990°

Titanfall Build Up and Running on PS4, Going Multiplatform says Insider

Well known industry insider Tidux has revealed some startling inside details regarding Respawn Entertainment sci-fi shooter, Titanfall.

Majin-vegeta3634d ago ShowReplies(2)
Neonridr3634d ago

Maybe sometime down the road perhaps. But no way MS would pay for for an exclusivity of like 6 months.

Godmars2903634d ago

Bioshock and Mass Effect say hi?

Not that it should really matter given the overall low quality of the game. From graphics to story and even game modes.

3634d ago
u got owned3634d ago

E3 announcement incoming... Titanfal PS4 1080p 60fps launching fall 2014.

georgeenoob3634d ago (Edited 3634d ago )

@Godmars

Only reason Mass Effect went multiplatform was cause it was originally published by MS, but then EA bought Bioware and the publishing rights. How does that scenario apply to this one?

Titanfall was already confirmed by IGN to be a lifetime X1 exclusive as part of an MS deal. The deal wasn't for timed exclusivity, it was for full exclusivity. http://m.ign.com/articles/2...

Titanfall 2 may release on PS4, but not Titanfall 1.

truefan13634d ago (Edited 3634d ago )

LOL isn't this the guy "confirming" that sony E3 lineup. EA and Respawn don't want those lawsuits, Titanfall 1 is on MSFT platforms only, Titanfall 2 will be multiplat, ACCEPT IT.

Oh the hearts of some of you holding on to some simmer of hope for Titanfall, just let it go. EA has too many games on xbox xonsoles to make MSFT an enemy. EA and Respawn have both confirmed TITANFALL 1 IS EXCLUSIVE TO MSFT PLATFORMS FOR THE GAMES LIFETIME. Also I thought you all were going to get it on PC anyway.

listenkids3634d ago

The difference is way more than 6 months, to be fair.

sobotz3634d ago

Keep dreaming bro, it won't happening soon. Maybe 4-5 years later, when Titanfall 2 is released.

And anyway, low quality game with Meta-score higher than Infamous or any shooter for the past 5 months? oh dear you stretching it

http://www.metacritic.com/g...
http://www.metacritic.com/g...

NewMonday3634d ago

remember EA saying to shareholders the first game is XB1 exclusive for it's"lifetime", I think this could only be the game engine as Respawn prep for Titanfall2.

now that the franchise is going multi-platform perhaps we can have some fanboy-free discussion about the game. it needs more players, more contet, better visuals, a full SP campgain and no bots.

Biggest3634d ago

The difference here is that Microsoft funded EVERY facet of the game at some point. Mass Effect and Bioshock were timed exclusives due to funding for timed exclusivity. . . Maybe. I agree with Neonridr. I do not see Microsoft investing so much into one game for a 6 month period of exclusivity. Furthermore, I would see Microsoft paying AGAIN to keep it exclusive based on the fact that Titanfall would see more on the PS4 if released in the next 3-6 months. Microsoft is often deluded, but they aren't outright stupid.

InMyOpinion3634d ago

It's a good game but not my cup of tea at all. If I wanted to play it I would've bought an XB1 instead of the PS4.

Great for people who like these types of FPS's though.

Neonridr3634d ago

@Godmars290 - did you read my comment? How much longer did Mass Effect and Bioshock come to the PS3? Mass Effect 1 took 5 years to show up on the PS3, Bioshock took 13 months. I specifically said 6 in my statement - even though you clearly didn't read that.

I never said that it wasn't coming, merely that it wouldn't be until 2015.

Godmars2903634d ago (Edited 3634d ago )

@sobotz & Others:
What is it with fanboys and inability to comprehend?

It doesn't matter whether or not its TF1 or TF2, if/when the game shows up on the PS4 that in itself is going to be enough.

As for the tired old argument of metacritic or review scores in general equating to quality when the last COD likely received high scores but still has game breaking bugs - f**k it. You deserve what you get.

Just stop trying to argue when you have nothing to argue with.

@Neonridr:
Likewise to what I just said; does it really matter whether its six months to supposedly not at all if TF1 actually does show up on the PS4?

Sure you'll be able to retain some worthless shred of fanboy dignity in the coming years by repeating over and over in other pointless forum "discussions" that it didn't happen within a six month window, but that wont change the fact that if it happens it will have happened.

ZodTheRipper3634d ago

These were exclusive for much longer than a few months ...but I agree, the game looked interested when it was revealed but after seeing the final build I could. not. care. less. about a PS4 release.

BlackTar1873634d ago Show
tehpees33634d ago (Edited 3634d ago )

@ truefan 1

This is how a contract with a publisher tends to work. A game is put on sale exclusively for that platform and if it meets the required sales target it then a contract can be terminated at ANY POINT! Titanfall is well known to have not met EA's expectations. Actually their multiplats are confirmed to not be meeting their expectations on XBO.

If Titanfall didn't sell enough the contract is allowed to be cancelled. See Zombi U on Wii U as another example. It didn't meet Ubisoft's expectations and Rayman Legends went multiplatform as a result.

MysticStrummer3634d ago

All they have to do is include any DLC, call it Titanfall Ultimate, and release on both XB1 and PS4, but for me it wouldn't make a difference. I've seen enough to know it isn't my kind of game, just like most shooters. Not a bad game by any means, just not my style.

TheTwelve3634d ago

This *should* surprise nobody but it will surprise many and there are those who will still not believe this.

It's all about the money. If enough money can be made, anything (and I mean anything!) is possible.

Neonridr3634d ago

@Godmars290 - ok let's set something straight here too. I own a PS4, I do not own an XB1. While I do own a 360, I don't own nor have I played Titanfall on it. I haven't touched my 360 since I got my PS4.

Your out of context or misinterpretation of my original comment is what started this whole debate in the first place. They reported that TF is coming to the PS4. I said maybe sometime down the road perhaps, but don't expect it this year. Which would put it at a year or later in terms of exclusivity. You were the one who brought up ME and Bioshock which didn't help defend your cause, only support mine.

In the end it's a good thing. Game scored very well (you clearly don't own it) and has sold very well too. More gamers get to play the game, everyone wins.

BlackTar1873634d ago (Edited 3634d ago )

Truefan,

M$ can't afford to make EA an enemy. XBOX and MS need EA more then EA need MS.

Think about an XBOX without future EA games. All the sports nuts will not just stop playing those games they will go to where the games are being released.

MS has a whole heckuvalot more to lose then EA.

scott1823634d ago

I would buy it if it had a single player component, maybe TF2 will. Looking forward to seeing it on PS4!

johndoe112113634d ago

Yeeeaaahhh so i'm not buying it. No way in hell is microsoft going to allow a game that they helped fund, a game that the publisher came out and said is exclusive for its lifetime, to be published on another competing platform.

If they said titanfall 2 then yeah, I'd believe that but not this first one. I'm not saying it's impossible, I just don't believe this rumor. If it does happen, well, good for everyone who is interested in playing it.

Negative773634d ago Show
tehpees33634d ago (Edited 3634d ago )

@ johndoe11211

People said the same thing about the GTA IV DLC. Titanfall, like the GTA IV DLC is not funding the game. It is a payment for exclusive rights.

The only occasion where funding and publishing a game has happened is with Ninja Gaiden II. Tecmo built Sigma 2 around the Sigma engine which is how they were able to cheat a PS3 release for the game.

Titanfall is absolutely a money hat. That was obvious when Microsoft was confirmed to tamper with the contract after we all knew going multiplatform was inevitable. They only made EA a payment for exclusive rights. EA then use that money towards the game. Funding and publishing the game yourself is a completely different matter.

EA being the publisher here may have found a way around things like with Mass Effect.

forcefullpower3634d ago

They could have a clause with MS that says if they don't get above 1 millions sold they can port it to other systems. The other could be MS doesn't want to pay for the lost revenue they had in the contract with EA due to low sales so they have torn the contract up and let EA port ot to PS4.

I have it on PC and still dont think its that great anyway. But at least my mates would have something else to play as BF4 is to laggy and Ghosts is just shit.

But then again the new COD comes out in November.

Edsword3634d ago

I thought MS paid for lifetime exclusivitivity for TF1. Maybe the contract had a minimum sales clause. If X number not sold by X date, kind of thing. I could definitely see that happening in that kind of agreement.

Godmars2903634d ago

@Neonridr:
"Game scored very well (you clearly don't own it) and has sold very well too."

Neither do you by the way you describe your console preferences - what does that have to do with anything? Also by EA's own admission while the title did not sell very well but has enough interest to continue further it, again, what is the actual point you're trying to make?

Ghost_Nappa3634d ago

What story? You mean that none sense shouted at you during campaign matches?

Neonridr3634d ago

@Godmars290 - that it coming to PS4 is a good thing, means more people get to play it. You stated that it was a low quality game, I simply digressed, saying that many critics and fans like the game.

I already told you I don't own nor have I played Titanfall, do you even read my comments before you reply?

Vegamyster3634d ago

Lacking content and story yes but graphically (At least of the PC) its not a bad looking game and the gameplay itself is very tight, low quality isn't a good word.

morganfell3634d ago (Edited 3634d ago )

X1 exclusivity may have been dependent upon a certain number of new gen sales within a 30 day period. There were obvious signs X1 version sales were not going as planned when the game did not top even 1 of the charts at the 4 largest US retailers on launch day.

EA would doubtless protect themselves with some sort of sales clause and we likely see that here

HammerKong3634d ago

but this wont be happening with titanfall because this game was helped to maked buy ms more than ea and all ,so atleast the first game is not going multiplatform ,yeah 2nd one can go multiplatform but not this one,u people use to take insiders very seriously right?

amazinglover3634d ago

Both of those where timed exclusives allowing them to be brought to PS after a set period of time. Titanfall was basically funded by MS in the later stages and worked out a lifetime deal with EA the publisher if it does come to PS4 it will be it's sequel.

Godmars2903634d ago (Edited 3633d ago )

@Neonridr:
I'm just failing to understand the criticism of not having played the game, by someone who also hasn't played the game.

I mean while we literally both agree that the game being available on other platforms is only a good thing, you seem to have a particular bug up your butt about when it happens as if that really matters.

Likewise you insist that this game you've never played is only great - according to those who have played it - and all I'm saying is that by what I've seen and heard is that its narrative was played with as fast loose and lazy as a 1930 pulp fiction. That Respawn should be given no credit for sticking to "artistic license" when they under delivered then later patched in game modes.

Dir_en_grey3633d ago (Edited 3633d ago )

I agree, still not interested if it's going to be an incomplete unfinished low quality game like the XBone version.

system223633d ago

bioshock and mass effect weren't nearly as important to ms as titanfall.

and for as shitty as ps4 fanboys seem to think titanfall is, its STILL outselling inFamous by a lot... on a console selling less than the ps4.

choujij3633d ago (Edited 3633d ago )

@Georgenoob Oh, IGN said it!? It must be true!

I've learned to take these exclusivity arrangements with a grain of salt ever since the PS2 days. I remember Tecmo explicitly saying Dead or Alive 2 was a Dreamcast exclusive. But then magically Dead or Alive 2: Hardcore was released on PS2. Pretty much the same game with a different name.

So I really wouldn't be surprised if something like Titanfall: Hardcore Edition was released for PS4 with minor changes to the game. But I gotta say, if Titanfall 1 in any shape or form does end up on the PS4 and PS3, it would be devastating blow for Xbox fans.

mikeslemonade3633d ago (Edited 3633d ago )

Told ya so.. Titanfall Sigma confirmed.

We all know from the three camps the company that uses the word "exclusive" the most loosely is Microsoft. They were the first ones who started to coin games as exclusive or the word "only on xbox" for timed exclusives.

I like that clause theory that it would have only been exclusive based on X xbox sales or it was never a full exclusive anyway and better yet a timed exclusive.

As for me personally I don't like the 6 v 6. The idea of the game is fine but execution of this game is very mediocre. 1080p and 60 frames still gonna be bad looking with those inferior graphics.

InTheLab3633d ago

Any PS gamers interested in this game should understand that it is not a complete game and should have been delayed a year.

The good news is, those of you that do own it like myself can get a nice trade in credit at Gamestop for $41 so you won't feel ripped off.

What is there is decent but it is not a full priced game and you'll probably go back to playing whatever shooter you were playing once you finish the story mp and have unlocked the only Titan that's worth a damn.

10 pilot weapons
6 titan weapons
very few attachments
burn cards are capped at 3 per match

This game could have been epic with more content and maybe a less generic set of maps and characters. As-is, it's $20 dlc.

CuddlyREDRUM3633d ago

They say hi from a year or more down the road, which was his point.

illustratedDEO3633d ago

Also the Ninja Gaiden series and DOA, next would be Dead Rising 3.

Neonridr3633d ago

@Godmars290 - we both agree then, let's leave it at that :D

I totally understand that 3rd party exclusivity is almost always not a permanent thing. I was only trying to say that MS wouldn't have spent a boatload on timed exclusivity unless it was going to be worth their while. A year seems like a reasonable amount of time. In the end, you are right, it is irrelevant. If it comes to the PS4, then bonus. If not, then there is always TF2.

AntoineDcoolette3633d ago

Bhut bhut Respawn said Titanfall and its online bots was only possible on the one because of MS's dedicated servers and the power of the cloud!

/rolleyes

andibandit3633d ago

@Godmars

A contract between ms and respawn says hi

ALLWRONG3633d ago

Playstation fans want Xbox games. Who knew?

AliTheSnake13633d ago

They did say it will never come out to PS4. So all that was Marketing BS ?
Anyhow, the game is super overrated for 60 bucks. Maybe the sequel would be worth it.

Eonjay3633d ago

My goodness this thread is something to behold. People are freaking out.

Omegasyde3633d ago

Lol publisher doesn't mean jack #%@#%@

Want examples?

Ninja Gaiden!
Mass Effect 1
Joe Danger: The Movie

That is Why if Sony really wants to keep exclusives it will purchase all of the IP's associated with it. Microsoft is catching on by purchasing the Gears of War IP.

Unless you have the exact details of the agreement between Microsoft and EA (THE ACTUAL contract), you all are just assuming.

TheGreatAndPowerful3633d ago (Edited 3633d ago )

I really don't understand why PS users want a port of this game when PC and Xbox users themselves admit that the game is pretty boring.

"Titanfall has been out for ~2 months. Now that the hype is gone...How is the game?"

http://www.reddit.com/r/Gam...

Pogmathoin3633d ago

Crazy season starting already.......people.... Go take time out all and play the games you claim to play...blacktar..... Stop calling out people too, you sound like you could me many others too.....be glad we have this medium.... Simple....

Amsterdamsters3633d ago

To u got owned...my PC version has been doing that since release. Why do you console only gamers keep bragging about the PS4 doing 1080p?!? My nearly 2 year old PC is more powerful and in a year or so, I'll build a new one that will smoke the consoles multiple times over and still be able to play any of the millions of games available.

I also own all of the consoles for their exclusives, but stop bragging up 1080p PS4 games that are also on the PC, it just looks foolish.

thorstein3633d ago

The pic is old and of course it contains PS dev kits. Why wouldn't it? Respawn planned on making Titanfall Multiplat. EA saw dollar signs from MS and went that way.

So, of course there is Titanfall Code for PS. They make games over the course of years. It was only recently that MS bought exclusivity so they can it.

GribbleGrunger3633d ago

@morganfell:

I'd say you are right. There's a reason for MS giving the game away for nothing and reducing the price of the console to help drive sales.

WilDRangeRrfc3633d ago

I have PS4 and X1 TF is the best MP game I have ever played 75 awards and counting 9/10 10/10 across the board and the highest metacritic next gen game so far gtfo

WilDRangeRrfc3633d ago

I own PS4( collecting dust ) and X1 TF is the best MP shooter I have ever played,75 awards and counting 9/10 10/10 across the board,highest rated next gen game on Metacritic says hi,your so butthurt it's obvious,your trolling shows one thing,your jealous and butthurt,oh and Sunset Overdrive says hi that's not going to PS4 either,real gamers and not hate filled vile fanboys like 80% of people on N4G will buy both if they can afford,I'm playing Infamous Titanfall Killer Instinct BF4 getting TLOU for the first time on PS4 ( never played excited ) while you all argue like kids,both are great Xbox is winning on AAA games which is all I care about,f2p and Indies can gtfo

+ Show (50) more repliesLast reply 3633d ago
tuglu_pati3634d ago

We all know Titanfall will come to PS4 at some point, the question is will it be Titanfall 1 or 2.

MasterCornholio3634d ago

I dont think it will be the first one. I'm pretty sure the second one will come to the PS4. Respawn and EA can't ignore the PS4s install base unless Microsoft pays then millions to do so.

jairusmonillas3634d ago

The first one can still be ported if EA and MS deals somehow fails on sales target or something like if it gets low sales they can port it 6 months

u got owned3634d ago

@jairusmonillas

where are you getting this from. Link or it never happened.

arkard3634d ago

They very well could have a clause in the contract that states if sales don't = X over Y months then exclusivity is lost.

nerdman673634d ago

Titanfall is awesome, it should always have been on every console.
They should be wary though, most PS4 owners have made it clear they think Titanfall is terrible and are happy the PS4 doesnt have it.

BlackTar1873634d ago

It's true. To deny that such clauses exist in every type of contract from Sports to sponserships to rights is ignorant.

I don't know if this is true but there ae a million ways for contracts to be written to protect the biggest party.

Copen3633d ago

I have to believe EA protected themselves with a sales clause in the contract. Titanfall has not sold like EA and MS though it would and as a result here we are. The only reason EA even made the deal was because they thought after last gen that MS would be the market leader so the exclusivity contract seemed like a slam dunk but things haven't unfolded that way and the sales gap is only widening from here on out so it's in EA's best interest to get the game on as many consoles as possible to reap the benefits from exposing their product to more consumers so despite the fanboy logic and the arguments EA is worried about EA and if that means bringing TF to the PS3/PS4 then they will absolutely do it even if it pisses MS off. Either way MS loses because while they funded the game all that money is wasted because it's a guarantee that all further installments of TF will be on Sony's platforms and maybe other systems multiplat is a given and the fact that MS paid for it has to be devastating to MS they have to be livid that despite their best efforts they lose a exclusive game. But this is just the start of a trend that'll see less true exclusives than ever before and not just because MS isn't the market leader able to dictate terms and pay for exclusivity. Triple A development costs are through the roof and it makes fiscal sense to get you product as much exposure as possible and that can't happen tied to one console.

jacksons983633d ago

PS4 will probably get Titanfall with all the DLC included like PS3 and previous 360 games. Then shortly after Titanfall 2 will release.

XStation3633d ago

@Copen Uh, no; Sony actually didn't want Titanfall at first on the PS4, they wanted it on the PS Vita actually.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 3633d ago
Charybdis3634d ago (Edited 3634d ago )

They financially assisted with the development of titanfall, but don't own the ip. Will be interesting to see how the online server platform will or will not be implemented on the ps4. This could be positive or negative promotion for Microsoft Azure platform . Both pc and xb versions use azure servers don't think the ps4 will use same servers .

jukins3634d ago

Azure is not the only "cloud based server system" plenty of companies out there that could provide the servers.

Charybdis3634d ago

@jukins
Exactly! Will be interesting to see what and if there would be performance and reliability differences with a game which relies on azure servers.

johndoe112113634d ago (Edited 3634d ago )

As far as I know sony has a very good relationship and business arrangement with Rack Space so that should not be a problem.

StoneyYoshi3634d ago (Edited 3634d ago )

Considering the Azure servers arent holding up very well. I have it on PC, and i feel like I'm playing COD all over again.

Matchmaking is broke as hell and it still lags with that all mighty and powerful cloud. What is the damage with putting a damn server browser in the game for dedicated servers?? Is that too much freedom for us PC players??

Copen3633d ago

MS has successfully tricked consumers including you that they have the ONLY infrastructure with the cloud and the benefits those servers provide. Sony had dedicated servers for games last gen and they have some for this gen as well. MS isn't the only one with dedicated servers despite what you may have been told. Sony has used Rackspace for server solutions in the past and they're using them now so the server solution even if it's not on MS's Azure will be the same on Sony's platform it's not a problem.

Charybdis3633d ago (Edited 3633d ago )

@Copen
Microsoft does have the resources and infrastructure available to support their claim with regional data centers. Azure +/- 14 data centers 10 regions (+plans for 5 more regions) compared to Rackspace 9 data centers in 6 regions (probably also planning for more regions). While Microsoft isn't the only one with such a large cloud infrastructure; It is the one readily offering and promoting it with its console across multiple regions.

Ofcourse Sony can partner up with multiple parties in order to increase their 'infrastructure'/avail ability in different regions but that doesn't seem very likely. Also remember they are rumoured to use custom servers in order to emulate ps3 games for ps now.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3633d ago
rdgneoz33634d ago

As below mentioned, there was Ninja Gaiden Sigma. Also, it could be that they're starting work on the sequel and getting what they currently have done on the xbone, working on the PS4. And they never said a sequel wouldn't come out by the end of the year.

Dewitt3634d ago (Edited 3634d ago )

Mass Effect 1 was funded by MS when under contract by MS. After EA bought them they forced the game to go multi. Bioshock was because the PS3 development was way behind so MS paid for a year exclusivity.

cardgenius3634d ago

And with each of those games, the creators said vehemently that they would never come to PS3. But they did.

Jazz41083634d ago

Why is it that you guys do not want microsoft to have any 3rd party exclusives? They funded this game. I do not see this happening when sony buys exusives from third partys where ms fans are every day coming up with articles on why its coming to there platforms. Are you guys this jealous of ms? If you want the game its out go buy it and quit spreading stupid rumors.

StoneyYoshi3634d ago

@ Jazz

Oh please there was always somebody starting a rumor about weather or not MGS4 was going to come over to the 360 for years!

"I do not see this happening when sony buys exusives from third partys where ms fans are every day coming up with articles on why its coming to there platforms."

Every day??? LMAO get off your high horse man. The main reason this is getting so much attention is the fact that this is EA we are talking about. One of the largest 3rd party publishers in the world for gaming, and it just amazed people how EA pulled an exclusive deal with MS.

Name one other game published by EA that was exclusive to one console. Cant find one?? What a shocker!

CYCLEGAMER3634d ago

That would be messed up, especially considering that MS helped them get the game off of the ground. You would at least think they would wait for the sequel before going multiplat.

choujij3633d ago

Not if it failed to meet sales expectations. This could very well be "Plan B".

ziggurcat3634d ago

@ neondir:

the first mass effect was partially funded by MS game studios, and it still ended up on the PS platform, so anything is possible.

Jazz41083634d ago (Edited 3634d ago )

Ms said after five years of exclusitivity they were fine with sony getting to enjoy mass effect. That's straight from ms. They will not be giving up there investment in titanfall 1 for many years.

Kribwalker3634d ago (Edited 3634d ago )

Microsoft paid to develope the game, not just for exclusiveness

http://fauxbuzz.com/2014/04...

I can see MS allowing it to go on PS4 to recoup some of their cost, and make money on every copy sold, much like the way they will with Destiny (seeing as they still have equity in bungie) . That way MS and EA are both happy

ziggurcat3634d ago

@ kribwalker:

the MS game studios logo is not on the box, so they did not pay to develop the game.

that, and the article you linked is full of conjecture as there not a shred of evidence pointing to any lack of cooperation/openness from sony.

trouble_bubble3633d ago

Every quote and press release out there implies MS were quite territorial over MassEffect. They didn't let it go so PS owners could enjoy ME1, lol. They'd brag the opposite:

"The original Mass Effect is absolutely an Xbox 360 exclusive, making Xbox 360 the only place to get the full Mass Effect experience.”
http://www.thesixthaxis.com...

"The Microsoft representative also noted that those who want the full Mass Effect experience--Mass Effect 1 and Mass Effect 2--will only find it on the Xbox 360. BioWare will not be bringing the original Mass Effect title to Sony's console."
http://www.cnet.com/news/mi...

EA bought BioWare and obviously re-secured their IPs and tied up loose ends like ME1. They either bought back the distribution rights or the MS contract expired and MS wasn't given the option to buyout ME like they bought out Gears of War from Epic. EA wanted it and took it. MS wasn't gonna argue amidst negotiating for what would become Titanfall.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3633d ago
ramiuk13634d ago (Edited 3634d ago )

i expect with the amount of sales its got and the amount of sales it could of had,with the way EA are i fully expect it to be true.

they are too greedy and prob gave MS half there money back and said screw ya exclusive rights.
either that or they will do a Definative version or just call i something else and give MS first dibs on DLC etc like COD.

problem is with multiplatform developers,they cant refuse the numbers,they need to make money and its what shareholders want

OrangePowerz3634d ago

The exclusive deal is for Titanfall, they can always release Titanfall: Ultimate Edition or whatever they want to call it. Just like FF13 Versus was exclusive but FF15, the same game in content but not in name, is not exclusive.

That's the thing with exclusive contracts in most cases when they are for a single game they are void once you change the name. Not sure MS would be too pleased with their partner, but EA just cares about their money and not about their relationship with others as we have seen with Nintendo. Going from "unprecedented partnership" very quickly to "no games for you".

MightyNoX3634d ago (Edited 3634d ago )

I see it similar to Ninja Gaiden Sigma or Black. Release a few reskinned levels, stick a name like Titanfall: Delta and they could probably worm out of Micrsofts clause.

Josh1013634d ago

This is absolutely correct. They worded Titanfall exclusivity VERY sneakily. "Exclusive for the life of the title/game." As coincidence would have it, the ESRB rates "Game of the year editions or Definitive editions" that include the base game AND DLC as brand new games. That is because they have a brand new SKU and are deemed a new game altogether. Titanfall will absolutely be released on the PS4. But that doesn't make a difference to me. I would never pay over $20 for online only game.

Visiblemarc3634d ago

I wonder, though, if the agreement didn't have sales minimums built in. If so, this might be an "out" to reduce the duration of the exclusivity.

Either way, I think it's obvious that no 3rd party is thrilled with going exclusive anymore, they're all trying to build brand-kingdoms and chasing insane sales. Every publisher wants to sell big across all platforms and set up future sales for sequels. So, that said, EA is definitely pulling any and all tricks out it's bag to get on to PS4 asap, especially due to it's record sales.

bobtheimpaler3634d ago

I just don't care. Played it on pc for a couple of days and the novelty wears thin very quickly. Just another casual shooter combined with everything wrong with modern shooters. Still prefer quake 3 and unreal tournament.

Not to say its bad, it can have its moments but it is all style and little substance.

Armadilo213634d ago

maybe Titanfall Redux or Titanfall complete Edition just to change the name and maybe loophole for this

imt5583634d ago

I hope that is true, for Axios2 sake. He will carefully keep an eye on Titanfall's sales numbers. :)

Mr-Dude3634d ago

I really don't care about this game. I'm a singleplayer guy, so nice for the people who want it. But for me personally, I don't give really

Angeljuice3634d ago (Edited 3634d ago )

Does anybody even care about this game anymore? As a PS4 owner I haven't given this over-hyped lackluster title a second thought.

I think most PlayStation owners who want this game to come to their preferred platform don't want to play it, they just want Microsoft to lose face by being unable to keep hold of an exclusive.

I could be wrong.

Josh1013634d ago

Yeah, they kinda burned a bridge they were building with the exclusive deal. I know I won't be purchasing it because it is online only. But also more-so because of the exclusive deal at the last minute. Remember even the developers were surprised.

Neonridr3634d ago

that would be a terrible way of thinking if that were true so I hope you are wrong. Is that what we have come to? I can't play it, so I would rather less people get to play it on your system by it going multiplatform? Weirdest logic I have ever heard.

Lots of people care about this game, that's why it has sold quite a few units. It coming to the PS4 means that MORE people get to enjoy it (assuming they like that type of game).

It's not their studio, so it's not an exclusive. It's no different for Sony. 3rd party exclusivity is almost always timed. MS doesn't own Respawn, so they can't enforce that.

calis3634d ago

Xbox fanboys are on Sunset Overdrive now anyway.

Qrphe3633d ago

Im still playing it. Just got The Show so I may decrese my activity on it.

choujij3633d ago (Edited 3633d ago )

Yup. Among other consoles, I have a gaming PC, PS4 and Xbox 360. I have no desire to buy this over-hyped game on any platform I own.

I just want to see what M$ has to say when they explain: "wha' happened?".

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3633d ago
FITgamer3634d ago

Impoossible. According to some on N4G Titanfall isn't possible on PS4 without "the cloud" ;)

Magicite3634d ago

Tidux plays a dangerous game :D
But on a serious note, this might be a shock for quite some people, if turns out to be true.

Patrick_pk443634d ago

It was a terrible mistake from EA. They most likely thought the Xbone would sell more units than the PS4, which didn't happen by a large margin. We all knew Titanfall would not be passed over to Microsoft as an exclusive. It has a lot of potential and would double the sales of the game.

3634d ago Replies(1)
iKenny3634d ago

Microsoft probably had an exclusive with EA/Respawn depending on how much was sold during its first few days or weeks and if it wasn't met in their contract or clause then it would go multi platform.

kenshiro1003634d ago

Microsoft likes to waste money so I wouldn't be surprised if they did that.

brich2333634d ago

Microsoft can sell the exclusivity back to ea, they did it with Mass effect 1.

Zombro3633d ago

All I have to is gooser challenge I hate you

Evilsnuggle3633d ago

I said this yesterday and got a bunch of down votes from fanBoys. EA could just release a Titanfall 1.5 or definitive edition on PS4 . Why not just add a single player 4 hour campaign to Titanfall and sell it on the PS4.

Copen3633d ago

Like every contract I'm quite sure there's clauses within the contract most likely sales related saying that for the contract to be valid Titanfall had to sell X amount of copies and it has NOT done what EA and MS expected it to do to date it's not even sold 2 million copies and that's money down the drain for EA and MS. If EA knew then at they know now I guarantee you they never would've allowed it to be exclusive and cutting out the PS3 and PS4 they are undoubtedly losing money from that decision. Still I'm skeptical that it'll come to the PS4 or the PS3 for Titanfall 1 BUT it will definitely be multiplatform from here on out Respawn has said it and it makes sense from a money prospective to go multiplat. See this is where MS is in trouble okay since they aren't the market leader and are falling further behind every day their practice of "moneyhatting" exclusives won't be as easy or as cheap as it's been previously because AAA game development costs are skyrocketing and honestly going exclusive with any platform now more than ever makes no sense it's more money for everyone by going multiplat with any AAA game. And the other part is the smaller install base with regards to the Xbox One Sony's close and will reach a 2-1 advantage in hardware sales so even if MS tries to buy any game exclusive it's going to be a tough sell and id wager most publishers will say no because it's not worth excluding the platform with the bigger install base and the price to cover what money X game would sell on the platform with the 2-1 advantage would be astronomic and I think we'll see fewer true exclusives as this gen unfolds because of it.

ZombieKiller3633d ago

GOOD! I like this game but I bought it on my 360. I don't play the 360 like that so having it on my PS4 would let me actually play it as much as I want to. I don't have friends on 360 like I do on PS, not to mention I just want to get rid of my 360 altogether but was hanging onto it FOR Titanfall.

If this is true, then goodbye Microsoft in my life. It's about time.

Eonjay3633d ago

its really quite hard to know what the deal exactly entailed.

Delsin_Rowe3633d ago

You know it could be TitanFall 1 called with a extended name, have different maps from XboxOne. PlayStation maps only, exclusive DLC, 1080p 60 Frames, new character model, New extended name.

ForgivenZombie3633d ago (Edited 3633d ago )

They can add new maps and titans and give it a new name like Titanfall Future or something so it's not Titanfall. There's a lot of ways to get around a contract, it just can't be identical to the Xbox one game. Not saying it's a good thing, just saying there are ways around contracts, it's all about money you know.

+ Show (28) more repliesLast reply 3631d ago
Da Ill One3634d ago

I wonder what's different enough for it to be on PS 4 (assuming this is even real). and by example I mean like Ninja Gaiden was a 360 exclusive, but Ninja Gaiden Sigma came out for PS 3, it was the same game but different enough that it didn't breach contract.

-Foxtrot3634d ago (Edited 3634d ago )

What about if it included all the modes and DLC on disc, I mean it would be classed as a different game then....right since it wouldn't be the same as what came out on the Xbox One/360/PC first

Da Ill One3634d ago

Yes that's where I was going with this as well...maybe it's "Titanfall GOTY edition" for PS 4, and not "Titanfall"

Josh1013634d ago

Exactly right. The ESRB rates "Game of the Year/Definitive" editions as brand new games with a brand new SKU. I've been parroting this since the exclusive deal was revealed. No-one listened.

T23634d ago

@Josh - I hear ya... no surprise if titanfall 1.5 comes to ps4... so many ways around that contract....

younglj013634d ago

To be honest that would be f'd up.

younglj013634d ago

If you brought Xbox One for TitanFall only and now we have an rumor it's running on the PS4 with the intent of releasing on the PS4. How is that not f'd up to those people? I'm sure 100-250,000 XB1 owners would be piss at EA and Respawn Ent if this is true.

I'm sure TitanFall and an PS4/XB1 at Christmas is better then an over-hype game in the spring. And yes it still the most over hype game even when it release on PS4. If TF was delayed until X-Mas of 2014 then we might would have seen records broken...

ats19923634d ago

Here we go again with this topic give it up already

Show all comments (325)
90°

15 Underrated FPS Games You May Want to Try

Popularized by Doom in 1993 and still making video game haters gnash their teeth today, first-person shooter games are the best thing to happen to gamers since pizza rolls. So here are 15 underrated first-person shooter games you may have missed.

Read Full Story >>
ghettogamer.net
Jiub588d ago

Although the late 2000s Turok wasn't my favorite, I would love a new entry. Open world survival with shotguns and dinosaurs. Not sure how we'd get the fusion cannon, but that would be pretty sweet too.

MadLad587d ago

Lol

All of these games are pretty much universally praised. Outside of Timeshift I literally own all of these.

Venoxn4g587d ago (Edited 587d ago )

XIII, The Darkness 2, Far Cry: Blood Dragon, Timesplitters: future perfect, Bulletstorm are awesome games

60°

An ode to Titanfall: The last twitch shooter I'll probably ever enjoy

Windows Central: "Titanfall 1 is being sunset, taken off storefronts by EA. While the servers remain live for now, one has to wonder just how much time it has left. I look back and pay tribute to the last "twitch"-styled shooter I ever truly loved."

Read Full Story >>
windowscentral.com
90°

Respawn Entertainment is Discontinuing Sales of Original Titanfall

Sales for the original Titanfall are being discontinued.
It will be pulled from subscription services on March 1, 2022.

Ethereal868d ago

Physical media. Unfortunately the way games are going these days game servers will eventually be shut down and you can stare at the menu and wish you could play the game again.

littletad868d ago

This is why reading is so important. Nothing to do with digital or physical media. The game, which is online only, is being delisted because of DDOS and other hacker attacks. The case got so bad that only six players in the world log on. For PC. Rather than fix it, they continued to sell the game, broken as it is, and only now just decided to call it quits. But please, go on thinking what you will.

Ethereal866d ago

I'm aware of the DDOS attacks and that this case is not typical. This game would eventually have it's servers shutdown regardless of the current situation so that is a moot point. My comment was in a general sense and that there are instances in which games can be preserved physically when official support ends.

Let's recap your first sentence. I said, "the way GAMES are going these days" indicating a broader stroke than just this game. I agree, reading IS important. I was simply stating the obvious downsides of the digital marketplaces and online only trends in games these days. I could even make the argument that the online only offering which has allowed hacker manipulation has impacted the preservation of this great game. My comment is valid in the general sense and thank you for your permission to continue to think what I will.