80°

Halo 4 Matchmaking Update: 4.14.14

Every two weeks we update Halo 4 Matchmaking with exciting new game types, playlist changes and more. You can see what we have planned in the months ahead by visiting the Matchmaking Playlist Calendar, but below you can get details on what's now available in today's Halo 4 Matchmaking Update.
Ninja Assassins

Ninja Assassins is an 8-player Free-for-All game type that features Spartans decked out in custom armor, equipped with Energy Swords and Sniper Rifles, and outfitted with the Thruster Pack. Motion tracker is disabled, and ten points are awarded for each kill. Watch your back, though! Assassinations will net players 30 points – the equivalent of three kills. During each life, you’ll level up – this is accomplished by getting kills in succession. One kill will bring you to level 1, two kills for level 2, and if you manage to get three kills in a row, you’ll be at level 3 – here are the details and attributes of each level:

Read Full Story >>
blogs.halowaypoint.com
pakua3663d ago

I love Halo, especially the multiplayer but Halo 4 was dreadful. Seriously, it didn't even feel like a Halo game. Doubt anyone cares about these updates, which is sad in a way considering the amount of time I've spent playing Halo over the years.

lets_go_gunners3663d ago

I've played a dreadful game before...Halo 4 was not even close to that. You didn't like it...oh well go drink some tea or something.

pakua3663d ago

It was dreadful because the previous 3 in the main series were so great. Even Reach held my interest more than Halo 4.

The campaign in Halo 4 was great, one of my favorites infact but we all know the longevity is in the multiplayer. Stats don't lie, Halo 4 was snubbed online by a big majority.

Gazondaily3663d ago (Edited 3663d ago )

Halo 4's MP has been forgotten by many. I spent hours on Halo 3 and a lot more on Reach. Halo lost its identity as far as its MP is concerned with Halo 4. I'm not saying its terrible; its still great, but Halo's standards are VERY high when it comes to mp and it just didn't live up to them.

Too many things wrong with it BUT not things that 343 can't learn from for the sequel. They have said they are aware of their shortcomings so I expect something better for the next game.

The campaign in Halo 4 was great. Lets hope for an excellent campaign AND mp for Halo 5.

1nsaint3662d ago

I agree with septic, it wasn't a totally terrible game, but i did was very disappointed with halo 4.

Halo 3 had set my expectations to high.

Kavorklestein3662d ago

I actually really enjoy Halo 4 multi player. It's easier to escape, survive, and to be lethal in this game compared to 3. Reach was just Phenomenal, and 4 improved many of the things Reach did. The only thing I think 4 did wrong was having so many customizations that were not very noticeable or should have just been part of the player's base attributes... I liked how reach did something new with the armor abilities, and 4 had even more of them, but it's the EXTRA stuff like resistor, recharge, etc that aren't needed.
They should have just stuck with sprinting for everybody, and more armor abilites, and that would have been enough.

But Halo 4 is grat, and people are just too critical. It's fine, and the radar is great, the grenades are great, the guns are balanced, and it's very much Halo.
I just think people were disappointed some parts of the campaign and the disappointment carried over when they jumped online.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3662d ago
Illusive_Man3663d ago (Edited 3663d ago )

Halo 4 dreadful? No.

Halo 3 is dreadful (well the MP), I tried to play it again and not only does it look bad, but it plays way too slow. I felt faster in Halo ODST as a human! That can't be! I imagine Spartan IVs to be extremely fast, hyper lethal killing machines. Halo 4 brought a fresh feel to the series. I am actually glad the series changed hands to 343i, I think overall they did a better job. I know, blasphemy. Bungie did an admirable job and established Halo as a gaming juggernaut but I think 343i took it farther and made it not only a visual joy (Halo 4 is breathtaking) but also made it a blast to play by mixing old and new gameplay elements.

matrixman923663d ago Show
LAWSON723662d ago

Halo 3s online player count for over a year 300,000. Halo 4 managed that number for probably not even a week. I think the community speaks for itself.

lets_go_gunners3663d ago (Edited 3663d ago )

Doesn't sound *Dreadful* to me. "The campaign in Halo 4 was great, one of my favorites in fact". Sounds like it wasn't loved as the originals...still far from dreadful. If you want to know what dreadful is play Dead Space 3.

Noba3662d ago

I think Halo: Reach was the most detracted from the series which ultimately led to Halo 4 being a little off. I bet if they never made Reach Halo 4 would be a lot different.

3-4-53662d ago (Edited 3662d ago )

Halo 4 was trash.

Worst maps in a FPS game ever.

I loved all the other Halo games.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3662d ago
IQUITN4G3663d ago (Edited 3663d ago )

Agreed, I did initially quite enjoy multi side of 4 but there's something I can't quite get on with it. Had a few quibbles with Reach and still do regards to armour lock etc but it's bloody good otherwise. I get more annoyed with 4 than I ever do with Reach or did with 3

Also when will Spartan ops be purchasable. I have gold but this doesn't assure me that I'll be able to play this mode when a sign in process isn't in place. It's a great mode but one I wont go anywhere near. And of of course a very small percentage bother anyway. As it is you're essentially shafting a lot of people

GearSkiN3663d ago (Edited 3663d ago )

big halo fan! i u sure do love halo 4, dont care what anybody says, if people dont take risks,,, it will just be the same thing over and over.

plus the game single player is gorgeous cant wait for what 343 can do with the new hardware!

LAWSON723662d ago (Edited 3662d ago )

Id rather have the same thing over and over. Say what you will about COD but the fact is its fans still enjoy playing the game, which is something I can not say for the majority of Halo fans

Halo 4 was a casual fest that ditched the idea of an arena shooter to appeal to everyone but fans of the trilogy.

If I wanted to play something new and fresh I would look for a new IP not hope for a completely different game from one I am a huge fan of.

techie0153662d ago (Edited 3662d ago )

Ninja assassins sounds pretty cool to me, I haven't played 4 since release, maybe i'll pick it up over the long weekend and the next :D

50°

Master Chief Became More Than A Machine In 343's Halo

In Halo 4, 5, and Infinite, Master Chief became a more nuanced, human character.

In spite of the Halo series’ struggles, 343 deserves praise for adding nuance and characterisation to the ever-beating heart of Halo - The Master Chief. Playing through Infinite, it's abundantly clear that the events of the current and previous trilogies have irrevocably changed the iconic hero. He’s no longer the ‘blank slate’ that was previously presented by Bungie. He’s a fatigued, damaged and fallible protagonist, and one who is meandering through currents of grief, while reveling in his newfound agency. Giving the Chief a compelling and meaningful voice was no small feat, and 343 should be proud of that victory.

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
kingnick406d ago

This article completely misses part of the appeal of the original iteration of character in the original game trilogy. It was the Chief and Cortana vs an entire alien collective. The blank slate Bungie displayed in their games was genius, he was an mysterious hero a wide audience could identify with because he wasn't as clearly defined as most characters.

The books added a lot of lore and backstory but most Halo players just want a fun game with exposition that doesn't get in the way of gameplay, it's why the Cortana level in Halo 3 was derided.

Not every character has to be a damaged soyboy, a soldier has to suck it up and do his duty.

BandarHub405d ago

A lot of people give the 343 version of Master Chief a lot of slack.
But Fundamentally he is still the same character, he just has a couple more dialogues. He has not changed in terms of attitude.
"Not every character has to be a damaged soyboy, a soldier has to suck it up and do his duty."
And that's what he has done at the end of the day, he did his duty. Watch his partner die, and was ready to destroy the weapon in Halo infinite....he is still the same soilder that everyone remembers

Halo Infintes one was a nice balance between both.

slate91405d ago

Chief and the halo franchise became a joke under 343

Sciurus_vulgaris405d ago

The 343i Master Chief has is based on the books. However, in Halo 4-Infinite, the Master Chief overtime become. gradually becomes more willing to show some emotion.

Obscure_Observer405d ago

"However, in Halo 4-Infinite, the Master Chief overtime become. gradually becomes more willing to show some emotion."

Which is awesome! I love how Master Chief become more John and less soldier.

Sciurus_vulgaris405d ago

I didn’t even notice my typos,lol

50°

Halo's Identity Problem Began With an Admirable Mess

It’s a law of nature that eventually, every long-running game franchise will have a particular entry that gets dinged for straying too far from what made it so fun in the first place. Your Super Mario Sunshine, your Dragon Age II, Assassin’s Creed III, and so on. Whether or not that opinion changes more favorably over time, the initial specter of negativity will forever hover it. Microsoft’s Halo is no exception, except that negative specter hasn’t hovered over one particular game, but one whole studio.

The3faces526d ago

True Halo 4 was a sign of 343i's incompetence and the decline of Halo.

180°

10 Years Later, Halo 4 Proves Itself a Disappointing Omen for Halo Infinite

Halo 4 released 10 years ago today, and its disappointing reception was just an omen of things to come with 343 Industries at the helm.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
Sonyslave3534d ago (Edited 534d ago )

Halo 4 and infinite have a 87 on metacritic and five a 84🤣. 343i need contents and everything else will play it self out.

ChasterMies534d ago

Halo 4, 5, and Infinite reviews are good examples of the pressure on review sites to score everything between 8-10 out of 10.

ChubbyBlade533d ago

As if reviews scores are any indication of a franchises health.

Halo has been in shambles for YEARS

-Foxtrot534d ago

Halo 4-6 are like the Star Wars sequel trilogy

They all just seem like a brand new games with small connections to the last one but no solid arc connecting them, you’re just told stuff that happened off screen in between the games and nothing makes sense

It’s like they didn’t plan a new trilogy out

CoNn3rB534d ago

That's actually a pretty good way to sum it up

LucasRuinedChildhood534d ago (Edited 534d ago )

I would argue that the new Star Wars trilogy is still better. lol

Most Halo fans would kill for the equivalent of The Force Awakens at this stage (a competent rehash of what came before it). Halo Infinite tried to be that but was undercooked and failed. Halo 4 wasn't that either - they started messing with the formula straight away although the story was okay.

There was nothing particularly compelling about Halo 5's story besides the fake plot they advertised. The Last Jedi is a divisive movie but as RedLetterMedia would say, it was "sporadically interesting" because it tried some new things and set up things that could have been great (like Kylo teaming up with Rey after backstabbing Snoke). That conversation with Yoda is great and it felt like the real Yoda, not that CGI thing in the prequels.
- "Skywalker, still looking to the horizon. Never here, now, hmm? The need in front of your nose."
- "The greatest teacher, failure is ... Luke, we are what they grow beyond. That is the true burden of all masters."
- "That library contained nothing that the girl Rey does not already possess." (because she already took them, haha).

The Rise Of Skywalker is the only one where loads of stuff happens off screen ("Palpatine has returned") in between and nothing makes sense because ... they just needed a main villain and 100 star destroyers to blow up. They could have done something much better.

MrChow666534d ago

no, all disney star wars sucks also disney marvel and everything godamn disney touches

534d ago Replies(3)
Yui_Suzumiya534d ago

Um, didn't Halo 4 have the best campaign out of the new Trilogy? Lol

ChubbyBlade533d ago

Yep and even then it wasn’t very good.

Levii_92534d ago

I'm getting a good gaming laptop soon and i'm finally going to play through the Halo franchise again plus Infinite but i never played Halo 4 before .. can anyone tell me how's the campaign in comparison to the games before it and compared to Halo 5 ?

Stanjara534d ago

Halo 4 campaign great, multi bad.
Halo 5 campaign trash, multi good.

Best Cortana halo 4.

ChubbyBlade533d ago (Edited 533d ago )

Halo 4 was when they started turning it into a “modern” game. Aka taking tips from CoD.

The older titles were sandbox based with weapons that all filled a niche and vehicles that did the same. Open levels with multiple ways to approach in different spots with different weapons etc.

Halo 4/5 doesn’t have that. It’s a linear shooter and nothing else. The story is alright but that’s about it. If it wasn’t a halo game, it would be ok but because it is a halo game, it’s outshone by the previous games.

It’s a hell of a lot better than 5 though. I found infinite pretty meh

Show all comments (25)