620°

We'll never mislead you about Call of Duty's graphics on Xbox One, says Sledgehammer

Sledgehammer Games isn't in the business of screening top-tier PC-based demos that are literally impossible to achieve on a console, the developer's co-founder Michael Condrey have told OXM. As far as Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare is concerned, what you see is what you get.

Read Full Story >>
totalxbox.com
Nitrowolf23574d ago

TBH I don't think COD devs ever shown anything different then their reveals. As much as I am tired of COD and such, still gotta give them that for not misleading anyone there

NextLevel3574d ago

Agreed. They got the resolution (882p) out of the way very quickly.

MonstaTruk3574d ago

AND...the lower frame rates. Don't forget the lower frame rates for a twitch shooter that they'd like you to get out of your system talking about, also...

headwing453574d ago

It's not like the Advance Warfare gameplay was raising the bar or anything... the game was running 40 - 50 frames a second.

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

Bigpappy3574d ago

Where did you guys find info on the frame rate and resolution. Was that in the full interview?

The writer of the article wrote: " The game's resolution is "ahead" of that of Call of Duty: Ghosts, though Sledgehammer has yet to lock it down".

Mr Pumblechook3574d ago

I'm glad that despite the Microsoft marketing deal Sledgehammer are being open about the Xbone resolution and frame rate.

3574d ago
DLConspiracy3574d ago

@monsta Truk

No offense to you but, why do you keep bringing that up from a captured video at E3? 6 months before release. If there is one thing I have learned about COD. 60 FPS is KING.

NatureOfLogic_3574d ago

@ DLC, Too bad Xbox One struggles with both resolution and fps compared to PS4.

DLConspiracy3574d ago (Edited 3574d ago )

@ArgumentumAdPopulum

That wasn't my point. Nor was I flame baiting. Just seems like an attempt to perpetuate unsubstantiated rumor (or inconclusive/finalized stats) as fact just to be able to downplay something.

k3rn3ll3573d ago

Quit complaining about the frame rate of a demo over five minths out. Especially if you have know desire to own said game. They have plenty of time to optimize. Also take into account it was the single player campaign. CoD has always run slightly less frames and spikes during campaign. Also if you watch the frame rate video... over 75% of those spikes came in cut scenes. That is not going to affect me in my CoD experience

Pro Racer3573d ago

Not sure how showing the game looking its best is considered misleading. Its not like they're showing prerendered footage and calling it gameplay. Either way, even on PC, CoD has never been anything special in terms of graphics.

Bryanarchy1013573d ago

@Pro Racer

Watch_Dogs is a prime example of how a game can be misleading. If you remember correctly the game came under fire since release. Its graphics and such were toned down in a very obvious manner and this angered a lot of people as they got a game that looked graphically inferior to what was shown years ago, even on a PC.

It's one thing to show a game at its best, and another thing to release a game that looks nothing like what was shown in a demo.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 3573d ago
AngelicIceDiamond3574d ago

@Nitro True.

The graphics are definitely better. The gameplay looks same o however.

It has the looks finally now they need to address that gameplay.

k3rn3ll3573d ago

If anything the only gameplay change they should back is take it back a few years. Ghost multiplayer was awful. Worst I've played. That has to change. Thats what people buy the game for. Some buy for single player. But tens of millions buy for online. Im sure they know that

n4rc3573d ago

No.. They just mislead you on everything else.. Lol

Best cod ever.. All previous issues that we don't admit exist are now fixed! Lol

Gamer19823573d ago

Yep they always show there sub par looking games off the bat..

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3573d ago
ironfist923573d ago

So what? Ubisoft makes much better games anyway.

randomass1713573d ago

I think the point is that CoD games generally don't get shadily downgraded.

ironfist923573d ago

Well yeah, only coz COD games are terrible to begin with lol

BattleTorn3574d ago (Edited 3574d ago )

I think the appropriate reaction we - as gamers - should have regarding the PC-based E3 demo is that we should focus our praise toward developers who demo their game in-engine, like Naughty Dog.

We should praise devs that demo their games running on the consoles we plan to play them on.

I wish I saw more E3 videos begin with "The following footage was captured directly from a [Xbox One or Playstation 4]"

BattleTorn3574d ago

I'm left to presume those disagreeing are in favor of misrepresentation... ? amiright

Show all comments (72)
150°

Call Of Duty Advanced Warfare 2 Was In Development Before Being Canned For WWII

Former director at Activision, Bret Robbins, revealed that Advanced Warfare 2 had a working prototype, but it was eventually shelved for COD WWII.

Read Full Story >>
dualshockers.com
chicken_in_the_corn374d ago

That is a shame. AW is my favourite CoD. I hope they do a sequel one day.

LordoftheCritics373d ago

Thoroughly enjoyed AW.

Good campaign and everything.

LOGICWINS373d ago

Same. Fantastic campaign, but I wasn't crazy about the jetpacks in multiplayer.

RaidenBlack373d ago

I still prefer CoD based on historical settings or in near future settings(like CoD: Ghost) ... even though I liked infinite Warfare's campaign ... it was top notch

CobraKai373d ago

I felt it was a good time to revisit WW2

porkChop373d ago

I actually really enjoyed WWII. I never understood the hate it got.

JEECE373d ago

A lot of people who never played a shooter prior to like 2012 get really mad about anything that isn't a modern combat game.

Show all comments (10)
50°

Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare Weapons That Should Return in a Sequel

Game Rant Writes "With rumors swirling about a sequel to Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare, Sledgehammer Games can bring back a few weapons for a modern encore."

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
MaximusTKG474d ago

Here’s hoping that a sequel just doesn’t happen.

260°

Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare remains the series' lone bright spot this gen

GR: "If one series truly defined the seventh generation of consoles it was Call of Duty. Sadly, the series has struggled to reach the same heights on PlayStation 4 and Xbox One and only Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare feels like the previous era of innovation and top-notch storytelling."

Read Full Story >>
gamerevolution.com
Killa781622d ago

I quite enjoyed it but I think black ops 3 was the high point.

Modern warfare could be if a few tweaks are made and the new maps are good.

Baza1622d ago (Edited 1622d ago )

Story wise.. black opps 3 was all over the place. Modern Warfare story is so much more cohesive and actually makes sense.

Immorals1622d ago

Black ops 3 was terrible. The story was absolutely atrocious.

Knushwood Butt1622d ago

I quit that campaign after about an hour. All I remember is some crappy robot drone combat R2D2 thing that you had to use. I didn't make it past that.

Epicor1622d ago

For me the Black Ops installations have always been the high peaks in terms of PVP mode. Black ops 3 campaign was pretty bad though. Advanced Warfare's campaign was pretty good, one of the best ones - but PVP was bad!

gamer91622d ago

LOL Advanced Warfare, too funny

1622d ago
Kabaneri1622d ago

The campaign was OK, but the guns sounded like cap guns and the multiplayer maps were not memorable at all.

Show all comments (29)