GearNuke: Can you tell the difference between 30 vs. 60 fps gameplay?
PSLS writes: I have traveled across the country using the Razer Kishi Ultra in airports and hotels for both PlayStation Remote Play and mobile gaming in general, and I am thoroughly impressed.
Stellar Blade might be the hot game right now, but we already got a better version of it more than half a year ago.
Stellar blade is currently higher than lies of p on metacritic with 40 more reviews. No shade on Lies of P but just pointing that out.
But i don't even know why compare them? Because both are souls type games?
Then you can just reuse this article all the time and say Elden Ring is "whatever new souls game" but good for every new souls game.
Stellar blade hate articles must be rolling with clicks...
I mean… it’s like saying we have a better NieR with Devil May Cry. Yea, there’s some similarities, but Lies is really hardcore in the sense of emulating a FromSoft game almost perfectly, where Stellar has some Souls-like elements, but I’d say it’s closer to Sekiro than say a Dark Souls game. This almost feels click-baitey
Fallout 4 is now available on next-gen consoles, offering 60fps gameplay and 4K resolution. But it's bad news if you claimed the game on PS Plus.
Probably won't happen for PS+ since Sony makes a clear distinction between a PS4 game and a PS5 game, unlike PC and Xbox where it is not a specific device game (It's now always an Xbox game).
So to make the PS5 game of fallout 4 available. Bethesda would need to renegotiate the complete deal with Sony.
hence why there's often only the PS4 version of the game available on PS+.
Let's hope Bethesda and Sony can arrive to term quickly.
yes...easily.
next question.
protip: i'm no "i wont buy a game because of the fps count."
but i could tell the difference when playing the game...u can sorta feel the difference in movement n stuff like that. at least thats me. i remember playing rage (i think it was rage) and was like dam it moves faster and looks better that i thought i would. it was later that i found out it ran at 60fps.
LoL
You might not see the difference, but you can definitely feel the difference.
Yes, you definitely can. This isn't like the resolution argument; the difference between frame rates is absolutely noticeable.
Just my Opinion
Framerate, yes you can tell the difference easily side by side. That being said, if you have a solid framerate at 30 or higher, the game will still look great (true certain game types benefit more from higher framerates). Very few people will argue different frame rates being unnoticeable. Where most people differ is in regards to resolution.
I don't remember the stats exactly, but it's something like, unless your TV is 55in or bigger and you're sitting less than 4-6 feet away, your eyes physically cannot tell the difference between native 720 and 1080. Meaning 900 and 1080 has such a minor difference that I doubt it will ever matter. You can tell by the fact that every time there is a graphics comparison there are so many caveats (side by side, slow frame or still frame, magnified, different lighting all on a PC screen less than a foot from your face...just to notice a difference) just to make it so you can tell. At that point, a controller I like, network stability/mp voice quality, where my friends play and simply the fact of where I'm gathering my achievements/trophies is much more important than any difference in my opinion.
That being said, so far all games on all the systems this gen have looked great, I personally have nothing to complain about any of them graphically. I personally feel that FPS, your TV, and graphics other than resolution are much more important in making a game look great. Again, just one persons opinion.