170°

Digital Foundry vs The Last of Us Remastered

Mystery has surrounded Naughty Dog's PlayStation 4 remaster of its survival horror classic, The Last of Us. Announced by error and with a somewhat muted marketing push, it's a remaster where the developer has seemingly been unwilling to actually show us the game in action, a state of affairs that persisted into E3 where it was mysteriously absent from the Sony press booth. Quite why this was the case remains a puzzle - Naughty Dog had nothing untoward to hide. It's a brilliant game.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
imt5583553d ago (Edited 3553d ago )

Game really smooth at 60 fps. Drops here and there and that's fine by me.

Reviews for now :

IGN: 10/10
Game Informer: 10/10
Videogamer.com: 10/10
Games Radar: 10/10
Meristation (Spanish): 10/10
vgnetwork (Italian): 10/10
Gameplanet: 9.5/10
Playstationer.net: 9.5/10
Multiplayer.it (Italian): 9.5/10
Vandal Online (Spanish): 9.5/10
Metro: 9/10
US Gamer: 9/10
Crave Online: 8.5/10
Gamespot: 8/10
Polygon: 8/10

Well, first time Polygon reviewed TLOU with 7.5
http://www.polygon.com/2013...

GameInformer upgrade their score from 9.5 to 10.

DragoonsScaleLegends3553d ago

Yeah it might drop once in while but for the most part it's 60fps which is great. It's not like Infamous Second Son which was all over the place.

Mr Pumblechook3553d ago (Edited 3553d ago )

It's funny how Polygon only deem this worthy or a review update, an amendment to the end of the original text. I suspect when Halo The Master Chief Collection is released they will go the whole hog and give it a separate review.

jackanderson19853553d ago

@pumble

it is the same game regardless of the resolution or framerate... not entirely sure why sites are re-reviewing it to be honest

MCC i'm assuming will get a re-review but just so it encompasses all 4 within a smaller review

then again they're journalists so they might do anything

LightDiego3553d ago

Polygon and Lamespot, that represents really well what are these sites. I know that everybody has different opinions, but look at their articles, only click-bait and poor journalism.
With Gamespot, also we have Kotaku, trying to push the feminism agenda, just pathetic.
Anyway.... Great scores by another more respectful sites.

JP13693553d ago (Edited 3553d ago )

You lost me with your criticism of "the feminism agenda." What the hell is wrong with equal treatment of women? Would you really prefer that the industry try to maintain an image of childish misogyny? Please answer so we can clear this up. Oh wait, you only have one bubble. Funny, that.

Edit:

Wow, you're post history is really interesting.

"That's because you have only one platform, lol, you are pathetic."

"True Sasuke.
Just sell it Activision, you are not capable to make a true Crash game."

"I hate liberals, they believe in global warming and always blame George Bush, he was a great president."

Nice alt account, Sasuke. I'm expecting at least three disagrees, one from each of your accounts.

imt5583553d ago

Yep, Polygon review is pretty LAME, but anyway, they gave 0.5 higher score. :D

Spotie3553d ago

You seem really upset, JP.

Thing about that "feminism" agenda: it's not feminism at all. Generally speaking, the complaints made against the industry are from those who want SUPERIOR treatment, not equal treatment.

As a black man in the south, believe me when I say I've experienced my share of discrimination. However, representation- which is what the complaint usually boils down to in gaming- is based not on whether or not I'm equal, but how many people like me there are. In gaming, there just are not as many female gamers or developers, so they CAN'T be very heavily represented. Not because they're not important, but because there aren't that many.

Google can't hire more qualified women if there aren't that many qualified women in the first place. And if they choose a qualified woman over a better qualified man, that's just as sexist, isn't it?

This last is the type of thing being pushed in gaming's "feminism." They don't want to be harassed online, even though men are harassed just as often. They don't want to be oversexualized, even though that's par for the course for men. I will admit, there have been individual times where people went too far, but it was an INDIVIDUAL that did it, not some conglomerate of gaming entities. There's no concerted effort to keep women down.

-sigh-

Anyway, the scores and general reception are to be expected. Even from Polygon(don't know how that site's still around... wait, Microsoft money, I forgot).

I wonder, though, if truefan will make his way in here. He had "genuine" concerns about the fact that Naughty Dog hadn't shown much/any gameplay. What will he and others have to say, now that Digital Foundry has gotten their hands on it and found it to be as good as advertised?

JP13693553d ago

What you completely miss, Spotie, is that no one is asking for over representation, as you claim in your straw man argument. The argument made by people with sense is that women are almost always treated as objects. They're either meant to titillate, or simply drive the plot forward by virtue of just being there. Very rarely do they get the same character development as their male counterparts. And since when are men sexualized in the same way as women? Once again, the males get their power fantasy, while women are viewed as a vehicle for teenage sexual fulfillment. Marcus Fenix is not the same as Bayonetta or the girl from Lollipop Chainsaw, or any female character from just about any fighting game ever made. Tell me, have there been games made where you take photos of men in swimsuits? What about male rape simulators?
It's funny that you bring up the issue of race and then mention that there isn't a concentrated effort to keep anyone down. Isn't it possible for individual racists to affect your life, or do they have to be a part of some grand conspiracy? The problem with sexism is the same as racism in that certain ideas that put one group in a society at a disadvantage are not only accepted, but are then defended as being "just the way things are." It's both funny and tragic that you would be so ready to use an argument that has been used against African Americans for hundreds of years. Nice post otherwise.

CaptainObvious8783553d ago (Edited 3553d ago )

@JP

If you think feminism is actually about equality, then you're just another fool that believes their lies.

Did you know that every single bill in the US that has tried to increase parenting time for non custodial parents (dads) has been opposed by a feminist group?

EVERY SINGLE BILL.

That's just 1 transgression in an ocean of hypocritical rhetoric and hatred.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3553d ago
Dynasty20213553d ago

Except it's not 60 FPS.

It's 60 FPS most of the time.

Clogmaster3553d ago

Like 99% of every 60fps game released that is not a fighter, or has average graphics.

Qwagy UK3553d ago

Now the Xbox one needs a 10/10..... sooner the better!

Jilokle3553d ago (Edited 3553d ago )

Well, that might come with the Master Chief Collection...but I am not sure. Anyway, TLOU it's a game that any video game enthusiast should play.

HeavenlySnipes3553d ago

You're crazy if you think an upgraded version of the Halo series is a 7-8^

Malphite3553d ago

Halo Collection and GTAV remastered will most likely get some 10/10 scores.

On topic: Nice to see that the framerate is stable. Definately going for 60fps then.

Gamer19823553d ago

GTA maybe..But Halo? No.. Since most of the game runs at old graphical fidelity with only certain maps upgraded.

Vegamyster3553d ago (Edited 3553d ago )

@Gamer1982

1 & 2 have graphical enhancements over the originals and all will benefit from the higher resolution and framerate, 4 is still a great looking game.

http://images.eurogamer.net...

Brim3553d ago

oh so we consider this a ps4 10/10?.. come one guys lets be real... it's a ps3 game ... thats like if MCC is rated a 10/10 ... nope not a x1 game ... whats wrong with the gaming world?..

Mikeyy3553d ago

Might want to brace for impact, because when Halo MCC comes the usual suspects will be stuffing it down all our throats constantly.

I'm sure it'll get 10/10s because it's a halo game.

But where going to get articles from Mr. X Telling us how ps4 is doomed after and whatnot. .

Goku7813553d ago

This just isn't fair to Xbox One. No way to catch up in any way now.

pornflakes3553d ago ShowReplies(3)
Sonyslave33553d ago

Catch up 2 what a game that came out years ago lol

Sonyslave33553d ago

All the hype Naughty Dog did any not really much improvement.

Gamer19823553d ago

Wow.. Just wow.. You know nothing about game design clearly..

medman3553d ago

@sonyslave
TLOU remastered will sell more units than the xbone console has sold. We understand why you're so frustrated and bewildered. Good luck with that. The rest of us will be playing the best games available on the better console.

stiggs3553d ago (Edited 3553d ago )

@medman

"TLOU remastered will sell more units than the xbone console has sold"

The original Last of Us game sold approximately 4.5M units on the PS3 which has an install base of about 82M consoles.

Do you really think that the remastered version is going to sell more than 5M units (XBOX One current total) on the PS4 which currently has an install base of 8M?

I really enjoyed The Last of Us too, but come one now...don't go all hyper-fanboy. That just invalidates anything else you have to say.

Clogmaster3553d ago

Guess you learned to write but not read.

Show all comments (49)
160°

The Last of Us Part 1 – Why The Ending is Still so Impactful

The Last of Us never dreams of insulting its audience’s intelligence. And the best example of this is, of course, is its ending.

Read Full Story >>
goombastomp.com
shinoff2183490d ago

Shit the beginning was to. I'm not sure how I would feel if I didn't have kids but having them it broke my heart to see.

ClayRules2012490d ago

Yes. The beginning and ending…how they break you, make you think , question things etc. so impactful.

And yeah, I have a son (he’ll be going to college here next year) and just feeling Joel’s pain, heartbreak, loss…it hits you differently when you have a kid (s) of your own.

PhillyDillyDee490d ago

I didnt have kids when i played it and the beginning had me sobbing. That story left an impact on me

Orchard490d ago

The story was a rollercoaster from start to finish. Probably my 1st or 2nd most favorite game on PS3 (the other being MGS4).

Aloymetal490d ago

I agree with you. MGS4 was truly special, I wasn't the biggest fan of the long cutscenes but I understand is part of Kojima. Great game nonetheless.

Snookies12490d ago

Best Metal Gear game, coming from a HUGE fan of the series. I bought a PS3 JUST for MGS4. And got the collector's edition too. Worth every bit of money.

Yes, the cutscenes can be very lengthy. But a lot of it was quite necessary to really tie things together. Previous games had some longer cutscenes as well. It's just that they were trying to wrap everything up with MGS4. So, it's understandable that they'd have to throw some info dumps into the game here and there.

Orchard490d ago

The cutscenes are long indeed, every Kojima game sets a new record there :P

But the game was awesome, the second they showed that first E3 demo, it was clear it was going to be something special.

I still remember being mind blown by the Octocamo. It was also the first third person shooter game where I felt like the controls and aiming etc all went smooth / fluid and weren't janky. Hard to explain in words, but it felt 'natural' to aim, move etc in it.

gangsta_red490d ago

I thought the game went on a little too long and it started to wear thin. It should have stopped at Winter. That would have been a great way to end that game with the sequel continuing from there (if necessary).

-Foxtrot490d ago

I loved it however the ambiguous ending was kind of ruined in the sequel

The first game had this conflicting grey area of Joel's actions, a decision to let you think it over and discuss it with people, however the sequel created a narrative that "OMG JOEL 100% DOOMED HUMANITY...HOW SELFISH" and making out Ellie wanted to die in the hospital even though 1) She didn't know she was going to die and 2) She was ready to see Joel once she got out of surgery so he could teach her how to play Guitar.

For me he did the right thing, I mean they pretty much attacked him when he was trying to save Ellie, they lied to him and said they were going to kill her without thinking any other decision out or asking Ellie herself and they pretty much were going to throw him out onto the street without any of his weapons/gear where he could have probably died. There was no guarantee a cure could be made with these guys, it was all "chance".

Crows90490d ago

Exactly. He made the first good decision and this time around the girl he took care of didn't die while escaping...which alluded to the beginning of the game. He was prepared this time.

-Foxtrot490d ago

Like I just don't know why the Fireflies (and now Jerry in Part II) didn't think about any other tests, it was literally "Yeah this bitch has gotta die". You're telling me they couldn't wait for more blood tests, think of new ways to approach it? The worlds been gone for decades, it's not going to collapse even more by waiting, the damage is done.

If they woke Ellie up and asked her but Joel also told her what they did and were going to do to him I don't think she'd really want to sacrifice her life for these guys compared how she suddenly reacts in the sequel.

Even the hospital setting in the original game was run down, dirty and literally the best they could do, that alone didn't inspire confidence they had the tools to distribute a cure let along make one. I know the sequel and remake kind of retcon it where it looked cleaner, brighter and newer but again I'm going off the original, the first time I played it. The Fireflies at the end of the day were not good people, they were still terrorists with their own ambitious goals in mind, I don't think they would have been fair handing out the cure if they did get it made

TricksterArrow490d ago (Edited 490d ago )

It's a work of fiction, and more than once Bruce and Neil stated that the cure was a given, it was a sure thing and they regret not making it more clearly. If the cure wasn't a thing, the ending wouldn't ne nearly as impactful as is.

Crows90490d ago

@trickster
Except tlou2 states that it isnt a given. The ending is still impactful.

Inverno490d ago

Think the reason why she was going to die was because the guy was a vet, not a doctor

-Foxtrot489d ago

Yet suddenly was the only person who could create a cure

"We deffo need to kill her"

"Wait...WHY"

"Trust me....I'm a vet"

TricksterArrow489d ago (Edited 489d ago )

Jerry was a doctor. A lead doctor. His bio makes it clear that he attended Northern Utah Medical University. He just happened to like animals. I wonder if people really pay attention to the games they play anymore (if they played, it’s a toss with TLOU2’s critics)…

Imalwaysright489d ago

TricksterArrow

You should play the PS3 version. Once you do, you'll realize that the ending was retconned because Jerry wasn't the surgeon that was going to kill Ellie.

TricksterArrow489d ago

I played all versions. He was not a vet in any of them.

Imalwaysright489d ago

He was not in the original version of the game but the "Jerry" that Joel killed in the original clearly wasn't someone that acted professionaly or inspired confidence because he was willing to work in a dirty operating room and was wearing boots.

TricksterArrow489d ago (Edited 489d ago )

Jerry was a minor unnamed role that got expanded on the sequel and also got recast, not unlike any TV series and games before this one (such as Resident Evil, in which Claire, Leon, Carlos and Chris all look considerably different from one iteration to the other). Also, still not a vet. And also unsure what argument you are trying to make by “dirty room” and “wearing boots”. He is still a doctor that has the ability to develop a cure, it doesn’t matter what he is wearing or what tools are at his disposal, the story is what it is.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 489d ago
ChubbyBlade489d ago

That’s why I didn’t like part 2. It removed all the nuance

Inverno489d ago

I think when you realize he's a vet, Joel's decision feels a bit more justified for those who played both games. Just playing, since you're in Joel's shoes, you don't really question it. Then playing the second there's a justification that doesn't take away from Joel's decision but for the player should reinforce your understanding of it.

You said it in the second comment. "The Fireflies at the end of the day were not good people, they were still terrorists with their own ambitious goals in mind." That's why they just went along with killing her cause they didn't want to figure out some other way.

shinoff2183489d ago

Foxtrot

I think they just tried to show you how Joel's decision affected more then just Joel and ellie . Just showing different angles and a bigger picture. I think Joel did the right thing.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 489d ago
dmonee490d ago

The story had me emotionally engaged. Gaming for 40 years it was the first time a game story messed with my emotions in the way movies do. As far as the game and gameplay? Not so much lol. It wasn’t bad in my opinion but the game itself was ok. It was the storyline that kept me going in TLOU 1 and TLOU 2.

ClayRules2012490d ago

“As far as the game and gameplay? Not so much lol. It wasn’t bad in my opinion but the game itself was ok.“

What exactly did the game do that qualifies it for just being ok? And same question for the gameplay?

dmonee489d ago

That’s a tough question because I could ramble on and on as to why. I’m speaking for myself because I usually pass on survival horror type games. So instead of getting into a debate as to why I found the gameplay to be ok. I originally commented on how the narrative had me emotionally sucked in. Especially the opening segment. So much that I purchased a game I would never have purchased if not for the story. It’s more kudos to the developer for getting people like me out of my comfort zone to play a game I wouldn’t usually play.

ClayRules2012490d ago

I know some people were upset with Joel lying to Ellie (friends of mine) that they felt it should’ve given the player an option to have Joel either

A. Lie to Ellie or B. Tell Ellie the truth. Type of situation, which just makes no sense. The game nor its story doesn’t given the player any control to have/make any choices that change the direction or outcome of ANY of these characters in this unforgiving and dark world.

I don’t blame Joel for doing what he did.

1. Ellie became the “Something” that he needed to keep fighting for, beyond just living day to day, simply being survivors.

2. Marlene gave orders to that no -name guard to kill Joel if he tried anything…you just done pissed him off all the more with those words. I wonder, if Joel had been killed and Marlene ever came across Tommy again (Joel’s brother) would she have the guts to tell him “Listen Tommy, we need to talk! About Joel…I couldn’t waste this gift. Tommy “What the hell you talking about, Marlene??” Marlene “I had Joel killed, if he” Tommy “YOU SON OF A BITCH!” Got carried away there lol. You get the idea tho. To my point, it wasn’t guaranteed that Ellie was the cure, and after all Joel did, went through, not even allowing Joel to see Ellie, just talk with her, that’s messed up.

3. Of course looking at the actions Joel took in the hospital and how that has major consequences in Part 2 for him, Ellie etc. it’s not like there wouldn’t have been a big threat later on at some point. This world is wicked, dark, unforgiving and everyone’s growing up, has their own WANTS. NEEDS. DESIRES. Solely for themselves, loved ones, or group. All while trying to survive.

Joel I think knew when he said “I Swear” that he’d done something much worse than when he actually saved Ellie from that operating room and possibly causing death to humanity (as if it would be appreciated anyways.

Yes, he lied to the one person who gave him purpose to live, purpose to have hope, purpose to be that father again (which he of course wasn’t looking for, but it just naturally happened upon him) like he was to his daughter Sarah all those years ago. And to him, maybe in that moment, lying would be worth the little bit of time, the years they’d have together creating memories, seeing Ellie grow up before his eyes etc. rather than lie to her and see a reaction in words and deeds in which she might’ve ran off losing all hope and trust in him etc. I mean, she did lose trust in him all those years later etc. but as we saw, she was willing to work with him, try to repair what Joel broke, and he knew it wouldn’t be easy, as did she. But with time she understood I think why he did what he did.

It’s just sad in the end, his lie, the time they lost with his betrayal, and than horrific death, caused Ellie to go seek revenge in a way in which Ellie changed, she kept chipping off more of herself along the journey, scary and sad thing to see, and exhausting. But powerful storytelling throughout it all.

Show all comments (36)
40°

Top 10 PlayStation Plus Premium Horror Games

We love to scare ourselves silly within the horror genre of video games. Thankfully, there are many to find on PlayStation Plus Premium, such as the intense Resident Evil VII: Biohazard and cult favorite Little Nightmares.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
40°

PlayStation Store July Sale Is Live With More Than 500 Games Discounted

PlayStation Store is offering a new sale this week with more than 500 games discounted including some DLCs. See the complete list here.

Read Full Story >>
novicegamerguides.com