1060°

Metal Gear Solid 5 Ground Zeroes: PS4 Versus Xbox One Head To Head Screenshot Comparison

"Metal Gear Solid 5: Ground Zeroes is finally available for North America players across current and next gen platforms, but we've known for a good solid month now that it's the Xbox One and PS4 versions that fully realize Hideo Kojima's open world vision."

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
jhoward5853684d ago (Edited 3684d ago )

The PS4 version of metal gear 5 has better dark shadows than the x1's version.

ToastyMcNibbles3684d ago

Don't know why we need more comparisons. Everybody knows the PS4 version is superior.

christian hour3684d ago

Plus Konami, being very transparent about their games, which i foudn unusual for a big publisher (Ubisoft, take note!)released their own comparison comparing all 4 platforms.

This is all you need to see

http://www.konami.jp/mgs5/g...

PS3/360/XBONE are very similar, with xbone coming out on top with higher resolution textures etc and better shadows and AA.

PS4 is above and beyond all 3, its the only version touting a dynamic sky box, however I dont see why the xbone does not have this feature at all, even though its hardware is slightly weaker than the ps4's, theres enough under the hood it should be able to do this.

Hopefully by the time MGS5 comes around they'll have figured it out and xbone people can get that nice pretty, supposedly Dynamic, sky.

Either way regardless of what platform you buy this game on you're going to have hours of enjoyment, Kojima Productions did a bang up job on making this game look beautiful on all platforms, even the 360/ps3 versions look fantastic despite being on extremely dated tech at this point in time.

dantesparda3684d ago

I think these two shot say it all. And all i got to say is DAMN!

PS4: http://gamingbolt.com/wp-co...

X1: http://gamingbolt.com/wp-co...

Anthotis3684d ago

The differences are significant in a few of those pictures.

_FantasmA_3684d ago

We need to rub it in. We still got like 6-7 years of doing this to pay back those bros who always use to brag about a tenth of pixel that was missing from the PS3 versions last time around.

Gaming1013684d ago

It isn't just the darker shadows, it's the more advanced lighting, higher resolution textures and lighting on each individual object. It's also the higher and steadier framerate. We DO need comparisons like these, as not everyone is schooled in the differences of each version. I always hear X-bone fans clamoring about how the differences aren't anything noticeable in a feeble attempt to justify their fanboy attitudes.

Gekko363684d ago

@all This is ridiculous!. I can't tell the difference between the screenshots. I've got good eye sight and there is no difference I can see.

I think this is like some pompous art lover seeing something in a painting where 99% of the population seeing nothing but a painting of dogs playing cards.

Dumb article and dumb comments!

Corax3683d ago

Or maybe it doesn't matter because a person is going to buy it for whatever system they prefer to play on or what ever system they have at the moment.

cozomel3683d ago

@Gekko36

Damn, dude, seriously? you still cant tell after looking at those 2 pics? Damn, click on them to make them bigger then flick back and forth between them, Its clear as day. The PS4 is sharper and has better textures and more rocks, plus its also got dynamic sky whereas the XO ver. doesnt. You may have soemthing wrong with your eyes

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 3683d ago
badz1493684d ago

I'm scratching my head too over this comparison. The xbone's version is not even on the technical level of the PS4 version and which version would looks best is already decided before the comparison even made. It's like comparing multiplats on PS3/360 vs PC version which is also a waste of time because there already is a clear winner.

So what does this comparison suppose to do? Just for the sake of rubbing it on the xbone's face or trying to deceive people into thinking that the xbone version looks comparable despite the low res?

Ra30303684d ago

I agree with you.

"So what does this comparison suppose to do? Just for the sake of rubbing it on the xbone's face or trying to deceive people into thinking that the xbone version looks comparable despite the low res?"

These screen shots where carefully selected to show there is no difference between the 2. I can't see any difference in them. For the record maybe you and others can see it. I think if you put them side by side and remove the PS4, Xbox One title most people would not see the difference. Someone above also said the PS4 has better shadows. I took another look just to see that and I didn't. But there were really no good screen shots to highlight that. With all that said if they added the Xb360 and PS3 screen shots some people would not see enough difference to call the PS4 screen shots better. IMO.

DemonChicken3684d ago

I am no techie but I like to raise the question of why is the shots of both the PS4 and X1 at 1920 x 980 dimension (I just clicked on screens, zoomed in, right click, save and checked the properties of pic)?

At least the screens are .png (lossless). But kind of questioning this and where the shots came from as if it was me I would take actual shots of the game running on their respective consoles.

dantesparda3684d ago (Edited 3684d ago )

@Ra3030

PS4: http://gamingbolt.com/wp-co...

X1: http://gamingbolt.com/wp-co...

Seriously, you cant tell that the PS4 version looks sharper? its also missing stones on the X1 version and also has lower res textures. And this is with res truncated pics like DemonChicken said. So its not even showing the full res, which benefits the X1.

Boody-Bandit3684d ago (Edited 3684d ago )

Never mind.

dantesparda beat me to it.

morganfell3684d ago (Edited 3684d ago )

Every website, unless it was run by fanatics has acknowledged there is no question the PS4 version is on a different level than the X1 version. Then I read this:

"These screen shots where carefully selected to show there is no difference between the 2."

Do you know what an agenda is? Because I smell one and you are giving your website a huge black eye. Can you say BIAS?

Dependability rating? Absolutely zero.

I don't think you realize the impact of what you wrote. It reads like someone in a desperate situation willing to subvert the truth to support a platform.

I don't think anyone is going to want to pay your site the least bit of heed from now on and that includes not giving a click. When this hits a place like Gaf I would say you are sunk because they'll be all over this.

If I were you I would look for two knobs. One says, "DAMAGE CONTROL IGNITION". If that one fails find the one that says "EJECT".

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3683d ago
ITPython3684d ago

My goodness, this specific screenshot show the biggest difference between the two:

PS4 - http://gamingbolt.com/wp-co...

XB1 - http://gamingbolt.com/wp-co...

XB1 version is significantly blurrier (looks like a last-gen game in that screenshot), and if you switch back and fourth you see that the PS4 version also has more things laying around on the ground, and has more plants, cactus etc.

If they didn't accidentally use the 360 for that screenshot, then the XB1 version might as well be a last-gen game. Because it looks absolutely terrible.

Aloren3684d ago

XB1 is significantly blurrier indeed... but what strikes me the most in this screenshot is how terrible it looks even on PS4, I'm glad I saw gameplay footage, cause based on this screen alone, I'd say the game looks terrible.

Fishy Fingers3684d ago

Well even Kojima admitted the PS4 is slighter prettier, but looking at those screens there's not much in it.

HeWhoWalks3684d ago (Edited 3684d ago )

Sure, if you don't consider a difference in res (1080p vs 720p) to be anything but "slight".

Edit: "but looking at those screens there's not much in it."

My reply was based on your words.

shazui_203684d ago

Yeah, from a technical aspect that is a fairly huge difference but it doesn't translate to a gigantic visual difference, really. The difference I'm interested in seeing is the dynamic atmosphere simulation on the PS4 version

Fishy Fingers3684d ago (Edited 3684d ago )

HeWhoWalks

No, your comment post edit was centred purely round the use of the word "slight" which as I said is Kojimas words. Now you've edited your post to try and pick fault in my comment. I'm here to read about games, not play games. I'm getting it on the PS4 regardless so I'm not interested in making a big deal out of something that has little to no impact on me.

HeWhoWalks3684d ago (Edited 3684d ago )

@ Fishy: If it's no big deal to you, stop replying to it, then. Problem solved. :)

And, btw, I know what Kojima said, but if you're backing his words, then you're supporting the content, which, again, was what I replied to, no matter how pedantic you want to be about it.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3684d ago
Jonnyquest3213684d ago

He was hardly gonna alienate Xbox fans by stating their version is much worse even if it was so the words don't really matter, however I do have eyes and yup the difference is minimal yet at the same time noticeable

Fishy Fingers3684d ago

I'm not here to psychoanalyse the agenda behind his wording, I merely stated it as in an article comparing versions of his game his opinion is probably the one that carries the most weight.

nucky643684d ago (Edited 3684d ago )

fishy, if those screens above are indicitive of the game - the ps4 version looks much cleaner and lifelike compared to the x1 version. you must not be looking at those pics to say "there's not much in it".also, what carries "weight" with me is how the game looks - and that ps4 shot above looks stunning.
and no - i don't own a ps4 or x1 yet - but i'm leaning ps4 when i see screen comparisons like the ones the poster above showed.

shysun3684d ago

We all get MGS, Lets be happy.....runs to PS4!

3684d ago Replies(3)
Locksus3684d ago

Not as big a difference as I would've expected as both look pretty good.
PS4 looks to have darker colors and higher resolution compared to the Xbone version.

Cryptcuzz3684d ago

Its not only the resolution that is better on the PS4.
Look at the two screenshots posted above by members like BattleTorn.

It clearly shows better anti-aliasing, sharper images overall, better textures, and even rocks/cactus are missing from the Xbox One version.

That and the fact that the PS4 version is the only one with dynamic sky, whereas the other versions is a static sky. Plus, I found the use of the DualShock4 built-in speakers to be quite a neat feature that does not get talked about much.

If all that is apparent with just one screenshot, imagine the overall differences throughout the whole game.

Either way, I am sure the game is enjoyable on all versions, but if anyone who has a PS4 or plan on getting a PS4, I suggest getting the PS4 version for all the reasons listed above.

Show all comments (133)
140°

The Metal Gear series has sold over 59.8 million copies

300,000 Metal Gear games were sold during the first quarter of 2023, Konami has announced, bringing the total number to 59.8 million.

Read Full Story >>
metalgearinformer.com
FallenAngel1984336d ago

Still waiting on Konami to put the MGS Collection back on digital stores

Nyxus336d ago

I know right? And rerelease the games for current gen systems while they're at it.

just_looken336d ago

Do not worry they will give use those pichincko remakes for top dollar soon.

Metal gear solid 3 in the fox engine looked/ran amazing but was sealed away :(

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

Sarcasm336d ago

I know re-makes and stuff have been played to death this generation.

But damn I wouldn't mind an MGS4 remake

gold_drake335d ago

i played it quite recently and it holds up very well

CantThinkOfAUsername335d ago

It does, but a remake will be available on platforms other than PS3.

itsmebryan336d ago

I thought the series would have sold more over all these years and different releases.

Ready4nxtgen336d ago

Yeah I would have thought over 150 Mil. Something.missing here

Nyxus336d ago

Metal Gear isn't that big, and there hasn't been a new release in years. Also MGS2 and 3 are still missing from digital storefronts.

shinoff2183336d ago

5 mgs games in total if I'm not mistaken. 59 60 million seems about right. Mgs is dope to some of us but it would be hard for a lot of regulars to understand

ChasterMies336d ago

I would love to buy MGS4 but it’s still a PS3 exclusive.

JEECE336d ago

Although there are notable exceptions (GTA, certain first-party Nintendo games, Gran Turismo), as a rule games didn't sell as much in earlier generations as they have in the past few generations. So a lot of PS1-PS2 era titles that are viewed as seminal games didn't actually sell all that much by today's standards (yes, despite the large install bases of those systems lol). I remember a similar surprised reaction happening a few months ago when Square announced the total overall sales of Final Fantasy VII.

Deathdeliverer336d ago

Some of the best fun you can have online was the first metal gear online and to a lesser, but still fun to an extent, MGO2. The magazine, CQC, stealth, and tactical play Vs real players is just a blast. Not to mention playing Snake vs everyone? Amazing. The game will never be the same without Hideo, but Konami can definitely update what’s already there and take my money.

ceyoga336d ago

You wouldn't be talking about the OG MGO that was included with MGS3:S would you? It's rare running into another former player. Those were some of the best memories of any online game I had.

Deathdeliverer336d ago

Yes my man!! That seems like the BEST game that nobody played! Tranquilizer pistol, drag the body to a corner and lay a girly mag right by their head so they wake up and instantly get caught by the mag. You could get real toxic if you wanted at that point, but man that game was incredible! The only thing annoying was that damn Konami ID

P_Bomb336d ago

Did my part!

“You’re pretty good” 🫡

Show all comments (20)
220°

Kojima looks back on Metal Gear Solid V: Ground Zeroes on its 9th anniversary

Hideo Kojima: "After the launch, many people seemed to expect GZ to be a full game."

Read Full Story >>
metalgearinformer.com
-Foxtrot394d ago

People would have gotten “your intention” if you stated it from the beginning but people didn’t want smaller episode like MGS games.

He should have just focused on MGSV and work Ground Zeroes into that game instead

I_am_Batman394d ago

I don't remember there being confusion over Ground Zeroes being a full game. But then again I was just starting to catch up on the MGS series as a whole at that point so I might've not paid enough attention or simply have forgotten that there was confusion about it. I bet the whole Moby Dick Studios thing didn't help the casual observer understand what the hell was going on though.

I only got both MGSV games when Phantom Pain was already out and I kinda agree that it probably would've sucked if I had to wait one and a half years to pay The Phantom Pain after Ground Zeroes.

jambola394d ago

I'm sorry what now?
Who expected that?
If it was meant to be episodic or an experiment for that, the price should / would have reflected that

MadLad394d ago (Edited 394d ago )

To be fair, there really wasn't enough content to actually justify even the smaller price tag. It was still half the cost of a full game, yet a 20th of the content.

I can't stand these paid glorified demos.

CrimsonWing69394d ago

Honestly, it was basically similar to the FF15 Duscae demo. My theory is he was taking too damn long to make a game and Konami was like, “Sell what you got!” It just has kind of a scummy corporate “let’s sell this demo for half the price of a full game,” feel to it.

That’s just my take on it. I love Kojima and I love the MGS series, but this and 5 were the biggest let downs, ever. Clearly unfinished work forced out because, in Konami’s defense, Kojima was going over budget and taking forever on the project.

MIDGETonSTILTS17394d ago

Lol, I loved Ground Zeroes, but releasing that level at $40 during a dryspell for games at the onset of the new gen was an obvious cash grab.

I handed over my money happily, but plenty of non-diehard fans were understandably letdown by the scale of what $40 bought them.

Chocoburger394d ago

The price was originally $40 for the physical PS4 and XBO versions, but due to controversy it dropped down to $30 before launch. And as much as I love GZ, and even bought it twice, I do agree that $30 was too much. It should have launched at $20.

https://kotaku.com/konami-c...

staticall394d ago

I don't know how about anyone else. But i've bought it for $20 1 week after release (or $15, don't remember the exact exchange rate) and spent 24 hours beating every mission and getting all the steam achievements. I was 100% aware what the game was about beforehand though and i did enjoy every second of it. I knew it was a work in progress and it was probably the best and less restrictive game i've played in a long time (and controls were just perfect).

Even previous MGS games didn't gave me that much freedom as Ground Zeroes did.
Love stealth? Got you covered.
Want to speedrun? Here's the timer.
Wanna kill everyone? No problem, grab that AK then and let's party.
Wanna cause chaos? Just tell Pequod where to land.
Love to drive? Then go ahead.
Miss Raiden? Then play as him.

I wish they would continue MGSV, finish remaining chapters and add more missions as DLCs, there was SO many options... A poor man still can dream...

Show all comments (15)
370°

Metal Gear Solid V Is The Greatest Stealth Game Ever Made

Hideo Kojima was dealing with a hostile publisher who was pulling his team’s game apart at the seams in order to launch in some form of finished state, and it’s still downright masterful. Everything about it is mechanically focused and aesthetically nuanced, and not a single thing feels out of place or without purpose. Big Boss moves about each environment with a pace that provides the perfect cadence to use all manner of gadgets in whatever ways you like.

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
Mobis-New-Nest566d ago

You are incorrect and I will be taking this time to correct you. The Legend of Zelda Wind Waker Forsaken Fortress is stealth that no game has yet to match. Having Link, crawl, sneak and hide under a barrel is innovative stealth that Metal Gear Solid, Splinter Cell, Thief and Tenchu wish they had achieved. I rest my case.

ChubbyBlade566d ago

Cardboard box beats barrel

566d ago
got_dam566d ago

Lol I see what you did there.

fr0sty566d ago

So tired of opinion pieces... I come here for hot news, not hot takes.

-Foxtrot566d ago

Shit Metal Gear Solid game though

It's boring, empty, repetitive

Great mechanics and gameplay but it's just so dull....

567d ago
Chard567d ago

I played it long after the hype had settled, and I had a blast with it. Strip away the disappointment over what it could have been, and you're still left with a great game

porkChop567d ago

The gameplay loop was phenomenal, no question. From a gameplay standpoint it's an incredible stealth game.

porkChop567d ago

"Hideo Kojima was dealing with a hostile publisher who was pulling his team’s game apart at the seams in order to launch in some form of finished state, and it’s still downright masterful."

Let's not pretend Kojima was entirely innocent there. The game was 5+ years into development, way over budget, and wasn't even halfway done. That's why Chapter 2 is so unfinished and Chapter 3 was scrapped entirely. He was wasting time micromanaging and second-guessing everything his team was doing, and little to no progress was being made. The same thing happened with MGS: Rising. That's why the game got rebooted as MGR: Revengeance and was handed off to Platinum. That's the only way the game was going to get finished. And yet after wasting millions on a scrapped game, MGR only went on to sell a little over 1 million units. It was a failure no matter how you look at it.

That's why Kojima was "locked away" in his office for the final 6 months of development of MGSV. So the team could actually piece together and finish the game. Was Konami just supposed to let Kojima spend more than a decade with infinite funds to make one game? Kojima isn't Rockstar, his games don't sell 170+ million units. At some point the game has to come out.

I get that Konami are a garbage company but they aren't solely responsible for what happened with Kojima. As much as I love his games and will always be a fan, MGSV was almost entirely Kojima's fault and I'm tired of people pretending that it wasn't.

MIDGETonSTILTS17566d ago

Sounds like mismanagement by Konami.

generic-user-name566d ago

Can you prove any of what you're claiming? Because I've seen Kojima build a studio and release a AAA game in 3 years with Death Stranding. All I'm seeing here are the same conspiracy theories that people like to believe to confirm their biases towards certain people, same with Neil Druckmann. For instance, MGSV may have been in development for a while but you leave out that he was also having the FOX Engine developed alongside it, an engine so good that MGSV ran at 60fps on a PS4.

He's gone on record disputing that he ever goes over budget on very rarely has to delay his titles.

"He was wasting time micromanaging and second-guessing everything his team was doing, and little to no progress was being made."

Where did you get this from?

565d ago
Workshyskiver567d ago

Best gameplay of the series hand down, its not even close. Worst story in the series hand down, its not even close.

Ezio2048566d ago

But that ending though with amazing music. The Man who sold the world.

1Victor566d ago

I can’t say it’s the best or the worse to me I stopped playing metal gear at the end of 4 the official end of the snakes saga and the best in my book was 3 snake eater excellent gameplay and excellent story telling giving us the reason for big boss to go and create his own country before the metal gear saga on the 4-8 bits consoles.

Show all comments (66)