80°

The Next Call of Duty Might Actually be Modern Warfare 4!

There's a really strong reason to believe that Sledgehammer Games are working on a reboot of Infinity Ward's Modern Warfare franchise!

Read Full Story >>
at7addak.com
KinjoTakemura3649d ago

Does anyone else think that this type of game is on it's last legs?

BiggCMan3649d ago

Not really. It is SLOWWWWWWLY getting less and less sales, but I mean very very slowly.

Ghosts is still a massive seller, and I would say it only sold less because it is actually a terrible game and people saw that.

If they can make the next game at least to the quality of anything before Ghosts or better, it should sell just as much.

A lot of the talk has gone away now, but it is definitely not on its last legs. Unfortunately we will still see the shooter phenomenon bleed into the new generation. But at least we are seeing new experiences like Destiny and Evolve out of it.

TripleXuLtiMaTe3649d ago

@BiggCMan
You have a point. Plus, with the new three year cycle I think Treyarch has much more time to expand their game even more, with more zombies, larger campaign, and better multiplayer (I believe Treyarch are the best developers for COD because their games are way better than Infinity Ward's).

akraven3649d ago

I really don't. Why would it? What would replace it?I don't think Battlefield could. And titanfall 2 won't.

BiggCMan3649d ago

Battlefield is a much better game, and it sells ALMOST as much as Call of Duty. No reason to think it couldn't be the king of shooters soon. Many people already think it is, and it should be because they are very good.

OrangePowerz3649d ago

@Bigg

At least CoD is playable on launch day unlike BF that still needs fixing several months after release.

Mikeyy3649d ago

Even with all the bugs, I'd take battlefield over COD anyday.

Cod simply refuses to innovate and should not be rewarded for that.

getting kills in BF is rewarding, cod it's just another kill...

OrangePowerz3649d ago

I must have missed all those innovations BF4 made, oh wait they didn't make any either. The last change BF had was destructible environments besides of that it is also still the same game since the first BF. I love and enjoy BF games, but they get too much credit for doing the same always as well while releasing a fundamentally broken game.

If you play either game against good players that are in an organised team it's rewarding to get kills and to win.

I think both games should be treated fairly and not having one slammed for not doing something new while the other game gets praised and nobody complains that they don't do anything new.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3649d ago
OrangePowerz3649d ago

Not really, even the lower sales of Ghosts is still a large amount.

RaptorBlade3649d ago

I've been saying this ever since it was announced that Sledgehammer Games was going to be making the next Call of Duty. It is going to be Modern Warfare 4, but it will be a reboot of Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare. Thus, the 4's. Also, with this being their first CoD game they are making by themselves, it would make since to do a reboot of a classic that everybody enjoyed.

csreynolds3649d ago (Edited 3649d ago )

I wouldn't complain about a good (emphasis on GOOD) reboot of CoD 4 - it was the best one. However, I don't think that's what Sledgehammer is developing. Still, I'm happy to be wrong. I feel they'd have to do SOMETHING new with it though to dodge the fire from the "I don't want remasters" crew.

ScamperCamper3649d ago

From what I've seen so far, evidence is leaning towards something futuristic: http://www.callofdutyforeve...

I think suggesting "modern" isn't likely if you choose to believe that guy Drift0r. If that media he saw is to be believed, then it futuristic. A modern game that's futuristic? I can't see that at all tbh.

DrRobotnik3649d ago

I was hoping for Black OPS 3. Oh well, guess I'll skip another Call of Duty.

TripleXuLtiMaTe3649d ago

It's a 3 year cycle now. Black Ops 3 (or whatever game it will be) is going to happen in 2015, since that's when Treyarch will release a game. It goes like this now: Infinity Ward, SHGames, Treyarch, Infinity Ward, SHGames, Treyarch... Black Ops belongs to Treyarch and they're developing next year's Call of Duty.

VengefulPenguin3649d ago

I really hope Sledgehammer doesn't milk Modern Warfare too far that it turns to shit, remember the "You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain" line? (Ilikethatmoviedonotjudgeme)

Mikeyy3649d ago

What are you talking about? Mw3 already took a huge dump on the series and was the start of its downfall.

Now they need to start copying BF or go extinct. 6vs6 200sqft maps ain't gonna cut it with next gen. You should demand more.

csreynolds3649d ago (Edited 3649d ago )

This is a good catch. Could be true; given Sledgehammer co-developed MW3, it'd make sense that they forward the series with MW4.

Frankly, I'm just happy that it'll be next-gen first, and that PlayStation is the lead development platform (yes, I'm a PS4 owner, yes, this is a selfish point. Not sorry :-D). From my experience, CoD games played so much smoother on Xbox 360 than they did the PS3.

Show all comments (19)
200°

Players claim Fortnite ruined Call of Duty by letting in more corporate greed

Do you remember what gaming was like before Fortnite entered the gaming space? One of the biggest arguments was about loot boxes. Now we have conversations about crossovers, battle passes, and community outreach.

Read Full Story >>
gamesandwich.com
GoodGuy092d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Idk. Loot boxes did disappear and battle passes and in game purchases are all cosmetic. We get free weapons and maps post launch, any gameplay affecting content. I could care less about all the cosmetics.
I absolutely hated the days where weapons were locked behind a less than 1% chance lootbox pull where it'd take 5+ hours to have enough tokens to do a single pull and lazy remastered/remake maps cost you $15 each wave or $50 for the season pass that you didn't know what you'd get and these maps were only available to those that bought it so you get a smaller pool of players match with.

Tacoboto1d 3h ago

The "good ole days" are actually what drove me away from COD and Halo 3/Reach. Halo 4 becoming a COD-like drove me away from that only a week or so after it launched and I beat its campaign.

It sucked way back then, going a month or two without playing online-shooter-of-the-moment, and then needing to buy a $15 map pack to play with the majority of the population or your favorite playlist. The "community" rejecting Spartan Points in MCC killed that game's support, too. No revenue = no support, plain and simple.

Cacabunga19h ago

That headline could easily be something Spencer could have said 😅 I had to check if it was really an opinion piece

KyRo19h ago

As times gone on, the COD battle pass has got ALOT worse so they can push people to buy the more premium battle pass which itself is a huge rip off and nearly half the price of the base game.

The cosmetics can be fine but they've taken it to far to the point of no return. Why make a military themed game then have rabbits, dinosaurs, cats, rats & z list rappers as skins? You wouldn't add a Lamborghini to a fantasy RPG to replace a horse and you would never see Mario have limb dismemberment because they know what they are. COD is having identity crisis but kids and streamer but then all

franwex1d 5h ago (Edited 1d 5h ago )

Call of duty can simply not copy the bad aspects of Fortnite? Or is that too out of this world? Like COD, a realistic shooter-just HAD to have Nicki Minaj running around? Or super heroes?

Inverno1d 2h ago (Edited 1d 2h ago )

Exactly! Trends don't all need to be followed. Plus where Fortnite got somewhat better with it's monetization, Acti got worse. Or at least Fortnite has lended itself more to the wacky stuff, and has put more effort and quality into that stuff.

jjb19811d 3h ago

I prefer the battle passes with free maps than the $50 season pass that divided the community. I definitely feel that Fortnite had some influence on CoD having loot boxes with Blackout being introduced in 2018 with Black Ops 4.

PRIMORDUS1d 3h ago (Edited 1d 2h ago )

Actually Fortnite bullshit ruined Unreal Tournament. Epic are sellouts and I will never have that shitty store on my PC, fuck them and that shit bag Tim Sweeney. At least the community keeps the games alive, I still play UT2004.

StoneTitan15h ago

I mean cant really blame them for supporting the game that made them the most money and the most people player...ever?

Psychonaut851d 2h ago

Call of Duty ruined Call of Duty. They needed no outside assistance.

Ra30307h ago

100% correct! The makers of Call of Duty ran out of ideas long, long ago so they take ideas from other games like Ghost Recon, Fortnite and any other FPS game hat had success hell CoD remasters maps that they've remastered several times already then charge you again for it. Call of Duty is simply a cut, copy and paste and then put the $70 price on it every year. Activision and now Microsoft has been essentially remastering Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare every year since it was released in 2007 its to the point it's worse than the sports game like the Madden, NBA and others yearly sports franchises.
@Psychonaut85 is spot on "Call of Duty ruined Call of Duty. They needed no outside assistance"!

Show all comments (24)
100°

Massive new COD Black Ops Gulf War leak lifts the lid on loadouts

The Black Ops Gulf War leaks continue with a list of weapon descriptions giving more info on what you can expect from new and returning weapons.

Read Full Story >>
theloadout.com
80°

Call of Duty Players Disappointed by $80 B.E.A.S.T. Glove Bundle Deal

Recently, players of Modern Warfare 3 and Warzone were met with a new bundle featuring the B.E.A.S.T. Glove, inspired by King Kong's armament in the Godzilla x Kong movie. However, the $80 price tag attached to this themed accessory left many Call of Duty fans feeling underwhelmed.

Read Full Story >>
xpgained.co.uk
Kaii9d ago

Morons that allow themselves to be milked continuously by this company is the definition of irony.
Spend more $$ and you'll end up In easier lobbies so you win both ways when ya spend that cash

melons8d ago

Controversy in the COD community feels like it happens within an alternate timeline. Activision will take the piss with something, there will be a momentary fuss about it, and then they will forget about it and carry on anyway. Repeat this cycle literally every year for the rest of time.

Gridknac8d ago

They call that a crack head! Thats what this is really about, its an addiction. People who dont smoke cigarettes look and laugh at the addicts that spend $8-$10 a pack, but they cant help themselves, they are addicted. That same analogy applies perfectly to the whole MT industry. Only an addict that was not thinking clearly would spend this kind of money on something so frivolous. A round of multiplayer provides the same high a person gets from scratching a lotto ticket, or putting money on a sports bet. MT in general need to really be regulated because you have a generation of kids becoming adults who grew up only knowing the MT era of gaming. Its normal to them and they will in turn teach their kids the same by just being a gaming parent and getting their kids involved with them in gaming. Thats why no matter how ridiculous the headlines keep getting out of the MT industry, it never seems to fade or go away.

X-237d ago

I'm so tired of hearing about what they're doing with this game, its never going to change and it's never going to value the consumer over money, furthermore the people who engage so heavily in the microtransactions I guess allegedly are having a blast and can't wait to do it some more this year when the new version of the game drops.