Top
240°
9.5

Diablo III Review | IGN

Well worth the wait.

The story is too old to be commented.
TheXtremePulse1945d ago

We all have the right to our own opinion, but a 9.5 seems kinda high for this game. Its still a really good game though.

Nintenuendo1945d ago

Seems pretty spot-on to me. Different strokes, I guess.

sticky doja1945d ago

If the game didn't have DRM issues and horrible lag I would say its a 9-9.5 but right now for me at least the random lag drops it into the 8s.

da_2pacalypse1945d ago

I wouldn't give it anything more than an 8. This was not worth the 12 year wait in my opinion.

Montrealien1944d ago

you only waited 10 years da_2pacalypse, and even at that, you didnt even know about Diablo 6 out of those 10 years.

Letros1945d ago

60 hours in right now, easily a 9.5 game.

BiggCMan1945d ago

60 hours in a week, GOOD LAWD!!! I could never play a single game that much, so quickly. 60 hours might take me a month or so depending on how much I like a game, but a week, goodness!!

Letros1945d ago

Lol! I know it's crazy, damn blizzard games are always overly addicting. They lace their games with e-crack.

Daver1945d ago

I played a lot and its a fun game but its not a 9.5.
On a realistic scale where not all games get 10. this game is probably worth a 7.5 in my opinion.

Swiggins1945d ago (Edited 1945d ago )

and your opinion doesn't matter, welcome to the internet.

jk, I'm curious as to why you think that, Diablo is a good game.

MiamiACR211945d ago

Diablo may be a good game Rainbow, but a good game will never satisfy a fat boys need to be rebellious.

ThatEnglishDude1945d ago

At least they waited a bit before publishing their review to get a good idea on the game rather than trying to gain hits by being the first (like they usually do)

Ducky1945d ago (Edited 1945d ago )

They usually tend to play games a decent amount.
It's just that most games have an early review copy, so they usually get to play for around a week and then write a review close to the launch date.

I don't think Blizzard gives out any review copies, so that could be one reason why they had to wait a week to make a review.
... besides, I doubt there's many people that were going to buy Diablo3 based on its reviews anyways. =p

sticky doja1945d ago

No review sites got to play the game any quicker than the general public. IGN was writing a daily "Review in Progress" blog as they were playing and gathering information for their final review. When they felt they had sufficient playtime and information they finished up their review.

ThatEnglishDude1945d ago

Right. Which is good. A lot of sites have been posting reviews much earlier than this. I guess my point is - it's a really good game. Stop whining.

SaffronCurse1945d ago

8/10 for me, i love it to death but it's far from perfect.

VsAssassin1945d ago (Edited 1945d ago )

Hmmm... I can't brush off their every right to give this game a high score, but I don't think this game deserves a 9.5. The highest score I could give it is 7. One big minus is the always online DRM. The story is also very predictable.

Edit: And this is coming from a Diablo 2 enthusiast.

Show all comments (31)
The story is too old to be commented.