Top
240°
9.5

Diablo III Review | IGN

Well worth the wait.

The story is too old to be commented.
TheXtremePulse2031d ago

We all have the right to our own opinion, but a 9.5 seems kinda high for this game. Its still a really good game though.

Nintenuendo2031d ago

Seems pretty spot-on to me. Different strokes, I guess.

sticky doja2031d ago

If the game didn't have DRM issues and horrible lag I would say its a 9-9.5 but right now for me at least the random lag drops it into the 8s.

da_2pacalypse2030d ago

I wouldn't give it anything more than an 8. This was not worth the 12 year wait in my opinion.

Montrealien2030d ago

you only waited 10 years da_2pacalypse, and even at that, you didnt even know about Diablo 6 out of those 10 years.

Letros2031d ago

60 hours in right now, easily a 9.5 game.

BiggCMan2031d ago

60 hours in a week, GOOD LAWD!!! I could never play a single game that much, so quickly. 60 hours might take me a month or so depending on how much I like a game, but a week, goodness!!

Letros2030d ago

Lol! I know it's crazy, damn blizzard games are always overly addicting. They lace their games with e-crack.

Daver2030d ago

I played a lot and its a fun game but its not a 9.5.
On a realistic scale where not all games get 10. this game is probably worth a 7.5 in my opinion.

Swiggins2031d ago (Edited 2031d ago )

and your opinion doesn't matter, welcome to the internet.

jk, I'm curious as to why you think that, Diablo is a good game.

MiamiACR212031d ago

Diablo may be a good game Rainbow, but a good game will never satisfy a fat boys need to be rebellious.

ThatEnglishDude2031d ago

At least they waited a bit before publishing their review to get a good idea on the game rather than trying to gain hits by being the first (like they usually do)

Ducky2031d ago (Edited 2031d ago )

They usually tend to play games a decent amount.
It's just that most games have an early review copy, so they usually get to play for around a week and then write a review close to the launch date.

I don't think Blizzard gives out any review copies, so that could be one reason why they had to wait a week to make a review.
... besides, I doubt there's many people that were going to buy Diablo3 based on its reviews anyways. =p

sticky doja2030d ago

No review sites got to play the game any quicker than the general public. IGN was writing a daily "Review in Progress" blog as they were playing and gathering information for their final review. When they felt they had sufficient playtime and information they finished up their review.

ThatEnglishDude2030d ago

Right. Which is good. A lot of sites have been posting reviews much earlier than this. I guess my point is - it's a really good game. Stop whining.

SaffronCurse2031d ago

8/10 for me, i love it to death but it's far from perfect.

VsAssassin2031d ago (Edited 2031d ago )

Hmmm... I can't brush off their every right to give this game a high score, but I don't think this game deserves a 9.5. The highest score I could give it is 7. One big minus is the always online DRM. The story is also very predictable.

Edit: And this is coming from a Diablo 2 enthusiast.

Show all comments (31)
The story is too old to be commented.