160°

Snake moves with the times, Lara doesn't.

Eurogamer: Lara Croft and Solid (or Naked, or whatever) Snake: you can't rival these two rock stars of gaming for their iconic power. And though Snake's roots go back a little further, they both have a deep, emblematic connection with the fifth generation of game consoles, the so-called PlayStation generation - those heady days of the late 90s when gaming burst out of teen bedrooms, into 3D and into a cinematic world of high adventure and sexy intrigue.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
DarkOcelet3532d ago

Capcom making resident evil a timed exclusive with be met with even more negativity to ms . Its really weird how they are always attracting such bad news for gamers and besides halo 5 and quantum break , they needed a third exclusive to rival the exclusives sony has announced , bloodborne , uncharted 4 , the order 1886 , and they still havent announced what mediamolecule and guerrilla games , maybe tgs will have more exclusives in 2015 , for ms .. they really need to pick up the pace but in a better way as they actually put themselves in a bad position with that announcement .

OmegaShen3532d ago

MM has already shown their game at Gamescom.

scark923532d ago

I think they have another unannounced game, lets hope so, as Tearaway is not exactly a new IP

iamnsuperman3532d ago (Edited 3532d ago )

That isn't the new game. Tearaway was made by a small team (I think 14) at media Molecule. This is just them porting it over with some changes (because its sales were abysmal). The new media Molecule was teased not so long ago with that trippy teaser with all the colours going all wrong (bug)

Read it here http://uk.ign.com/articles/...

Lightning Mr Bubbles3532d ago

I missed the whole thing of when Tomb Raider became relevant again. Tomb Raider was back in the good old days of Crash Bandicoot.

Lightning Mr Bubbles3532d ago

No way, if Resident Evil becomes XBOX One exclusive I will riot, People will be tearing down XBOX headquarters.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3532d ago
jackanderson19853532d ago

they have Halo, Gears, Forza, Quantum, Crackdown, D4, Phantom Dust, Scalebound, Sunset Overdrive, Fable.... i think MS has a handy number of exclusives to be honest and those are just the announced ones (there is more I just don't wanna list every single title)

MS have 17 first party game development studios, I think the above are like 6 of them if even that

DarkOcelet3532d ago (Edited 3532d ago )

Phantom dust news will come 2015 so it may or may not be released in 2015 and crackdown is 2016 , D4 might be a timed exclusive because deadly premonition was timed too , scalebound will also likely to come to the ps4 just like bayonetta did ... Gears is 2016 too. I am talking about exclusives in 2015 .

lunatic00013532d ago (Edited 3532d ago )

Yeah...that what makes me mad about ms...they have franchises like conker...banjo...and perfect dark...why don't they start bringing those franchises back...hell I would love to see lost odyssey 2 on xb1...but what do they do...get tomb raider....exclusive...for a little while -_- ...d4 maybe but scalebound...I highly doubt that's coming out on anything but xb1

Clown_Syndr0me3532d ago

Tomb raiders great the way it is. It doesn't need to evolve with the time. Not every game needs to go Sci fi/futuristic.
I was a huge fan of MGS until MGS4, which was awful IMO.
The latest installment seems to head back to its roots, thank god.

jetlian3532d ago (Edited 3532d ago )

i gave you an agree on mgs4 but the article wasnt about evolving. the writer is mad MS tied up tomb raider while praising konami for opening mgs up to valve!

He was trying to insult MS and SE. If so why isnt he on SE for giving sony kingdom hearts 1.5 and 2.5 hmmmm. Wheres the sega yakuza moving with the times. The writer was hating look at this.

" Microsoft finds Xbox One lagging so far behind PS4 in sales that it's not prepared to entrust the 2015 holiday season to a fair fight between the first-party big hitters - Sony's Uncharted 4 and its own Halo 5"

As if MS with halo is worried about uncharted!

TheGrimReaper00113531d ago (Edited 3531d ago )

Well, it seems you are rather clueless on how Sony works with IP's.
Very clueless indeed.

Sony owns ALL their exclusive IP's. This is to prevent them from being released on other consoles. I believe this started during the PS3 era.

Now, when was Kingdom Hearts 1 and 2 released?
2002 and 2005
What about Yakuza?
2005(J) and 2006 (EU+NA)

The PS3 was announced in 2005 and released 2006.
At this time, Sony wanted to secure their exclusives for the PS3.
Yakuza 1 was already then established as an IP owned by Sony and that's why Yakuza 1 - 5 are ALL exclusive to Sony platforms

Kingdom Hearts 1 was released as a NON owned IP by Sony and that's why we have seen Kingdom Hearts on the DS twice, on the PSP and 3DS.

Because, however, Sony can claim exclusive rights over titles, Square Enix is allowed to re-release Kingdom Hearts 1 and 2 on the platform that Sony chooses, which was the PS3
But even if you take this out of the account, Kingdom Hearts 1 and 2, re chain of memories were all on DVD's, same as the XB360 games.
Putting 2 DVD's on 1 is somthing the XB360 doesnt do. Putting 2 DVD's on a blueray?

It has way more space.

Also, other proof of this?
Kingdom Hearts 3 is going to be released on both the PS4 and XB1. Why? Because Sony doesn't own the IP. End of story. Good day to you

3531d ago
medman3531d ago (Edited 3531d ago )

@jetlian
Microsoft should be worried, but not for any one game...rather the plethora of games coming exclusive to ps4, as well as tech like morpheus, vitatv, psnow, and shareplay...the list of exclusive games is already staggering, with my personal favorites including Uncharted, The Order, Bloodborne, No Man's Sky, Abzu, Rime, Wild, The Tommorrow Children, The Vanishing of Ethan Carter, Until Dawn, Alienation, Everybody's Gone to the Rapture, The Witness, Media Molecule's new game, Sony Santa Monica's new game, Sony Bend's new game, Guerilla's new game, Quantic Dreams new game, etc. etc. etc. Not to mention the multiplats that will sell more on ps4, such as Destiny, GTAV, Far Cry 4, Project Cars, The Division (even though it will get dlc first on xbone), MGSV, Arkham Knight, The Witcher 3, Star Wars Battlefront...if you think Halo is going to bail Microsoft out, you must be one of those who thought Titanfall was going to be game of the year and also triumph in sales. I sincerely hope you're not one of those who thinks it isn't a game if it doesn't have guns. Good luck with all that.

jetlian3531d ago (Edited 3531d ago )

GRIM 360 has games on 4 dvds no excuse as to why any of these game not on 360. Japanese dont want to work with MS unless they willing to pay for it.

tales games recently only come on sony systems wheres the out cry?

medman listing indies and changing the subject. I dont care what new game such and such is doing til I see it

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3531d ago
trouble_bubble3532d ago (Edited 3532d ago )

@clown
The gameplay in ground zeroes is closer to mgs4 and peace walker than any other metal gear that you liked. The camera, customizing, codec, controls and larger maps/multiple paths have been carried over from mgs4 while the Fulton and mission score rankings from peace walker have been as well. What's this "return to roots" you speak of?!

@jetlian
Yakuza was always a Japanese niche. That's the difference. No one expects it to flip flop, especially when the last two, three actually if you count the HD collection, weren't even --released-- outside of japan!! How could Ishin be multiplat when the xbone hasn't even gone on sale there yet, lol!? Come ON guy.

jetlian3531d ago (Edited 3531d ago )

who was talking about ishin only and you totally side stepped SE own kingdom hearts!

MGS started on ps and has since moved around so whats stopping yakuza and kingdom hearts and a host of other games?

can I get more tales of games?

Clown_Syndr0me3531d ago

It just felt less futuristic and Sci fi. O think it was the theme that felt better to me. I dunno, I love Snake Eater the most though.

Artemidorus3532d ago

Suprise suprise. Eurogamer. That website has been PRO Sony from day one. Xbox bags Tomb Raider so they talk down on it.

Turning into fanboy websites never mind the fanboy comments.

You want Tomb Raider? You pay otherwise put up and shut up until you are told different.

kaelix3532d ago

haven't been keeping up with eurogamer for a while but throughout the cycle of ps3 eurogamer gave ps3 a fair share of doom and gloom articles for the system

scark923532d ago

Or you can wait a year, Timed Exclusives are not exactly system sellers imo. Maybe for hardcore fans.

alb18993532d ago (Edited 3532d ago )

It will depends on how good and popular the game is. Let see what brings TR.
Wait for time exclusive resident evil or Devil May Cry.....I can see it happen.

Tundra3531d ago

Lol Eurogamer... Pro Sony.

You must've missed the entirety of the last-gen of consoles.

strangeaeon3531d ago

Let the trashing of TR begin now that MS has it as a timed exclusive. This attitude would not exist if it had been Sony.

70°

Why Are Steam's Recommendations Dogpoop?

Blindfolding myself and clicking a Steam page at random would serve me better recommendations than Steam’s algorithm

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
UltimateOwnage9d ago

Hmm, not sure I agree with that. The recommendations I get are usually pretty good, but then again I have pretty large library of games on Steam and hundreds of them in my wish list, along with lots of curators I follow for it to build recommendations off of. On occasion it will throw me a random FIFA game or something I've never bought or shown interest in, but mostly its decent IMO.

80°

5 Best Metroidvania Games on Steam (March 2024)

Dive into the best Metroidvania games on Steam, from hidden gems to top-rated classics, and embark on unforgettable adventures!

jznrpg19d ago

Skul is a metroidvania ? It’s on PS+ soon I’ll check it out. If it’s good I’ll buy a copy physically if they have one

Nacho_Z19d ago

If Pseudoregalia is one of the best I'd hate to see what the worst look like.

330°

Dragon’s Dogma 2 releases to mixed user reviews, as microtransactions criticised

Players can pay to edit their character, resurrect the dead and other actions.

Read Full Story >>
videogameschronicle.com
AdonisIsBeast27d ago

Who cares as long as it’s optional

phoenixwing27d ago

paying to edit your character is kind of crap as far as microtransactions go

Xristo27d ago (Edited 27d ago )

I hate any/all MTX in a paid game (especially a full-price game)... but know that you can spend in-game currency (RC), which you get from killing mobs, to completely remake your character.

phoenixwing27d ago

@xRisto how much did it change the gameplay though? Changing your character would have probably not cost any rc if they weren't hellbent on getting money by making it inconvenient

koga8827d ago

You can literally edit your character using in-game gold, dropped from monsters or obtained from selling items, as soon as you reach the first main town. You can even use Rift Crystals obtained from other people using your pawn or dropped from monsters to change your entire character or Pawn. It's paying to avoid doing something that is literally in the game.

PRIMORDUS27d ago

They are lucky there using Denuvo or their game and all future DLC etc. would be for free. 🤣

phoenixwing27d ago

@koga you completely missed the point i was making but go ahead and act like i'm being the wrong one

lucian22926d ago

you can pay ingame currency though; why are ya so derp

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 26d ago
Crows9027d ago (Edited 27d ago )

Capcom cares quite a bit....hence why it was kept from reviewers and initial impressions.

As far as optional...yeah...ALL mtx are optional. That's not the problem. The miss the mark entirely.

Heck buying the game is "optional" too.

The fact that they were hiding this is scummy as hell. I was going to buy this day 1 or day 3. Now I'm reconsidering the purchase entirely because as the reviews point out...there are certain design decisions which have not changed but funnily enough seem to be remedied by these mtx...

In other words they may have left certain features in the game in order to monetize them. So the mtx affected the development of the game in a negative way.

garos8227d ago

I'm certainly not buying it anymore. It has affected at least one sale from me. I'll pick it up second hand

peppeaccardo27d ago

Very close to buy the game at a discounted price but not anymore.
Bad business practice and hence they do not get my support/money !

warriorcase26d ago

It wasn't kept fromreviewers s though. Twitter reviewers are saying there was mention of mtx's in the reviewers guide

-Foxtrot27d ago (Edited 27d ago )

STOP. USING. THAT. SHITTY. EXCUSE

God damn man

Look how DLC changed after Oblivions horse armour, within 10 years most developers took the absolute p***. What was said then aswell? “It’s only optional who cares?” Now look where we all are.

There’s no half measures with these things, when will people realise this.

jwillj2k427d ago (Edited 27d ago )

Oh it’s gonna get worse. Ng+ locked behind mtx, “cool downs” preventing you from playing for more than 3 hours at a time unless u pay the mtx for unlimited access, main campaign bosses, in-game music, certain dialog, difficulty modes, certain npc interactions, all locked behind mtx, etc.. etc. gonna end up being like the NBA 2k games eventually paying for cross overs and shit… They gon get mid-evil on our asses.

OMGitzThatGuy27d ago

I can guarantee most of the items you can buy with mtx and ingame currency wouldn’t exist in ANY paid form if the main goal wasn't monetization. If the goal is to give idiots who are willing to pay for basic game features as mtx a way to do things faster then the only ones the mtx hurt are the non paying players as you are now locking features behind a grind that you chose to put in the game that you are essentially admitting to creating some type of time sink. I have never heard of a game locking basic character editing behind a ingame paywall, it’s usually just an option.

Chard26d ago

Takes two to tango though - unfortunately people buy this garbage which incentivises the behaviour. It's an inevitable outcome of the profit motive

thorstein27d ago

@Mario

Yes. And so are resurrection "Wakestones." You can find them but they're rare.

victorMaje27d ago

Buying the game is now very optional too. If you don’t know why then you don’t get it.

shinoff218327d ago

Because it's only a door way. That's why we care. We've already seen some shit since Mtx was introduced.

Rimeskeem27d ago

1. DD2 is an ARPG with 8 different playable classes
2. There is no multiplayer aspect to the game
3. You can only have one character (have to pay for more)
4. You cannot delete the character unless you go into the game files
5. The game is $70 dollars upfront

Having to pay for more character slots in a game that *features* 8 playable classes is pretty much not optional for an ARPG.

Angyobangyo27d ago

Judging from steam reviews, gamers care. Not plastic gamers. Why didn’t Itsuno mention such MTX would be available in-game? Why weren’t the MTXs there for review copies?

Kiryu199227d ago

Who cares is how all this started. The many many excuses. Please keep defending these greedy publishers and unfair tactics. We be gamers are the problem

Horse armor

$10 online passes if buying a used copy

Cheat codes gone and are replaced by micro transactions

Unlocking stuff by playing games behind micro transactions and XP boosters

It’s only cosmetic

No one is being forced to spend even though publishers are literally making their games more grindy to force people to play

Full priced games have mobile game type micro transactions

$70 priced games because higher development costs while making record profits and laying off record number of employees

And to play the game early pay us extra $20-30 on top of full price

Release games now and promise to maybe fix them later only to abandon the game

Day one patches that make the games worst

If it’s your favorite game defend the publisher if it’s not hate on another publisher for similar content

SixFrvgz26d ago Show
+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 26d ago
kenpachi27d ago

Must have picked up some EA crew to put this in the game

robtion27d ago

Yeah these are really bad ones. Directly impacting gameplay too. Super scummy move. I hope nobody buys them.

CrimsonWing6927d ago

Yet Helldivers 2 gets a pass? Y’know a GotY contender by the name of RE4 had them and so does Devil May Cry V. The funny thing is I enjoyed both of those games thoroughly without having to buy a single microtransaction.

What I do consider a valid complaint is not being able to start a new game or being able to edit your character. That’s kind of a seriously baffling decision, but then I think how I played Dragon’s Dogma 1 and I never edited my character and I just did a 100% playthrough on a single file and didn’t start a NG since. So, I don’t think these are really going to impact me, but I can see how it will others.

Crows9027d ago

Helldivers 2 is a live service game where everything is obtainable in game with incredible ease.

Not sure about re4 or DMC but nobody is giving anyone a pass ...this article is about dragons dogma 2...not those games.

What is valid are in game features made to supposedly force you to think carefully only to have a surprise online store offer solutions to built in problems for more money.

Goosejuice27d ago

Those same things they are selling can be found Ingame as well. U can buy the character editor through merchants with gold. Don't get me wrong..I dislike these mtx they are doing but you don't need to buy them to be able to get them.

CrimsonWing6927d ago (Edited 27d ago )

Oh my bad, I can’t bring up games with microtransactions that nobody had a sh*t fit over. My mistake.

I love how people move the goalpost.

Crows9027d ago

@goose
@crimson

All mtx sucks. I'd rather helldiver's not have them because it makes me wonder if the rate at which you collect materials. That said. The games features are all fully enjoyable and aren't affected by the mtx.

That's not the case with dragons dogma 2...they left in place features that are supposedly part of the challenge of the game only to let you buy your way out very conveniently. I didn't look through all of them but I've heard some are rare but can be purchased with more money now. Even more so in a game about managing weight load there's a tent, I believe, that you can pay more money for that weighs less than your typical tent...not all sure on all the mtx and I'm aware that you can purchase many through in game vendor but they're incredibly useful mtx that are obtained much more slowly in game...or even a limited amount of them.

Instead is selling fast travel...just let us don't for free....or instead of selling cosmetic changes...how about letting us do it for free...

Nothing in helldivers comes close to this abomination

Angyobangyo27d ago

One is a single player game and one is a live service game. One is $40 vs$70. And most importantly, one game is there to spread democracy.

Ironmike26d ago

It's not incredibly easy for certain things in helldivers though u still have grind quite bit but u ate correct in saying u can eventually get enough medals to purchase stuff

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 26d ago
Moegooner27d ago

Read your comment again and maybe, just maybe you might realise how dumb it was.

CrimsonWing6927d ago (Edited 27d ago )

What was dumb about it? That I pointed out the hypocrisy?

garos8227d ago

It was extremely scummy that capcom hid this from reviewers. I have no doubt this game is good but these type of microtransactions don't sit well with me. They've lost a sale from me

Lionsguard27d ago

I was going to pay full price to support this game because I've been waiting for it for forever but I think I'll wait until I get it for free from Epic or a Humblebundle monthly.

Redemption-6427d ago

I am not defending Capcom, as I am not a fan of MTX in single player games. I do however belive they were open to reviewers about having MTX in their game. The reviewers just decided to leave that part out. Which is very disingenuous. There are some companies that get away with these things. Image if this was done by EA, Ubisoft, or even Activision? I am positive those defending Capcom, would have had their pitchforks ready if the companies listed above did this

anast27d ago

That's why reviewers can't be trusted. In fact, they are not reviewers at all. They get free codes to talk about stuff they don't understand nor care about.

Sanctusone27d ago

I mean it was pretty obvious to anyone with eyes...one of the items you get from deluxe edition was in game items.
1500 Rift Crystals - Points to Spend Beyond the Rift (A)
Which honestly I figured they kept a similar mtx system like DMC5 and the optional red orbs.

Lionsguard27d ago

1500 Rift Crystals doesn't mean anything. The first game had Rift crystals too, you just earned them by people hiring your Pawn and you get it from certain quests.

anast26d ago (Edited 26d ago )

A reviewer's job is to point out the obvious of a product as though they were the consumer. This means reviewers, to do their actual job, would need to review the complete game: the edition they are reviewing, how they got the game, technical aspects, story, and monetization scheme. Since, it is obvious that MT's are a part of the game, it would need to be reviewed. This way people can be informed, so they can decide if they want to play this style of game/monetization scheme.

For example, AC Origins was bad with Mt's. I had to farm side missions or pay to advance the story. This was after I already did close to 25 or more side missions. While I was grinding there were constant reminders that I could pay to ease the grind. I would have never bought the game if it were reviewed properly.

Show all comments (78)