320°

The One Upcoming Title Not On PS4 That You Really Want

There are lots of great games on the horizon, including PlayStation 4 exclusives. But which title NOT scheduled for Sony's console has caught your eye?

Read Full Story >>
psxextreme.com
randomass1713551d ago

I think mostly Zelda fans want this as oppose to everyone, but I'm getting it since my friend and I want to do co-op... too bad we HAVE to be in the same house to do it though. :/

Ballsack3551d ago

I don't want it on ps4

Zelda is tailor made for the wii u controller

I will buy a wii u when this game is released... Never thought I'd buy one but the wii u is starting to impress me now

UltraNova3550d ago

The wii u is quickly turning into something like that itch on the back of your head...you will scratch it eventually.. Resistance is futile!

ShinMaster3550d ago (Edited 3550d ago )

Not a lot of people bought the last two Zelda games.

Well, WWHD aside, Skyward Sword sold less than 3.8 million. It's not a bad number, but for a Zelda game, it's on the lower end and falls bellow 8 other Zelda games.
And Skyward Sword was released on the Wii, which was Nintendo's BEST SELLING home console of all time.
I'm not sure what it is, but it sure says something about... something...

greenlantern28143550d ago

You should it is a lot of fun. And that is what Nintendo should focus on making fun games. Mario U and MK8 are a blast to play with the family, or friends.

SilentNegotiator3550d ago (Edited 3550d ago )

I have a Ps4 and I'm not even remotely interested in this game. It isn't the presence of Zelda characters that make a great Zelda game, it's the gameplay, and it just looks like Dynasty Warriors.

randomass1713550d ago

Lots of Zelda fans seem interested so the brand is having some influence. I've only just gotten into Zelda myself so I think it will be a great way to get introduced to some of the previous game characters and play my first Warriors game in years. Like I said I think you need to be into Zelda to really want this game and it seems like you're not all that interested in Wii U. :P

Scatpants3550d ago

Yeah I have zero desire to play Hyrule Warriors. When the real Zelda comes out I might break down and pick up a WiiU though.

KingKelloggTheWH3551d ago

I Love Zelda, but I won't touch Hyrule Warriors.

I am tired of the Warrior games, and I see people complaining about them 24/7 but then this came out, and some reason people are hyping it?! It looks just like all the other warrior games! Just with a shiny new skin, why should we be excited for it? Just because it has the name Zelda in it, no thank you.

TekoIie3550d ago (Edited 3550d ago )

I've had the exact same reaction as you. I have friends getting excited for this game and I say the same thing every time.

If you're looking forward to this game so much I know a way for you to play it early and cheaper: http://www.amazon.com/Warri...

SimonSmith3551d ago

I have never been a fan of the Warriors games but I love Zelda and that is really my only reason for wanting Hyrule Warriors plus my brother in law is looking forward to the co-op.

FlameHawk3551d ago

Am I the only one who isn't interested in this? It's just Dynasty Warriors with Zelda skin, seriously. I'm only looking forward to Xenoblade Chronicles X on Wii U.

OtakuDJK1NG-Rory3551d ago (Edited 3551d ago )

" It's just Dynasty Warriors with Zelda skin"

SMH ........

FlameHawk3551d ago (Edited 3551d ago )

Explain to me how it isn't? It's made by the Dynasty Warriors developers who make Dynasty Warriors, so tell me how are they not going to be similar? Seriously? Instead of saying SMH, tell me how different it is other than Dynasty Warriors with Zelda skin. It's even considered a spin off of the Dynasty Warriors series. I mean there intention is to make it like Dynasty Warriors.

OtakuDJK1NG-Rory3550d ago (Edited 3550d ago )

Z-Targeting from Zelda series
Fight Zelda Giantic Bosses
Treasure Chest - Zelda Items
It has it own original story and characters

It not a spin off Dynasty Warriors series it a Spin off of the Zelda series. It just a collaboration and using the hack n slash gameplay with Zelda series action mechanics such as Z-Targeting dodging and rolling.

Sm00thNinja3550d ago

Your foolish to think this is anything but a dynasty warriors reskin. I wanted to think the same thing about Dynasty Warriors Gundam. Still I'm a fan of the endless cannon fodder wave gameplay so ill be picking this up

SilentNegotiator3550d ago

"Z-Targeting from Zelda series
Fight Zelda Giantic Bosses
Treasure Chest - Zelda Items
It has it own original story and characters"

So, targeting and Zelda characters with Zelda items. Did you even convince yourself?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3550d ago
Dasteru3550d ago

XBOne - Fable Legends, Quantum Break
WiiU - Zelda, Star Fox

randomass1713550d ago

Wii U also has Smash Bros., Bayonetta and Splatoon. I think XB1 is topped by Wii U in exclusives and it's also trumped on third parties by PS4. I like XB1's upcoming exclusives but I don't think they are as good as Nintendo's, let alone Sony's.

Savsky3550d ago (Edited 3550d ago )

Splatoon looks dumb.

Go ahead, give me a disagree. But Splatoon doesn't look as "innovative" as people are saying, and looks very boring and uninteresting.

randomass1713550d ago

I can't think of very many family friendly shooters out there and this is one that's made by Nintendo. Kinda like a Little Big Planet paintball shooter. I don't know how innovative it is but it looks like a really fun spin on the shooter genre.

Show all comments (45)
70°

Disney Dreamlight Valley teases part two of paid expansion

Disney Dreamlight Valley devs have officially teased the second part of the paid expansion titled The Spark of Imagination.

70°

Best Stardew Valley Farm Names – 100 Funny, Nerdy, Cute Ideas and More

Starting out a new farm, but need help choosing a name? Check out this article for a 100 farm name ides for Stardew Valley.

190°

Bethesda Needs to Reduce the Gaps Between New Fallout and Elder Scrolls Releases

Waiting a decade for new instalments in franchises as massive as Fallout and Elder Scrolls feels like a waste.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
-Foxtrot13h ago

Microsoft have Obsidian but I feel it's Bethesda who just don't want to play ball as they've always said they want to do it themselves.

Once MS bought Zenimax in 2020 they should have put the Outer Worlds 2 on the back burner, allow Bethesda to finish off its own Space RPG with Starfield (despite totally different tone why have two in your first party portfolio with two developers who's gameplay is a tad similar) and got Obsidian for one of their projects to make a spiritual successor to New Vegas.

When the Elder Scrolls VI is finished Bethesda can then onto the main numbered Fallout 5 themselves.

The Outer Worlds 2 started development in 2019 so putting it on the back burner wouldn't have been the end of the world, they'd have always come back to it once Fallout was done and it would have been nicely spaced out from Starfields release once they had most likely stopped supporting it and all the expansions were released.

If they did this back in 2020 when they bought Zenimax and the game had a good, steady 4 - 5 years development, you might have seen it release in 2025.

We are literally going to be waiting until 2030 at the very earliest for Fallout 5 and all they seem bothered about is pushing Fallout 76.

RaidenBlack11h ago(Edited 11h ago)

Its not just only Todd not playing ball.
Obsidian have made a name for themselves in delivering stellar RPGs, but most famous once have always been sequels/spin-offs to borrowed IPs like KOTOR 2, Neverwinter Nights 2, Fallout: New Vegas, Stick of Truth etc.
Obsidian wants to invest more in their own original IPs like Outer Worlds or Pillars of Eternity with Avowed.
Similar to what Bluepoint & inXile wants to do or Kojima is doing (i.e not involving anymore in Konami's IPs).
So yea, even if New Vegas has the most votes from 3D Fallout fans, Obsidian just wants to do their own thing, like any aspiring dev studio and MS is likely currently respecting that.
But a future Fallout game from Obsidian will surely happen. Founder Feargus Urquhart has already stated an year ago that they're eager to make a new Fallout game with Bethesda, New Vegas 2 or otherwise. Urquhart was the director of the very first 1995's Fallout game after all.
And don't forget Brian Fargo and his studio inXile, as Brian Fargo was the director of Fallout's 1988 predecessor: Wasteland

KyRo7h ago(Edited 7h ago)

Obsidian should take over the FO IP. They're do far better with it than Bethesda who hasn't made a great game for almost 15 years

RaidenBlack1h ago(Edited 1h ago)

@KyRo
So, by 15 years, you mean Fallout 3 was the last great game Bethesda made?
You don't consider Skyrim a good game, which came out 13 years ago?
I'd consider Fallout 4 a pretty decent game as well. It's Story & RPG elements were a bit downgrade from New Vegas but the exploration and shooting on the other hand, were upgrades.
FO76 was disappointing and Starfield could've been better at launch I'll agree.

Duke197h ago(Edited 7h ago)

I disagree. Part of these games is the support for the mod community. If they move to releasing a "next game" every 2 or 3 years, the modding support plummets and the franchises turn into just another run of the mill RPG.

Make the games good enough to withstand the test of time, to keep people coming back to them and expanding on them with mod support.

--Onilink--4h ago(Edited 4h ago)

I dont think anyone is saying they need to come out every 2 years (not to mention almost no game is released that quickly anymore)

By the time Fallout 5 comes out, it will be more than 15 years since Fallout 4 came out (same with ES6 coming out 15 years after Skyrim). Even if you want to use F76 as the metric for the most recent release, that one came out in 2018. It will be a miracle if F5 comes out before 2030

The point is that for a studio that doesnt seem to operate with multiple teams doing several projects at once, that their projects normally take 4-5 years as a minimum, and that now they even added Starfield to the rotation, it becomes a 15+ years waiting period between releases for each series, which doesnt make sense. Imagine that Nintendo only released a mainline Mario or Zelda game every 15 years…

They either need to start developing more than 1 project at a time, let someone else take a crack at one of the IPs or significantly reduce their development times

Duke193h ago(Edited 3h ago)

Why should someone else take a crack at one of the IPs? Look at what happened to Final Fantasy as a recent example - there is pretty clear FF fatigue setting in because they are now pumping out titles in the franchise every few years. Pumping out more games faster doesn't always make a series better.

There are plenty of options to make new games, not just create more titles in the same universe at a faster pace.

-Foxtrot42m ago

"Why should someone else take a crack at one of the IPs"

He's literally just told you why

We're waiting like 15 years before a sequel comes out, it's insane

Skyrim came out in 2011, the next game is expected to come out in 2027 at the earliest so that's 16 years apart while Fallout 4 came out in 2015 and might not release until 2031, again 16 years.

We're fine with Bethesda trying new things and doing new IPs like Starfield but adding a new game to the cycle now means a bigger wait. Also Starfield didn't meet most peoples expectations, can you imagine waiting 15 years or so for a sequel and it's disappointing? It would feel even worse because you would have to wait another 15 years to see if they manage to come back from it.

They need to give it to another developer, we don't need main numbered titles but a spin off of Fallout and Elder Scrolls should be cycled in between the long gaps of the main releases.

Once again you are making out people want these games as quick as possible when all we want is a standard development time of at least 4 years or so rather than waiting 15.

mandf4h ago

Yeah I’m going to say it, who cares about the modding community when making a game? Half the time developers only tolerate modders because they fix there game for them.

Skuletor6h ago

Yeah, let's all advocate for smaller gaps between series' releases, then we'll probably get headlines about how the series have dropped in quality and they could have benefited from more time in the oven. Let them cook.

SimpleSlave5h ago

"how the series have dropped in quality and they could have benefited from more time in the oven" So every Bethesda game then? Got it.

Listen, I would agree if this was about From Software or something, but Bethesda?

🤣

C'mon now. What timeline are you from?

Skuletor3h ago

Think about it, they're already bug filled messes on their current schedule, can you imagine how much worse it would be if they rushed things?

-Foxtrot38m ago

@Skuletor

Who's saying to rush the releases? No one is saying that...

People just don't want to be waiting 15 years for a sequel, they aren't working on the game for that long, you do realise that right? The issue isn't coming down to them working on the game and us "rushing them", it's the fact they are working on other games like Starfield now meaning bigger gaps before they even get started on them.

I bet you any more Elder Scrolls VI only entered full development last year when Starfield was finished despite being announced in 2018.

Duke193h ago

I mean you aren't wrong. People are going to complain about anything

isarai5h ago

Hows about you focus on quality, just a thought 🤷‍♂️

Sciurus_vulgaris4h ago

Bethesda [or Microsoft] would have to reallocate internal and external studios towards fallout and elder scrolls titles. Bethesda has the issue of developing 2 big IPs that are large RPGs on rotation. If you want more Fallout and Elder Scrolls, development will have to be outsourced.

Show all comments (22)