Try our new beta!Click here

Dear Esther review (PC)

coolbeans | 1374d ago | User review
Reviewing: Dear Esther
Avant-Garde Game-Making at Its Worst
Independent game studio The Chinese Room has been better known for their Half Life 2 mods. First released in June 2008 as a free mod for the Source engine, Dear Esther was completely remade from 2009 to 2011 for a commercial release in 2012 with a ten dollar price tag. Unwilling to bow down to conventional game wisdom, Dear Esther is a game that focuses more on stimulating the player through storytelling rather than gameplay mechanics-an ambitious attempt in today’s market. While there’s much praise to be given in what it’s trying to attempt, there’s little admiration in the way of what the game has actually accomplished.

The game starts off displaying its epistolary narrative as this-supposedly-shipwrecked person gives his monologue to Esther. Only a few feet away from the starting point is a run-down cabin and lighthouse that looked to have been abandoned for years. From here, your investigation of this unnamed Hebridean island truly begins taking a turn for the stranger.

In regards to quality, this enigmatic story is one of the most erratic and engaging to be played in recent history. During the long hike to the end, many of the “Dear Esther…” monologues given (with different variants if you replay those sections) throughout the adventure evoke a sense of an awesome tragedy that’s rife with interesting symbolism-although biblical references feel clumsy. For every thought-provoking narration, there’s always a tawdry line or two that sticks out like a sore thumb, most noticeably when the narrator starts comparing body parts to the island. While these tasteless lines jut out every now and then, the story is oftentimes delivered in eloquently stated sentences that will stick with the player. The consistency is rather disheartening, but the great moments will more than likely be remembered.

The visuals are some of the best to be seen in an indie title. The amount of extra detail in the final product compared to the mod when it first released is astounding. From the draw distance of steep cliff heads to refulgent caves glimmering from the slightest hint of light, there’s always some artistic detail to appreciate from beginning to end. The technical requirements for the game are pretty low as well. Even though I played on a laptop and lowered the settings, it wasn’t hard for me to be left in awe at certain points, which was helped by a smooth frame rate-then again, walking and stopping are your only movement options. Overall, Dear Esther is worthy of winning visual design awards; it’s still technically limited to the aging engine being used, but that makes certain details all the more impressive.

The sound design in both voice acting and musical score are what truly shine. Despite being the only voice you’ll hear, Nigel Carrington’s excellent British timbre made every read letter to Esther a treat to hear. Even more interesting is the dedication given to the delivery of each line, even when the words would fall flat. Starting out as a more stolid narrator, his emotions began to grow more and more as we neared the finish line. As he became more acrimonious of the situation, I too would become more bitter about this island. Supporting these moments is a well-rounded track that contains a variety of stringed instruments and piano keys. Specific moments of discovery in Dear Esther become unforgettable thanks to these excellently-paced scores. While it’s a shame that the sound of soft footsteps are essentially filler until the next invisible line is crossed to start the next narration or score, the sound design still stands as the best quality to be found in this title.

The gameplay, or lack thereof, in Dear Esther is the weakest aspect of the game. You’re limited to only a few buttons: the W, A, S, and D keys are for movement, Q key to swim up, and left-click on the mouse allows you to zoom in. Even from this reduced control scheme, the forward, right, and left movements can still get you through the game, since there’s no oxygen meter for the underwater sections. What this amounts to is an overwhelming feeling of a game controlling too much of what you’re allowed to do (even crouching is done automatically). While the idea of limiting the player’s fastest speed to a casual walk and turning the flashlight on naturally in dark areas does make sense from a pacing perspective, it also feels like a way to hide the fact that this adventure could be finished in a half-hour if it had a normal control scheme (average run-time will be around one and one-half to two hours).

While it may seem strange to lynch-pin storytelling to where I focus on gameplay, this is one of those rare cases where it makes sense. Dear Esther is reminiscent of the “Iceberg Theory” (found most popularly in Hemingway’s works) in regards to both narrative and gameplay. Similar to an iceberg, the twenty percent all gamers see (the control scheme) is there and restricted, while the other eighty percent (emotional exploration through storytelling) is-theoretically-meant to be deciphered by the gamer’s experience. Conceptually, this idea does make sense; however, Dear Esther’s scant monologue given to those who purposefully go off course harms what seems to be a brilliant idea. Even after wanting to get lost to hear more narrative, I was rarely rewarded for my searches. There are so many times presented for the player to either examine work and discover something, yet is treated with nothing but what’s presented to them. Even light green words etched across cliff walls don’t present anything that gives a better direction to this vague story. After becoming lost so often with little reward for it (one time I received just a simple sentence for intentionally taking a wrong route), it came with great disappointment to realize Dear Esther’s overall gameplay is downright obstructing, both above and below the surface.

While Dear Esther does feel utterly lacking in some regards, I still believe these types of “games” do have a place in this medium. You can have great story-driven games with limited control schemes, but not to the point of feeling bare-boned. For all the criticism given to “hand-holding” games, I don’t see why heuristic titles that offer no reward in discovery shouldn't receive the same amount of ire from gamers; in fact, it’s kind of nice to know I’m not going to be fooled with those other popular titles (which shall remain nameless) into believing there is something tangible between point A and point B. I can appreciate the themes presented in a poetic manner throughout the story, though roadblocks make it feel pretentious at times, and the excellent visual/audio design, but it comes at such a detrimental cost. In the end, Dear Esther presents an educated challenge on what to expect in a game, yet stumbles on the most elementary methods.

coolbeans' *RotteN* badge
Haunting score
Pushes the definition of what makes a game
Story can be intriguing at times...
...though sometimes fumbles in delivery
Bad gameplay decisions
Short with little replay value
Graphics This beauty is welcoming to a wide range of computers/laptops.
Sound It's tough to choose which is more impressive: the bolstered score from the original mod or how meticulous the delivery was for the only voice in the game.
Gameplay There are moments where the lack of gameplay works in Dear Esther's favor, but they're few and far between.
Fun factor I have had more fun deciphering the possible meanings of the story than playing the game.
Overall (out of 10 / not an average)
coolbeans  +   1374d ago
Hope everyone enjoyed the review. :D

It's rather surprising to see how tough it was to review a game that's based so much around experiences. It was a fun criticism, but felt like a chore to explain sometimes.


Even though I watched this BEFORE purchasing the title, I can now see that the likes of other games I was eyeing like 'The Path' are probably not for me (save if it's free). I recommend watching the Jimquisition video linked and reading RobotGeeker's solid 9.0 review (on this site) so you get a better idea of where your allegiances lie. It seems to be one of those divisive games that you'll either love or hate.
#1 (Edited 1374d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
Captain Tuttle  +   1371d ago
Very well written. You're a good writer.
coolbeans  +   1371d ago
*blushes* Thank you :)
M1chl  +   1373d ago
I have kind of same opinion, but for me its not much of the game, its more like program. I bought it and I feel like that money goes intothis product, was horribly wasted. I don't even got some emotional connection, its was just bad. I guess, that these days you can do something different and you will be priced by many people, just to be different, despite the fact that you "game" sucks. I don't want to be a hater, because we need more different experiences, but not in this way.
Valenka  +   1373d ago
Good review, but I can't help but notice that it's a review from someone who doesn't really understand the vision and basis behind the game. It's not meant to have some sort of extensive or in-depth gameplay, hence the simplistic control scheme. The game is meant to tell a story, and while I can understand the overall disappointment that one might have after purchasing it and realizing it's not much of a game but a story-telling, that's why one ought to research the game first. ;)
coolbeans  +   1373d ago
From the review: "Unwilling to bow down to conventional game wisdom, Dear Esther is a game that focuses more on stimulating the player through storytelling rather than gameplay mechanics-an ambitious attempt in today’s market."

Although I'm glad you commented (your comments are always welcome :D), your assumption is wrong. You would be correct if you stated I don't have much experience in these games like "The Path", "Everyday The Same Dream", and whatever other walking games there are, but from the very start I knew this game's intention; in fact, that very premise is what got me excited about purchasing it.

Dear Esther is not just a 'simple control scheme' we like to say with all 'art games,' it's one of the most obstructive I've ever played. I'm not asking for something in-depth, I'm just...asking for something in general beyond the crossing of an invisible line to hear more monologue or music. I want to at least be rewarded with something if I dig through some of the abandoned houses. I feel as if I'm being treated like an idiot when a game essentially tells me how to play it; to quote the link given: "Walk, but don't run. Look, but don't touch." As stated in the review, I don't see how this treatment is any different than hand-holding games that highlight each objective for you.

Towards the end, even the storytelling started to dawdle that line of deep meaning and intentionally vague b/c they were out of ideas. I also find it tough for anyone to disagree that the final act has examples of bad storytelling. The only way to decipher the long, final phrase written on the cliff side was by strafing left, then right up some stairs while writing down the painted words on a notepad with your free hand (fine exaggeration, but you get the point).

And yes I have done ample research on this title. From the time I heard it, this was a game I was rooting for (look at my comment in the other n4g review). It just simply failed to deliver in a few important categories (even in story and storytelling).
#3.1 (Edited 1373d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
Valenka  +   1373d ago
I stand corrected and tip my hat to you, coolbeans. Apologies for the false assumption. :O
coolbeans  +   1373d ago
No problem. If you wish to discuss the game and/or review further (since you're out of bubbles D:), feel free to PM me with...well generally whatever you want to ignite more enjoyable discussion.

Denethor_II  +   1373d ago
The game left me thinking after I finished it, and for quite a while after I still felt a little depressed thinking about it. Whenever we view, play or listen to any kind of media it should make us feel a certain emotion, and for me the game really delivered in what it set out to do.
Letros  +   1373d ago
It's not for everyone, I particularly enjoyed it because I feel it explores the idea of video games being a medium for a more narrative story, there's definitely a disconnection between traditional games, which is both an accomplishment and maybe a failure.
coolbeans  +   1373d ago
@ Denethor_II

I can agree that I was left trying to dive deeper into the story as well. Like other minimalist gameplay/narrative games I've played, Dear Esther did leave me with a few emotional moments. UNLIKE those other minimalist games I've played, I felt Dear Esther took away too many of the novelties those other games employed. As much as I enjoy the "Iceberg Theory" in narratives, I don't like when certain elements feel intentionally shackled. To be honest, I'd rather just read some of Hemingway's stories for the sake of knowing I won't feel like I'm running into pretentious material.

@ Letros

Regardless of the score, I still appreciate those creators trying to break the mold. It's not so much the disconnect in "traditional" games that's the failure but rather the seemingly outright rejection of necessary game fundamentals; the most obvious of these aspects DE ignored was actually feeling stimulating.

Of course, it's agree to disagree in the end...but I thank you for your input and hope for more :).
#6 (Edited 1373d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
Letros  +   1373d ago
I fully understand man, this type of game is going to have mix opinions, and I fully respect yours.

Possibly their next project, Amnesia: A Machine for Pigs will be a smash hit. Amnesia walked the fine line between traditional horror gameplay, so it might be the perfect project for them.
Jurat  +   1373d ago
Whilst I was blown away by what thechineseroom managed to achieve with rather dated tech, I did find Dear Esther to be one of be most passives experiences in a video game to date. I thoroughly enjoyed it, but found I was unable to engage at any kind of emotional level due to It's brevity.
MySwordIsHeavenly  +   1372d ago
I was the same way with Journey. :) It was an enjoyable experience, but...where was the emotion? I never once felt connected to the character(s).
s45gr32  +   1371d ago
response to review
Great review and yes this is my first artsy walking game. I was surprised by the lack of gameplay to the point that I wanted so bad to examine the books, medical equipment scattered around and also some puzzles would of help to expand and add more meaning to say story. Is just how can I call dear esther a game when there is no puzzles, enemies, etc. all I do is walk from point A to point B; nevertheless, it delivers a great emotional story.


Basically you came to this deserted island to visit your dead wife called esther and how this island used to be prosperous via fishing, goat herding, etc. but as time went along, one of the inhabitants called Jacob got a disease from who knows what whether it was from the goats or the sea is not explained. You as the gamer do see were Jacob was buried (were the cross is at). Is very emotional and along the way you break your leg; later in the game you find out that esther died in a car accident through the dream that you play through. Apparently the husband of Esther wrote her a lot of letters and is clear by the end of the game were all the letters ended up in the ocean is also clear that from the medical equipment laying around that the people of the island were trying to cure each other............

If I am wrong let me know it does have a good story.
coolbeans  +   1371d ago

While I need to go somewhere online and reread all of the different verses to better support my theory, my initial thoughts were that my trip through the island was a manifestation of his subconscious while he's recovering from the accident with Esther (or she may be dead already). Although he has those letters set out to sea, I think that's metaphorical for honest feelings/adventures in his head that he'll never be able to discuss with her.

I accidentally stumbled upon this notion by falling into the water and constantly hearing the "Come back" line. That spoke to me in the way other mediums have discussed the mind before, like Inception, as it were a huge maze or prison that's forcibly guiding you along to admit to 'true reality' (which is typically the big plot twist). Here, it seems like he never meets that reality and instead keeps randomly replaying similar themes over and over again (notice how lines are delivered semi-randomly in each different playthrough).

This theory hits a few ruts in regards to the other characters mentioned (Jakobsin and Donnelly), but perhaps there's something there that supports my theory that I may have forgotten.

Edit: Argh at bubble system >:( Everyone can still feel free to discuss this (be sure to mention spoilers). I'll respond with PMs if you want to keep story theories going.
#8.1 (Edited 1371d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
Krew_92  +   1370d ago
Great review. This game, as boring as it felt throughout the time I played it, I just couldn't put down. I was interested in the story. Although I do wish the character could move a little faster.

I often saw myself lost, and going in the wrong direction at times sometimes the path wasn't too clear.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login

Dear Esther

Average Score 7.8 Reviews(68)