I'm feeling less stable.


CRank: 22Score: 0

User Review : Dear Esther

  • Haunting score
  • Pushes the definition of what makes a game
  • Story can be intriguing at times...
  • ...though sometimes fumbles in delivery
  • Bad gameplay decisions
  • Short with little replay value

Avant-Garde Game-Making at Its Worst

Independent game studio The Chinese Room has been better known for their Half Life 2 mods. First released in June 2008 as a free mod for the Source engine, Dear Esther was completely remade from 2009 to 2011 for a commercial release in 2012 with a ten dollar price tag. Unwilling to bow down to conventional game wisdom, Dear Esther is a game that focuses more on stimulating the player through storytelling rather than gameplay mechanics-an ambitious attempt in today’s market. While there’s much praise to be given in what it’s trying to attempt, there’s little admiration in the way of what the game has actually accomplished.

The game starts off displaying its epistolary narrative as this-supposedly-shipwrecked person gives his monologue to Esther. Only a few feet away from the starting point is a run-down cabin and lighthouse that looked to have been abandoned for years. From here, your investigation of this unnamed Hebridean island truly begins taking a turn for the stranger.

In regards to quality, this enigmatic story is one of the most erratic and engaging to be played in recent history. During the long hike to the end, many of the “Dear Esther…” monologues given (with different variants if you replay those sections) throughout the adventure evoke a sense of an awesome tragedy that’s rife with interesting symbolism-although biblical references feel clumsy. For every thought-provoking narration, there’s always a tawdry line or two that sticks out like a sore thumb, most noticeably when the narrator starts comparing body parts to the island. While these tasteless lines jut out every now and then, the story is oftentimes delivered in eloquently stated sentences that will stick with the player. The consistency is rather disheartening, but the great moments will more than likely be remembered.

The visuals are some of the best to be seen in an indie title. The amount of extra detail in the final product compared to the mod when it first released is astounding. From the draw distance of steep cliff heads to refulgent caves glimmering from the slightest hint of light, there’s always some artistic detail to appreciate from beginning to end. The technical requirements for the game are pretty low as well. Even though I played on a laptop and lowered the settings, it wasn’t hard for me to be left in awe at certain points, which was helped by a smooth frame rate-then again, walking and stopping are your only movement options. Overall, Dear Esther is worthy of winning visual design awards; it’s still technically limited to the aging engine being used, but that makes certain details all the more impressive.

The sound design in both voice acting and musical score are what truly shine. Despite being the only voice you’ll hear, Nigel Carrington’s excellent British timbre made every read letter to Esther a treat to hear. Even more interesting is the dedication given to the delivery of each line, even when the words would fall flat. Starting out as a more stolid narrator, his emotions began to grow more and more as we neared the finish line. As he became more acrimonious of the situation, I too would become more bitter about this island. Supporting these moments is a well-rounded track that contains a variety of stringed instruments and piano keys. Specific moments of discovery in Dear Esther become unforgettable thanks to these excellently-paced scores. While it’s a shame that the sound of soft footsteps are essentially filler until the next invisible line is crossed to start the next narration or score, the sound design still stands as the best quality to be found in this title.

The gameplay, or lack thereof, in Dear Esther is the weakest aspect of the game. You’re limited to only a few buttons: the W, A, S, and D keys are for movement, Q key to swim up, and left-click on the mouse allows you to zoom in. Even from this reduced control scheme, the forward, right, and left movements can still get you through the game, since there’s no oxygen meter for the underwater sections. What this amounts to is an overwhelming feeling of a game controlling too much of what you’re allowed to do (even crouching is done automatically). While the idea of limiting the player’s fastest speed to a casual walk and turning the flashlight on naturally in dark areas does make sense from a pacing perspective, it also feels like a way to hide the fact that this adventure could be finished in a half-hour if it had a normal control scheme (average run-time will be around one and one-half to two hours).

While it may seem strange to lynch-pin storytelling to where I focus on gameplay, this is one of those rare cases where it makes sense. Dear Esther is reminiscent of the “Iceberg Theory” (found most popularly in Hemingway’s works) in regards to both narrative and gameplay. Similar to an iceberg, the twenty percent all gamers see (the control scheme) is there and restricted, while the other eighty percent (emotional exploration through storytelling) is-theoretically-meant to be deciphered by the gamer’s experience. Conceptually, this idea does make sense; however, Dear Esther’s scant monologue given to those who purposefully go off course harms what seems to be a brilliant idea. Even after wanting to get lost to hear more narrative, I was rarely rewarded for my searches. There are so many times presented for the player to either examine work and discover something, yet is treated with nothing but what’s presented to them. Even light green words etched across cliff walls don’t present anything that gives a better direction to this vague story. After becoming lost so often with little reward for it (one time I received just a simple sentence for intentionally taking a wrong route), it came with great disappointment to realize Dear Esther’s overall gameplay is downright obstructing, both above and below the surface.

While Dear Esther does feel utterly lacking in some regards, I still believe these types of “games” do have a place in this medium. You can have great story-driven games with limited control schemes, but not to the point of feeling bare-boned. For all the criticism given to “hand-holding” games, I don’t see why heuristic titles that offer no reward in discovery shouldn't receive the same amount of ire from gamers; in fact, it’s kind of nice to know I’m not going to be fooled with those other popular titles (which shall remain nameless) into believing there is something tangible between point A and point B. I can appreciate the themes presented in a poetic manner throughout the story, though roadblocks make it feel pretentious at times, and the excellent visual/audio design, but it comes at such a detrimental cost. In the end, Dear Esther presents an educated challenge on what to expect in a game, yet stumbles on the most elementary methods.

coolbeans' *RotteN* badge

This beauty is welcoming to a wide range of computers/laptops.
It's tough to choose which is more impressive: the bolstered score from the original mod or how meticulous the delivery was for the only voice in the game.
There are moments where the lack of gameplay works in Dear Esther's favor, but they're few and far between.
Fun Factor
I have had more fun deciphering the possible meanings of the story than playing the game.
The story is too old to be commented.
coolbeans2238d ago (Edited 2238d ago )

Hope everyone enjoyed the review. :D

It's rather surprising to see how tough it was to review a game that's based so much around experiences. It was a fun criticism, but felt like a chore to explain sometimes.


Even though I watched this BEFORE purchasing the title, I can now see that the likes of other games I was eyeing like 'The Path' are probably not for me (save if it's free). I recommend watching the Jimquisition video linked and reading RobotGeeker's solid 9.0 review (on this site) so you get a better idea of where your allegiances lie. It seems to be one of those divisive games that you'll either love or hate.

Captain Tuttle2235d ago

Very well written. You're a good writer.

M1chl2237d ago

I have kind of same opinion, but for me its not much of the game, its more like program. I bought it and I feel like that money goes intothis product, was horribly wasted. I don't even got some emotional connection, its was just bad. I guess, that these days you can do something different and you will be priced by many people, just to be different, despite the fact that you "game" sucks. I don't want to be a hater, because we need more different experiences, but not in this way.

Valenka2237d ago

Good review, but I can't help but notice that it's a review from someone who doesn't really understand the vision and basis behind the game. It's not meant to have some sort of extensive or in-depth gameplay, hence the simplistic control scheme. The game is meant to tell a story, and while I can understand the overall disappointment that one might have after purchasing it and realizing it's not much of a game but a story-telling, that's why one ought to research the game first. ;)

coolbeans2237d ago (Edited 2237d ago )

From the review: "Unwilling to bow down to conventional game wisdom, Dear Esther is a game that focuses more on stimulating the player through storytelling rather than gameplay mechanics-an ambitious attempt in today’s market."

Although I'm glad you commented (your comments are always welcome :D), your assumption is wrong. You would be correct if you stated I don't have much experience in these games like "The Path", "Everyday The Same Dream", and whatever other walking games there are, but from the very start I knew this game's intention; in fact, that very premise is what got me excited about purchasing it.

Dear Esther is not just a 'simple control scheme' we like to say with all 'art games,' it's one of the most obstructive I've ever played. I'm not asking for something in-depth, I'm just...asking for something in general beyond the crossing of an invisible line to hear more monologue or music. I want to at least be rewarded with something if I dig through some of the abandoned houses. I feel as if I'm being treated like an idiot when a game essentially tells me how to play it; to quote the link given: "Walk, but don't run. Look, but don't touch." As stated in the review, I don't see how this treatment is any different than hand-holding games that highlight each objective for you.

Towards the end, even the storytelling started to dawdle that line of deep meaning and intentionally vague b/c they were out of ideas. I also find it tough for anyone to disagree that the final act has examples of bad storytelling. The only way to decipher the long, final phrase written on the cliff side was by strafing left, then right up some stairs while writing down the painted words on a notepad with your free hand (fine exaggeration, but you get the point).

And yes I have done ample research on this title. From the time I heard it, this was a game I was rooting for (look at my comment in the other n4g review). It just simply failed to deliver in a few important categories (even in story and storytelling).

Valenka2237d ago

I stand corrected and tip my hat to you, coolbeans. Apologies for the false assumption. :O

coolbeans2237d ago

No problem. If you wish to discuss the game and/or review further (since you're out of bubbles D:), feel free to PM me with...well generally whatever you want to ignite more enjoyable discussion.


Denethor_II2237d ago

The game left me thinking after I finished it, and for quite a while after I still felt a little depressed thinking about it. Whenever we view, play or listen to any kind of media it should make us feel a certain emotion, and for me the game really delivered in what it set out to do.

Letros2237d ago

It's not for everyone, I particularly enjoyed it because I feel it explores the idea of video games being a medium for a more narrative story, there's definitely a disconnection between traditional games, which is both an accomplishment and maybe a failure.

Show all comments (17)