250°

Destiny review copies to arrive to reviewers one day before release

"Destiny developer Bungie and publisher Activision have decided to ship out review copies for their game for arrival on Monday, Sept. 8. As the game launches on Sept. 9, there is no practical way for us to have a Destiny review in time for its launch at midnight on the 9th in your territory of choice."

Mikelarry3514d ago

I played the beta so i am not that worried as i know what to expect.

Palitera3514d ago (Edited 3514d ago )

In terms of content you don't. They can make the game insanely repetitive if they follow the mission design used on the beta missions. And to be fair, that's what I think will happen. Will hurt reviews? Absolutely, but tho$e DLC have to be needed...

Also, the story can suck and the equip progression can be badly made, since it's their first time dealing with loot. Judging from the beta, it seems like you'll need a hundred games (notice: on the same damn few areas) to get even one piece of equip. I'm ok that high tier stuff needs work to be got, but not in a Dragon Age 2 level design.

Etc etc etc.

Anyway... Some people praise even Warframe as a great game, so whatever...

Mikelarry3514d ago (Edited 3513d ago )

After reading your comment below i cant really take you seriously. brainwashing.. sheep, so tell me if all reviewer gave it a 10 would that make you run out and buy a game instead off you playing a beta and researching the product thoroughly.

if you search the internet you will find videos of bungie talking about what to expect in the final game

so ill make my statement clearer, i have played the beta, i know of bungie past work and i have watched the videos of them explaining what to expect when the game releases so i am not that worried about reviews and if it turns out to be a bomb i will have noone to blame but myself because i did proper research into this title before preordering

i also find your hypocrisy laughable, games you care about like pt and wild even though you just like me you have seen a small section of the game you praise them like the second coming but just because you dont care for destiny you try to down play it...

and i quote from your comment history

"Now wait this baby grow and have an affair with No Man's Sky... Boom! The game to kill all games. "

"More likely to blow my heart.

Seriously, this teaser is already dangerous"

"Judging for the demo, I vote the opposite. It was masterfully done in first person.

The scarier, the better"

PSN-JeRzYzFyNeSt3514d ago

lol im pretty sure Destiny is Packed with Content nothing can have less content then COD games lol now thats repetitive and we see how well that does..

NukaCola3514d ago

A game this big needs at least 1 to 2 weeks. You won't get to see much of anything in 24 hours.

3-4-53513d ago (Edited 3513d ago )

If I want a game.....I'm getting it, unless it's a unanimous 4/10 or something like that.

Some of my favorite NES/Genesis/SNES/N64 games were 5/10,6/10 type of games.

I just didn't know it at the time because I was having so much fun.

Phene3513d ago

So true ...if I want something I'm buying it. Battlefield 4 is a perfect example ...turned out to be disappointing, but I preordered because I love the franchise.

Walker3514d ago

No surprise there. It's a big budget AAA title in 2014; any and all tricks in order to skate by with higher sales will be used.

longcat3514d ago (Edited 3514d ago )

If they gave reviewers early copies, some would simply accuse them of trying to influence them with perks and favors. There's no winning. This is actually fair to smaller outlets that do not have the influence necessary to get an early copy. Its actually pretty fair. All reviewers get the game at basically the same time.

They had a beta to demonstrate the game and they are not forcing anyone to buy it day 1.

1nsomniac3514d ago

The vast majority of titles get shipped to reviewers way before release so by that logic the majority of reviews are all biased?

There's only 1 reason for not providing early review copies & everybody knows the reason for this by now.

3514d ago
Shadonic3514d ago

I doubt its because of that, most likely due to leaks plus the Servers not even being active until the day before release as well. I wonder how their going to even review Destiny as a whole considering how the game will be adding new things ( possibly large and small things ) over the time on a daily bases. Will they give it more time or take what they have at face value ignoring a major part of it being an open and ever changing world?

Phene3513d ago

I've seen ign review of a period of time, I'm assuming that's how they'll do destiny. But let's be real this game is gonna receive high praise.

OrangePowerz3514d ago

Most played the beta and know what to expect. Maybe they just don't want stuff to be leaked.

admiralvic3514d ago

I'm not surprised. The game requires server access, which Bungie has already revealed won't happen until it's the 9th somewhere (or something like that), which means it would be impossible to play the game until then anyway.

qwerty6763514d ago

its because they know it will get high reviews. however i feel like a title like this requires people to experience a lot of the multiplayer capabilities with the masses to get a better picture.

Show all comments (51)
240°

Destiny Made Over $160 Million In Microtransaction Revenue In Less Than 2 Years

Destiny has made over $160 million in MTX revenue, and these numbers only account the data from late 2017 to early 2019.

Sgt_Slaughter323d ago

That's extremely low for microtransactions, especially for a game that's essentially designed around it

LucasRuinedChildhood323d ago (Edited 323d ago )

This was back when the game wasn't free to play.

The figures are from November 2017 to February 2019 (1 year and 4 months).

Based on that projection, the MTX revenue for Destiny 2 likely would have been closer to ~$240m for 2 years.

Not sure if premium expansions are included in that figure either although ... I'd hope that they are though and that most of the revenue was for actual content like Forsaken.

People spend way too much money on cosmetics.

Rude-ro322d ago (Edited 322d ago )

Seasons($10 and just got bumped to $12) and dungeon keys($10 each, two a year) are through the eververse(micro transaction) store.
So for those two years, in order to play a season, you would pay through micro transactions.

Sonic1881322d ago (Edited 322d ago )

Bungie Marathon will be worse since it's designed around it as well

Kurt Russell322d ago

It makes me sad to agree... but at the same time I am looking forward to giving it a go. Destiny 2 is so far in, I find it difficult to figure out what I am meant to do first.

buffig323d ago

I think FIFA alone makes over $1bn a year from mtx

anast322d ago

FIFA promotes a worldwide sport. It should make more money than destiny.

CantThinkOfAUsername322d ago (Edited 322d ago )

Let's compare something similar. Apex Legends and its ridiculous $18/$40 skins make EA a billion each year.

z2g322d ago

For as much as ppl complain how much they hate microtransactions, they sure don’t act like it. No wonder they aren’t going anywhere.

spicelicka322d ago

By "people" you're referring to millions and millions of people. Obviously the ones complaining aren't necessarily the same as the ones spending all that money.

322d ago Replies(1)
322d ago
Father__Merrin322d ago

There's millions that purchase MTX and there's nothing we can do about it

Show all comments (17)
70°

Stop Trying To Make Destiny

In Episode 1 of Spot On, a new weekly news show, Gamespot talks about the dangers of chasing a trend.

Read Full Story >>
gamespot.com
100°

Destiny 1 Becomes Playable on PC via Emulation

Playing Destiny 1 on PC has been something fans have been requesting for years. It looks like Destiny 1 is now playable on PC via the RPCS3 emulator.

Read Full Story >>
gamejunkie.net
spoonard474d ago

I've been thinking about playing through D1 again before it goes away...

CobraKai473d ago

That’s the sad reality of a game like this. I bought it, invested lots of money, and it can go away at anytime. I still think this was more fun than 2.

jeromeface472d ago

prob because 2 is a grindfest slog

spoonard470d ago

That's the bummer of 'games as a service'.