his signature gravelly voice wouldn't come as such a blow.
It's a good thing they announced Watch Dogs.
If the game ends up being a great game then a voice change is very little to complain about. I actually like the direction it's going, more action/less stealth. The early games actually bored me more often than not...sneak hear, sneak there, kill 1 guy, sneak for 10 min kill another guy; rinse and repeat...
And if there is one thing i hate in ANY game is one that gives me different weapons and gadgets but i end up going through the level or game not needing to use any of it...but in terms of continuity i do agree with some that they should have came up with a different character. Perhaps a cousin, or younger brother to sam fisher.
And for the record, Lara Croft has gone through several changes in appearance and voice but i don't recall people complaining about that.
No doubt, Ironside brought charisma to the role of Sam Fisher. They became one in the same. After Chaos Theory, I felt that Double Agent was a step to refresh the franchise, and Conviction was an attempt to streamline the gameplay.
Sure, the game had lost it's stealth focus, but I have continued with the series to witness the journey of the character of Sam Fisher. The journey and character of Sam is more important to me than the gameplay.
My beef is that while Blacklist is a sequel to Conviction, the character of Sam Fisher has changed.
He is no longer the gruff, elder-statesman of the previous games, instead he's taken on the case of Benjamin Button. I think this tarnishes the franchise.
If Fisher is meant to be leading Fourth Echelon, why couldn't he be a NPC, with Ironside retaining the role? Bring in a new character to steer the ship for upcoming titles.
However, in doing so, people would probably complain about not being able to control Fisher.
That all being said, I'm still looking forward to Blacklist, even with the more action-orientated focus.