690°

The Xbox One price drop isn't just to boost sales, says Microsoft

Engadget :
This morning, less than a year after Microsoft unveiled its Xbox One, the game console's price dropped from $500 to $400. How's Microsoft making up for the price difference? By removing Kinect, of course. The camera/microphone peripheral introduced halfway through Xbox 360's life cycle was a standard in every Xbox One sold since launch last November, but no longer. As of this June, a second option will exist on retailer shelves. A less expensive option. And Xbox marketing lead Yusuf Mehdi is all about that option:

Read Full Story >>
engadget.com
headwing453626d ago

"We have 80-plus million Xbox 360 users today who want an Xbox One, and many of them tell us, 'For me, it's an affordability issue. I'm gonna get there, it's just a question of time. If you make it more affordable, then I'll upgrade faster.' So this is an opportunity to really make it easier for them to get there at their pace."

I love how they realize this SIX MONTHS AFTER RELEASE. Counting E3, they has pretty much a year to realize people didn't want Kinect and people aren't going to pay more because of it.

4Sh0w3625d ago

BS. Liars, of course its purely about sales.

LordMaim3625d ago

They wouldn't be changing course so radically, at such a great cost, if it weren't motivated by money.

3625d ago
XiSasukeUchiha3625d ago

Of their lying man just because it's all for sales my friend!

Mr Pumblechook3625d ago

"The Xbox One price drop isn't just to boost sales!"
Jimmy Reckon!

osprey193625d ago

See! Microsoft do something good and what the fans ask for and u call it bs.
then Sony lie to u all about specific game res/fps and u all forgive them. Bias.

blackbeld3625d ago

"The Xbox One price drop is just to boost sales, says Microsoft"

Here I fix that for you Microsoft.

Highlife3625d ago

@osprey oh come on this is a business not a charity. Like mattercornholio said if sales were flipped between ps4 and x1 you really think ms would have lowered the price out of the goodness of their heart so poor Johnny can afford one. Answer no. They need sales.

amiga-man3625d ago (Edited 3625d ago )

MS didn't do something good they are trying to put right all the things they did bad, they bought this onto themselves they don't deserve credit for fixing something that should never have done in the first place.

To be fair it is a step in the right direction but the simple fact is there is no difference between the consoles apart from one being more powerful,the sad thing for M$ is that for your money the more powerful console is made by Sony.

SilentNegotiator3625d ago (Edited 3625d ago )

Now instead of getting the console, camera, and two games, we can buy the system for a mere $50 less and buy the rest separately!

I'm convinced that this has nothing to do with money!
/s

HammadTheBeast3625d ago

It's basically like when you go to a job interview and never mention money. They are trying to never mention sales, but we all know what its all about.

Mr-Dude3625d ago (Edited 3625d ago )

Just a question... what would happen if sony would announce a ps4 and vita bundle as counter reaction for say... like $499?

ABizzel13625d ago

"We have 80-plus million Xbox 360 users today who want an Xbox One, and many of them tell us, 'For me, it's an affordability issue. I'm gonna get there, it's just a question of time. If you make it more affordable, then I'll upgrade faster.' So this is an opportunity to really make it easier for them to get there at their pace."

Does that not translate into......."SALES".

I've always planned on getting a XBO once the DRM policies were removed, and Kinect wasn't required, but the price : performance ratio was off, and there really aren't many "next-gen" games I want right now on any console (InFamous & Mario Kart, .....).

However, this new SKU is exactly what I wanted to begin with, but the facts are this was all about getting more sales.

RAWSTA3625d ago

Sit down troll and eat all the glory of xbox today lol

Visiblemarc3625d ago

Yeah, I mean...

How could pricing not be about sales?

That is a very odd thing for them to claim.

troylazlow3625d ago

I think this is a great move, don't get me wrong I love my Kinect and use it everyday, but I can see how it's not for everyone.

t-hall7853625d ago

Of course its about sales...this is big business. the more people that have one, the more games they can sell to them. i thought we all understood this by now.

mikeslemonade3625d ago

Just PR spin. You really think if it was selling well they would change their model 8 months from launch?

TheSaint3625d ago

Agreed, they should have cared more about this sort of thing at the start.

UltraNova3625d ago (Edited 3625d ago )

Its all good MS, no need to lie even more, you did the right thing here for both the consumer and your Bank accounts just don't smear it with more BS.

Now I m more interested to see what Sony does in response...

Will they drop to 349? or will they test the consumers trust in the PS brand just like they did back in 2007 and fail?

Will they be proud about it and stay at 399 just to show MS they are not 1st because of the lower price? That would be a mistake. Price > Brand Name well...most of the time (see Apple's prices and sales).

They should focus on getting out there the message of why getting a PS4 over the xbox1 gets you more hardware, more quality games in their exclusives, better performing multiplats, PS+ free games and full gen support, unlike MS.

Plus they have Project Morpheus as well, but I suspect an MS-Facebook/Oculus partnership will not go unexploited and they certainly wont let Sony go at it alone you can be sure about that!(MS owns 4% of Facebook and now part of Oculus as well). E3 will be exiting.

One thing’s for sure, this will force Sony to be even more creative and competitive which means more for us!

British_Knight3625d ago (Edited 3625d ago )

Microsoft earned $24.52Billion in the second quarter, while Sony has been crippled by losing a little over a billion dollars. Money isn't a factor for Microsoft. The Xbox division breaks even or earns a modicum of revenue, that doesn't make an impact either way, for one of the top 5 most powerful companies in the world.

Xbox is a marketing tool for Microsoft. They're more interested in getting as many consoles in consumers' homes as possible to push the Microsoft brand (Windows), but they can't give them away for free. Remember what the Joker said, "If you're good at something never do it for free." Xbox One is a year or two away from scratching the surface of what it's capable of.

Microsoft has completely changed their vision for the system, from a software perspective, in a short amount of time. I don't cast that as a negative aspiration, but rather a sign of how powerful the system's architecture truly is. Lets see if Directx 12 and improved Kinect will make a difference. At the end of the day, it's more about the games themselves. More exclusives can help and better PR can help as well.

gazgriff2k123625d ago

flip flop flip flip flop1

Ju3625d ago (Edited 3625d ago )

'Will they drop to 349?'...why would they lower the price for the stronger machine over the XO? The XO is still overpriced - IMO even more now that you get no advantage over the PS4 but the lower speced box for actually the same price.

I rather think consumer who haven't made a decision yet see two console @ 399 - and when asking what's the difference and you get the answer "well, one runs 1080, the other don't" (if in fact you find a non biased clerk) which one would you pick?

The $399 XO is great for people who wanted one in the first place but it yields no advantage over the PS4.

PX543625d ago

How does removing the Kinect from the box to make it cheaper constitute a 'price-drop'?
Realistically isn't it the same price, just without the Kinect...?
There's no price-drop here, they're just giving the customers the option (which should have always been there) to buy the console without the Kinect.

Pain3625d ago (Edited 3625d ago )

" The Xbox One price drop isn't just to boost sales, says Microsoft " and Girls showing there boobs on the internet isn't for attention.. ether..

UltraNova3624d ago (Edited 3624d ago )

@JU

You see we have a Paradox here.

Meaning the question here should be why didnt MS drop to 350 not Sony, effectively giving them a fighting chance when they clearly have the inferior product and now without the Kinect, the inferior product with nothing to differentiate it from the competition. They essentially turned the one into a less powerful ps4.

Now to my comment, no matter what at the same price the ps4 will bleed some of its sales to the xbox at least in the US. That's irrefutable. At Sony they wont/shouldn't allow that, its their 1st chance in 8 years to get a win in the US where MS was outselling them 2:1.

By dropping 50 bucks they can at least sustain their current sales, keeping them ahead of MS, again in the US at least and like it or not shareholders decide based on US performance first, the world later.

Business wise they need to deal the competition the final blow, not allow them room to breath.

+ Show (23) more repliesLast reply 3624d ago
MasterCornholio3625d ago

Just a question. If sales were flipped (meaning the Xbox One outselling the PS4 by a huge margin) would Microsoft drop Kinect?

Answer is no.

Jazz41083625d ago

They had two skus last gen with the pro and arcade so they might have. This does not seem that car off.

Charybdis3625d ago (Edited 3625d ago )

It could simply mean xbox devision is finally taking a more consumer/gamer friendly approach. First kinect needed to be connected to xb1 for the x1 to work 1,consumers disagreed , kinect no longer needed to be connected to xb1. Then consumers wanted kinect less bundle, kinect less x1 bundle announced before E3.

If sales were flipped (in the darkest timeline), but consumers still wanted kinect less version would Microsoft drop kinect.

Answer- well maybe its another opportunity for them to make more money

Utalkin2me3625d ago

@Jazz4108

The arcade model was almost 2 years later. And it was just there for people to buy to replace their pro model that keep burning up. As my friend did 3 times before wising up.

MysticStrummer3625d ago

"this is an opportunity to really make it easier for them to get there at their pace"

…which means… a boost in sales.

-Foxtrot3625d ago (Edited 3625d ago )

Why are they lying, do they think we are stupid or something. It's a tad insulting to our intelligence to be honest.

People keep trying to spin it like it's some gift to gamers, something Phil Spencer has done for us when really it's about boosting sales for Microsoft as a whole since they are falling behind. If the Xbox One was doing better then PS4 then I highly doubt they would be doing this bundle.

Aleithian3625d ago (Edited 3625d ago )

Agreed. And this is why, even if they come out with great exclusives, I won't buy XBOX - I refuse to trade with a company that routinely insults me and tries to manipulate my gaming experience and life (DRM, involvement with PRISM, etc etc). Sony eff'd up last gen, but they've made the effort to recognize their errors and correct them.

EDIT: @Foxtrot.

It's psychology. Many people lack the capacity to engage objectively with reasons to some degree, and they lack the self-awareness to recognize that fact or to respond to those who point it out. Hence, they view reasons through a lens of allegiance and emotivism. No fact speaks for itself - it speaks only to those who approach it with objective consciousness. Neither of us are fanboys - we are responding to the state of the industry. If MS reversed course and demonstrated their trustworthiness for several years, I'd happily trade with them. But they haven't. Sony has.

Cheers.

-Foxtrot3625d ago (Edited 3625d ago )

@Aleithian

It's why I don't understand why you try to point it out to people on here for example your called a Sony fanboy....it's not about being a fanboy it's about judging a company based on their past actions and putting what they are doing in the present in perspective.

I'm not a fanboy, I love the look of the games on the system like Dead Rising 3, Quantum Break, Halo 5 etc but the problem is Microsoft are a slimy company who'll do anything to boost sales. While someone like Sony who has been doing this for 20 years this December know what gamers want. Yeah they've made mistakes, they aren't perfect they want money just like any other company but they've fixed their mistakes straight away and tried to get money by pleasing us as much as they could.

Look at the whole Phil Spencer thing, people keep saying I'm "hating" on him but it's not really him I'm annoyed at, it's the Microsoft fans who make him out to be the messiah and how he's going to fix everything JUST because he's a gamer. It's why I keep mentioning the little "front" speech and how Phil is just a pawn in Microsofts plan to win gamers trust back.....sad thing is it seems to be working. I mean yeah they'll announce games at E3, this is fantastic news but it's not because they are "for gamers" like super duper Phil Spencer says....it's just because they want to boost sales

As I've said above if the Xbox One was doing way better in sales compared to the PS4 then they wouldn't really bother about games and would most likely dedicate E3 to Kinect, Sports, TV, Apps, the obvious games like Gears of War and Halo 5

4Sh0w3625d ago (Edited 3625d ago )

No just no.

True, this is a straight up BS lie from micro.

However everything else you said is fanboy rhetoric. If I bought a console strictly on morals and from companies who don't lie, I wouldn't own a console ever.

I've been gaming since there was games just about, I was reading gaming news straight out of the old "Nintendo Power" magazines. I read lies then when exec's, devs, journalists said things they knew were never true. I can say without a doubt neither company holds a higher moral ground, they are just full of people with different viewpoints and that make different mistakes. What makes those mistake MORE or LESS important to us/individuals is simply a emotional attachment to one or the other. Hell some many times those small *white lies are worst than clear lies but not really hurting anybody lies like this because those lies are purposely made to impact sales of the other brand by providing factually incorrect data but this is about micro and I'm not here to regurgitate history. Sometimes we all get caught up in it, but I can tell you gaming has been so much pleasurable when I leave out the bias and just enjoy what I enjoy.

Ron_Danger3625d ago (Edited 3625d ago )

XBox 360: better with Kinnect

XBox One: better without Kinnect

Which is it Microsoft?

MastaMold3625d ago (Edited 3625d ago )

@foxtrot, MS do think gamers are stupid and it all started with their Drm for the Xbone and forced kinect they reversed the Drm and now kinect with every Xbone and how do gamers react, "yea we won as gamers they did what we wanted " that is BS and this shows that MS is a joke. If true gamers think that MS did all these 180s for the industry then you need to cone back to reality cause they did this to boost sales and nothing else. If people actually believe this no wonder the gaming community isn't taken seriously this also goes to gaming journalist too.

Kribwalker3625d ago

All you ponies kept yelling kinect less sku kinect less sku. Well here is a kinect less sku and you all start crying about something else, and yet, when sony blatantly lies about not only FPS but also resolution you ponies go and say it was just a mistake. Just like how sony lies about Killzone multiplayer. 1080p is 1920x1080. 960x1080 is interlaced. P stands for solid image. 960x1080 is not solid image. Yet sony never lied. You guys are helpless
#firstworldproblems #idiots #PSN4G

nypifisel3625d ago (Edited 3625d ago )

@4Sh0w

It's not about morals. It's about doing an educated purchase judging by historical information available to you as a consumer.

Microsoft and Sony both is in this to earn money of course. It's how you approach this that differentiate the two companies. Sony strongly believed that it could earn more money by pleasing the consumer, MS thought they could strong arm them into something that fundamentally was set up to earn the company maximum amount of profit out of the Xbox branch. They only changed due to outcry, not because they listened to fans but because they failed to do as they initially wanted, that behaviour shouldn't be rewarded. The Xbox One needs to be a failure even if MS show resolute intentions to change.

If people actually started to educate themselves more they would've seen how this would play out 4 years ago. MS have never done any long term investment in the gaming branch developing its in house studios or taking any financial long term risk to secure customer satisfaction that way. This is also the reason why I think buying exclusives the way MS does is just as insulting since it's also a sign of this and why I would never buy an Xbox, and don't think anyone should do.

It's about corporate nature at large here, Sony has never seemed as disingenuous as a company as MS has, and the hubris that was the PS3 was a brainchild of a really difficult man (Ken). But Sonys problem was never that of them not investing creatively in games. They should rightfully be rewarded with our money and MS simply should not.

To judge MS harshly even though they change their policies has nothing to do with fanboyism, it's about not promoting bad behaviour. The Xbox One simply wasn't designed for you as a gamer. And no policy reverse will change this fact. I would still regard anyone buying into this short term, an apologist.

DragonKnight3625d ago

@Kribwalker (such a perfect name for a baby): I assume you're talking about Watch Dogs. Can you prove that it was an outright lie, or a mistake the person who updated the website made? I'll wait.

Ju3625d ago

I wouldn't say that. If they bring some nice exclusives and drop the price by another hundred to $299 I could see myself getting me one eventually - purely for those games. But I'm not in a rush. I got the better machine which runs the better 3rd party games already. Why would I switch?

doolin_dalton3625d ago

So, when Sony makes mistakes (as you admit they've done) and reverses course to fix them, it's done to please gamers, but when MS does the same thing it's nothing more than a sales gimmick. Typical hypocrisy.

You're a classic apologist. You defend everything Sony does while blasting MS for doing the same. It's not hard to see why you're called a fanboy when you flip flop like you do.

You'll just look at anything MS does as "they are only doing it to boost sales". MS's E3 will be for gamers just like it's ALWAYS been. Haters like you simply find reasons to dismiss them while ignoring the substance. Only on N4G will anyone agree with the things you say.

nypifisel3624d ago

@doolin_dalton

Sony never shifted course from gaming. Even though you can call the pricing of the PS3 consumer unfriendly, it doesn't mean they inherently were trying to shift from a gaming centric focus. They haven't because the Playstation branch have always been run by people who actually look at games as something more than a way to make money. Phil Spencer might be the only one in the whole Xbox division which also does this, Don Mattrick certainly didn't.

The whole hardware design of the Xbox One really shows how games never were the focus. They had shifted course, being this "one in all box" was more important thinking they would bring in a new sort of potentially larger customer base. That wasn't the case. The damage have already been done on the hardware though. Kinect, and underpowered compared to the competition. If you were to design the best games console you could, it wouldn't be made like the Xbox One. But that's because MS never wanted to do that, they wanted an entertainment box.

I'm not even sure you who you directed your comment to but be clear, I don't play games on consoles, I don't even own a TV. I'm exclusively a PC guy, and have been for 10 years. The last console I owned was the original Xbox.. Yep that one! This is what I've gathered from looking at the evidence as objectively as I can, and sure I might have a Sony bias, but that because they treated me in a way that I feel inclined they deserve to be promoted. Xbox One is a catastrophe, better luck next time.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 3624d ago
imt5583625d ago

Yeah, Microsoft, price cut isn't just to boost sales! It is HUGE slap in the face to early buyers of Xbone at launch!!!

DefenderOfDoom23625d ago

Unless you can find people who work for free , then it is about sales!

Ginesis3625d ago

I was a believer in Microsoft's supposed "vision" they had for the Xbox One but as of yesterday I'm pretty much done dealing with this company. As a Day Oner I can't help but look at this like Microsoft have their early adopters a few good backshots.

You got me once Microsoft but never again! Good luck getting back those 80 million...just realize that of those 80 million a good majority of them bought multiple systems because of the RROD so I'd it really 80???

PX543625d ago

How is it a huge slap? It's a slight slap, but not a huge one.
It's a slap in the sense that early adopters were required to also purchase the Kinect, but realistically there's no price-drop taking place. If there was the Kinect would still be part of the console bundle. Basically they've just changed the bundle on sale from - Console + Controller + Kinect, to - Console + Controller. That's the only reason it's cheaper - they removed a peripheral. If you were to buy the XBO without the controller in the bundle it would likely be cheaper again.

trenso13625d ago

The bold face lie! No one wanted kinect and they really needed a sales push. With how it is selling compared to ps4 it is shocking that they dropped the price not even a year after launch. But now that kinect isn't mandatory devs will drop the support. Really they should have waited for the price drop to at least after this christmas. So by then most of the install base will have a kinect giving more reason to support it. but now that they are on par in price it will be interesting to see which one sells more, since the ps4 is still more powerful and so far is getting the better versions of some games. Or will Sony come around do their own price drop. Probably not.

kneon3625d ago

I can't see sony dropping their price anytime soon unless they see a significant and lasting decline in sales.

system223625d ago

its true. im surprised they didn't do this at launch... then again, i think the more other things that people complained about got cut back, the kinects importance also scaled back.

osprey193625d ago

@highlife. I agree, this isn't a charity its a business to make the most money possible, Sony are in the same business, so y give them every benefit of the doubt when u all hate on Microsoft? They want ur money too. The best way to make money is to make ur consumers happy, Sony have done that with a good console, Microsoft once had the idiot that was mattrick at the reigns, ditched him, put a gamer in charge and set about making things better, he has started to do that yet u dnt seem to like that idea. I say its a good thing, its now the same policy as Sony, have a camera, dnt have to its ur choice. U and i both knw if u took over from mattrick and ur task was to build up sales of the xb1, u wud do the same thing.

OrangePowerz3625d ago (Edited 3625d ago )

80 milion users is also a joke, they sold 80 million with RRoD and having several units that people upgraded to like with the original 360 never having an HDMI port.

So they still think that consumers are idiot for claiming it's not about sales. Sure if they would be first they wouldn't drop Kinect. They can stop with their pretentious "it's for the fans". And what's with their fans who already bought one and had to pay for Kinect?

Every single 180 was for sales and not for their fans. Always online and DRM was rumoured since 2012 and people always said it was a stupid idea, yet they reverse it only after they got their ass handed over in the pre orders after the E3 and the same withKinect having to be plugged in.

Next up indie support, indies complained for years about needing a publisher amd yet that was also only reversed after E3.

Netflix being behind the pay wall was criticised since day one and only reversed now.

They do nothing for their fans and all they do is only for sales and nothing else. They must have gotten a beating in the April US sales.

Sony aren't saints and they are also in the business to make money, but they don't try to screw over people at every corner and at least their people seem to care about their customers.

Codey473625d ago

Yep, If you've known Microsoft as long as I have you'd be on first name terms.

And "Mikey" certainly knows how to get everything Backwards Ass.

SuperBlur3625d ago

by their logic i would be part of their made up stats since i've once logged into a xbox with my hotmail account , i dont recall ever receiving a email asking me if i want a xbox one and for what reason haven't i gotten one by now.

D3ATH_DRIV3R_7773625d ago

You deserved that bubble, well said.

pyramidshead3625d ago

It is about sales. Apparently the NPD coming out on thursday shows Xbone dipping slightly under 100K sold with PS4 at a 2:1 lead in North America.

doolin_dalton3625d ago

@orange

That's some of the most ridiculous fanboy drivel that's been spouted around here in a long time.

First of all, if any significant number of people bought multiple 360's, the software attach ratio would have dropped like a rock. After all, people wouldn't replace their games when they replaced their console. In reality, 360 had the highest attach rate, therefore proving your theory 100% wrong.

Like many others here, you're a Sony apologist. You dismiss every mistake they make by saying "they did it for the fans", while accusing MS of caring only about sales. Just because you WANT to believe that doesn't make it true.

MS has created numerous successful ann highly rated games over the past decade. How is that "not for the gamers"? Remember, you said they do NOTHING for their fans. If you want to believe that so you can continue your endless hate crusade, go right ahead. Xbox gamers know the truth, regardless of how hard you try to distort it.

The xbox One is outselling the 360 at the same point in it's life cycle. Just because it's not selling as well as the PS4 doesn't mean it's having it's ass handed to it. Of course, you can keep dreaming and believe that MS is desperate, and they were forced into this by your beloved Sony, but only on N4G will anyone agree with you.

OrangePowerz3624d ago (Edited 3624d ago )

@Doolin

Really? I had 3 360s myself and I know a lot of people who bought more than one either because they upgraded or because it broke and was out of warranty. But let me guess the usual response is that it`s just a few people I know and that doesn`t represent at all the general userbase. On the other hand I still have my launch original Xbox, launch GameCube, launch Dreamcast, launch PS2 and launch PS3 all in working condition.

As for attach ratio, what valid numbers do we have to validate that?

Sony apologist? Sorry but if Sony would have pulled the same that MS pulled last year I sure as hell would not have gotten a PS4. Hardcore Xbox fans just bended over, put down their pants and go into position to take it from MS with their DRM, online check in and mandatory Kinect. All of that was rocket science and so integral that it could not be reversed.

Numerous successful and highly rated games? In the top 50 metacritic list there are 5 games created by MS. 2 Forza, 2 Halos and Mass Effect. Games like Gears of War don`t count because all they did was give Epic money to get it exclusive and to publish the games, they had not been developed by MS. On the other hand if I do the same I get 11 with a lot more variety from all the different genres.

MS is desperate, they just sent their beloved Kinect to die. And Sony didn`t do it, the sales did it. If you face being outsold 2:1 even in your home country you are getting your ass kicked, because the US and UK had been the only real strong markets last gen where they had a good lead to the PS3. Not even the overhyped Titanfall that cost them a crap load of money to get exclusive couldn`t get them to outsell the PS4 in the US.

The last generation lasted also a lot longer compared to the previous one so people are more willing to upgrade for either of the new consoles.

And finally. Hardcore Xbox fans deserve what they get now. Playstation fans got a lot of grief last gen from them because Sony was arrogant, Sony removed the other OS option, Sony got hacked, PS3 versions have less grass and 360 version are much better because they load 3 seconds quicker, 360 doesn`t have to wait long for game installs. Those same 360 fans just ignore all the screwing over that MS wanted to give them, they ignore all the arrogance of MS. MS never once said any of the stuff of the X1 was a mistake all they always say is that people just don`t get the vision. They always spouted their BS about how the 360 failure rate is withing normal standards and those 360 fans eat it up. Where are those Xbox fans now complaining about the X1 install times or having to download mandatory patches that are several GB big? They believe the crap about cloud, how DX12 will make everything better and all the crap Mister X writes. The original Xbox was only abandoned because of nVidia (ignoring the fact that MS didn`t gave a toss about the 360 gamers in the last few years). I don`t pity the fools.

Normal Xbox fans that are skeptical towards MS and question their decisions are fine. But people who go around with their Sony apologist or "phony" crap can continue to bend over to MS because in 7 years they got a lot more crap fed from MS than what people got from Sony since the PS1 and I will continue to enjoy having them squirm and spin everything in their favor.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3624d ago
yellowgerbil3625d ago

Well they also didn't spend that year proving the Kinects worth, how many games are kinect centered? or even use it in an integral way? 1, 2 maybe?
To all those that said with the Kinect in every box it would get support, there are like no games utilizing it, kinect sports is the only one I know of besides that dance karoke shovelware games ubisoft made.

fr0sty3625d ago

It wasn't about sales, it was about our fans!

*and their money, which they have been holding on to more than we anticipated.

Retroman3625d ago (Edited 3625d ago )

"XBOX 1 price drop not for boosting sales"

oh' REALLY??
umm let me guess E3 right round the corner for boosting NEW games this year. yeah' i say that price drop was for boosting sales.

MS if you can't lie correctly get out of marketing business. that is what marketing all about lure un-expected consumers with a Fantastic lie.

WilDRangeRrfc3625d ago

Yeah they could learn how to lie correctly off of Sony!! Got both systems selling PS4 to a friend game line up is horrendous my (2)DS4 thumbsticks are falling to pieces,the system gets warm and is loud,it has nice graphics but is hughely overrated,UI is plain and boring enjoy X1 far more better games and more fun online,disagree all you want this is my honest opinion,to single player focused games have no replay value although I did enjoy ISS I traded it in after 2 play throughs,people are blind and easily led by Sony

cheetah3625d ago

Desperate times call for desperate measures.

showtimefolks3625d ago

look i am a pro sony/ps4 but this is good news. I think most of us agree that $399 without kinect is the right move. Competition between sony and ms is a good thing

MS humbled sony last gen and made them make an competitive online service like xblive

sony pushed MS to do a lot of things right since E3 and now again. Along with that sony pushed MS to offer better content for xblive gold games

I for one can't wait to see what both have in store at E3 and moving forward.

#begamersnotfanboys#

aerisbueller3625d ago

MS always starts 'listening to the fans' when they are against the ropes.

n4rc3625d ago

Omg.. People.. Give your fkn heads a shake

He didn't lie.. People are trying to take one sentence out of context then ridicule the results..

Why the fk would you drop the price for anything but sales? He's simply saying they did it because many spoke to them about wanting a lower price point to jump on board..

Of course its about sales in the end.. But its not just to match or beat some other companies number.. Its about current customers asking for something..

All businesses run on money.. That is their sole motive.. Acting like it isn't makes you look like a naive kid..

But hey.. Ms killed fanboys main battle cries in a day, they gotta scramble for something else now to bitch about.. AMD we are scraping the barrel here

kenshiro1003625d ago

Lol @ Microsoft.

It was about sales. Who are you fooling?

Codewow3625d ago

New CEO has to make up for the greedy old CEO.

ZombieKiller3624d ago

I don't know what's worse, them shoving Kinect down peoples throats so they're forced to pay for it, or their lies.

Funny. I actually thought for a second I might pick the XB1 up at a $399 tag but honestly, every time I see some article about Microsoft and how their policies change, and how they treat their customers, and I do a 180 away from the thing again. I want the xbox, but I don't want all this drama and bullshit that comes with it.
Maybe if they made the experience actually customizable to me rather than a version their wallets think is customizable to my experience, and I might consider. Then again, they'll just hide the damn auto-renewal feature on me for the ump-teenth time after I buy. Sorry but I'm good with my Playstation for now despite what your excuse for screwing gamers is.

n4rc3624d ago

Ya.. How dare they listen to their customers? Such horrible treatment, free games and features people wanted... What assholes!

You gotta be trolling because I cant believe someone can actually think what you wrote. Lol

ZombieKiller3623d ago

...Or the fact that you have 2 bubbles? Let me guess, your excuse is this is a Sony fanboy site like every other idiot with a bubble or 2.

How is ANY of what I mentioned classified as "listening to their customers"?

Secondly, how DOES Microsoft listen to their customers? That is NOT it by any means. Just because you release a policy that makes all of your fans FLOCK to the competition, then do a 180 with them, that's not listening to people, that's being scared of losing sales. The free games would have NEVER happened if they didn't have the competition doing it. Next you're gonna say that they give out better free games than Sony does, right?
I'm not trolling nimrod, I have an xbox. I'm simply venting the fact that I want an xbox one because I'm a gamer, but refuse because I hate Microsoft. I can't believe you actually think at all, judging by what YOU wrote.

+ Show (16) more repliesLast reply 3623d ago
Christopher3626d ago (Edited 3625d ago )

*cough*BS*cough*

Sony, MS, Nintendo... their primary goal? Make da money!

So, no, this is all about boosting sales to get a bigger market share so that third-parties won't abandon you or ignore you and so you can make more money on software sales.

This has everything to do about boosting sales.

To say otherwise? Is to tell us that DRM can't be reversed or that XBO isn't possible without Kinect.

Edit: Add to this that MS pretty much dropped support of the 360. If they don't boost XBO sales, those gamers are going to just leave and go to PS4. Again, this has everything to do about boosting sales. Everything.

Aleithian3625d ago

They're dropping (or reducing) support for 360?

HeavenlySnipes3625d ago

What have you seen them announce for that system?

Its not necessarily a bad thing but I'd hope Sony and MS would reduce support for the PS3/360 to improve the experience on current gen

Christopher3625d ago (Edited 3625d ago )

@Aleithian: They have no game support on the 360. Their focus is on XBO. So, yes, support is being dropped in some degree. It's primarily just third-party games going to 360 now.

Also note how this article is all about getting 360 games to move over to the XBO. They don't want to manage two gaming hardware pieces.

PS3 on the other hand has a ton of game releases coming out for it that are exclusive to the platform this year, even with the success of the PS4.

4Sh0w3625d ago (Edited 3625d ago )

@cgoodno
3rd party support wasn't going anywhere, #1 Although trailing ps4 it was still quite healthy as far as sales, so if I'm a 3rd party dev I'm not going to limit my potential sales unless sony pays me. #2 Micro has deep pockets to pay for more 3rd party AAA exclusives as they are doing now.

There a big difference between saying its complicated to reverse DRM(can't fix overnight) and saying it can't be done, which from listening to the entirety of interviews was what Major Nelson and others pointed out.

You are correct this is all about boosting sales

Well last year although Gears Judgement wasn't up to past standards it was good, then other fan favorite stuff like Fable Anniversary was well received but yes exclusive support is lower especially with X1 arrival but its been out a long time now, plus plenty good games to play with its library of xbox exclusives here and there and tons of multiplats of course still coming. Frankly micro has been beat up either way on that front when they allow great games like Titanfall, Project Spark, etc to come to 360 too. After TLOU I see all of sony's big games slated for ps4 too, sure they'll get indie stuff and some less popular titles exclusive but I think if its anything highly anticipated its going to ps4. I mean you either had these platforms a long time and played them to death to recoup your investment or you're buying cheap now with a vast library to choose from, so at least imo I don't see either company focusing on their next platform as a bad thing, hell E3 will be all about wii-u, ps4 and X1; everything else if even mentioned will be a side note type announcement.

Christopher3625d ago

***There a big difference between saying its complicated to reverse DRM(can't fix overnight) and saying it can't be done, which from listening to the entirety of interviews was what Major Nelson and others pointed out. ***

I know it's a bit off topic, but I disagree with that comment they made as well.

Comparatively, "undoing" a process is pretty easy compared to creating that process in the first place.

They create a program flow that involves "DRM check". To remove it, quickly, on calls to that to get values, instead remove the calls and set the values you want to send to "verify" as DRM. Done. Very easy compared to the whole process of doing the whole DRM validation, which would be its own class structure.

Anyway, sorry for the slightly OT.

OrangePowerz3625d ago

The Titanfall delay was a clear indication of how much they care about the 360 user base. I don't buy it that the game wasn't ready and had to be delayed on the 360 because of it, they never even.promoted the 360 version at all. It all poibts towards MS getting EA to release it later. Plus all we got last year was one Gears of War ge and that was it regarding MS supporting the 360.

4Sh0w3625d ago

nah, its cool.

I see what you're say "comparatively" but that said building a whole platform with the idea that it was going to have online checks IS complicated and also I'm sure DRM was embedded in many unknown ways to ensure functionality, not sure how long after E3 they changed it but I bet it was a significant effort with a lot of late nights on their part.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3625d ago
4Sh0w3625d ago (Edited 3625d ago )

My bad, reply above.

Godmars2903625d ago

There is a difference between how Nintendo Sony and MS went about making money though. Namely where the first two went about it by providing a product, which was generally a onetime purchase, MS has been leaning towards providing a service while controlling - profiting from all - interactions in between to produce an ongoing revenue stream. It shows in everything they've done from online support for the first Xbox to the DRM plans. Kinect itself was more about making money from advertisers, being an easily accessible market research network, than actually working.

But like their DRM plans which went belly up at E3, Kinect has now finally joined it. Maybe from those mistakes the Xbox brand can finally become similar to its competition, actually give customers something before looking for more money just to work, but I still have doubts.

Christopher3625d ago

In general, MS has seen what Apple has done with their storefront and they badly want to copy it. I think that concept was heavily at play in designing the XBO and its storefront/online system.

Even on the OS side, they want to get people to use their store front so they can get a big of each profit without doing anything but providing the content.

I'm glad that this concept doesn't fare well with a lot of my fellow gamers. I've moved away from iOS myself for that reason alone to Android, where I am able to make more decisions, buy from more sources (HumbleBundle love here), and so on.

doolin_dalton3625d ago

The 360 is in it's ninth year on the market. How many other consoles had significant exclusives released in their ninth year? How many PS2 exclusives were released in it's ninth year? Next year we'll find out how many PS3 exclusives Sony releases in PS3's ninth year.

This late in a console life cycle is always about third party support. As long as MS keeps making 360's, there will be plenty of games to play. That's how a console is supported, and how it's always been. Complaining about supposed "dropped support" without considering all the facts screams of fanboy insecurity. Of course, this is N4G so facts are usually irrelevant if they don't support Sony or bash MS.

Christopher3625d ago

360 has been lacking exclusives for more than its 9th year. Let's not make it look like it suddenly became an issue. They've been lacking for the last 3 or so years easily.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3625d ago
Kayant3625d ago

If it wasn't it would have been done time ago as fans have been calling for the option for a while and you won't have restated multiple times your belief in kinect as an integrated part of the system and that a kinectless option was never going to be an option.

April's NPD should be interesting.

Volkama3625d ago

May and June's system updates should be interesting. A kinectless bundle must surely coincide with a fairly hefty interface revamp...

Eonjay3625d ago

May NPDs can be called before April's. PS4 will win May by default. After that it gets interesting.

Yo Mama3625d ago (Edited 3625d ago )

Hahah. Yeah right.

While it's true that every company loves money. Sony and M$ operate totally differently from each other. If Sony were as bad as M$, they would have launched the PS4 with DRM and a camera before deciding to reverse course and remove it. It was the perfect opportunity to do so because their competition had included it. But they didn't. THEY ARE THE ONE WHO LISTENED to what the fans wanted and went the opposite direction, which meant they could sell the PS4 at an even lower price than planned. Not M$. They do what's best for them and react once they see gamers aren't going to put up with their shit.

Basically, MS are arrogant idiots that thought they could screw over gamers any way they wanted and that we would still buy their system because they were considered the market leader last gen, but they got burned. Now all the sudden, they're "all about the gamer" and "listen" to want people want? Give me a break!

mcstorm3625d ago (Edited 3625d ago )

Do you remember the price of the psv and memory card? Or the price and direction they took the ps3? To say Sony are not as bad as Microsoft is not true. All companys are as bad as each other.

Sony knew this time they could not afford the ps4 to have a bad start like the ps3 or psv and made changes to make sure this did not happen and also played it very safe too.

Microsoft had a vision and people did not like it so they are changing it to what people want. If you see that as a bad thing then its on you. For me I don't think they should sell the Xbox one without Kinect as it sets the console apart from the Wiiu and ps4 but only time will tell if sales start to pickup now people have a choice.

For me its the same with the Wiiu I don't think Nintendo should remove the Wiiu pad from the Wiiu.

ThanatosDMC3625d ago

Mcstorm

Bluray was new tech. Sony cards is completely different from SD. 360 HDD is a case with a normal HDD.

mcstorm3625d ago

@ThanatosDMC So its ok for Sony to do things but not Microsoft? Come on. Even before the PS3 came out Sony removed Backward compatibility then the SD slots, Then launched a new slim console with price drop, then removed other OS ect. Sony made lots of mistakes last gen and did the same with the PSV. Yes the PSV memory card is different than SD but dose that still make it right to charge so much for a memory card that is not bundled with the console even though you need to have one for the device to work properly?

Come on Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo have and will carry on making mistakes but its what they do after they make the mistakes and Sony managed to turn the PS3 around by spending time on PSN as it was poor at the start. PS+ was a nice addition too.

Microsoft have had a bad start with the xbox one but have made changes because they saw the backlash they received after the console was shown and now have a new guy in charge who seems to understand gaming and what gamers want. Changes are being made to better the xbox one just like Sony did with the PS3.

At the end of the day every games console that comes out always had + and - points and always will do. Some people will also always like one over another that's why we have choice.

DragonKnight3625d ago

@Yo Mama: Your comment sounds like you believe that Sony had DRM and the camera planned and then removed it when they saw the backlash against MS, but that's not true. The PS4 never had DRM, and although the camera WAS going to be included (and the price was still going to be $400), Sony removed it because they didn't want to take so big a loss on each sale.

@mcstorm: Where to begin.

"So its ok for Sony to do things but not Microsoft?"

Stop crying.

"Even before the PS3 came out Sony removed Backward compatibility then the SD slots."

Funny, I have a PS3 with BC and the SD slots. How did I get one before the PS3 came out?

Sony removed BC because of people like you who complained about the cost of a PS3 and said things like "I don't even use BC anyway" so they listened to the fans. They removed the SD slots for the same reason.

"Then launched a new slim console with price drop, then removed other OS ect."

They always launch a new slim console. They have since the PS1. Were you expecting them not to? Other OS was removed for security reasons and because less than 1% of the userbase was using it. Get over it.

"Sony made lots of mistakes last gen and did the same with the PSV."

Not as many as people like you seem to think they did. It's a case of taking something and blowing it out of proportion to defend someone else.

"Microsoft have had a bad start with the xbox one but have made changes because they saw the backlash they received after the console was shown and now have a new guy in charge who seems to understand gaming and what gamers want. Changes are being made to better the xbox one just like Sony did with the PS3."

None of the changes that Microsoft are doing are for the gamers. There are Xbox fanboys in this very comment thread that are telling you the same thing.

mcstorm3625d ago

@DragonKnight where did you get the fan boy thing from? The only console I don't own at this moment in time is a PS4 and that is because the only game I want is DriverClub so as soon as this is out I will own one and own every console this gen just like the last one and the one before that.

Im not crying btw I am making a point that people on this site seem to forget the mistakes that were made by Sony and Also Nintendo in the past. No company is perfect and never will be. If you read what I say in a negative way then that's because your taking the sony side too serious.

I am a big fan of Sony and there products but I will point out when they made a mistake and also when they made the right choices like I said in my last 2 comments.

Imalwaysright3624d ago (Edited 3624d ago )

DragonKnight

The corporate apologist that believes that everything Sony does is for the fans. MS removes Kinect and is solely for the sales, not because fans asked them to. Sony removes BC and its because fans asked them to, not because of sales. Your hypocrisy is laughable but hey I know that you love to buy HD remakes and HD remakes of HD games.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3624d ago
kewlkat0073625d ago

"Sony and M$ operate totally differently from each other."

...lol

Oh yeah, only one likes your money/s

Yo Mama3625d ago (Edited 3625d ago )

Maybe you should read and reply to the whole post instead of just taking the one sentence out of context and coming off like a complete and utter fool?

Omegasyde3625d ago

^^^^^@ kewlkat

You just got served. OUCH!

kenshiro1003625d ago

kewl, you just got caged and I do mean literally.

wynams3625d ago

Microsoft was WAY more entertaining when they just told us we were crazy #kinect #drm #alwayson #thefuture #thecloud

ThanatosDMC3625d ago

"You cant turn it off like a switch." ::Turns it off::

Show all comments (231)
350°

Microsoft VP: 'No one' touches what HoloLens is, no other system going after it

Among them are the potential that lies within their HoloLens technology

Read Full Story >>
examiner.com
Captain_Wormy3057d ago

No one wants to touch it. Everyone else is going for something greater and better.

Kalebninja3057d ago

Lmao I was thinking this when coming into the topic. Honestly I think the tech is cool but as its own thing separate from video games.

nX3057d ago

Pretty much, I don't see myself gaming with it... could be useful in other areas though. VR is the thing I want to game with, especially immersive games like Elder Scrolls or Fallout.

donthate3057d ago

I can see HoloLens one day merging AR and VR into one device simply by completely covering the field of view with AR.

Once we get the device small enough, HoloLens can go with you to everywhere you go. It can replace your mobile phone and be much more convenient too especially with Cortana!

The next 10-years in computing is going to be very exciting.

Peace_Love_and_FPS3057d ago (Edited 3057d ago )

Donthate has a point, the combination would be spectacular. Hololens is too expensive in its current form, but throw that and VR together? Done, bought, first day. That said, any other VR companies could do that with the use of 3 cameras or 2 lighthouses, something multiple companies have products made for. Wouldn't be a patent breach and is just software that that point. Hopefully developers figure it out first and keep it open to everyone ;)

bleedsoe9mm3057d ago

i'd say the same thing applies to VR

kitsune4513057d ago (Edited 3057d ago )

The Hololens is simply augmented reality attached to your face. Almost every console from PS3 to 3DS has tried to implement a gaming experience into augmented reality and failed. If Nintendo, of all people, could not succeed, Microsoft likely won't either.

Retroman3057d ago

MS gotta lie to pump sales. dont see anyone but diehard x1's gamers buying this.

RiseofScorpio3057d ago

@nX

You don't see yourself gaming with it because you can't judging by all your anti Xbox One MS comment history.

D-riders3056d ago

NX you just gave a woody, saying Fallout and Elder scolls with VR OMG

3056d ago
TheBrit3056d ago

The fact that for a single person, or even someone that is not single, the ability to not having to or wanting to upgrade your t.v every couple of years this is a winner right there.

100 inch t.v screen on any wall you like - priceless. No cables no drilling no brackets - nothing.

hololens could indeed have an incredible future.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 3056d ago
Thatguy-3103057d ago

Hololens will excel in the fact that it will do more than gaming. When putting it up against Vr for gaming purposes it falls short. When broadening it's use to every day life applications then you can easily see the potential for this thing. I'm more excited for the non-gaming things I'll be able to do. Gaming on this will be pretty casual so when it comes to that aspect of it I'm not so thrilled

BlackTar1873057d ago

Hololens will be awesome for stuff outside of gaming. I mean it's awesome tech and hopefully someday i'll find something can personally use it for.

donthate3057d ago

I don't think gaming on HoloLens will necessarily be casual, because it depends on what you are making and if you can receive the inputs of a controller.

Overall it is just too soon to tell, but it is possible that HoloLens in the future will be both an AR and VR device when the field of view can be completely covered with AR.

hoju693057d ago

Gaming is, and has been for quite some time, about immersion. Immersion IS about taking you out of reality and putting you in the game world. Immersion IS NOT taking the game world out of the TV and putting it on your coffee table. Microsoft isn't pushing Hololens as a gaming device because even they know its applications in that field are limited at best. In the commerical and industrial worlds, it can be a game changer though.

JMyers3057d ago

@dboy

Or the opposite because it will not have much to do with gaming. Like Kinect had many applications outside of gaming, and ultimately failed to do anything as a result.

D-riders3056d ago

IT reminds me of Google Glass in the ways it could be effective

Raiden3056d ago

Indie games will fly to this device, how many indie games are on pc's tablet's and mobile phones, but I too am looking forward to the non-gaming options, movies for one.

TheCommentator3056d ago

Why couldn't Hololens also be VR? All it would take is an extra peice of plastic to block out the environment around you.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3056d ago
Dabigkahuna763057d ago

What if Sony did this just asking

Bathyj3057d ago (Edited 3057d ago )

I still wouldnt want to play a game where the level was my living room, and the whole game was as big as my house, even if Sony did it.

GamingIVfun3057d ago (Edited 3057d ago )

It probably would not do well, just like the move controllers and kinect.

BitbyDeath3057d ago

They already kinda did with Vita. The main difference being Vita doesn't strap to your face.

But otherwise it got quite a few uses in the AR world.

IIFloodyII3057d ago (Edited 3057d ago )

It still wouldn't really be a gaming peripherals, so nothing would change for me, I think the tech is really cool, but I'd have no use for it, I'm sure companies will though, and others.

Saying that I also don't really care for VR either, besides that multiplayer Mech game, non have really interested me.

Salooh3057d ago (Edited 3057d ago )

Speak for your self fanboy. I would react the same way but the way you fanboys act like everything is against you and then act innocent is stupid and obvious, same goes for sony fanboys. These topics have an opinion aspect , not every sony fan will act the same.

I didn't like how sony supported the vita and i did talk against sony in the same year they released the vita and i got tons of disagrees, those that saw reality agreed with me but fanboys really proved themselfs at that point now the ones that disagreed are doing what i did. Many people who like sony products do the same as me. I don't care about sony , i care about what i will get.

I am still doubting VR which is focused on games let alone something that is not related to games. All i care about is a better but reasonable experience for gaming. VR sounds promising yet needs to prove it self before i support it or claim anything. As for AR , i am sure a billion% that if anyone bought it for gaming will be disappointed just like what happened to kinect. This is not a feature , this is an expensive device, gaming so far use it as an extra feature because it's hard to come up with something creative and practical in the same time.

3056d ago
+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3056d ago
Lennoxb633057d ago

What do you mean by greater and better? There's no other tech out there that's producing holographic images through nothing but glass. So what's competing with it?

Vasto3057d ago

No one wants to touch it? The top 3 companies in the world.

1.Apple
2.Microsoft
3.Google

All are working on AR.

Peace_Love_and_FPS3057d ago (Edited 3057d ago )

I'm going to get one of them when the price drops after they're all released, definitely won't be buying Apple, but AR could change business, laptops and and education if they mass market and produce it to them. This thing + AutoCAD O_O

RiseofScorpio3057d ago

Sony fans on N4G trying to twist reality in their favor is sad.

3056d ago
lelo2play3057d ago

Honestly... HoloLens is looking more interesting then VR.

joeorc3056d ago

Well when you can combine both, its pretty darn Awesome

http://www.gizmag.com/sulon...

Bathyj3057d ago

I think everyone agrees that it is very impressive technology (much like Kinect), really future is now stuff (much like Kinect), with many implications to real world industry, but not really useful for gaming (much like Kinect).

donthate3057d ago

Kinect never got a chance to be explored in gaming. For instance, Xbox Fitness gamified fitness at home and is a huge leap forward.

Other games that have come that are great include Fantasia, Dance Central, Fruit Ninja Kinect, D4 and so on.

There is still a lot of potential there, but the naysayers killed Kinect!

Bathyj3057d ago

Naysayers? If the product was good then the haters wouldnt really have a leg to stand on. Two iterations of Kinect and the best part of a decade since it came out and still no one has proved how it came better real core gaming experiences in any meaningful way. Thats not naysayers, thats just reality.

Devs had plenty of time to produce a real game on it, it never happened. All they showed is that its good for dance games or punching balls away, not real games that real gamers want to play. You cant blame naysayers for that and its a long way from the bold promises of changing gaming that MS went on and on about.

Im yet to be convinced Hololens can be used well in gaming. Like I said its impressive tech with possibly a million uses. It could very well change society the way smart phones have. But gaming? Some one tell me how, please. I dont want a level that is my house. It sounds very limiting.

Even the on stage demo of that guy shooting aliens looked cool, but really the way he was ducking slowly away from even slower fire and plodding around the stage, after that initial shock value of an alien in your living room wears off, will that sort of simple gameplay be enough for todays MP centric twitch shooters gamers?

I think VR definitely has a lot to add to gaming as it can immerse you right in the game and block out the world. I dont think AR with its bringing the game into the world approach has much to offer gaming. Buy hey, if a game comes out that proves me wrong I will happily admit it and buy one.

s45gr323057d ago

Kinect will really shine once vr takes off. Think about it, the real world gets blocked off and now you are inside the gameworld. The gamepad/keyboard and mouse will become useless. Kinect works in vr due to body movement. So be able to move in a gameworld using your body will truly change the way we play games. I can't wait till vr reaches sword art online status

GamingIVfun3057d ago

Cool technology, but I don't think gamer's want something that equates to something like a secondary experience, so far I have not seen any real control type game play done with it. It's just a more elaborate secondary screen type of thing, not literally but similar in what it can offer to games. The price for it will probably be more than most would want to pay for that experience.

It's more suited to educational purposes.

s45gr323057d ago

RTS, basically able to have full view of the map and order troops to go forward. Be able to spot the enemy from miles away. Have a virtual chat with your rival or the nation leaders you want to conquer. It could also bring the star wars: a new hope chess game to life. I do want to emphasize that its real strength comes outside of gaming.

2cents3057d ago

Speak for yourself.
I'm going Hololens, day one my friend.

BallsEye3057d ago

Care to elaborate? Comparing VR tech to Hololens is like comparing a calculator to a PC.

Raiden3056d ago (Edited 3056d ago )

Wrong wrong, wrong, and wrong. @Captain wormy

Good luck with greater and better

Firstly this technology is not for gaming, it was not created for gaming, it was created to do whatever the application is on the device, app's run everything and if a game is made for it so be it, this device is created to be a multitasking unit, I for one can't wait to be sitting on one of my long journey to work or home and just watch a movie on the go full surround sound, also since most of you haters of MS, saying games this and games that, just imagine a Bluetooth connection between your mobile phone or mini tablet to this device, your phone or tablet being the controller, you can adjust the size of the screen to suit yourself, I play Dungeon Hunter(V) on my tablet everywhere, now this is just app, so why can't it be possible on this device that was never intended to focus on games. Can you take VR on the road, are you free to move about with VR, NO you can't, don't get me wrong I can't wait to see what the gaming industry do with VR, but HOLOLENS, I don't see them pushing it, but I do see indie games making a big bang with, on the move big screen gaming, this device is a multitasker like your PC/MAC,and TABLETS, If pushed and marketed correctly you would see this more common place, it may look silly to ware out on the streets, but when people start to ware, depending on the price, who knows what possible and I can tell you, there will be two types, the one sold to the general public and the one sold to businesses and universities training hospitals and schools, I don't see any other devices offering this flexibility apart from your laptop, tablet and mobile phone all on a small screen.

Game on

Taero3056d ago

Well, if you're talking about being on a journey and watching movies/projecting game screens then actually I'd like VR instead of AR. Why would I want my game overlaid on top of random surroundings (which looking at the Hololens might not work so well as the 'windows' seem to snap to flat surfaces which aren't in ready supply on the move).

Wouldn't it be better to effectively sit in a dark cinema with surround sound and watch your movie, or project your games video feed up onto the massive screen?

Plus the Holo lens FoV is pretty tiny which annoys me as all the promo bullshots have shown it effectively taking up the whole area wherever you look as opposed to the center.

elarcadia3056d ago

While HoloLens is going to be very cool for gaming, I know that Microsoft is making it to use in numerous industries. Gaming, architecture, design, science, etc. etc. I like that they are trying to make something that can be used in all facets of your everyday life; it is an interesting little device, and I am excited to see where the project goes.

DiRtY3056d ago

HoloLens is not a gaming device by nature. The everyday use will be awesome and the gaming aspect is just icing on the cake.

Imagine all the possibilities with it... This device is perfect for watching sports, gaming and of course porn. Every TV station tries to sell you the second screen stuff, here the second is just there when you want it.

Brazz3056d ago

on the video game front... yeah, hololens isn't that big deal for games, there are much better things...

on other fronts...

damn, this thing is amazing, i can see this becoming a must have product. it's still early, and there are lot's of problems, but there is lot's of potenttial on lens.

UncleJerry3056d ago

@ captain wormy...I think that remains to be seen. But yes, VR is more relevant right now and certainly closer to consumers hands. But hololens does seem like it has cool potential. Maybe it will wow us, who knows. Unless they repeat the whole "project natal will change earth and cure cancer and peter molynuex talking to wierd virtual kids" thing.

zarbor3056d ago (Edited 3056d ago )

Back in the days, 3D was suppose to be the future. It did get resurrected only to die a horrific death. Sony went all in on 3D and it was an epic fail.

Back in the days, Nintendo try to do VR saying it was going to be the future. It failed and has shown up again. Sony has gone all in and guess what will happen? Just a matter of time.

Augmented Reality was done with Sony Eye back in the days. Like all the other tech, it was cool but died. Now years later MS is making it look even cooler but outside of Minecraft no real gaming advantage. It too will fail like Google glasses.

+ Show (15) more repliesLast reply 3056d ago
SCW19823057d ago

Cool tech but if the view from inside is really that confined I don't know how well it will do.

YinYangGaming3057d ago

Haven't we all dreamed of experiencing holograms? Think the tech is still in early days so to most consumers/users on this site it might not look as appealing right now but in a few iterations or given some time, this tech could be revolutionary

kenwonobi3056d ago

I completely agree. Like you said in future iterations. I believe it's decades away similar to VR was in the early 90's.

ScorpiusX3057d ago

Great how about getting it ready for the public , growing tired of waiting .

mkis0073057d ago

Was with them until I found out it doesn't cover the whole display. Not fully immersing.

Show all comments (96)
410°

Microsoft: 2015 Was “The Best Year” for Xbox; Promises “Best Lineup” for Xbox One in 2016 as Well

Yesterday Microsoft Corporate Vice President for Windows and Devices Marketing Yusuf Mehdi spoke at the Credit Suisse Technology Broker Conference, and talked about the performance of Xbox this year, next year’s lineup, and the outlook for Xbox Live across consoles and Windows 10.

Read Full Story >>
dualshockers.com
DarkOcelet3058d ago (Edited 3058d ago )

Didn't MS say '2015 has the greatest lineup in Xbox history'?

Are we gonna ride with those words every year now?

And no, 2015 wasn't the greatest lineup in Xbox History.

JackTheRipper1013058d ago

It was a great line up and 2016 looks even better.

Gazondaily3058d ago

Heck 2016 looks even better. It has the variety, the titles are spaced out throughout the year for those that care for it. I mean who can rip into titles such as:

Crackdown
Sea of Thieves
Recore
Quantum Break
Cuphead
Gears
Scalebound

Pretty damn beastly and superior to even this year's showing which relied a lot on the usual MS staple which were still great in their own right.

The best shooters and racers this year and then that variety next year.

mark_parch3058d ago

@septic
don't forget below and halo wars 2

Gazondaily3058d ago (Edited 3058d ago )

Ah yeah wow.

So we get third person shooters, a FPS MMO, an adventure game, a 2d platformer (of sorts), a unique indie title and a RTS.

Now that is some sick variety and big name titles to boot. Pretty beastly!

NewMonday3058d ago

@Septic

they will be nice for those who already got an X1, but as a draw to the platform they will have an impossible job with games on other platforms dominating the hype like Zelda, Horizon, NMS, Uncharted4..etc and 2 big hardware launches for gamers to consider with the NX and PSVR.

2015 was Microsoft's big shot and it's gone

uptownsoul3058d ago (Edited 3058d ago )

Xbox's 2015 "greatest lineup in Xbox history" consisted of only 2 NEW AAA exclusives.

Everything else was remake/port, timed, Free2Play & small budget/indie (Nothing wrong with these types of games...But I seem to remember a certain community bashing those exact type of games)

Gazondaily3058d ago

@Newmonday

"2015 was Microsoft's big shot and it's gone"

What a load of rubbish. Where did you get this expiration date from? Why should MS commit sepuku in 2016?

"They will be nice for those who already got an X1, but as a draw to the platform they will have an impossible job with games on other platforms dominating the hype like Zelda, Horizon, NMS, Uncharted4."

'Impossible to draw to the platform'? We're talking about great games lineups. What are you on about? Sales? Believe it or not, some people actually play consoles to play videogames and what we're talking about here is a variety of promising looking titles.

Spare me the badly drafted doom and gloom posts please.

3058d ago
3058d ago
bouzebbal3058d ago

according to my tastes and my expectations i don't think it's that hard to top 2015 in terms of releases. tbh i have no idea if an exclusive game came out to X1 this year between January and September.
2016 seems indeed to be the year of the variety on all platforms, and certainly a massive year for gaming.
Zelda Wii U
Uncharted
GT Sports
Horizon
Star Ocean
...

X1 owners will for sure have a blast in 2016, but the question is: Is any of these games a system seller? not sure though.

DiRtY3058d ago

Great Lineup already. Nobody can argue against it.

nX3057d ago (Edited 3057d ago )

Wow what a poor attempt at good PR from one of the most annoying guys at MS.
If 2015 was the best year in Xbox history I'm glad to have spent my money elsewhere but yes, 2016 looks more interesting in terms of variety.

freshslicepizza3057d ago

@NewMonday
"they will be nice for those who already got an X1, but as a draw to the platform they will have an impossible job with games on other platforms dominating the hype like Zelda, Horizon, NMS, Uncharted4..etc and 2 big hardware launches for gamers to consider with the NX and PSVR."

this is about how the xbox one looks in 2016, why is it impossible for you to see that instead of always trying to downplay what the xbox one offers? nothing in that article talks about dominating in sales but you can't resist the need to counter any positive article about the xbox one can you?

"2015 was Microsoft's big shot and it's gone"

then why are you here?

ThePope3057d ago (Edited 3057d ago )

The question I keep seeing is "are the games coming out for the X1 in 2016 system sellers". I guess I would reverse the question and ask "what PS4 games outside of UC4 are system sellers?" Because the games you list are games that are in the same class as what the X1 has coming out. Unknown quantities. The difference and only,difference is that if it's coming out on PS4 it's an instant system seller.

Let's use Horizon as an example it's a game we know little about by a studio who makes good but not amazing (which is what I'm guessing you guys think a game has to be to be a system seller) games. Yet here newmonday and others are sitting talking about how it and other unknown games will make it impossible to buy an X1.

On top of that Many of the games listed as X1 killers in 2016 have no release date! Come on guys. Both systems have what may shape up to be the best year in gaming.

P.s. Psvr is not going to sell well. My prediction because who in there right mind wants to cover your face for hours? I could be wrong but that's my opinion.

P.p.s now I'm off to play Tomb Raider because unlike newmonday and his mob I play games not systems or sales

P.p.p.s I don't care about any exclusives because when Mass Effect comes out I don't plan on leaving my house.

r2oB3057d ago

Both 2015 and 2016 are great years for Xbox (actually Xbox gamers). But neither are the best in their history in my opinion. That is reserved for 2007 when Halo 3, Forza 2, Lost Oddysey, Eternal Sonata, Mass Effect, and BioShock were exclsuives on the Xbox 360.

christocolus3057d ago

@Jack

Couldnt agree more.

BDSE3057d ago

2015 is the best 2015 for XBOX One in XBOX One history in 2015 for sales that we don't report because they don't matter except when we do report them when they do matter.

Sevir3057d ago

Well, I can certainly entertain that MS bolstered a major complaint about not having anything for the beginning of the year.

Recore, and Quantum Break as big titles are great.. they've got stuff for summer and fall as well so the XBO community has stuff to play all year.

However, the known quanties and the strongest of the entire line up is Quantum Break, we have no idea what Record is, it hasn't even gotten a gameplay trailer and it's pressumably 5 months out from launch spring being March-May.

Sea of Thieves is Rare's return to AAA since Nuts and Bolts, Gears 4 looked underwhelming, Crackdown looks promising but the beta is Summer, and could probably launch in early 2017 to nail the mechanics, Scalebound looks really promising, but the gamescon demo was rough, and last we heard, that game is a 2017 title.

As for Halo Wars, I've got nothing as I don't care for RTS...

I'm not gonna bother listing and comparing, but Just gonna say, What MS has lined up is ok! I'm intrigued in Record, and Quantum Break... Everything else

Docknoss3057d ago

This year looks to best last year in my opinion, with all these new fresh IP's. Glad MS is doing more than the Halo, Gears, Forza rotation from the 360 gen. This will pay off tremendously for MS, just like this same Business strategy as Sony did with the PS3.

Rayven3057d ago

@ThePope

Pretty much all third party games are system sellers for the ps4 simply because they are all better with it, excluding a few poorly optimized ones.

_-EDMIX-_3057d ago (Edited 3057d ago )

@Septic- Sea Of Thieves, Gears, Cuphead etc and likely the rest of that line up will be released on PC, its hard to say how great an XONE line up is when I can play most of those titles on a PC....

I mean...I don't need to own a XONE to play lots of that line up so I question who much reasons to do I really need to own a XONE if I can on PC. I don't know how "beastly" that is for XONE, I mean...MS is getting bank, but I'm not seeing much incentive to actually buy an XONE vs buy a MS published title.

Also forgot about Halo Wars. I'm sorry but with MS push for PC as well, I'm not too sure how many will jump on XONE next year when many of its key titles are coming to PC or likely yet to be announced to be coming to PC as Phil stated they still have more games coming to PC, who knows what else they will release.

Multiplats play better on PS4 and I don't see that stopping and lots of MS titles are coming to PC...I again don't know how well that makes anyone want to buy a XONE next year any more then this year. Halo didn't move units but Gears will? Even though its lessor to Halo?

OH Forza will, even though it has no history of moving such units?

OH those new titles will even though XB has a history of not selling much units in regards to Japanese titles? I mean...I don't see much that will really help MS next year, its just as bad as this year.

Mr Pumblechook3057d ago

You know what happened to the boy who cried wolf?!

+ Show (19) more repliesLast reply 3057d ago
Fro_xoxo3058d ago (Edited 3058d ago )

It's just a marketing SLOGAN, don't make a big deal of it.

just like, "Greatness awaits" <-- Do I agree with this? Nope as I'm still waiting for greatness on that platform.

The game companies can advertise, or use whatever slogans they choose to use... They are trying to sell you consoles after all.... Since most of you are obsessed with sales figures, advertising is a part of it in case you haven't figured that out.

xoxo

--

Oh and, marketing or not. 2015 was indeed great on XO. In this part of the world, there's something for everyone on it. The Chief, Lara, Marcus Fenix Rare Replay Ori and all sorts.... basically games.

Gazondaily3058d ago

Well said + bu....wait is there any point now?

Its true though but marketing or not, 2015 was good, albeit relatively quiet for the first half of the year but next year is mad. The PS4's lineup looks insane too. Bye bye money

Eonjay3058d ago

Except they aren't saying it was great, they are saying it's the best in history... which can't be proven because it's entirely subjective. Kinda like Sony'so best place to play slogan.

The problem with Microsoft slogan is what do you call next year's lineup... is it better than the best in history...

Microsoft is very self-congratulatory lineup is all hype (except for Halo). It's just a PR tagline. So, next year they will have a new tagline.

3058d ago
jb2273057d ago

"just like, "Greatness awaits" <-- Do I agree with this? Nope as I'm still waiting for greatness on that platform."

The thing is, you don't even own that platform, so how can you accurately judge its content? Sure you can twitch stream most of the games and get a feel for how they look, but I've personally passed on plenty of games only to go back and actually try them later & absolutely fall in love w/ new titles & genres. You can't pass judgment on a lineup you haven't played. I'm sure there are plenty of games on your XBO that you wouldn't typically enjoy only to actually try them and love them. Same goes for PS4. You can't judge what "greatness" is or isn't there because you haven't actually tried it out. Same goes for me & the XBO...right now the only 2 exclusives that really get me going are SSOD & QB, but when I finally do get one, I'm pretty sure I will try out many others and potentially dig them a lot...I wouldn't discount a system I don't own...perceptions are one thing but reality is another.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3057d ago
HaydenJameSmith3058d ago (Edited 3058d ago )

Shouldnt those be words every console manufacter/publisher should live by ? To make their next year better than their last...

Fro_xoxo3058d ago

Hey, it is the norm around here to call Microsoft out for absolutely every little thing.

all the way down to their Slogan of choice.

So Ocelet is just following tradition.

RiseofScorpio3057d ago

He's pro Sony he's not gonna care whatever MS says. Geez its just a slogan why does MS get bashed in when every other company does the same?

gamer78043058d ago

technically if every year is better than the last, then you could have it the "Best" lineup in xbox history every year. Just remember this is subjective, they could pick a different MS employee every year when they showcase their favorite games. So it doesn't have to be YOUR version of "Best"

DarkOcelet3058d ago

But 2015 wasn't the greatest lineup in Xbox's History. X360 had much better years.

3058d ago Replies(2)
Paytaa3058d ago

I still think 2007-2008 were some of Xbox's strongest years. Between the two you had Halo 3, Mass Effect, Bioshock, Crackdown, Gears of War 2, Ninja Gaiden 2, Fable 2, Too Human, Lost Odyssey, Forza 2, and PGR4.

2015 to me wasn't THE best but one of the best in a while. 2016 looks to be even better given the variety within the year and finally there seems to be exclusives from start to end in 2016.

Sevir3057d ago

Besides Too Human, that year was MS's strongest line up of games in their history of gaming.

Besides, they haven't been able to replicate that

3058d ago
Vasto3058d ago (Edited 3058d ago )

All consoles should have a better lineup the next year. 2016 does look like the best ever.

DarkOcelet3058d ago

Yeah, 2016 looks so amazing.

quaneylfc3058d ago

nothing but sequels, this year or generation hasn't been good for anyone.

DarkOcelet3057d ago

Until Dawn and Bloodborne were amazing and they werent sequels.

quaneylfc3057d ago

Yeah but they (for their lack of originality e.g. Bloodborne was a Dark Souls game with a different name for sould) aren't the big tentpole games that are made for everyone.

Minato-Namikaze3057d ago

Bloodborne is bloodborne, not dark souls. Or is dark souls just demons souls by a different name?

ThanatosDMC3057d ago

LOL! Bloodborne is a completely different beast than Dark Souls.

Dark Souls 3 is copying a lot or everything from Bloodborne though.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3057d ago
uth113057d ago

MS is a broken record in this regard. Just like every release of Windows is the "Best Ever", even ones like ME, Vista and Win 8

DarkOcelet3057d ago

Windows 10 is amazing though. Gotta give credit to them on that one.

user99502793057d ago

and 2016 gets the best games ever! and 2017 gets the best games ever! and you get a car! everybody wins! wooooo

Its official, Xbox is top tits. Scalebound, Crackdown, Quantum Break, Sea of Thieves, Recore, Halo Wars, Gears, Forza. Probably some unnanounced stuff and times exclusive junk like ARK and ED. That's how we do it in the hood.

http://i284.photobucket.com...

spicelicka3057d ago

They never said '2015 has the greatest lineup in Xbox history'?

As far as I know they said the holiday is Xbox's greatest lineup, and they touted their announcements as greatest in Xbox history. This includes 2015 holiday to 2016 holiday.

If you look at what they released and plan to release it really is the greatest lineup in Xbox history.

Gears Ultimate
Rare replay
Forza 6
Halo 5
Tomb Raider
Fable legends
Recore
Quantum Break
Crackdown 3
Scalebound
Gigantic
Gears of war 4
Halo wars
Sea of Thieves

I've been playing Xbox for a long time and it's never had such a diverse AAA lineup within a span of a year and a half.

DarkOcelet3057d ago (Edited 3057d ago )

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

They said that many times. Look at the end of the trailer.

spicelicka3057d ago

^But that's also referring to the holidays, not all of 2015. They didn't even come up with this campaign until E3.

I really think people are taking it out of context, they're referring to 2015 holidays and beyond. This is why they advertised Gamescom with the same "greatest lineup" thing, when it was all about 2016.

It's only a marketing campaign about their investment in exclusives, which has never been better.

ThanatosDMC3057d ago

2 months of plety out of the year and 10 months of drought.

Lennoxb633057d ago

What's wrong with that? Both Sony and MS strive to have the best line up every year.

danny8183057d ago

it really was. Stop being s sour you fanboy

Yetter3057d ago

um, it was pretty damn close

3057d ago
Export3057d ago

It was the best year for xbox , I believe that . Tomb Raider , Halo 5 , screamride , ori and the blind forest and forza .

S2Killinit3057d ago

They should just say best line up every year and be done with it.

Gameplay9993057d ago

Basically, each year will be special. Don't overthink it my fellow gamers.

lxeasy3057d ago

2016 line up looks better than 2015 in my opinion

+ Show (17) more repliesLast reply 3057d ago
Dario_DC3058d ago

So they're thinking about pushing the Live subscription model on Windows? Good luck with that

Magnes3058d ago

Yeah I'm looking to get out of paying to play online not add more platforms to the list.

3058d ago Replies(8)
ninsigma3058d ago

I would agree 2015 was the best year for xbox one. It had a lot more and better exclusive games than it did the previous years that should keep fans of various genres happy. My one gripe is that we had to wait until the end of the year to get them. Either way I thoroughly enjoyed ori and the blind forrest, gears of war remastered and rise of the tomb raider on my xbox this year.

Show all comments (152)
390°

Yusuf Mehdi: Original Xbox One vision was right, digital is the future

Microsoft's Chief of Marketing probably turned a lot of fans against him with recent comments about how he thinks the company's original vision for an always online, no used game console was the "right vision".

Read Full Story >>
gimmegimmegames.com
XiSasukeUchiha3596d ago

No, no it wasn't my friend, not even close maybe in 20 years but not now.

XiNarutoUzumaki3596d ago (Edited 3596d ago )

Not even in 20 years. People like physical disk more.

Digital games aren't ours. We just own the license until they shut down the servers. No thanks

NatureOfLogic_3596d ago (Edited 3596d ago )

Just when I thought MS PR would turn a new leaf. They're back to saying we didn't understand. I'm sure everyone understood you clearly MS. MS should look at what their "original vision" did to their rapidly declining market share. Phil is doing a great job, but Yusuf is really not helping.

Summons753596d ago

Yup, good example of this is look at how many games (arcade or full) you downloaded on your 360 or ps3, now look at how many of those you could redownload on your xbone or ps4? Besides the very very very few that were ported the answer is NONE.

Digital only is not the future .

darthv723596d ago

Oh but wait...it isnt just MS pr. Sony and nintendo promote digital games as well. At some point there will have to be a transition from physical to digital. We all know this and no matter what anyone thinks....it is the future.

Maybe not tomorrow or 10 years (or 20) but it is happening. The push for any kind of adoption of a new trend starts with the right key ingredient.

Be that a new digital only version of a high profile game or the inclusion of content only made available to digital versions of a game...it will happen. Perhaps sooner than expected.

And when it does, then all these people who are saying it wont happen or people like physical will all be on that digital roller coaster with their hands up wondering why they didnt get on sooner.

if you think that its only MS saying this...you are sadly mistaken. There is an underline method to this madness and it isnt just MS that is behind it. Its any physical medium producer looking for a way out to save $$ but still deliver their product.

Eonjay3596d ago (Edited 3596d ago )

I think thats the point. Yes digital sales are becoming more prevalent, but Microsoft should take a page out of Sony's playbook. See, both companies want the same thing, but Sony is doing it correctly. PSNow is the first step and is more ambitious than anything to come out of Microsoft PR. Sony seems to understand though,that you can't pull the rug from up under people. If digital is really superior, we, the consumers, will eventually chose it for its speed and convenience. All the while we will still have physical copies.

Every successful technological step forward superseded its predecessors because it was better, not because the old tech was pulled from the market. Sony has introduced a service that is a threat to the preowned market, but they are smart enough to allow preowned sales to continue with the expectations that we will see streaming as a faster and more convenient method.

Microsoft learned the hard way that the old American philosophy is correct; the market itself decides. To say that their vision was correct is insane. Consumers are correct because we ARE the market. This is not open for negotiation.

theshonen88993596d ago

Correct my if I'm wrong but I believe this is the very first comment in which XiSasukeUchiha actual says something sensible.

N83596d ago

Yup and that's all I can think about. I could never go full digital.

Malphite3596d ago

I disagree. I think in about 10 years most of the music, movies, and games will be digital only. Maybe they'll produce a limited amount of physical copies but I guess the lion's share will be bought digitally.

But still MS was way too early with most their policies and flat out stupid with some and I'm glad they changed them.

Multiplatguy3596d ago

PC gamers tend to like Digital.

The problem with Microsoft/console is that Digital will never be the future with the way they are treating it. Watchdogs was £39.99 on Steam yet £60 on Xbox Live.

johndoe112113596d ago

And this my good people is the reason I will NOT support microsoft this gen. They are just snakes waiting to strike.

ShinMaster3596d ago

*
On consoles, more people are buying games in physical form still.

Games are getting bigger. 20 to 40GBs in size. And with ISPs limiting bandwidth and throttling speeds, it's not as easy as it should be.

It may be the future, but we're not there yet.

*

3596d ago
rainslacker3596d ago

@darth

OK. So lets say that in 10 to 20 years digital is where it's at. Does that mean that we have to accept it as the only thing today? 3D displays are probably going to be commonplace in 20 years, but is it something we should be saying is the future now, and is it something that an entire ecosystem should be focused around?

MS problem was never their DD policies, it was their policies on retail games.

Here's my prediction. In 20 years, both retail and physical will co-exist, and we'll still be having this same argument.

Seriously. In ten years internet providers will probably start upgrading their infrastructure. By then, games will probably be 4x bigger than they are now...conservatively speaking, and the net will still be too slow.

therealmarauder3596d ago

@Multiplatguy A hundred times this. If we go all digital, there should be atleast the subsidy of the cost of production of physical hardware passed on to the consumers, ala steam. You cant be seriously selling 4 year old games at 60$ and expect gamers to cough up.

RAAMzilla3596d ago

Physical games aren't ours either, they're another version of a license.

Volkama3596d ago

Yusuf shouldn't be allowed to talk. Whether he is technically right or wrong, he just constantly says the wrong things from a PR persective.

He is like the anti-Phil Spencer. One has a silver tongue and says everything gamers want to hear, the other has a regular tongue that he uses to clean the foot he keeps in his mouth.

+ Show (13) more repliesLast reply 3596d ago
phantomxll3596d ago

Yea I was against the whole digital thing. But the last few games ive purchased gave been digital. InfamousSs, Watchdogs(ps4), Wolfenstein (XB1). Its so dam annoying having to get up and change the disc of a game that i still have to install anyway. Id rather just download and be done with it. Way more convenient. And im not a "trader". I buy games and keep them. The discs are just annoying now.

Copen3596d ago

Your problem is laziness and that extends well beyond gaming.

IrishSt0ner3596d ago

So was I until I bought a few digital games. Don't get me wrong some of the DRM stuff was bad, but the always online was also to allow reselling/lending of digital titles.

So now as a result, if I want digital, I have to pay full RRP for a game that can never be lent out or sold. We all asking for these services now, and guess what, we can't have it as always online was the pirate protection. Great job internet, thanks /s

phantomxll3596d ago

Copen if youre using your remote instead of getting up to change the channel then youre as lazy as me. Douche.

beerzombie3596d ago

I have also gone all digital since X-1 and will not go back.Plus I like saying go to a game and start to play.

Volkama3596d ago

It bugs me having to find discs just to switch games. It bugs me having to find places to store discs (specially places that are out of the reach of my children). It bugs me when I cannot find a game I want to play.

I have no desire to sell or trade games. The box and disc hold no value to me what-so-ever.

Digital games are just a better choice for me, and for the poster you replied to. Being lazy has nothing to do with it.

You prefer discs. There are several reasons someone might prefer discs. That's fine. It doesn't make you better than him.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3596d ago
DLConspiracy3596d ago (Edited 3596d ago )

Then explain to me why people steal movies, games and music on the internet? How about explain to me why Netflix is so popular as a service? Let's take it a step further. Why is it that we like the PS+ service so much. We don't get to keep those unless we pay for the service.

EDIT *when I say the above. I am referring to the trend of DIGITAL, and how people use media*

Digital Age is here and the dip in physical discs sales are starting to show that. In a lot of ways we use digital all the time. Buy a CD, dump it on your computer or IPOD, never touch the CD again.

EDIT *I can guarantee that 90% of people then go to a store SELL that CD once it's digital on their computer IF they bought a physical copy. How would that be any different with Games? That's why there was a Digital Daily Check in. They had to protect the developers or they would be in trouble and owe. Just how business works. Step have to be in place for people making money on stuff. *

Just to be clear. I didn't like the Daily Check in idea. That was the one thing that needed work on. Otherwise the rest of it felt OK in my book. Obvious changes and restrictions needed to be made. You will start to see more digital sales happen in time. Both Sony and MS will make that happen, because they make more money off it. They will both show you the advantages by offering better prices and giving you more for your money. It's just a matter of time.

xHeavYx3596d ago

People steal movies because they are free. People use Netflix because it's $8 a month instead of $200. People like PS+ because you get a ton of games for just $50

DLConspiracy3596d ago (Edited 3596d ago )

@xHeavYx

I am not talking about that. Ownership is the word I base that off of when it comes to the PS+ and G4G service. Is all I am saying. It's ALL Digital still is it not?

ThePope3596d ago

Your 100% right. It is not right in 20 years its right now. Movie, game, music, book sales are all down by a large amount all because of digital. I have only bought 2 of 5 games on disc this gen, and truly don't plan on doing it again.

On top of that, as I've said several times, digital downloads protect developers and put the money in their hands, and not in the hands of Gamestop who benefit the industry not one bit.

kayoss3596d ago (Edited 3596d ago )

@dlconspracy,
Let me answer this for you.
The reason why is the data size. Music takes up very little space and it usually comes in a portable device like an iPod or phone. In order for you to listen to music on the go with ease is to go digital. No one carries a CD player around any more.
Netflix, is cheap and can be access anywhere as long as you have Internet access. It takes up no space at all. People who have Netflix do not care for ownership.
Movies, most hardcore movie viewers who like quality will never buy digital. They will buy the bluray. But unfortunately the majority of viewers just want to watch the movie once it's released. Buying digital movies is a lot cheaper and it can be access anywhere as long as you have Internet. Not many people trade in physical disks.
Digital Games, take up lots of space and it seems that it will just get bigger as this new generation mature. Many people want to own their games so that they can replay it down the line. You have to admit, finding retro games to play is harder then finding older movies. Another factor is the trade in and sharing of the physical disc. You can not do this with digital.
Internet bandwidth and cap is another issue. Not all people have the bandwidth to download a 50gb game. It easier and faster to go buy the physical game.
The last point is portability, you do not want to lug your console to different location just to play a game do you? Physical discs allow you to take just the game with you to play on other consoles.

ShinMaster3596d ago (Edited 3596d ago )

Because you DON'T own movies streamed through Netflix or the music you steal.

Major game titles are 20-40GBs in size.

ISPs like to limit bandwidth and throttle speeds in many cases.
And people don't often download 20-40GBs of music or movies at a time.

Physical copies look better in collections and they're not limited to an online account.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3596d ago
lelo3596d ago (Edited 3596d ago )

^^^

Ever heard of Steam? Digital is the future, and closer then you guys think. PC games have reached it. Consoles won't take long. Even Sony is launching a digital service, PS Now.

Now if people said that Microsoft's digital service (that was planed for the X1) wouldn't have prices and promotions that Steam has, that I would believe. Microsoft are quite stingy when it comes to discounts or promotions.

DLConspiracy3596d ago

I agree. MS was looking at the Steam example for their own. I don't disagree with you. I am apart of steam.

truefan13596d ago

Man you people hate change don't you. Either that or you are thinking narrow sighted as usual.
1) Digital eliminates constraints, we get full games without the limitation of disk space.
2) lower prices as there is no costs for shipping, disks, storage...
3) External hard drive is more reliable than disk, especially backed up in the cloud. A broken disk is useless.
4) You can download overnight if your Internet is that slow.

I think you people just prefer to kill the industry by reselling and renting games. You want AAA games, but don't support them. Also it seems like gamers are stuck in mud, we went from cartridges, to disks, and in the future digital. When is the last time you seen a portable cd player, digital I pods and phones took over.

ziggurcat3596d ago (Edited 3596d ago )

people accept change, they just don't appreciate draconian policies being shoved down their throats.

the problem with their "vision" was that *if* I chose to purchase a physical copy of a game, they were going to revoke any right I had to be able to lend the game to a friend or sell the game in order to make my next game purchase a little less expensive.

and just so you know, music on vinyl is back (and has been back for some time now). people still want to have physical copies of things, so I don't think that forcing people into an all-digital distribution model is the way to go.

that being said, I buy digital all the time - I have been doing it for quite some time - whether it's a PSN/XBLA title or digital version of a full retail game. I enjoy the convenience of not having to travel to a store to purchase a game I want. Does that mean I'm going to stop buying physical copies? nope... because there are certain franchises that I will only buy the physical copy for.

SamPao3596d ago

Go home your drunk

It the arrogance that killed xbone (original)
They wanted a piece of something that is not up to them. You can go digital and nobody cares as it transitions into it either way, but what MS did is downright insulting to customers!

Bathyj3596d ago

1.
Its funny how you care so much about disk space now. 50GB is enough, and if not 200 would be.

2. Are digital games cheaper? Really? Cos 90% of the time I see them more expensive than at JBHiFi. Of course I'm looking at the PSN prices, but please, tell me if XBL is different. Unless theyre selling new games cheaper on XBL than on PSN I doubt it, but digital prices are nearly always more, for some baffling reason. How would it be if that was the only place you could buy them?

3.
Really? I've had Harddrives fail before. Not very often. But I dont think I've ever had a disc fail that wasnt mistreated. Yes you can redownload a digital game. I supposed thats the price you pay to have it in your hand.

4.
So go make a sandwich huh?

Basically, i like owning the physical copy, I like having the cover on my shelf and I see no advantage at the moment to changing to digital. If they were cheaper than maybe I'll revisit.

MCTJim3596d ago (Edited 3596d ago )

I did appreciate the original xbox one vision. The problem was in the way it was explained. So I agree with Mendi. People never stopped to listen to the real story.(I understood it perfectly) And why was that? because it was poorly explained. You could trade your games like usual, you could lend/share your games to friends. But before they could explain it correctly the damage was done and they reversed said policy. At E3 this year, I was hoping they would have announced Digital downloads could be shared like originally they had announced, but alas, it did not make the show. I was also hoping for a price cut for digital only games too, cutting out the middleman would indeed make it cheaper and more realistic for people to adopt it. So a $60 game would be $45. I would definitely like to save money just like the next person. As for the people hate change comments I see below and above, yes, people do not like change, but if you make them want to change..with incentives like cheaper costs to purchase game, then they will adopt it quicker.

Edit: also the article and title were taken out of context...its definitely out for clicks/flaming.

rainslacker3596d ago

1. Digital is limited by constraints. Constraints on hard drive space. Constraints on bandwidth. Constraints on what you can do with your purchases.

2. Not my overall experience. On consoles, on release day they're the same price. Down the road, retail games are much cheaper. More often than not, the retail versions are often $10-20 cheaper than the still full priced digital version after less than a month.

3. Take care of your stuff and you won't have broken discs. I haven't broken a single disc in my entire life. What about when the games are taken down from the servers. It's rare but it happens. What about when that server decides to shut down completely...such as Games for Windows?

External hard drive? By your argument, save money on games(already disproven) but spend it on storage mediums. Dunno about you, but what has more value? A game you can sell, or a hard drive that will be worthless in a couple years?

4. I can drive to the store and be back in 15 minutes max. Don't have to wait overnight.

The industry isn't dying from buying a reselling games. It's making more money now than it ever has.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3596d ago
Magicite3596d ago

everyone in xbox camp, except spencer, act like idiots.

Pogmathoin3596d ago

Oh I see the usual suspects are here...... MS vision will come to fruition eventually, maybe under the guise of Apple, Google, Samsung or even Sony.....we are almost there already..... Video games are the only real medium that had a used market, and that will die eventually.... Caused by gamers who trade in for nothing, to see game sold for $5 less than new retail price...... Our own greed and stupidity is causing it..... Nothing can stop Drm right now, it is inevitable....... Gamers think the big guys listen..... They do listen..... To the till....... Thats what matters....... Bring on the hate....

soandsoz3596d ago (Edited 3596d ago )

"Caused by gamers who trade in for nothing, to see game sold for $5 less than new retail price...... Our own greed and stupidity is causing it....."

Greed is positively what this all boils down to. Though, in my opinion it's stemming from the opposite corner you steer attention towards.
I believe the industry will significantly contract or worse if they proceed in pushing digital exclusively.

I truly believe the industry will be feasting on humble pie if they take too stern a position on digital and always online/DRM.

Microsoft should foresee this. I hope they aren't blinded by the green light again/still

JBSleek3596d ago

Here's the thing. Steam does that already and people love Steam yet that is indeed DRM.

People just choose what DRM they like which is weird if you are going to complain about it.

If you don't think digital is the future then you are very wrong. It may not be now and even in five years yet digital is indeed the future.

Also actually read the article before posting it was taken out of context.

PS4isTHEkneesOFbees3596d ago

20 years, huh? So what about those millions upon millions of PC gamers with huge Steam collections? Those are all digital. I don't see them complaining about buying games super cheap and not owning a physical disc. 20 years, sure, if you prefer to be stuck in the past while the world moves on..

Mystogan3596d ago

Yes it was, whether you like it or not. All mu friends are buying games digitally. Everyone is connected. Maybe it was a bit too soon but it definitely was the right vision. It is the future. Just like how the original Xbox required Broadband when everyone was on dial-up, Xbox should have pioneered this vision. I hope the Xbox 4 will do what they tried to do with the X1.

ovnipc3596d ago

This guy should shut up and let phill do the talking. This guy will set back all the bs phill has been fixing. Shut up dude and go sleep.

rainslacker3596d ago

From what I can tell he just says that digital is the future, but where MS screwed up was trying to force it on retail. Said they didn't give the choice, which is why people were so against it.

Don't think this was really an epiphany...as it's what's most gamers have already said. Don't screw around with retail. They can do whatever they want to improve DD, but when they tried to apply it to retail, people were upset.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 3596d ago
XiNarutoUzumaki3596d ago (Edited 3596d ago )

Negative. Physical Disks are!

jackanderson19853596d ago (Edited 3596d ago )

i'd say within 5 years it'll move to a primarily digital service across the board... publishers will love it as it'll cut out a cost on the retailers cut, physical disc/packaging/distribution costs and warranties (they do actually exist on games I've been informed)

if they cut the costs of digital by 10-15 it'll drive people towards it

BananasGoldsteinberg3596d ago (Edited 3596d ago )

Physical isn't going anywhere as long as there are still ISP mandated bandwidth caps and the US is still lagging behind in bandwidth speeds. And that likely isn't going to change anytime soon with these new threats to net neutrality hovering above our heads.

And an all-digital future definitely won't mean lower prices. Not by a long shot. The only reason we see discounts on digital versions of games now is because they use the discounts as a way to push digital sales. If digital is the only format, they'll have no need to try and the format to us and thus will just charge the same prices as they would physical copies. Even now, discounts on digital media is both rare and largely insignificant compared to the physical price.

pwnsause_returns3596d ago

Aaron Greenburn and Yusuf Mehdi, what do they have in common?

That they NEED TO SHUT THE HELL UP!

everything seems to be going MS' way right now with Phil Spencer as head. Dont let these guys tarnish the brand even more so...

GamersHeaven3596d ago

Of course it was that's why you guys dumped it in a heart beat when PS4 was slaughtering you in pre-order sales.Clearly you don't stick with your visions Kinect is another prime example of all talk no walk from M$.

Show all comments (115)