480°

Sony Comments On Lack of AAA Titles For PS4: "Perception Issue, 2015 Great For Core Players & More"

Playstation 4 is selling like a hot cakes, recently at GamesCom 2014, Sony announced that PS4 worldwide sales has crossed 10 million units. However, critics and fanboys have still tagged it as a "Console With More Indie Games" all because of lack of AAA titles, especially during upcoming Holiday Season.

nX3539d ago

"Starting with Destiny, it'll really begin to take off."
That's very true. From September onwards every month is filled with interesting games until at least March. Up to now I think both next-gen consoles had a pretty weak lineup but remember that the first year of every new console is/was pretty rough.

3539d ago Replies(12)
Sayai jin3539d ago

People need to patient with the next gen console as far as games. There was not a plethora of games last gen either. The games are coming.

esemce3539d ago

Please can you fools stop with this 'nextgen consoles' BS, They have been out nearly a year and are current gen.

3539d ago
Sayai jin3539d ago

@Esemce - Resorting to name calling. By your comment you are the only fool.

People forget that last gen consoles really did not have games flowing toil about 9 to 12 months. Plus there was not a lot of cross gen or last gen games being made for the PS2 or Xbox.

Letthewookiewin3539d ago

If there were no games on PS4 it wouldn't have sold 10 million units and double the X1. It's a ploy from the Xbot side. I've got a backlog on PS4 and there is absolutely no reason to own an X1. Ryse, no, Forza, no, Dead R 3, no. Titanfall, No! Sunset Overdrive, No. PS4 has a ton of games I have no idea what people are going on about.

ScorpiusX3538d ago

Feel the same way about Playstation , no need to buy ever. Besides got a cousin who owns a PS4,just borrow his win win for me without the expense.

Letthewookiewin3538d ago

So you want to barrow a PS4 because you dont have the money to buy one yourself. Gotcha.

Death3538d ago

It's awesome that you can completely dismiss games on the Xbox One and then say you have no idea why people say there are no games on PS4...

FanboyKilla3539d ago (Edited 3539d ago )

how is destiny a big deal for ps4? you can play that almost anywhere. granted they may give you a helmet or armor, but i bet you take all they give you off for whats in the game.

i actually played destiny on ps4 and xone. same f n game. it will come to your preference.

if you can play the game elsewhere, its not a plus for you. the delusion that multiplats run better on ps4, is a sony fanboys wet dream. not true, and you are still pissy.

im not a fanboy. i own all the next gen systems. so if i choose to play games where i can do more than just play games (xone) what do you have that i cant get anywhere else? drive club? forza horizon, checkmate. next. lbp3? ps3 and lmfao. what about me? im left in the cold because i wont eat the shit you feed me.

if this is sony doing a graet job, and their fans are contempt with it, ill be selling this ps4 soon. no need to keep it around hoping it gets better. according to sony and its fans its already awesome.

if you think you are awesome, but you are not. you wont be spending anytime trying to become awesome, because in your mind you already are. smh at the sony fans. you only hurting yourselves, trying to prove a point that is a lie, to someone online, that probably can give 2 shiznits about whatever you are saying.

im willing to bet destiny sales more on ps3 and 360. its a cross gen game for a reason. advertised through next gen systems. the game is last gen.

Hardcore_gamerxbox3538d ago

Can you name me exclusive AAA game on ps4 from September till March watever u said ?

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3538d ago
3539d ago
polow got sol3539d ago

So i guess this is sonys way of telling us to abandon 2014

Spotie3539d ago

No. It's their way of saying you're looking at it wrong.

mrpsychoticstalker3539d ago

I see no real triple AAA exclusives. Is that wrong?

MysticStrummer3539d ago

@polow - Look up the word "perception".

HiddenMission3539d ago

See below for games coming 2014 and tell me it's dead...if you can your not a gamer by any means.

Farcry 4
Dragon Age Inquisition
Disney Infinity 2.0 Marvel Super Heroes
Guilty Gear Xrd
Dragon Ball Z Xeno...something lol
Alien Isolation
Assassins Creed Unity
Shadows of Mordor
The Evil Within
Lords of the Fallen
Little Big Planet 3

PS: There are way more than this...these are just what I'm picking up.

imt5583539d ago (Edited 3539d ago )

From September and by the end of the year there is BUNCH of games on both sides. WTF?

Well, if you want to know ( Golf Club is on PS4 also ) :

http://i.imgur.com/EjkV2Ef....

http://i.imgur.com/nbZi7AO....

Btw. this month Diablo III and Metro Redux and InFamous for me. Maybe PvZ also.

iamnsuperman3539d ago (Edited 3539d ago )

While I would agree with you and it will sell on Xbox but the PS4 is in the same position the 360 was in the last generation (especially those regions in that era for the UK and USA). Destiny is going to sell more PS4 units that most of the exclusives it has this year. Destiny is popular and the PS4 version is popular also. That is why Sony is banking on it

come_bom3539d ago

All the disagrees! So I guess Destiny is not on the X1. Somebody better tell Bungie and Activision.

nX3539d ago

His comment had nothing to do with the topic at hand, hence the disagrees. We all know it's on Xbone as well, nobody talked about Xbone though.

ShowGun9013539d ago

the disagrees are because it doesn't matter where else it is. the article is about the ps4 having "no games"

not no AAA games.
not no exclusive games.

just games to play in general. so, besides having 2 infamous games, lbp3, and planetside 2, (probably forgetting something), the ps4 will also have the superior performing multi-plats... i'm really struggling to see how it has "no games"

no year 1 has looked this impressive.

HiddenMission3539d ago

Exactly, I think back to when the PS3 had it's 1st year it was really shallow and I had like maybe 10 games where as it's 9 months in and I know I have over 25...so yeah off to a great start and it's only going to get better.

MysticStrummer3539d ago

More people will play it… on PS4.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3539d ago
Show all comments (115)
70°

Disney Dreamlight Valley teases part two of paid expansion

Disney Dreamlight Valley devs have officially teased the second part of the paid expansion titled The Spark of Imagination.

70°

Best Stardew Valley Farm Names – 100 Funny, Nerdy, Cute Ideas and More

Starting out a new farm, but need help choosing a name? Check out this article for a 100 farm name ides for Stardew Valley.

200°

Bethesda Needs to Reduce the Gaps Between New Fallout and Elder Scrolls Releases

Waiting a decade for new instalments in franchises as massive as Fallout and Elder Scrolls feels like a waste.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
-Foxtrot14h ago

Microsoft have Obsidian but I feel it's Bethesda who just don't want to play ball as they've always said they want to do it themselves.

Once MS bought Zenimax in 2020 they should have put the Outer Worlds 2 on the back burner, allow Bethesda to finish off its own Space RPG with Starfield (despite totally different tone why have two in your first party portfolio with two developers who's gameplay is a tad similar) and got Obsidian for one of their projects to make a spiritual successor to New Vegas.

When the Elder Scrolls VI is finished Bethesda can then onto the main numbered Fallout 5 themselves.

The Outer Worlds 2 started development in 2019 so putting it on the back burner wouldn't have been the end of the world, they'd have always come back to it once Fallout was done and it would have been nicely spaced out from Starfields release once they had most likely stopped supporting it and all the expansions were released.

If they did this back in 2020 when they bought Zenimax and the game had a good, steady 4 - 5 years development, you might have seen it release in 2025.

We are literally going to be waiting until 2030 at the very earliest for Fallout 5 and all they seem bothered about is pushing Fallout 76.

RaidenBlack12h ago(Edited 12h ago)

Its not just only Todd not playing ball.
Obsidian have made a name for themselves in delivering stellar RPGs, but most famous once have always been sequels/spin-offs to borrowed IPs like KOTOR 2, Neverwinter Nights 2, Fallout: New Vegas, Stick of Truth etc.
Obsidian wants to invest more in their own original IPs like Outer Worlds or Pillars of Eternity with Avowed.
Similar to what Bluepoint & inXile wants to do or Kojima is doing (i.e not involving anymore in Konami's IPs).
So yea, even if New Vegas has the most votes from 3D Fallout fans, Obsidian just wants to do their own thing, like any aspiring dev studio and MS is likely currently respecting that.
But a future Fallout game from Obsidian will surely happen. Founder Feargus Urquhart has already stated an year ago that they're eager to make a new Fallout game with Bethesda, New Vegas 2 or otherwise. Urquhart was the director of the very first 1995's Fallout game after all.
And don't forget Brian Fargo and his studio inXile, as Brian Fargo was the director of Fallout's 1988 predecessor: Wasteland

KyRo8h ago(Edited 8h ago)

Obsidian should take over the FO IP. They're do far better with it than Bethesda who hasn't made a great game for almost 15 years

RaidenBlack2h ago(Edited 2h ago)

@KyRo
So, by 15 years, you mean Fallout 3 was the last great game Bethesda made?
You don't consider Skyrim a good game, which came out 13 years ago?
I'd consider Fallout 4 a pretty decent game as well. It's Story & RPG elements were a bit downgrade from New Vegas but the exploration and shooting on the other hand, were upgrades.
FO76 was disappointing and Starfield could've been better at launch I'll agree.

Duke198h ago(Edited 8h ago)

I disagree. Part of these games is the support for the mod community. If they move to releasing a "next game" every 2 or 3 years, the modding support plummets and the franchises turn into just another run of the mill RPG.

Make the games good enough to withstand the test of time, to keep people coming back to them and expanding on them with mod support.

--Onilink--5h ago(Edited 5h ago)

I dont think anyone is saying they need to come out every 2 years (not to mention almost no game is released that quickly anymore)

By the time Fallout 5 comes out, it will be more than 15 years since Fallout 4 came out (same with ES6 coming out 15 years after Skyrim). Even if you want to use F76 as the metric for the most recent release, that one came out in 2018. It will be a miracle if F5 comes out before 2030

The point is that for a studio that doesnt seem to operate with multiple teams doing several projects at once, that their projects normally take 4-5 years as a minimum, and that now they even added Starfield to the rotation, it becomes a 15+ years waiting period between releases for each series, which doesnt make sense. Imagine that Nintendo only released a mainline Mario or Zelda game every 15 years…

They either need to start developing more than 1 project at a time, let someone else take a crack at one of the IPs or significantly reduce their development times

Duke194h ago(Edited 4h ago)

Why should someone else take a crack at one of the IPs? Look at what happened to Final Fantasy as a recent example - there is pretty clear FF fatigue setting in because they are now pumping out titles in the franchise every few years. Pumping out more games faster doesn't always make a series better.

There are plenty of options to make new games, not just create more titles in the same universe at a faster pace.

-Foxtrot1h ago

"Why should someone else take a crack at one of the IPs"

He's literally just told you why

We're waiting like 15 years before a sequel comes out, it's insane

Skyrim came out in 2011, the next game is expected to come out in 2027 at the earliest so that's 16 years apart while Fallout 4 came out in 2015 and might not release until 2031, again 16 years.

We're fine with Bethesda trying new things and doing new IPs like Starfield but adding a new game to the cycle now means a bigger wait. Also Starfield didn't meet most peoples expectations, can you imagine waiting 15 years or so for a sequel and it's disappointing? It would feel even worse because you would have to wait another 15 years to see if they manage to come back from it.

They need to give it to another developer, we don't need main numbered titles but a spin off of Fallout and Elder Scrolls should be cycled in between the long gaps of the main releases.

Once again you are making out people want these games as quick as possible when all we want is a standard development time of at least 4 years or so rather than waiting 15.

mandf5h ago

Yeah I’m going to say it, who cares about the modding community when making a game? Half the time developers only tolerate modders because they fix there game for them.

Skuletor7h ago

Yeah, let's all advocate for smaller gaps between series' releases, then we'll probably get headlines about how the series have dropped in quality and they could have benefited from more time in the oven. Let them cook.

SimpleSlave6h ago

"how the series have dropped in quality and they could have benefited from more time in the oven" So every Bethesda game then? Got it.

Listen, I would agree if this was about From Software or something, but Bethesda?

🤣

C'mon now. What timeline are you from?

Skuletor4h ago

Think about it, they're already bug filled messes on their current schedule, can you imagine how much worse it would be if they rushed things?

-Foxtrot1h ago

@Skuletor

Who's saying to rush the releases? No one is saying that...

People just don't want to be waiting 15 years for a sequel, they aren't working on the game for that long, you do realise that right? The issue isn't coming down to them working on the game and us "rushing them", it's the fact they are working on other games like Starfield now meaning bigger gaps before they even get started on them.

I bet you any more Elder Scrolls VI only entered full development last year when Starfield was finished despite being announced in 2018.

Duke194h ago

I mean you aren't wrong. People are going to complain about anything

isarai6h ago

Hows about you focus on quality, just a thought 🤷‍♂️

Sciurus_vulgaris5h ago

Bethesda [or Microsoft] would have to reallocate internal and external studios towards fallout and elder scrolls titles. Bethesda has the issue of developing 2 big IPs that are large RPGs on rotation. If you want more Fallout and Elder Scrolls, development will have to be outsourced.

Show all comments (22)