250°

TheSixthAxis: Hands On With PlayStation TV

TSA: "PlayStation TV is one of the most impressive pieces of kit I’ve seen. It’s primary focus in Western markets is for Remote Play – Sony are pushing it as a multi-room solution for your PS4, so that you can jump from playing a game on the big screen in your sitting room to another screen in your bedroom, gaming room or elsewhere."

Read Full Story >>
thesixthaxis.com
twdll3597d ago

I like it. Sounds like a winner if Sony plays it right, and does not fill it with ads and other bloatware everywhere. Speaking of ads, I wish if you were a subscriber to PSN that PSN ads did not show. Wishful thinking.

Omegasyde3597d ago

Uh, those PSN ads aren't intrusive i.e. show up on the main dashboard. Not sure what you are pointing to.

twdll3597d ago (Edited 3597d ago )

PSN ads are all over PSN. I am saying that it would be good to not see ANY PSN ads on PSN if you already have it. On my PS3 it is much less than on the PS4, and that makes for a less "intrusive" experience. It seems like ever since PS4 Sony is getting more hungry with ads everywhere. I prefer an ad free experience since Im paying money for the service.

Drekken3597d ago

twdlld, You can start complaining about ads when McDonalds, Burger King, Mountain Dew, and Dorito ads show up.

REDGUM3597d ago

An ad is an ad!
Who cares where it pops up?
Just my opinion!

REDGUM3597d ago (Edited 3597d ago )

Oops. Double post!

twdll3597d ago (Edited 3597d ago )

Im saying its like this... I have a Grooveshark account and I pay for it. It has NO advertisements. My ps4 PSN account is paid as well, it has advertisements (most of which I dont mind) but I dont want to see GET PSN PLUS everywhere when I already have it. Kinda like a better experience for those who have PS PLUS. Just sayin.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3597d ago
jtsventor3597d ago

Especially with a $99 price tag this is a great value. This will be the only known way to get my Vita games like Killzone, Dragons Crown etc... on my TV which I've been waiting for. With PS Now and a PS4 in my home this should be awesome. I hope it will also allow me to play Vita games multiplayer with my Vita so I can invite friends over.

Whxian3597d ago

there is another way however its an expensive mod that would double the price of the vita, so this will be a cheaper solution.

KwietStorm_BLM3597d ago

Are you talking about ads in the store? Advertising things on sale in the store? Because there's nothing on the home screen. What do you mean by all over PSN?

GrandTheftZamboni3597d ago

Ads in the store? Stop the madness!!!

Th4Freak3597d ago

I suspect you have never seen the PSV PSN because the only ads you see are in the dashboard but once you open the app (store) there are no ads...

Conzul3596d ago

Actually PSV has some intrusive advertising on the app-switching page. Always along the bottom.
The one you press and hold the PS button to access.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3596d ago
Anon19743597d ago (Edited 3597d ago )

I used to have two PS3's, one for my home entertainment system downstairs in my den and one upstairs in my living room. For me, PSTV is worth $100 bucks to me as a PS4 extender alone. The fact that I can play many of my Vita games on the bigger TV is just icing on the cake.

I can certainly see these things being popular with parents also looking for a cheap console to put in their kids room, or something portable that they could take on vacation with them. Both my brothers picked up new rv's this year with TV's in them and I'm seriously considering getting them each a PSTV for Christmas for their campers so the kids have them for rainy days and can still play with them at home as well.

Edit: Just read that, assuming your internet connection is fast enough these things will stream PS4 over the internet as well like the Vita can do. That's a nice plus. Too bad it won't play media off a usb device as well. That's really the only thing extra I can think that would be nice to have. They have Netflix on everything else, including the Vita. I'm sure it's just a matter of time before they have this on PSTV as well.

darthv723597d ago (Edited 3597d ago )

streaming the ps4 is the least of my desires for this device. i want it to play vita games on a bigger screen. i do that now with my PSP Go hooked to a tv and using an extra sixaxis controller.

But the beauty of the Go is i can undock it and keep playing. I was really expecting sony to make a vita with tv out but this is just as good.

What i am most interested in is if i can pop out the memory card from the vita and put it into this device an still play the games saved to it.

i know that with the PSP, if you dl a game to the memory card in one PSP and then tried to put that card into another psp it would not let those games play. something to do with the way the games are locked to the originating system so i hope its much easier with vita to pstv.

i will read the article now and see if that is addressed.

Anon19743597d ago (Edited 3597d ago )

I didn't see them mention it in this article, but I believe before with the Vita TV in Japan they said you could just switch the cards between Vita and VitaTV and keep playing the same games. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm sure I read that somewhere. I hope that's correct, because that would be a concern for me as well. When I'm playing Rayman on my Vita, I'd like to continue the same game I'm playing on my PSTV.

As for issues with games that require the touch screen heavily like Tearaway, too bad the Vita can't simply act as a PSTV controller. I'd love to just fire up my Vita and have it output to a TV screen wirelessly. :)

darthv723597d ago

dark...i would think that with the vita being bluetooth compatible, sony could implement some sort of fw update that allows you to pair the vita to the pstv for use as a controller.

that would be ideal. Maybe sony has been playing around with that option but have not quite gotten it to work right. in time though...i could see them making it work.

Killzoner993597d ago

"PlayStation TV is one of the most impressive pieces of kit I’ve seen."
Was there ever any doubt? This is Sony we're talking about. Playstation TV will no doubt be successful , I just hope Sony can keep up with demand.

barb_wire3597d ago

Let's just hope Sony supports PSTV.. cause they did a lackluster job with the PSP and now they're repeating it with the Vita.

KwietStorm_BLM3597d ago

PSP had great support. It was the hackers that moved developers away, and Sony isn't or can't do much about that.

hkgamer3597d ago

demand is not going to be that high. its just the practicality i think. i mean look at its competitors and its ui and apps, then compare it to the vita/pstv. its definitely lacking in on demand video apps.

the ui is not suitable for tv screen.

the only plus side is that it can play many games such as psone, psp games. stream ps2 &3 through now in the near future. stream ps4 games if you have a ps4. only bad side is the limited vita games that may or may not work.

i'll get this once it has atleast the channels i have from the ps3/4.

Omegasyde3597d ago

Sorta like how they dropped support for PS move....

Clown_Syndr0me3597d ago

Ill buy this as I want to play Vita Games, but zi don't want a Vita. I wont use the PS4 extension features, but its great to know theyre there if there's ever a change in my circumstances.

hkgamer3597d ago (Edited 3597d ago )

you may have compatability issues, since many vita games require the use of the fron or rear touchpad. not sure if that problem has been resolved yet.

update

@darkride66

i know it does sound stupid, but they should allow vita users to use their vita as a controller. i know many people that would love to play some vita games staring at a big screen.

Anon19743597d ago (Edited 3597d ago )

Obviously some games aren't going to be able to port over. While some touch screen controls can be mapped to button layouts, really...what can you do with a game like Tearaway that uses the Vita's camera and both front and back touch? There's really no way to make that work on a single controller.

Or rubbing etchings on Uncharted, or when you have to hold your Vita up to the light to see through an image as part of the puzzle solving. You'd just have to be able to skip over those, or remove them altogether to make it work.

Unless they made the Vita an optional controller for PSTV. :) Of course, that wouldn't help Clown above who doesn't particularly want a Vita.

Clown_Syndr0me3597d ago

Well if that's the case I wont buy it. But its been out in Japan for a while and I wasn't aware of any problems.
I wont lose sleep over it, but if they make all (or atleast most) games compatible somehow then ill definately buy it, if not ill pass.

@darkride Id only get a Vita if I could stream to the TV, without the use of an extra peripheral. I wouldn't buy both PS TV and a Vita for example.

Spotie3596d ago

Why don't you just buy a damn Vita? That doesn't make any sense.

Show all comments (41)
100°

Sony Could Increase Your Game's Difficulty If It Sees You Complain About It

Sony has recently published a new patent that wants to dynamically handle the games' difficulty and gameplay based on the player's emotions.

jznrpg5h ago

This is something I might use. Sometimes I play some good games but they don’t have difficulty option and are a little too easy.

Profchaos4h ago

Souls games will be like that players struggling make it harder

PassNextquestion4h ago(Edited 4h ago)

I think if used correctly it could work well

jambola15m ago

cool idea
cool idea for horror games especially
the way it's explained here sounds like it could never be forced hopefully, so that's ok with me

Show all comments (6)
140°

PlayStation Doesn't Need a Dedicated PC Store Launcher

With all the PlayStation games that are now coming to PC, is it time for Sony to release a dedicated PC launcher?

thorstein4d ago

No, and they already solved any need with the overlay that's coming.

Vits4d ago

Unless they are trying to kill their recently created PC business, I would advise against opening a dedicated PC store. It's an extremely hard endeavor, and people, in general, are very comfortable with Steam. Even Epic, with their billions of dollars invested, is still struggling to find a foothold, and they have Fortnite.

just_looken2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Money is one thing security is another but again millions have 0 knowledge past 2020.

Epic store for years struggled with a shopping cart/account theft/credit card theft

Rockstar launcher/store to this day over 5 years later still has horrific user interface security flaws lost account's and stolen CC

Then you got that activision need phone number oh we lost it launcher

The crown jewel is the ea launcher/store ea app 3 yrs old still has hundreds of threads were people lost games/accounts/game access or just straight up crashes.

Edit" Oh ubi launcher were you buy a game that may or may not be there again or work and the launcher 5yrs old still has no 4K support if you launch it on a 4k screen there is a high chance it will just crash.

ocelot073d ago

Can tell who ever put this together is not all that clued up on pc gaming.

It's just a known fact. The PC gaming community prefer Steam and Steam alone. They don't like different launchers. I personally don't mind them. But majority just stick with steam. Hence why EA and Ubisoft went back to on releasing on steam and why Microsoft release games on steam as people hated buying from the windows store.

The only other launchers that I imagine are doing ok is GOG due to being drm free and epic games due to the free games every week. Sony shouldn't release any sort of pc launcher n

Nitrowolf23d ago (Edited 3d ago )

It literally says in the OP that PC gamers don't like multiple launchers lol. It even mentions Steam being the go to for gamers

Tacoboto3d ago

Title: "PlayStation Doesn't Need a Dedicated PC Store Launcher"

N4G: "Can tell who ever put this together is not all that clued up on pc gaming"

When you don't even read the headline...

ocelot073d ago

I read it and had a brain fart. As read the title then this "With all the PlayStation games that are now coming to PC, is it time for Sony to release a dedicated PC launcher?"

So I hold my hands up on that mistake. Rest of my comment still stands.

Giblet_Head2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Steam and GOG are highly preferred because of the rich feature set. Ubisoft, Rockstar, EA, Epic etc have all set a precedent over the years for customers to instinctively expect individual publisher launchers to be so extremely half-assed that the majority simply don't want to bother dealing with what is almost an inevitable disappointment by comparison to Steam or GOG. Those publishers and their inaction or general disinterest to improve have effectively ruined any future adoption to be taken seriously.

Einhander19723d ago (Edited 3d ago )

This is just another ridiculous double standard article.

It's like how Microsoft can spend 20 years of making nothing but gaas and live service style games to sell microtransactions, dlc and subscriptions and get praise for doing it, but if Sony wants to make a single game like that every website under the sun is writing articles saying how Sony is anti-consumer or whatever.

derek3d ago

Yep, huge double standard look at the tortured reaction to the ps5pro, websites hyperventilating like Sony is forcing people to buy it.

just_looken2d ago

Wait my xbox from 2004 has avengers gaas on it? wow your so smart

m$ Gaas started with the other companies like sony

Gamepass yes they are deep into that but its still a huge money saver sense you do not own your games then get a service like that.

Now there pc xbox launcher that is trash for years now

Show all comments (15)
240°

Is Driver (PS1) Still Worth Playing in 2024?

"Driver was a technical achievement for PS1, a pioneer in cinematic gaming, and an often brutal challenge - TechStomper asks if its brand of 70s car chase antics still holds up."

Read Full Story >>
techstomper.com
PrimeVinister11d ago

The driving holds up, most of everything else does not.

PrimeVinister11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

@Shane Kim

Well, I mean the driving physics hold up. The draw distance, police AI, visuals in general etc do not

Cacabunga11d ago

One of my all time favorites on PS1. I spent a summer vacation playing this was so good

isarai11d ago

Sadly youd be hard pressed to find any driving game with better physics these days. But the draw distance really kills it for me

PrimeVinister11d ago

The physics hold up ridiculously well. And the draw distance is a real hurdle at first.

__y2jb11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

Nonsense. The physics in any modern game or any 360 game is light years beyond Driver.

Dandizzle11d ago

This game is hard, you will fail and quit

PrimeVinister11d ago

But you will get there eventually... maybe

MatrixxGT11d ago

All in the first two minutes.

jznrpg11d ago

Stop with is it worth it articles. If you want to play a game play the damn game!

anast11d ago

I loved this game awhile back.

Barlos10d ago

Yeah but is it worth reading pointless articles?

__y2jb11d ago

It wasn’t worth playing in the 90’s.

Espangerish11d ago

My thoughts exactly. I bought it at release for full price and got frustrated and bored with it very quickly.

Show all comments (41)